West Central Regional Service Center Race To the Top funding, important dates, forms and decisions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Strategic Interventions for English Learners Long Beach Unified School District Chris Dominguez, Deputy Superintendent Pamela Seki, Director, Program Assistance.
Common Core and Essential Standards Summer Institute Webinar Series for LEA and Charter School Teams March 21-24, 2011 Summer Institute Contacts: Yvette.
Administrators Meeting April 21, Key Areas of Grant-Based Monitoring Schools to be Served Instructional Assessments Instructional Strategies and.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Cohort Review in Arizona
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
A Key Piece of the Puzzle: The EQuIP NGSS Rubric & Delaware’s NGSS Implementation Plan Shelley Rouser and John Moyer Delaware Department of Education.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
Key questions around the Common Core and revised Standards.
Lesson Study Races to the Top in Florida A Report on Lesson Study Initiatives In The Sunshine State Collaborate Plan Align Learn Motivate Share.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Prevalence: HIV/AIDS, by County Rate Per 100,000 a- Pima b- Maricopa c- Pinal* d- Mohave e- Cochise f- La Paz g- Coconino h- Graham* i- Sta Cruz j- Yuma.
COMMON CORE GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Mike Royal Vice Chair, State Board of Education January 9, 2015.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
1 Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) Update Holiday Inn Albany, New York October 15, 2010.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Successful Practices Network ACTEA Annual Leadership Conference March 24-25, 2011 Dr. Edward Shafer, Director Dr. Constance H. Spohn,
Ministry of Education Update BCSSA SUMMER ACADEMY August 21, 2015.
CHEA GENERAL MEETING August 31, 2011 STATE SALARY SCALE Professional Learning Community (PLC) NEGOTIATIONS DPAS II CHANGES STATE SALARY SCALE Professional.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
OVERVIEW 1. WHAT IS FIP YOUR SCHOOL? 2 What is a FIP School? Our goal is to make every school in Ohio a FIP School – a school committed to embracing.
ANNOUNCEMENT The NC Department of Public Instruction is pleased to announce that Summer Institutes 2014 will take place in all eight regions across the.
State Board of Education Meeting Race to the Top Update August 1, RTTT3 Overview Allocation of Funds (State and District) State-Level Activities.
SEADAE Assessment Institute July 29,  To provide a level of richness that develops assessment literacy and changes teacher practice- not just teacher.
Race to the Top (RttT): Standards and Assessments RttT State Initiatives Update March 28, 2011.
1 Archdiocese of New York Academic Initiatives.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Curriculum and Instruction Curriculum Cross-walks available via ODE website Regional professional development opportunities Reminder: Begin the work NOW!
Successful Practices Network CTE Technical Assistance Center Work Plan 1.Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture.
Lawrence M. Paska, Ph.D. Coordinator of Technology Policy Educational Design and Technology Updates.
MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM CHARTER SYSTEM PETITION PUBLIC HEARINGS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 5:00 PM TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 6:00 PM PROFESSIONAL.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
AZ K-12 Education Needs in Rural and Remote Arizona: Analysis of Responses Reviewed by Board of Directors, May 31, 2013 ©2013 Science Foundation Arizona.
Oct. 13, 2015 Flagstaff Oct. 14, 2015 Phoenix Oct. 15, 2015 Tucson Arizona Charter Schools Program: Getting Ready for the 2016 Grant Cycle 1.
2 Louisiana Believes Objective: The Department is providing districts increased support in preparation for the school year. As districts plan for.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
© 2004 by David T. Olson Sample - Not for Public Use1 A Sample Presentation of The State of the Church in Arizona and the Phoenix and Tucson Metro Areas.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
FLEXIBILITY and the DENVER PLAN Objectives for today: Understand DPS’ future direction related to academic supports. Understand DPS’ approach to.
Statewide Transition Plan: Indiana Academic Standards in E/LA & Mathematics 2014 Amy Horton, Asst. Supt. for Student Achievement & Improvement Michele.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
DESE District Review Center for District and School Accountability Site Visit: April 11-14, 2011.
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District Program Evaluations A summary of recommendations from the completed program evaluations March 6, 2009.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
2010 Census Form D-3277 (E) Census: A snapshot 2 What: Count of everyone residing in the United States. Who: All U.S. residents must be counted—people.
Overview of Network Team Plan.  Deliverable Metrics are being finalized  Assessment of Network Team Deliverables ◦ Principals ◦ Teachers ◦ District.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Bringing it All Together Focus on Curriculum Development & Instructional Delivery Focus on Instructional Practices Focus on Instructional Alignment Where.
The Mental Health System
Resource Allocation and District Action Reports: RADAR
Statewide System of Support Foundational Services April 2015 Illinois State Board of Education In Collaboration with Regional Offices of Education/Intermediate.
Program Administrator Meeting
Implementing Race to the Top
Arizona Judicial Branch
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
NC Mathematics and Science Partnership Program
Presentation transcript:

West Central Regional Service Center Race To the Top funding, important dates, forms and decisions

Regional Education Centers Regional Education Centers $500,000 per Regional Education Center over 4 years (please see attached budget) Funds may only be used to: Hire personnel, or supplement existing staff, to serve as the Regional Education Center Coordinator Support Coordinator travel within region in support of RTTT Participating LEAs for their Scopes of Work, and all LEAs in the region with respect to the SEA Scope of Work Support RTTT related project operating expenses Race to the Top Mission: Support LEAs within each Region to: Implement the Arizona 2010 Academic Standards (Common Core) in English Language Arts and Math, using STEM as the vehicle Complete the Student-Teacher Connection within all of their schools Race to the Top Funding Source: Other locally identified funding streams including LEA race to the top funding. Regional Education Center Mission: Locally defined and accessible professional development, educational services and technical services to address statewide high priority initiatives, including (but not limited to): Data Use (supplemental to RTTT) Standards (supplemental to RTTT) and Assessment Great Teachers-Great Leaders Struggling Schools STEM (supplemental to RTTT) Local Funding Source Arizona Race to the Top provides the opportunity to create the initial structural framework to operationalize the Regional Education Center Model, and funding for two core areas of service and support related to standards implementation and data systems. However, additional components of the Regional Education Center Model may be implemented within each Region, based on locally identified need and locally identified supplemental funding sources to support those needs.

REVISED: Arizona Race to the Top Performance Measures Sub-Criterion (A)(2)(i)(b) – Regional Education Centers

Measure 4: Percentage of Participating LEAs, within each region, rating the effectiveness of the Regional Education Center model as an effective delivery mechanism for targeted support services for their respective region at 4.0 or higher on a 5-point lickert scale based on quarterly survey data Region 1050%75%85%100% Region 2050%75%85%100% Region 3050%75%85%100% Region 4050%75%85%100% Region 5050%75%85%100% CONTINUED: Arizona Race to the Top Performance Measures Sub-Criterion (A)(2)(i)(b) – Regional Education Centers Performance Measures Actual Data:Baseline(Current schoolyear or mostrecent)End ofYear 1(5/31/2012)End ofYear 2(5/31/2013)End ofYear 3(5/31/2014)End ofYear 4(12/21/2015)

CountyLEAs Total County Allocation Maricopa158$7,618,133 Pima39$1,776,681 Pinal19$541,003 Yuma7$495,091 Navajo13$434,556 Apache6$400,198 Mohave15$261,328 Cochise13$231,177 Yavapai22$207,527 Santa Cruz5$178,125 Coconino5$147,823 Gila7$111,153 Graham6$87,519 La Paz4$42,728 Greenlee1$5,854 RegionLEAsTotal Allocation Region 1 - Holbrook24$982,577 (Apache, Coconino, Navajo) Region 2 - Phoenix158$7,618,133 (Maricopa) Region 3 - Tucson57$2,185,983 (Cochise, Pima, Santa Cruz) Region 4 - Florence33$745,529 (Gila, Graham, Greenlee, Pinal) Region 5 - Prescott49$1,008,056 (La Paz, Mohave, Yavapai, Yuma) Total321 $12,540,27 7 Allocations by Regional Education Center Allocations by County Student Population

OPTIONS LEA VENDOR IGA ESA RSC

Each County Superintendent will: Establish a nomination process Call for an election of 2 County Representatives Serve on an Advisory Council, Details announced by 3/2/12

WORKING DOCUMENTS found on the Regional Website:

Arizona Race to the Top - LEA Detailed Scope of Work Guidance for Choosing Activities: 1. (B)(3) - Standards Implementation: Choose at least one* required activity for both ELA Standards Implementation and Math Standards Implementation. This choice should be driven by identified local need and the total Race to the Top LEA Budget Allocation amount. Note: All LEAs are required to develop local ELA and Math Standards Implementation Plans. 2. (C)(2) - Data Systems: All required activities must be addressed. * LEAs receiving an allocation of $70,000 or more must address all (B)(3) Elements within their Scope of Work. LEA NAME Required ActivitiesYEAR 2 (6/1/12-5/31/13) Total RTTT Funding Allocation (over 3 budget periods)$ (B)(3) - Standards Implementation Required GOALS "The Why" Indicate Chosen Elements (for March 2, 2012) Required RTTT Elements (The Participaing LEA will…) "The What" Plan for Implementation of Selected RTTT Activities "The How" Timeline for Implementation (Summer, Fall, Spring) "The When" Key Personnel "The Who" Performance Measures (Targets) Aligned to Activities Budget (RTTT) Budget (Other - As Applicable) Indicate Source Overall Performance Measure (Target) Required Goals Fully Implement the Arizona 2010 ELA Standards (Common Core), using STEM as the vehicle, in all grades by X Development of A High-Quality LEA ELA Standards Implementation Plan (Required for ALL LEAs) Fully Implement the Arizona 2010 ELA Standards (Common Core) in Grades K-3 and 7-9, and move from transitional to targeted implementation in grades 4-6 and by the end of the school year, using STEM as the vehicle Implementation of A High-Quality LEA ELA Standards Implementation Plan Examples of Activities in support of this Element (including, but not limited to): a. Personnel Expenses or Stipends for Teacher Teams to support local development and implementation; b. Development of ELA/STEM instructional resources, such as: Integrated ELA/STEM Lesson Plans; Curriculum Maps; Supplemental Instructional Materials and Resources; and. Professional Development Materials and Modules; c. Purchase of Supplemental Instructional Materials and Resources (to include online resources); d. Curriculum Alignment activities; e. Providing Coaching, follow-up and feedback; f. Providing Internal Professional Development; g. Implementing the Science Foundation Arizona (SFAz) STEM Immersion Matrix h. Monitoring and evaluating the implementation plan for fidelity Participate in Professional Development for Educators (teachers, administrators, coaches, instructional specialists) in Phase 1, 2 and 3 of the Arizona 2010 ELA Standards (Common Core) provided by one or more of the following: a. ADE b. Regional Education Center Specialists c. ADE Certified Trainers d. LEA Professional Development Cadre Certified by ADE Participate in Professional Development focused on Leadership (LEA Leadership team, administrators, coaches, PLC Data Team) in support of implementing the Arizona 2010 ELA Standards (Common Core) provided by one or more of the following: a. ADE b. Regional Education Center Specialists c. ADE Certified Trainers d. LEA Professional Development Cadre Certified by ADE

Fully Implement the Arizona 2010 Math Standards (Common Core), using STEM as the vehicle, in all grades by X Development of A High-Quality LEA Math Standards Implementation Plan (Required for ALL LEAs) Fully Implement the Arizona 2010 Math Standards (Common Core) in Grades K-3 and 7-9, and move from transitional to targeted implementation in grades 4-6 and by the end of the school year, using STEM as the vehicle Development and Implementation of A High-Quality LEA Math Standards Implementation Plan Examples of Activities in support of this Element (including, but not limited to): a. Personnel Expenses or Stipends for Teacher Teams to support local development and implementation; b. Development of Math/STEM instructional resources, such as: Integrated ELA/STEM Lesson Plans; Curriculum Maps; Supplemental Instructional Materials and Resources; and. Professional Development Materials and Modules; c. Purchase of Supplemental Instructional Materials and Resources (to include online resources); d. Curriculum Alignment activities; e. Providing Coaching, follow-up and feedback; f. Providing Internal Professional Development; g. Implementing the Science Foundation Arizona (SFAz) STEM Immersion Matrix h. Monitoring and evaluating the implementation plan for fidelity Participate in Professional Development for Educators (teachers, administrators, coaches, instructional specialists) in Phase 1, 2 and 3 of the Arizona 2010 Math Standards (Common Core) provided by one or more of the following: a. ADE b. Regional Education Center Specialists c. ADE Certified Trainers d. LEA Professional Development Cadre Certified by ADE Participate in Professional Development focused on Leadership (LEA Leadership team, administrators, coaches, PLC Data Team) in support of implementing the Arizona 2010 Math Standards (Common Core) provided by one or more of the following: a. ADE b. Regional Education Center Specialists c. ADE Certified Trainers d. LEA Professional Development Cadre Certified by ADE (B)(3) - Budget Subtotal (Year 1) (C)(2) - Data Systems Required GOALS Indicate Chosen Elements (for March 2, 2012) Required RTTT Elements (The Participaing LEA will…) "The What" Plan for Implementation of Selected RTTT Activities "The How" Timeline for Implementation (Fall, Spring, Summer) "The When" Key Personnel "The Who" Performance Measures (Targets) Aligned to Activities Budget (RTTT) Budget (Other - As Applicable) Overall Performance Measure (Target) Required Goal Complete the Course Mapping Process and the Student- Teacher Connection at all Schools within the LEA by 12/31/2012 X Complete the Course Mapping Process for all Schools within the LEA. Complete the Course Mapping Process for all Schools within the LEA by 12/31/2012 X Complete the Student-Teacher Connection at all Schools within the LEA, within the LEAs Student Management System (SMS). Complete the Student-Teacher Connection at all Schools within the LEA, within the LEAs Student Management System (SMS) by 12/31/2012 X Transmit complete Student-Teacher Connection data for all schools within the LEA to the ADE according to defined file specifications Transmit complete Student-Teacher Connection data for all schools within the LEA to the ADE according to defined file specifications by 12/31/2012

Find this MOU application at the Regional Website: