1 A NEW SPECIFICATION TOOL FOR STOCHASTIC VOLATILITY MODELS BASED ON THE TAYLOR EFFECT A. Pérez 1 and E. Ruiz 2 1 Dpto. Economía Aplicada Universidad de Valladolid (Spain) 2 Dpto. Estadística Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (Spain) XXXIII SIMPOSIO DE ANÁLISIS ECONÓMICO XXXIII SIMPOSIO DE ANÁLISIS ECONÓMICO Zaragoza, December 12, 2008
2 Outline Motivation and background The Taylor property in ARSV and LMSV models A new tool for model adequacy based on Taylor effect Asymptotic and finite sample properties Empirical application Conclusions
3 Motivation and background Sample autocorrelations of absolute returns are larger than those of squares; Taylor (1986) Autocorrelations of powered-absolute returns, |y t | , are highest for 1, i.e. absolute returns ; Ding et al (1993) Taylor effect, Granger and Ding (1995) Such autocorrelations tend to persist for long lags ==> possible long-memory in volatility; Ding et al (1993)
4
5
6 Reasons for interest in autocorrelations of |y t | Model adequacy: any theoretical model should be able to replicate these sample correlation patterns; Ding et al (1993), Baillie and Chung (2001), Karanasos et al (2004) Model selection: correlations of squares are not enough to discriminate models; Franq & Zakoian (2008) The power transformation that maximizes correlations related to predictability; Higgins & Bera (1992) Improved estimators of conditional heteroskedastic models; Deo et al (2006)
7 Taylor effect in LMSV models LMSV(1, d,0) model: y t : series of returns t : the volatility t ~ IID(0,1) symmetric t ~ NID(0, ) independent of t d <0.5, | |<1 for stationarity Note: d =0 => ~ AR(1) => ARSV(1) model Note: =Corr( t, t+1 ) + Gaussian => A-LMSV model
8 Kurtosis of y t => k y = k exp( ) Moments and dynamic structure: ACF of | y t | in LMSV model; Harvey (1998) k ( )= (| y t | ,| y t-k | ) = where ={E( | t | 2 )}/{E( | t | )} 2 k ( ) depends on:, , d, , distribution of t is the acf of
9
10 Let We focus on 1 ( ) and max (1) 1 ( )= d =0: ARSV(1) => h (1)= =0: LMSV(0, d,0) => h (1)= d /(1- d ) Persistence
11
12 A new tool for model adequacy Asymptotic properties: Gourieroux & Jasiak (2002) Consistent estimator of max ( k ) Asymptotically Normal:
13 Finite samples: Monte Carlo experiment 1000 series of sizes T={500, 1000, 5000} ={0.8,0.98}, ={0.01,0.05,0.1}, d ={0.3,0.45} t ~N(0,1) and Student t-7 A grid of values of (0,3) j {0.01,0.02,…,3} For each replicate i compute r 1i ( j ), j=1,…,300 For each j sample mean of r 1i ( j ) and 90%,95% For replicate i Pick up, i =1,..,1000
14
15 Kernel densities of
16 New tool proposed Given a data set and its fitted SV model with its estimated parameters: ( = N(0,1)) Define: = Test for model adequacy H 0 : max (k)= Reject, at %, when outside the 100(1- )% confidence region of the asymptotic distribution
17 Summary descriptive statistics of returns* SERIE EuroBPCANYenSP500Nikkei FTSE100 IBEX35 Size Kurtosis r 1 (1) Q | Y | (50) r 1 (2) Q Y 2 (50) * F iltered by fitting MA(1) and/or correcting possible outliers >5 t/T Empirical application
18 Estimation results of ARSV(1) models SERIESEuroBPCANYenSP500Nikkei225FTSE100IBEX35 (0.005) (0.002) (0.003) (0.003) (0.002) (0.004) (0.005) (0.005) (0.001) (0.002) (0.003) (0.004) (0.004) (0.004) ∞ (0.003) (0.004) ∞ Q | | (10) Q | | (50) * 81.5** 22.2* 103** ** * 75.2* Q 2 (10) Q 2 (50) ** 117** ** 123** 23.9** 70.7* 43.3** 91.1** 38.9** 81.3**
19 Estimation results of LMSV models SERIESEuroBPCANYenSP500Nikkei225FTSE100IBEX35 d ∞ ∞ Q | | (10) Q | | (50) ** 86.3** 28.8* 89.5** 22.4* 70.3* 45.3** 115** * 68.3* Q 2 (10) Q 2 (50) ** 71.8* * 18.9* ** 80.9** 21.1*
20
21 Conclusions 1.ARSV, LMSV and A-LMSV models are able to generate Taylor effect for the most realistic parameter sets 2.Sample and theoretical autocorrelations of | y t | peak at similar values of 3.Use as an additional tool for model adequacy of a fitted SV model 4. consistent and asymptotically Normal