Improving Courses Across an Online Program: A Design-Based Approach Leonard Bogle, Scott Day, Daniel Matthews & Karen Swan University of Illinois Springfield.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
When Students Can’t Read…
Advertisements

Zehra Akyol & Randy Garrison. Theoretical Background Research Question Methodology Results Discussion Conclusion.
Welcome to College and Career Ready Standards Quarterly Meeting # 1.
Peer Assessment of Oral Presentations Kevin Yee Faculty Center for Teaching & Learning, University of Central Florida Research Question For oral presentations,
“Digital technologies are for education as iron and steel girders, reinforced concrete, plate glass, elevators, central heating and air conditioning.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Utilization-focused Assessment in Foundations Curriculum: Examining RCLS 2601: Leisure in Society Clifton E. Watts, PhD Dept. of Recreation & Leisure Studies.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Making Your Assessments More Meaningful Flex Day 2015.
Incorporating Critical Thinking and Writing Effectively in Your Course: Methods, Measurements, and Managing resistance to critical thinking FDC Workshop.
Karen Swan, Scott Day, Leonard Bogle & Traci van Prooyen University of Illinois at Springfield Exploring MOOC Pedagogies.
SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING AND LEARNING IN THE COMPOSITION CLASSROOM Or Faculty Journeys Down the Rabbit Hole of SoTL Janice Kelly Instructor, ASU Department.
Investigating Relationships among Elements of Interaction, Presence, and Student Learning in a Graduate Online Course Lydia Kyei-Blankson, Department of.
Instructional Design & Technology Cooperative Learning Effects in Online Instruction Beth Allred Oyarzun.
Formative Assessment in Idaho Idaho is committed to the idea that a system of assessment will yield far better information about teaching and learning.
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
METHODS Study Population Study Population: 224 students enrolled in a 3-credit hour, undergraduate, clinical pharmacology course in Fall 2005 and Spring.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Jeanne M. Clerc, Ed.D. Western Illinois University (WIU) October 14, 2011.
An Action Learning Approach For Increasing Critical Thinking Skills In An Information Systems Capstone Course Alan Burns School of CTI DePaul University.
EDUI 6701 Final Project. Objectives  Real world situation  Write a proposal to a curriculum committee in charge of training  Develop a new course –
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Hanmer School – Margaret Zacchei Highcrest School – Maresa Harvey Webb School – Michael Verderame Emerson-Williams School – Neela Thakur Charles Wright.
Closing the Loop From Analysis to Use of Results SLO Winter 2011 Workshop.
Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in.
Building Social Presence in Online Education Through Course Design and Course Management: Continuing the Conversation Kia J. Bentley, Ph.D., LCSW Kia J.
Innovative Teaching and Learning MOVING FROM THEORY TO ACTION 6 th June 2012.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in California.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Improving the Teaching of Academic Genres in High-Enrollment Courses across Disciplines: A Three-Year Reiterative Study Chris Thaiss University of California,
Successful Contract Training: A Grounded Theory for a Sustainable Business Model presented at the National Council for Workforce Education Conference by.
Closing the Loop From Analysis to Use of Results SLO Winter 2011 Workshop.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Teacher Algebra Network: Our Model for Professional Development in Three Rural North Carolina Counties Presented by Katie J. Mawhinney and Tracie McLemore.
Assessing Student Understanding of Physical Hydrology (#0691) Adam J. Castillo a,c ; Jill Marshall a ; Meinhard B. Cardenas b a Department of Curriculum.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
Creating Social Presence in Online Learning Carol Hostetter, PhD Indiana University Funded in part by: The Mack Center for Inquiry on Teaching and Learning.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
State University of New York An Emerging Model for Online Learning MERLOT International Conference – August A Systemic Approach to Online Learning.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Leading Beyond the Institution: Graduates as Learners, Leaders, and Scholarly Practitioners Drs. Ron Zambo, Debby Zambo, Ray R. Buss.
Contemporary Issues September 12, NJEA Today.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Lanphier High School The Future of Our SIG Efforts.
Identifying Assessments
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
ET4 Online Symposium, 2013 Using Text Analytics to Enhance Data-Driven Decision Making Liz Wallace Director, Institutional Research Melissa Layne, Ed.D.
Online learning The overall number of K-12 students engaged in online courses in , is estimated at 700,000.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Taeho Yu, Ph.D. Ana R. Abad-Jorge, Ed.D., M.S., RDN Kevin Lucey, M.M. Examining the Relationships Between Level of Students’ Perceived Presence and Academic.
Teaching in Blended Learning Environments: Creating and Sustaining Communities of Inquiry Dr. Norm Vaughan Dr. Marti Cleveland-Innes Dr. Randy Garrison.
Assessment Online. Student Assessment Design learner-centered assessment that include self-reflection Design grading rubrics to assess discussions, assignments,
By Kadir Kozan 1. Research Problem Rationale/Significance/Why? Conceptual Frameworks Data Collection & Analysis Validity Limitations 2.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Development of the Construct & Questionnaire Randy Garrison & Zehra Akyol April
Simulation Interaction Models: A Movement in Formative Assessment MYTHS & MOVEMENTS: REIMAGINING HIGHER EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Regional Conference on Assessment:
Interview Responses: Job Satisfaction
Using Evidence to Inform Continuous Improvement in Online Course Design ……………… Kay Shattuck, Director of Research, Quality Matters.
From Analysis to Use of Results SLO Winter 2011 Workshop
Social Presence within Two Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)
in 2009, questions about the types of technologies commonly used to support teaching & learning were administered to 31,000 students attending.
General Education Assessment
Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Creating a Community of Inquiry
Presentation transcript:

Improving Courses Across an Online Program: A Design-Based Approach Leonard Bogle, Scott Day, Daniel Matthews & Karen Swan University of Illinois Springfield

outcomes processesdesign Can course redesign based on meeting Quality Matters standards improve learning processes as measured by the Community of Inquiry survey? Can improved learning processes lead to improved student performance and perceived learning? Initial Study

CoI Survey Results

Student Performance

Initial Study outcomes processesdesign

Initial Study processesdesign outcomes

Design Experiment blends empirical research with the theory-based design of learning environments systematic investigation of innovations designed to improve educational practice through an iterative process of design, development, implementation & analysis in real-world settings (Wang & Hannafin, 2005)

Design-based research is characterized by: Situated in a real educational context Focused on design & testing of significant intervention Employs mixed methods Involves multiple interventions Collaborative partnership between researchers & practitioners Evolution of design principles (Anderson & Shattuck, 2012).

Course Redesign Model

Quality Matters Framework an input model of learning in online and blended educational environments grounded in an instructional design view of higher education assumes effective learning in higher education flows from well-specified outcomes/objectives/assessments

Quality Matters Rubric review by three peers 41 criteria in 8 categories (course overview, learning objectives, assessment, materials, interactivity, technology learner support, accessibility) that are either met or not 21 (3 point) criteria must be met + point threshold (cumulative)

Quality Matters Rubric

Community of Inquiry Framework a process model of learning in online and blended educational environments grounded in a social constructivist view of higher education assumes effective learning in higher education requires the development of a community of learners that supports meaningful inquiry teaching presence cognitive presence social presence

Community of Inquiry Survey 34 items – 13 teaching presence (TP), 9 social presence (SP) & 12 cognitive presence (CP) statements for which students indicate agreement/ disagreement on a five point Likert scale ( 1 =strongly disagree to 5 =strongly agree) at least 3 items for each element of each presence teaching presence cognitive presence social presence

Community of Inquiry Survey teaching presence cognitive presence social presence

Community of Inquiry Survey teaching presence cognitive presence social presence

Community of Inquiry Survey teaching presence cognitive presence social presence

CoI “tweaking”: Teacher Leadership Open-ended comments suggest that first assignment needs more scaffolding and more time for students to learn PDSA technique Response: break first large PDSA assignment into three separate assignments spread across three weeks

CoI “tweaking”: Curriculum & Assessment Lowest ratings on FA 11 CoI survey were 4 SP items (2 affective expression & 2 group cohesion) below 3.75 Response: more whole group activities designed to help students get to know each other; “question of the week” discussion added to offer additional collaboration opportunities; more group activities developed

CoI “tweaking”: Educational Research A Lowest ratings on FA 11 CoI survey were 4 SP items (2 affective expression & 2 group cohesion) and 3 TP items (all facilitation of discussion) below 3.75 Response: instructor more visible to students through twice a week postings to discussion board; instructions to article & proposal leaders changed to include participation directions as well

CoI “tweaking”: Educational Research B Lowest ratings on SP 10 – FA 10 CoI surveys seemed centered on online discussion and collaborative learning group work Response: changed discussion grading from extra-credit to 2 credits per discussion (x8 discussions); added negotiated contract to group work; changed discussion topics from problem-based to value-based

baselinecollect CoI survey & outcomes data QM review & revisions post QMcollect CoI survey & outcomes data CoI analysis & revisions CoI 1collect CoI survey & outcomes data CoI analysis & revisions CoI 2collect CoI survey & outcomes data CoI analysis & revisions CoI 3Collect CoI survey & outcomes data initial QM revision & iterative CoI “tweaking” …

FA 09 SP 10 SU 10 FA 10 SP 11 FA 11 SP 12 SU 12 FA 12 Ed Research A Ed Research B Teacher Leader Curr & Assment data collection & course revisions over time

Can course redesign based on meeting Quality Matters standards (QM revisions) result in improved student learning outcomes? Can changes in course design and implementation targeted to enhance particular Community of Inquiry scores (CoI revisions) lead to both increased CoI scores and improved learning outcomes? What is the effect of the two-phased combination of QM revisions & CoI revisions on student learning outcomes? Design Experiment

subjects – graduate students enrolled in EDL core courses (n=214/288=74% response rate) instruments – QM review & CoI survey outcome measures – standardized scores (percent correct) on major course assignments and overall course grades Methodology

Results: CoI Survey (n=214/288=74%)

Results: Outcomes (n=214/288=74%)

Conclusions Combination of QM & CoI revisions can result in improvements in student learning We believe this model can be adapted for use in other programs and/or disciplines using a two-phase process: (QM) adjustments for course design the use of analytics (CoI) to iteratively improve course implementation

Conclusions

Assure a collaborative, collegial process by including willing stakeholders in an ongoing, iterative cycle. Assure design quality by collaboratively choosing a common measure and applying it in an open environment of collaboration and trust. Assure implementation quality by collaboratively choosing a way to assess learning processes and applying it in a design-based, iterative manner. Revisit desired outcomes (match outcomes measures to them, then match design and implementation to desired outcomes -- backwards design) Implications for Practice

Questions/Comments?

Department of Educational Leadership University of Illinois Springfield