Minimizing Assessment by Maximizing Use: Part 1 CERA DECEMBER 3, 2015 SUSAN GREEN & LISA CAMPBELL SAN JUAN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Instructional Decision Making
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
Introduction to Creating a Balanced Assessment System Presented by: Illinois State Board of Education.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Assessment Report January 2013 Department of Teaching & Learning.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
FORMATIVE/INTERIM ASSESSMENTS OCM BOCES NETWORK TEAM.
Why move to Common Core?  Preparation: The standards are college- and career-ready. They will help prepare students with the knowledge and skills they.
(IN)FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT August Are You… ASSESSMENT SAVVY? Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning? Using it effectively.
Smarter Balanced Digital Library: Putting Formative Assessment Into Practice Getting Smarter & Long Term EL Symposium January 14, 2015 Access PPT at:
Fremont Unified School District An Informational Session for Families August 2015 Standards-Based Report Cards.
Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.
Formative and Summative Assessments Secondary Language Arts PLC: Andrea Bergreen, Jo Lane Jennifer Doerner, RHS Susanne Cuatt, RHS.
DRIVING INSTRUCTION THROUGH DATA WITHOUT DATA IT IS JUST AN OPINION.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Theories of Action: What are they, why are they important, and how are they created? January 2015 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell,
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Administrator’s Academy July 2015 Instruction & Accountability Division.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Curriculum Mapping.
Pomona Unified School District Standard Practices for Data Analysis Silvia San Martin Teacher Specialist Research and Assessment.
FOCUS… Formative, Ongoing, Classroom Understanding of Students and Standards An assessment system giving new directions to schools desiring to positively.
BASED ON THE WORK OF HEIDI HAYES JACOBS, PH.D AND SUSAN UDELHOFEN, PH.D CURRICULUM MAPPING OVERVIEW Revised by Lisa Cohen June 2014.
Curriculum Mapping Overview Based on the work of Heidi Hayes Jacobs, Ph.D and Susan Udelhofen, Ph.D Compiled and Presented to IUP undergraduate students.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
Supporting K-12 Mathematics Intervention Presenter: Jameson Rienick, Mathematics Project Specialist
Tran Keys, Ph.D. Research & Evaluation, Santa Ana USD
Timberlane Regional School District
Instructional Coach Training September 30, 2010 AIMS: Generating Reports to Use with CFIP 1.
Curriculum Mapping November Types of Curriculum Recommended – Standards as defined by experts in their field. Written – State standards, local goals.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
FOCUS Formative, Ongoing Classroom Understanding of Students & Standards.
SASIT Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education Amy Morton, Deputy Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Ed Vollbrecht, Ph.D., Director,
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right – Using It Well.
Challenging Curriculum and Organizational Structures Oct. 23, 2013 Jesse White.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Assessment Literacy Interim Assessment Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards October, 2012.
John Fuller Elementary School Pine Tree Elementary School &
Educational Program Review Mrs. Diane Fisher, CPA Chief Executive Officer High School Cafeteria March 4, 2014.
Transitioning to a Balanced Assessment System. Overview Professional Development in Assessment Smarter Balanced Logistics.
DO NOW 1.LOG ON NETWORK 2.Go to WIKISPACE…
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Outcomes By the end of the session, we will have : Reflected on our own perspectives about assessment. Considered a rationale for on-going assessment.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
WELCOME Please take a moment to fill out a name tent and to work on the task that has been placed at each seat.
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
SASIT Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education Amy Morton, Deputy Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Ed Vollbrecht, Ph.D., Director,
Assessment in the Classroom RD-49: Methods Teaching Secondary Reading April 6, 2005 Alexia K.S. Couch Staff Development Teacher Jason R. Reinke Interdisciplinary.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
The Assessment Dilemma August 31, 2010 Formative Summative Diagnostic Benchmark.
Implementing SBAC Pilot Items Rowland Unified School District Leadership Meeting November 6, 2013 Brian Huff.
District Response to Instruction and Intervention Reflection and Planning.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
USING RTI TO IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN LITERACY A Report to Our Stakeholders TEMPLATE to fill in/ add to/ delete as you see fit! SCHOOL NAME– Board.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Interim Assessment Information Hope Allen Director of Assessment 4/12/15.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
What about the Assessment System?
Common Core State Standards: Myths vs. Facts
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Presentation transcript:

Minimizing Assessment by Maximizing Use: Part 1 CERA DECEMBER 3, 2015 SUSAN GREEN & LISA CAMPBELL SAN JUAN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

San Juan Unified School District Diverse District (11 th largest…approx 49,000) Variety of Schools (1-1 to 10-10)  23 K-5 Schools  10 K-6 Schools  8 K-8 Schools  8 Middle Schools  School  8 High Schools  4 Alternative Schools  2 Dependent Charters Decisions are not Top Down Strategic Plan/LCAP Plan at the District Level Strategic Plans/SPSA at the Site Level

Instructional Core: Defined by SJUSD Assessment: Strengthen For Learning Calibration Use of Data Common Assessments

Assessment…….. WHY DO WE ASSESS? The goal of assessment has to be, above all, to support the improvement of learning and teaching (Frederiksen and Collins, 1989). WHAT IS ASSESSMENT LITERACY? Knowing When to Assess ◦Less is sometimes More Knowing How to Assess ◦How students were taught ◦Transference is the key Knowing How to Use the Data ◦Instructional Decisions

Assessment: Guiding Principles NOT JUST THE TEST BUT HOW YOU USE THE DATA “The purpose of formative assessment is to improve learning, not merely audit it.” “Formative Assessment is a systematic process to continually gather evidence and provide feedback about learning while instruction is under way.” (CA Math Framework, 2013)

What’s Available SBAC Tools District Assessments Assessments within the adoption Assessments within support materials Teacher Created Assessments SBAC Interim Blocks Text Level Benchmark Exam Doing ALL of these would mean…..Too Much Testing “What are you really doing with all of the information”

Formative Assessments: Teacher Checking for understanding on the concept or skill, in order to adjust instruction so that all students can meet standard. Interim: District/School (Grade or Course) Diagnostic or Benchmark assessments used to differentiate/adjust instruction in order to help all students achieve. Balanced Assessment System Teachers and schools have information and tools they need to improve teaching to improve learning Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career ready All students leave high school college and career ready End of Year Benchmark to college and career readiness over the years. Test, Quiz, Exit Slip, CFU, Questioning, etc. State: SBAC End of Year School: Common Final/Test District: Common 2-3 Times (MAP & TL) School: Common Tests/Data Reviewed

End of Year Benchmark to college and career readiness over the years. Teachers and schools have information and tools they need to improve teaching to improve learning For Learning (Formative) How can we improve instruction next year based on the results? What supports/interventions do incoming students need? Of Learning (Summative) How did students perform? Percent of students meeting standards Comparison to others Compare Your Students to the District/State State: SBAC End of Year District: K-2 Math* School: Common Final/Test

Interim-District/School (Grade or Course) Common assessments collaboratively used to differentiate/adjust instruction in order to help all students achieve Teachers and schools have information and tools they need to improve teaching to improve learning For Learning (Formative) Where are our students struggling? How can we adapt our instruction to fill the gaps or enrichment areas? Of Learning (Summative) What programmatic changes need to be made for next year? How many students are performing at grade level? District: MAP and ….. School: Benchmark Exam School: SBAC Interim Block Compare Your Students to other students at your School/District

Formative Assessments: Teacher Checking for understanding on the concept or skill, in order to adjust instruction immediately so that all students can met standard. Teachers and schools have information and tools they need to improve teaching to improve learning For Learning (Formative) What needs to be re-taught now? Who needs additional support or intervention? What do you still need to cover, what can be skipped, where can you go deeper, etc. Of Learning (Summative) What standards have the students mastered immediately? Where is the class in mastery of the standards/skill? Exit Slips Topic Assessment Weekly Quiz Observational Comparing Your Students to Each Other/School

Cycle of Inquiry…..Formative Process Analyze the Results Compare these results to other measures Revise Instruction for new year Monitor Progress of Changes and Results WHAT IS THE PURPOSE?

