Systems Change Modeling Scenarios for System-Wide Change For Consideration in HEARTH Performance Measure Goal-Setting Jenny Helbraun Abramson Sonoma County.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2014 HUD Data Standards. New & Active Clients All ESG, CoC and SSVF funded agencies are required to begin collecting data on new and active clients based.
Advertisements

Home Again A 10-year plan to end homelessness in Portland and Multnomah County Targeting Resources for Homeless Families Transitional Housing.
2014 H OUSING I NVENTORY C OUNT (HIC): W HAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ! J ANUARY 14, 2013.
Effectively Allocating Homeless Assistance Resources to End Homelessness NAEH Conference, Washington DC July 17, 2012 Katharine Gale Consulting Berkeley,
SAFE HARBORS PARTNERS’ MEETING MAY 29, 2013 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR)
Marygrace Billek, Director of Human Services Mercer County, New Jersey Mercer County’s Framework for Ending Family Homelessness.
For every 1,000 Sonoma County residents, 9 had an episode of homelessness last year. Sonoma County Homeless Data Sourcebook, Source: 2013 Sonoma.
Homelessness Outcomes Update April 3,  Transition to Rapid Re-housing  Permanent Supportive Housing  System Coordination  Capacity Building.
VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WORKGROUP Reallocate $ for more community based housing Need rapid rehousing dollars Adjust current grant to allow for more.
COSCDA Conference 2012 Washington, DC Karen DeBlasio, HUD March 13, 2012 Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS)
Shelters in the HEARTH era The Lyceum, Hartford, CT April 7, 2014 Katharine Gale
OCTOBER 24, 2012 PRESENTED BY RENEE LAMBERJACK, RESEARCH & EVALUATION ASSISTANT Annual Homeless Assessment Report Presentation to Safe Harbors Partners.
Countywide Homeless System Performance Winston-Salem/Forsyth County CoC prepared for North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness Megan Kurteff Schatz.
Coordinated Assessment: Understanding Assessment Tools 1 Kim Walker & Norm Suchar November 2013.
Where the Two Can Meet: Merging Transitional Housing with Rapid Re-Housing Virginia Coalition to End Homelessness October 21, 2010.
Coordinated Entry.  Helping people move through the system faster  Sends households to intervention best fit from the start  Reduce new entries into.
Nutmegit.com Provided by: P W HMIS DATA COORDINATOR MEETING February 2013.
Rapid Re-Housing and Homelessness Recurrence in Georgia Jason Rodriguez GA Dept of Community Affairs.
Reversing the Trend Repurposing Sonoma County’s Homeless Housing to Reduce Homelessness August 30, 2011.
Orientation to the Continuum of Care (CoC) July 29, 2014.
Continuum of Care Funding 2011 A Preview for Applicants July 28, 2011.
10-Year Homeless Action Plan 2014 UPDATE. Why a Plan Update? 1)Great Recession reversed progress made under the 2007 Plan 2)Depressed housing industry.
2015 POINT IN TIME & HIC. Sheltered PIT Data 2015 People in Households with Children.
Developing a Performance Measurement System in Utah Effective Strategies for Homeless Services COSCDA September 17 th, 2013 Jayme Day, Utah HMIS.
+ The New Emergency Solutions Grants Program Jenny Helbraun Abramson, Coordinator Sonoma County Continuum of Care Planning Group January 19, 2012.
Continuum of Care in Rural Nebraska January 26, 2010 NIFA Conference Omaha, NE.
Housing cures homelessness A summary of lessons learned from the National Conference on Ending Homelessness July 29-31, 2014.
Thursday, September 3, Agenda Status of Post Count Process Common Issues/Errors HMIS data Non-WISP data HIC Deduplication Impact of Service Based.
Adopting a Homeless Preference Catherine Peterson U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Volusia/Flagler County Coalition for the Homeless Eggs & Issues Presentation July 19, 2013.
System Performance Measures WIBOSCOC Data Committee: CoC Workgroup August 2015.
ALLIANCE FOR HOUSING– ANNUAL RETREAT MAY 15, 2014.
Ventura County Continuum of Care Coordinated Entry System and Housing First.
RACINE COC DATA SNAPSHOT February 21, EMERGENCY SHELTER USAGE
CAHS Process Flow operator completes pre-screen for shelter eligibility 3a operator transmits screening document over secure network to.
ORGANIZING THE FRONT DOOR: COORDINATED ASSESSMENT Emily Carmody & Corey Root NCCEH Rebecca Pfeiffer City of Charlotte.
FY 2015 Continuum of Care Application Priorities and Process Presentation to the Lake County Coalition for the Homeless April 7, 2015.
December 15,  Point in Time Count  AHAR  Chronic Homelessness – final definition  Orange County Rapid ReHousing applications  Upcoming Calendar.
Prepared by Abt Associates for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development The First Annual Homeless Assessment Report.
HMIS and PSH: Receiving Referrals from the One List Ending Veteran Homelessness Initiative.
2014 HMIS Data Standards Overview HMIS Data Standards Background – Key resources – Implementation Timeline – Revision Process Overview of Key.
Agency Technical Administrator (ATA) Team Meeting March 29 th.
Opportunities to Address Homelessness in California Danielle Wildkress, CSH.
Data and Evaluation Workgroup 9/10/2015 | 8:30-10:30am| Chinook 115 Family Options Study: Key Questions.
Thursday, March 1, Agenda Status of Post Count Process Common Issues/Errors HMIS data Non-WISP data HIC Deduplication Impact of Service Based Counting.
Ending Veteran and Chronic Homelessness in Louisiana.
New Department on Homelessness: The Development Process.
All Home Stakeholder Meeting July 20, Agenda Welcome General Updates Measuring System Performance in King County Role of System Performance and.
Homeless Continuum of Care Activities. Continuum Overview COMMUNITY SERVICES HUD requires all communities receiving McKinney-Vento homeless services funds.
Hudson County Division of Housing and Community Development
2016 Coc visioning session December 20, 2016.
The Role of Emergency Shelters in a Crisis Response System
Systems Transformation In focus: Rapid Rehousing
Detroit Continuum of Care (CoC) 2017 HIC and PIT Count
2017 Point in time & HIC.
Lake County Homeless Needs Assessment
Allocation Plan 2016 Continuum of Care NOFA.
Susan Price Director of Care Coordination County Executive Office
Session 1.02: Understanding your System: Using Program and System-Level Performance Measures Selina Toy Lee Director of Collaborative Community Outcomes,
2014 Broward Homeless Continuum of Care Governance Chart
2018 Point in time & HIC.
2018 Point in time (PIT) & Housing Inventory Count (HIC)
Annual Homeless Point-in-Time & Housing Inventory Count
Why we are doing this – RRH – reduce shelter length of stay
Coordinated Entry System
System Performance Measures: Goal
Appendix B: Capacity and Utilization as of 8/31/2018
What we learned system performance az balance of state coc
Introduction This report provides an overview of homelessness in Monroe County for the time period: 10/1/2107 – 09/30/2018. The time period selected is.
TPCH Sheltered & Unsheltered PIT 5 Year Review
Presentation transcript:

Systems Change Modeling Scenarios for System-Wide Change For Consideration in HEARTH Performance Measure Goal-Setting Jenny Helbraun Abramson Sonoma County Continuum of Care Coordinator

How the modeling was done The slides that follow use Sonoma County HMIS data, its housing inventory, and 2011 Count data to simulate client movement through, and out of, the Sonoma County Continuum of Care. This model uses systems change options provided in the simulation exercise used at the April 2011 CCPG meeting. For the sake of this experiment, we have standardized known average exit rates per month and destinations for the existing system, in a database model. Changes were introduced to this model one at a time. The charts that follow show the numbers of homeless clients moving into permanent housing over 6 months (in blue) and the number left un-served over 6 months (in red).

Adding units PSH = Permanent Supportive Housing TH = Transitional Housing ES = Emergency Shelter RRH = Rapid Re-Housing

Increasing exit rates PSH = Permanent Supportive Housing TH = Transitional Housing ES = Emergency Shelter RRH = Rapid Re-Housing

Re-purposing existing services PSH = Permanent Supportive Housing TH = Transitional Housing ES = Emergency Shelter RRH = Rapid Re-Housing

Limitations & Considerations As with any modeling, this is very simplified. Actual client pathways probably take longer and would result in fewer placed in permanent housing, and more waiting for (or giving up on) services. Client preference is not reflected in this model at all. What other changes should we test with this model? ????