TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR ASC PROGRAMS PARTICIPATION IN PROGRAM REVIEW Based on the PowerPoint presented at Spring Think Tank meetings May 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Module 2.4 Workforce Transition Planning and Tool March
POLK STATE COLLEGE PRIOR LEARNING ASSESSMENT PORTFOLIO DEVELOPMENT
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Mara Manson, Ed.D Adelphi University March 28, 2014.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
AN EXTRAORDINARY OPPORTUNITY FOR OUSTANDING TEACHERS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS TO TRANSFORM PUBLIC EDUCATION IN MASSACHUSETTS [i] [i] Teachers who already.
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Understanding Teaching Effectiveness and Assessment Projects.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Principal Leadership Academy Basic Leadership Training November 2012.
Making the Difference Finding and Applying for Careers in the Federal Government Tori Spring Tori Spring
Overview of the Environmental Immigrant Bridging Pilot Program.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
“Putting the pieces together – as a community” December, 2014.
Overview of California’s Accreditation Process Year-Out Pre-Visit Webinar Very Small Institution (1-2 programs) Site Visits Spring 2012 Ensuring Educator.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Preceptor Orientation
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence Program Assessment Technical Assistance Violet and Indigo Cohorts September
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence Program Assessment Technical Assistance Violet and Indigo Cohorts September
Streamlined NCATE Visits Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE 2008 AACTE Annual Meeting.
Ways for Improvement of Validity of Qualifications PHARE TVET RO2006/ Training and Advice for Further Development of the TVET.
Faculty Status Committee Seattle Pacific University Spring 2015 Sandra C. Hartje, Chair, 2014/15 David Nienhuis, Chair, 2015/16.
Organizing Your Information
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
State Trainer Recruitment Kim St. Martin Coaches’ State Conference December 2008.
Creating Pathways for Education, Career and Life Success Webinar: Developing a Pathways Plan January 18, 2013 Facilitated by Jeff Fantine, Consultant.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Mentor Training Update 1 April 2014 Guardian Ad Litem Program “I am for the child”
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Accreditation Overview.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Bilingual Coordinators’ Network Meeting September 25, 2008.
CCLC Conference March 18, 2005 Pam Deegan, CIO President, Miramar Randy Lawson, CIO President Elect, Santa Monica.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence Adult Education Technical Assistance January
Program Standards for Bilingual Authorization Jo A. Birdsell, Ed.D. Commission on Teacher Credentialing Technical Assistance Meetings November 21 & 25,
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
December 8, 2010 Ensuring Educator Excellence Accreditation Handbook 2. Team Member Ethics 3. Responsibilities prior to arriving at the Site Visit.
Induction Program Support Provider Orientation
Preparing Your ELCC Assessments for NCATE Accreditation Missouri Professors of Educational Administration Conference October 10, 2008.
Reviewer Training 5/18/2012. Welcome & Introductions Co-Chairs: NHDOE Representative:Bob McLaughlin.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
AA-T and AS-T Program Approval July 15, 2011 Presenters:Stephanie Low Stephanie Ricks-Albert July 15, 2011– This content is subject to change during the.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Common Standards August 19, :30 am-3:00 pm.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
Cornerstone International A division of Cornerstone Business Development Inc. ExportEdge Export Development Internship Company Information / Registration.
GET THE JOB! PRESENTED BY AFT 1521 LOS ANGELES COLLEGE FACULTY GUILD FEBRUARY 20, 2016.
Understanding Assessment Projects. Learning Objectives for this Session After completing this session you should be able to… 1.Articulate the requirements.
Comprehensive Review/Substantive Change Site Visitor Training July/August 2016 Please put phone/computer on mute during webinar.
University p&t forum Introductions April 24, 2017.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Partnership for Practice
UPDATE Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation:  A Data-Informed Approach to State Program Review Presentation to the Alabama State Board of Education.
ED 690: Reflecting, Writing, and Reviewing the PDP
Curriculum and Accreditation
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Time Line for Program Reviews
ACCREDITATION PROCESS SASSETA ETQA DIVISION PRESENTER: LYDIA MACHOBANE
Restructuring Principal Preparation Programs
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
Time Line for Program Reviews
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Practice Standards, Program Guides, and CES Operations Manual
Presentation transcript:

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR ASC PROGRAMS PARTICIPATION IN PROGRAM REVIEW Based on the PowerPoint presented at Spring Think Tank meetings May 2016

PSA  Replaces PSA  NOW, preliminary and previous guidelines-based programs complete the transition process through participation in Program Review  Standards-based clear programs and newly approved programs have already completed the transition process

PSA  Due date will be according to the institution’s Accreditation cohort membership  Red, Green, Indigo, Violet: Can submit starting July 1 st but DUE December 2016  Yellow will submit with institution:  Orange submit with institution:  Blue will submit with institution: (completion of site visit completed the transition process for them)

WHAT IS PROGRAM REVIEW?  Part of the CTC’s seven-year cycle of accreditation—Year 5  Outcomes-based processes submitted as evidence of candidate competence and program effectiveness  Will be reviewed ONCE and feedback given; institution will revise as needed before site visit  See Chapter 6 of the Accreditation Handbook for detailed information  Detailed directions will be available soon

SUBMISSION DETAILS  All submissions to be sent to  CTC’s preference is that all documents are organized on a website and a link to the website be sent to the address above  If a website is not possible, a document table of contents linking to the required documentation may be submitted

Key to the slides in this section Both programs: Preliminary Programs: Clear Programs: Note-taking guides were provided online PLEASE NOTE: Generic language has been used—customize it!

Preliminary Programs Clear Induction Programs 1. Program Description 2. Organizational Structure 3. Faculty Qualifications3. Qualifications of Coaches and PD Provider 4. Course sequence4. Program Sequence 5. Course matrix (Introduced, Practiced, Assessed) 6. Fieldwork and Clinical Practice5. Job-embedded Fieldwork & Clinical Practice 7. Credential Recommendations6. Credential Recommendation The Components Not standard-by-standard but by major categories; details aligned to PS

Program standards cut the program crosswise into individual slices Program Review cuts the program into lengthwise slices Two different ways to look at the standards

PROGRAM REVIEW COMPONENTS PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS CLEAR INDUCTION ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS 1.Program Description for Prelim and Clear Component DescriptionRequired Exhibits 1.1 Brief description of < 500 words providing context for the review team. Goal is to provide understanding of remaining evidence submitted. Guiding philosophies or specific mission included. 1.1 Narrative Description no longer than 500 words 1.2 Table showing delivery models (online, in-person, hybrid) and other options/pathways (intern, traditional, etc.) for each location Table depicting location, delivery models, and pathways

PROGRAM REVIEW COMPONENTS PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS CLEAR INDUCTION ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS 2. Organizational Structure for Prelim and Clear Programs Component DescriptionRequired Exhibits Graphic to show how the program leadership and faculty/staff are organized; how program fits into the unit, includes faculty in non-teaching roles, field placements. Should depict the chain of authority and include up to dean/superintendent. If a consortium with shared leadership, include admin positions serving in entities within the consortium. 2.1 Organizational Chart/Graphic

PROGRAM REVIEW COMPONENTS PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS CLEAR INDUCTION ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS 3. Faculty Qualifications for Preliminary Programs Component DescriptionRequired Exhibits 3.1 Overview of Faculty3.1 Faculty Distribution Table (numbers of full-time, part-time, adjunct, etc. Vacancies should be noted.) 3.2 Annotated faculty list including name, degree, employment status (full-time, part- time, adjunct), and list of courses taught by each. Name links to vitae while course links to syllabus. 3.2 Annotated Faculty List with links to vitae and syllabi 3.3 Published documentation regarding experience and qualifications to select faculty 3.3 Published documents regarding Adjunct Experience and Qualifications Requirements Other, if applicable:3.4 Faculty Recruitment Documents

PROGRAM REVIEW COMPONENTS CLEAR ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS 3. Coaches and PD Providers for Clear Induction Programs Component DescriptionRequired Exhibits 3.1 Summary of coaches and PDP (full time, part time, retired, vacancies) 3.1 Instructional Personnel Table 3.2 Annotated list of instructional personnel (name, degree, status (full-time, part-time, retiree), list of PD provided or mentoring assignment 3.2 Annotated Personnel List with links to résumés 3.3 Link to published documents on experience and qualifications used to select instructional personnel 3.3 Published Experience and Qualification Requirements Other, if applicable3.4 Instructional Personnel Recruitment Documents (if vacancies exist)

PROGRAM REVIEW COMPONENTS PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS 4. Course Sequence for Prelim and Clear Program Component DescriptionRequired Exhibits Clear information about the sequence in which a candidate takes courses (one for each pathway). 4.1 Published course sequence from Course Catalog

PROGRAM REVIEW COMPONENTS CLEAR INDUCTION ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS 4. Course Sequence for Prelim and Clear Program Component DescriptionRequired Exhibits Information about the sequence in which candidates complete program requirements for each pathway or model. 4.1 Published sequence of induction activities with links to activities required for program completion from candidate handbook, website, or other widely distributed documents

PROGRAM REVIEW COMPONENTS PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS 5. Course Matrix Component DescriptionRequired Exhibits A matrix denoting the candidates' opportunities to learn and master required competencies per course including course names, and the level of interaction with each competency (introduced, practiced, assessed). Each notation links to a specific place in the course syllabus or assessment tool. 5.1 Course matrix with links to specific activities within the syllabi that provide documentation of I, P, A of candidate competencies.  Each "I" and "P" entry must link to specific syllabus locations  Each "A" must link to the assessment used

PROGRAM REVIEW COMPONENTS CLEAR ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS Course Matrix Component DescriptionRequired Exhibits There is no equivalent piece required* *Note: numbers do not “match up” on #5, #6, #7 although topics do NONE

PROGRAM REVIEW COMPONENTS PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS 6. Fieldwork and Clinical Practice Component DescriptionRequired Exhibits 6.1 hours/activities/experiences for each candidate (required number of hours/activities/experiences and how they are broken out per phase) 6.1 Table denoting number of hours/activities/experiences of field work, clinical practice 6.2 MOU/Partner agreements/Supporting Documents, training and evaluation, support and assessment roles of each partner --delineating requirements of candidate placements --Expectations and criteria on selection, training, evaluation of veteran practitioners --Support and assessment roles, responsibilities of each party in the agreement 6.2 Signed MOU or Agreement for each placement 6.3 Training materials for veteran practitioners serving in support and/or supervisory roles 6.3 Veteran Practitioner Training Material Continued

PROGRAM REVIEW COMPONENTS PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS 6. Fieldwork and Clinical Practice Component DescriptionRequired Exhibits 6.4 Verification of appropriate placements for fieldwork for each candidate 6.4 Documentation of Candidate Placements 6.5 Published advising materials that provide information about expectations within the clinical experience on placements, support, assessments (e.g. handbooks) 6.5 Clinical Practice Handbook/Manual 6.6 Syllabi for clinical experiences including information on how a candidate is assessed during clinical practice. 6.6 Fieldwork/Clinical Practice Syllabi

PROGRAM REVIEW COMPONENTS CLEAR ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS 5. Job-Embedded Fieldwork and Clinical Practice Component DescriptionRequired Exhibits Specific evidence of meeting the requirements of job-embedded induction 5.1 Timeline or Table denoting timing of coach assignment for candidates 5.2 Signed Employer Agreements or MOU for each employer 5.3 Coach Training Materials 5.4 Documentation of Candidate Placements (Job location) 5.5 Program Manuals, Handbooks, Advising Materials 5.6 Individual Induction Plan template and related documents Assessment instruments

PROGRAM REVIEW COMPONENTS PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS CLEAR INDUCTION ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS 6. And 7. Credential Recommendation Component DescriptionRequired Exhibits 7.1 Description of < 200 words regarding the program's process to ensure that only qualified candidates are recommended for the credential. 7.1 Description of process ensuring appropriate recommendation --Link to document that monitors candidate progress Candidate Progress Monitoring Document

READER NEEDS  Approximately 50 Preliminary Programs  Approximately 25 Clear Induction Programs  2 readers per submission =  We need 150 volunteers to read these submissions!  Each institution provide readers for two documents  one volunteer reading two documents  two volunteers reading one document  Training for readers will be required before reviewing a submission  with names of volunteers!

QUESTIONS? Direct all questions to