Plan in June JUNE ASSESSMENT LITERACY KEYNOTE…..ADOPTION TRAINING ●Each Assessment Level….what is used, blueprint information and how it can be used for instructional decisions…. ●In depth into the New Adoption what is available for the formative pieces and how to select what to use AUGUST ADMINISTRATOR TRAINING ●Results….what data means for last years students….this years students.. ●How to use MAP/Text Level to inform instruction (District Assmt) ●Additional tools available including interim blocks ●Sites would write assessment plan as part of SPSA

This is what we were going to Present On

Site Planning….July/August Three Separate Things Occurred ❖ Plan their Instruction using Materials which included their curriculum assessments….. ❖ Review SBAC results from last years’ students ❖ Reviews SBAC results for their incoming students And Then in September ❖ Tested their current students on MAP and reviewed No CONNECTION Between Assessment Plan and Instruction Between Assessment Results and Actions

CHANGES NEEDED INCLUDED  Assessments need a Connection to the Focus of the School (Easy- SPSA)  Refine the Cycle (To Show Connections)  Needed a Picture (Assessment for the Year)  Designed Protocol for all Reviews  Including Test where you can’t see the items Assessment was being given but not used

Analyze the Results Compare these results to other measures Revise Instruction for new year Monitor Progress of Changes and Results

Multiple Assessments Throughout the Year: To support the achievement of all students SeptOctNovDecJanFebMarchAprilMay FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT Grade 3-5 SBAC End of Year MAP Text Level Making Sure Students can Transfer their knowledge to different types of items or situations Entry Test Text Level

Calendar Picture: Avoid Overlapping Conversations AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMay Cycle 1 (18 weeks option)Cycle 2 (18 weeks option) Pre Data 1Post Data 1/Pre Data 2Post Data 2 Cycle ACycle BCycle CCycle D End of Cycle 1 See Above End of Cycle 2 See Above Formative Assessment Process Ongoing Data Conversations Teacher Planning

Quality of the Data Conversations….. Developing “Admiring of the Problem & Barriers” Emerging “Describing the Problem and What Might Help” Mastering: “Altering Instruction & Monitoring Progress” Common Assessment/Data is Discussed Teachers have their own data to review Focused on data and maybe barriers No discussion on what to do differently No commitment to specific actions or follow up Common Assessment/Data is Discussed Group has ALL of the data (not just theirs) Focused on what worked and did not work and why Includes discussion about how instruction might be changed No commitment to a specific action or how/when to review progress Common Assessment/Data is Discussed Group has ALL of the data (not just theirs) Focused on what did not work, reasons why, then identified actions that could help Commitment to specific actions that could improve student outcomes Agreement is made about what data to collect and when the group will review the that data

Data Conversations….General Rule  Conversation needs to happen ASAP after the assessment/data collection  Should include only teachers whose students tested  Power in sharing aha’s/findings if multiple grade levels are looking at the same assessment (like MAP or Text Level, etc)  Need a long term calendar in order to make the commitment (instructional changes and monitoring)

Protocol….Connection to the Cycle

The Future…. Part 1 Data Conversations…..Based on Site Goals…..Defined by SPSA/LCAP Part 2 Helping Sites/Teachers Choose Common Assessments  Assessment has to match the issue….the data has to be able to help Part 3 Formative Assessment Process  Helping teachers plan for the results….what to do if……. Part 4 Accountability: Asking the Questions  What did you do?  What is the evidence you collected?  What did it tell you?  What are you going because of the evidence?

Obama’s Challenge –October 2015 Obama to Schools: Obsess Less About Testing “Learning is about so much more than just filling in the right bubble.” “Students typically spend about 20 to 25 hours per year on roughly eight mandatory assessments, according to the analysis and testing “inventory” by the Council of the Great City Schools. The report included exams that fulfill federal requirements, as well as other mandated by states or local districts.assessments In reaction to the new analysis, the Obama administration offered a high-profile pitch to reduce testing, including by urging states to require a 2 percent cap on classroom time devoted to taking such exams. ”a high-profile pitch The Altantic: Oct 26, 2015

Minimizing Assessment by Maximizing Use: Part 2 USE OF INTERIM BLOCKS CONTACT INFORMATION: Susan Green, Director San Juan Unified School District Phone: Lisa Campbell, Research Specialist Phone: