Need For The Project SPDG Competition FY 2011 1. The NEED FOR THE PROJECT is the foundation of the SPDG application  Scoring criteria: the range of points.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Extended School Year (ESY)
Advertisements

Rhode Island State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Stakeholder Input November 6, 2014.
Analysis of Data at South Paulding High School from 2008 to 2010 Kim Huett, Anne Roycroft, Gina Smeeton, and Robin Wofford.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
State Directors Conference Boise, ID, March 4, 2013 Cesar D’Agord Regional Resource Center Program WRRC – Western Region.
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
The Early Reading First Program CFDA # A and B Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives
Developing the Foundation for the PLAAFP
School Performance Index School Performance Index (SPI): A Comprehensive Measurement System for All Schools Student Achievement (e.g. PSSA) Student Progress.
Overview of the FY 2010 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey 1.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Professional Development: the heart of the matter.
State Personnel Development Grant SPDG. Project Goals Improve outcomes for students by: − Increasing skill of educators using research/evidence-based.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
Predominantly Black Institutions Program CFDA: A FY 2015 PREAPPLICATION WEBINAR Washington, DC July 14, :00 AM. – 12:00 PM, EDT July 14, 2015.
Need For The Project Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. April 23, 2009.
ANNUAL AND FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 524B FORM REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDIRECT COST RATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Professional Development: the heart of the matter.
General Grant Writing Tips. Research the problem/need and the program before beginning the grant proposal Review research on similar problems/needs and.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
Using Individual Project and Program Evaluations to Improve the Part D Programs Dr. Herbert M. Baum.
Petraine Johnson, Moderator, Presenters: Millie Bentley-Memon, Fengju Zhang, Elizabeth Judd Office of English Language Acquisition Language Enhancement.
The New IDEA: Major Changes Presentation to the Charter Schools Summit November 7, 2006 Nancy Reder, Esq. Deputy Executive Director NASDSE.
Project Design Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. April 23, 2009.
The Significance Section Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. April 23, 2009.
Project Design Jennifer Coffey OSEP May 4,
Applying for the SPDG Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D. November 23, 2010.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
Welcome! PROGRAM MEETING July 23, 2012 OSEP Personnel Development Program 1.
Special Education Teacher Preparation Program Improvement Grants (325T) Bonnie D. Jones, Ed. D. Education Program Specialist Office of Special Education.
FOCUSING ON GETTING THE PERFECT SCORE Robin Ward District Grant Writer Brevard Public Schools.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Updates and Current Issues ISES Meeting December 2011.
Need For The Project Shedeh Hajghassemali June 8,
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
1.  May 27, 2010: Informational Webinar on Technical Assistance & Dissemination (TA&D) Centers  Description: The purpose of the session is for States.
Tuesday, April 12 th 2011 SPDG Performance Measure Discussion.
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
ANNUAL AND FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 524B FORM REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDIRECT COST RATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES.
Texas Effectiveness Study Mini-Grant Program for LEA Follow-up.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
BUILDING BLOCKS TO EVALUATE MEASURABLE PROGRAM OUTCOMES AKA: PROGRAM MONITORING.
Overview of the FY 2011 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D. State Personnel Development Grants Program Lead 1.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
MODULE 3 FHIP NOFA – FACTORS 1 & 2. What will be covered in Module 3: Factor 1 - Maximum Points and Distribution for each sub-factor Factor 1 – Sub-factor:
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Project Design SPDG Competition FY C. QUALITY OF PROJECT DESIGN (0-20 points)  Describe the extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes.
No Child Left Behind Application Title VI, Part B, Subpart 2 Virginia Department of Education March 2011.
ACF, Office of Child Care Tribal Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Visiting Program: Development and Implementation April 2016.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
Pre-Applicant Training| SC Public Charter School District| Beckie Davis Serving Students with Special Needs.
Grant Activities, Needs Assessments And other SPDG application Issues to Consider.
Preparing All Students for College, Career, Life, and Leadership in The 21 st Century PERFORMANCE. EQUITY. IMPROVEMENT.
County Vocational School District Partnership Grant, Cohort 3 Technical Assistance Workshop January 6, 2017.
Department of Exceptional Student Education
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act and the Tile I, Part A Program
Serving Students with Special Needs
Need For The Project Jennifer Coffey April 19, 2010.
Jennifer Coffey OSEP April 19, 2010
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
ESSA accountability & Report Card Proposed regulations
Presentation transcript:

Need For The Project SPDG Competition FY

The NEED FOR THE PROJECT is the foundation of the SPDG application  Scoring criteria: the range of points awarded is  (1) The Secretary considers the need for the proposed project.  (2) In determining the need for the proposed project the Secretary considers the extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services, infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude of those gaps or weaknesses. 2

To Consider  The needs identified should be the underlying basis for justifying OSEP funding your project.  These needs should relate to the other components of the SPDG (e.g., significance, project design, resources, management plan and evaluation). 3

First Rule: Address only those needs that are relevant to the SPDG application  DO NOT include a global summary of the entire universe of a state's needs. –This will cloud the identification of relevant issues, and –make it difficult for the reviewers to identify what you are applying for in your SPDG application.  DO highlight the uniqueness of your State. 4

2 nd Rule: Use data to support the needs you have identified  Use SPP/APR data  619 data  State certification data  PBIS State Evaluation Data  NAEP  IDEA Data  AYP 5

The Need for Project should provide information about the following areas:  Specific gaps in services –Nature and magnitude of the gaps in services  Specific weaknesses in services –Nature and magnitude of the weaknesses in services 6

Provide information about… (cont.)  Infrastructure: both existing and any projected additions to/ changes in infrastructure resulting from the SPDG grant activities  Opportunities identified that are existing and to what extent they will be addressed by the proposed SPDG project 7

Nature and magnitude of the gaps or weaknesses in services  It is critical that you indicate how serious of a need this is, remembering Rule # 2 that you support the magnitude of the need with data.  The need may be specific to a low incidence group, but the magnitude of need for that group may be very significant. 8

Example: ABA personnel training  Example: While the percentage of students with Autism accounts for only 4 % of the state's special education population the incidence of identification of students with Autism has increased 250% over the past three years. 9

Example cont.  Of those students identified with Autism approximately 45% of their IEPs require services involving ABA staff or ABA related activities. Currently we have been able to identify only 10 ABA certified staff in the state. In addition, surveys of 820 special education professional staff serving students with Autism have identified a need for training related to ABA in their top 3 priorities 10

Existing infrastructure and any projected changes in infrastructure resulting from the grant activities  It is helpful to provide your state's demographics and service delivery models to provide context for what you are proposing in your grant, but be concise. –Reviewers just need to know those aspects of infrastructure that relate to what you are proposing. 11

Example: State demographics and service delivery model(s)  There are 501 school districts and 123 Charter Schools in our state that serve as LEAs for the provision of FAPE for students with disabilities. The total enrollment of students with disabilities (age 3-21) in the state is 310,692, which comprises 14% of the total student enrollment.  Of the total 624 LEAs, 123 serve students designated as rural with total school district enrollments of less than (X) students. 12

Example cont.  Our current professional development delivery model is provided through a 3-tier system. The first tier (provide a brief description of your system)...  The turnover rate for special education teachers in these designated rural LEAS is the highest in the state (provide data).  Our proposal of a distance learning model delivery system of professional development to improve our infrastructure is based on … 13

Opportunities that exist and to what extent they will be addressed by the proposed project  Provide concise information that is applicable to the needs you are addressing in the SPDG. 14

Example  In our state's attempts to address the needs of retention of special education teachers in our small rural school districts, we have recently initiated a pilot, with an IHE, of a distance learning model delivery system of professional development.  The initial results of that pilot are....( provide data regarding this opportunity). 15

Reviewer Comments + Applicant reported qualitative findings of needs assessment efforts that were used to determine need of the proposed project. + Clear connections were made between gaps and project objectives (p. 9-16). - Additional data (quantitative) to support overall need for some objectives (3, 4, and 5) would have provided a more complete picture of need in this section. 16

17 -- …there was no connection in this section to significance of the project on the targeted populations identified by the applicant… + The need for the project is nicely outlined and focuses on students with disabilities in the state, especially those from diverse ethnic backgrounds as this is a growing population with unique support needs. Specific data are provided on pages 2-5.

18 + Data are provided on page 7 regarding poor academic performance among students with disabilities (in the schools they will be working in) in comparison to students with disabilities state-wide. This discrepancy also applies in the discipline area as well (p. 8). + The section highlighting the need for increased parent involvement (p ) appears especially important due to the diverse immigrant population base in the state.

In Summary  The NEED FOR PROJECT section should address those needs that are relevant to the SPDG application.  Use data to support the needs you have identified.  Be concise.  Ensure that design flows from need. 19