MECHANICAL and AEROSPACE ENGINEERING Active Reconfiguration for Performance Enhancement in Articulated Wheeled Vehicles Aliakbar Alamdari PhD Candidate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cinematica dei Manipolatori e dei robot mobili
Advertisements

Mobile Robot Locomotion
Chin Pei Tang May 3, 2004 Slide 1 of 51 Automation, Robotics and Mechatronics Lab, SUNY at Buffalo Chin Pei Tang Advisor : Dr.
Kinematic Synthesis of Robotic Manipulators from Task Descriptions June 2003 By: Tarek Sobh, Daniel Toundykov.
Outline: Introduction Link Description Link-Connection Description
Rajankumar Bhatt December 12, 2003 Slide 1 of 36 Automation, Robotics and Mechatronics Lab, SUNY at Buffalo Formation Motion Planning for Payload Transport.
Manipulator Dynamics Amirkabir University of Technology Computer Engineering & Information Technology Department.
Introduction University of Bridgeport 1 Introduction to ROBOTICS.
Communication Piazza – Code Angel Computers in Lab Joined late – Be sure to me to remind me!
Kinematics & Grasping Need to know: Representing mechanism geometry Standard configurations Degrees of freedom Grippers and graspability conditions Goal.
Kinematic Modelling in Robotics
ME Robotics Dynamics of Robot Manipulators Purpose: This chapter introduces the dynamics of mechanisms. A robot can be treated as a set of linked.
Introduction to Robotics
Ch. 7: Dynamics.
Introduction to ROBOTICS
Ch. 3: Forward and Inverse Kinematics
Introduction to ROBOTICS
ME Robotics DIFFERENTIAL KINEMATICS Purpose: The purpose of this chapter is to introduce you to robot motion. Differential forms of the homogeneous.
Mobile Robotics: 10. Kinematics 1
Manipulator Dynamics Amirkabir University of Technology Computer Engineering & Information Technology Department.
CPSC 452: Lecture 1 Introduction, Homogeneous transformations and Coordinate frames.
Robotics Industry Posts Second Best Year Ever North American robotics industry posted its second best year ever in 2000 [Robotic Industries Association.
Introduction to ROBOTICS
Inverse Kinematics Jacobian Matrix Trajectory Planning
Introduction to ROBOTICS
Velocities and Static Force
ME/ECE Professor N. J. Ferrier Forward Kinematics Professor Nicola Ferrier ME Room 2246,
Definition of an Industrial Robot
February 21, 2000Robotics 1 Copyright Martin P. Aalund, Ph.D. Computational Considerations.
Motion Control (wheeled robots)
1 CMPUT 412 Motion Control – Wheeled robots Csaba Szepesvári University of Alberta TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete.
Advanced Programming for 3D Applications CE Bob Hobbs Staffordshire university Human Motion Lecture 3.
Adapting Simulated Behaviors For New Characters Jessica K. Hodgins and Nancy S. Pollard presentation by Barış Aksan.
Lecture 2: Introduction to Concepts in Robotics
Chapter 2 Robot Kinematics: Position Analysis
MAE505: Robotics Final Project – Papers Review. Presented By: Tao Gan Advisor: Dr. Venkat Krovi. Main Topic: Nonholonomic-Wheel Mobile Robot (WMR). Sub-Topics:
Introduction to ROBOTICS
T. Bajd, M. Mihelj, J. Lenarčič, A. Stanovnik, M. Munih, Robotics, Springer, 2010 ROBOT CONTROL T. Bajd and M. Mihelj.
12 November 2009, UT Austin, CS Department Control of Humanoid Robots Luis Sentis, Ph.D. Personal robotics Guidance of gait.
ASME DETC Robot Manipulators and Singularities Vijay Kumar.
Chapter 7: Trajectory Generation Faculty of Engineering - Mechanical Engineering Department ROBOTICS Outline: 1.
ZMP-BASED LOCOMOTION Robotics Course Lesson 22.
M. Zareinejad 1. 2 Grounded interfaces Very similar to robots Need Kinematics –––––– Determine endpoint position Calculate velocities Calculate force-torque.
Kinematics. The function of a robot is to manipulate objects in its workspace. To manipulate objects means to cause them to move in a desired way (as.
CSCE 452 Intro to Robotics CSCE 452: Lecture 1 Introduction, Homogeneous Transformations, and Coordinate frames.
Chapter 2: Description of position and orientation Faculty of Engineering - Mechanical Engineering Department ROBOTICS Outline: Introduction. Descriptions:
City College of New York 1 John (Jizhong) Xiao Department of Electrical Engineering City College of New York Mobile Robot Control G3300:
ROBOTICS 01PEEQW Basilio Bona DAUIN – Politecnico di Torino.
Forward Analysis Problem Statement: given: constant mechanism parameters for example, for a 6R manipulator – link lengths a 12 through a 56 twist.
ROBOTICS 01PEEQW Basilio Bona DAUIN – Politecnico di Torino.
Basilio Bona DAUIN – Politecnico di Torino
James Irwin Amirkhosro Vosughi Mon 1-5pm
Chapter 4 Dynamic Analysis and Forces 4.1 INTRODUCTION In this chapters …….  The dynamics, related with accelerations, loads, masses and inertias. In.
Gaits Cost of Transportation Wheeled Mobile Robots Most popular locomotion mechanism Highly efficient Simple mechanical implementation Balancing is.
Robotics Chapter 3 – Forward Kinematics
Velocity Propagation Between Robot Links 3/4 Instructor: Jacob Rosen Advanced Robotic - MAE 263D - Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering - UCLA.
Kinematics 제어시스템 이론 및 실습 조현우
MAE505: Robotics Final Project – Papers Review.
Direct Manipulator Kinematics
Zaid H. Rashid Supervisor Dr. Hassan M. Alwan
University of Bridgeport
2-DOF Manipulator Now, given the joint angles Ө1, Ө2 we can determine the end effecter coordinates x and y.
Manipulator Dynamics 2 Instructor: Jacob Rosen
Chapter 1 Introduction.
KINEMATIC CHAINS.
KINEMATIC CHAINS & ROBOTS (I)
Outline: 5.1 INTRODUCTION
Chapter 4 . Trajectory planning and Inverse kinematics
Robotics 1 Copyright Martin P. Aalund, Ph.D.
Presentation transcript:

MECHANICAL and AEROSPACE ENGINEERING Active Reconfiguration for Performance Enhancement in Articulated Wheeled Vehicles Aliakbar Alamdari PhD Candidate The State University of New York at Buffalo Venkat N. Krovi Associate Professor Primary: Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Adjunct: Electrical Engineering Adjunct: Gynecology-Obstetrics Adjunct: Pathology & Anatomical Sciences The State University of New York at Buffalo

 Introduction to Articulated Wheeled Vehicles (AWVs)  Kinematic Model Development  Articulation and Platform Motion Effects on the Wheel-Terrain Interaction  Kinetostatic Formulation in Wheel-Terrain Interaction  Articulation and Slippage Effects on the Platform Motion  Manipulability and Maneuverability of AWVs  Redundancy Resolution and Posture Control  Articulated Suspension Stability Criteria  Simulation Results  Conclusion 2 Introduction Kinematic Model Interaction & Manipulability REDUNDANCY RESOLUTION

1.The terrain-contact wheels are attached to the chassis via an articulated multi- body chain. 2.Wheel-relocation with respect to chassis during locomotion. 3.Provide significant re-configurability and redundancy. 4.Intermediate articulation plays as suspension system. 5.AWV can change the location of center of mass by adjusting linkages. 6.AWV can avoid roll-over when passing uneven terrain. 7.Improve stability and obstacle surmounting and enhance robustness. 3 Introduction Kinematic Model Interaction & Manipulability REDUNDANCY RESOLUTION Articulated Wheeled Vehicles Challenges 1.Wheel velocities governed by a set of no-slip constraints could be violated which can result vibration. 2.Minimization of wheel-slipping and skidding by proper coordination of the rolling/steering of the wheels. 3.Reconfiguration to enhance the traction condition and stability. 4.Determination of the best pose for internal configuration.

4 Introduction Dynamics Sensor Fusion Control sys. Introduction Kinematic Model Interaction & Manipulability REDUNDANCY RESOLUTION Developing a twist-based kinematic modeling for Articulated Wheeled Vehicle Parameters vector for each leg-wheel

5 Introduction Dynamics Sensor Fusion Control sys. Introduction Kinematic Model Interaction & Manipulability REDUNDANCY RESOLUTION The velocity of the contact frame respect to fixed frame expressed in {C} frame Twist vectors expressed in local frames by Adjoint Transformation Forming velocity level kinematic equations

6 Introduction Dynamics Sensor Fusion Control sys. Introduction Kinematic Model Interaction & Manipulability REDUNDANCY RESOLUTION Contact point velocity vector Remove columns of matrices associated with contact tilt and sway slippage Contact Kinematics

7 Introduction Dynamics Sensor Fusion Control sys. Introduction Kinematic Model Interaction & Manipulability REDUNDANCY RESOLUTION Determining the platform motion in terms of wheels slippage and joints rate Partitioned to sensed and not sensed quantities Navigation Kinematics

forward kinematic singularity 8 Introduction Dynamics Sensor Fusion Control sys. Introduction Kinematic Model Interaction & Manipulability REDUNDANCY RESOLUTION Determination of the best pose for internal configuration of the redundant leg-wheel vehicle to maximize manipulability. Homogenous transformation between the various frames of references Contact twists expressed in contact frame Legs can assume a variety of configurations without altering the pose of the chassis Twist vectors expressed in local frames Applying the non-holonomic constraints Forming velocity level kinematic equations Investigating the singularities of AWV pose Inverse kinematic singularity det(G) = 0 The platform cannot resist forces or moments in some directions The moving platform gains 1 or more degree-of-freedom

9 Introduction Dynamics Sensor Fusion Control sys. Introduction Kinematic Model Interaction Redundancy Resolution Purpose: Enable the robot to change the arrangement of its legs while moving around on uneven terrain. Two control tasks: Path following & Posture regulation for controlling the platforms Pitch, Roll and Yaw Closed loop control Kinematic redundancy & Actuation redundancy needs to be resolved Task space variables Controlled variables Sensor Fusion Interaction & Manipulability

10 The overall vehicle tip over measure A balanced vehicle configuration is defined as one has the low tip over measure. Thus, we define the objective function as Introduction Dynamics Sensor Fusion Control sys. Introduction Kinematic Model Interaction Redundancy Resolution Sensor Fusion Interaction & Manipulability

11 Results of redundancy resolution and balancing in different scenarios 1- Sloped terrain 2- One side of the vehicle moves on sloped terrain and the other side moves on flat surface Introduction Dynamics Simulation Conclusion

Bumpy terrain In the motion control we tried to force the longitudinal, lateral and detachment slippage equal to zero. Introduction Dynamics Simulation Conclusion

 A systematic and general approach to the kinematic modeling, analysis and control of articulated leg-wheel mechanisms while navigating over rough- terrains was presented.  Compact form of contact kinematics and Navigation Kinematics was established.  Best pose for internal configuration of the redundant leg-wheel vehicle was determined.  Motion control for redundancy resolution and balancing was formulated Introduction Dynamics Simulation Conclusion

MECHANICAL and AEROSPACE ENGINEERING