AB-CO Review September 20 2005 Session on circuit commissioning Session on circuit commissioning Post-Mortem requirements F. Rodríguez-Mateos on behalf.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jan Uythoven, AB/BTLHCCWG, 3 May 2006 Page GeV Commissioning Machine Protection Needs to be commissioned to: Prevent damage with the used, higher.
Advertisements

1 15 April 2010: Post Mortem Analysis by M.Zerlauth Automatic POWERING EVENT Analysis Adam, Arek, Gert-Jan, Ivan, Knud, Hubert, Markus, Nikolai, Nikolay,
Proposal for measurements on RB.A81 on 1st September August 2010 Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to A. Verweij.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
1 Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Project CSCM Mini Review Powering Implementation H. Thiesen 30 November 2011.
Powering Group of Circuit Doubts and proposals of the procedure reviewing team (Gianluigi, Rob, Sandrine, Matteo, Boris) Ref document: LHC-MPP-HCP-071.
An Example Use Case Scenario
MP3 report : W49 (6 slides, 6’) J.Ph Tock for the MP3 team Since oral report last week (24 th of November) 1JPhT – LMC 1st of December 2010.
Operational tools Laurette Ponce BE-OP 1. 2 Powering tests and Safety 23 July 2009  After the 19 th September, a re-enforcement of access control during.
TE-MPE-EP, RD, 06-Dec QPS Data Transmission after LS1 R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP TIMBER PM WinCC OA Tsunami warning:
Chamonix Risks due to UPS malfunctioning Impact on the Superconducting Circuit Protection System Hugues Thiesen Acknowledgments:K. Dahlerup-Petersen,
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
Powering of the Superconducting Circuits: Procedures and Strategies for Circuit Validation Antonio Vergara on behalf of the Hardware Commissioning Coordination.
LHC Hardware Commissioning Review May 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 LHC Hardware Commissioning Review Contribution ID: 20 – Quality assurance and.
HC Review, May 2005 Hardware Commissioning Review Hardware Commissioning Review Quality Assurance and Documentation of Results Félix Rodríguez Mateos,
CERN Rüdiger Schmidt FCC week 2015 Long Magnet Stringpage 1 Incident September 19 th Architecture of powering and protection systems for high field.
1 Beam Plans for Accelerator Systems: The Machine Protection System Jan Uythoven On behalf of the MPWG and the MPS Commissioning WG Special thanks to R.Schmidt,
Update and status for the Work Unit ‘Energy Extraction’ - equipping the three test benches for series testing of Super-FRS Dipoles D2, D3, D4 and Quadrupoles.
Training LHC Powering R. Denz Quench Protection System R. Denz AT-MEL.
PostMortem Workshop January LHC “Post Mortem” Workshop: Introduction Initiative by Robin Lauckner, Adriaan Rijllart and myself, helped by many other.
HC Review F. Rodriguez-Mateos Powering tests The outcome of the work conducted within HCWG and many discussions among colleagues.
Essential lessons from commissioning of the 28 EE systems of LHC sector A corrector circuits.
Power Converters and DC cablesSlide 1/.. LHC - HC review Hugues THIESEN – AB/PO Thursday, 12 May 2005 Water cooled cables warm bus bars power converter.
1 Commissioning and Early Operation – View from Machine Protection Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Thanks to the members of the MPWG.
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
NQPS commissioning …a long way to go. Topics nQPS component overview Enhancements in Firmware Commissioning diagram Detailed task list Summary.
SAFETY DURING HARDWARE COMMISSIONING, 18 October 2007, D. Bozzini, AT/MEL-EM 1 Safety during Hardware Commissioning Davide Bozzini on behalf of the ELQA.
Andrzej Siemko On behalf of the MPP-GMPMA Task Force: (A. Ballarino, R. Denz, B. Khomenko, A.Perrin, P. Pugnat, A. Rijllart, L. Serio, A. Siemko, A. Vergara.
MP3 List of main Issues during March 2010 MP3 - Team.
1 15 April 2010: Post Mortem Analysis by M.Zerlauth Automated analysis of Powering Events – Progress update.
OVERVIEW OF THE NEW FEATURES PVSS SCADA SYSTEMS USED DURING HCC MP3 - Frédéric BERNARD.
MA PM performance, Adriaan Rijllart Post Mortem data handling and performance Adriaan Rijllart, Beno î t Pannetier, Boris Khomenko, Greg Kruk,
Other Utilities of ALBA LLRF
Post Mortem Workshop Session 4 Data Providers, Volume and Type of Analysis Beam Instrumentation Stéphane Bart Pedersen January 2007.
PM System Architecture Front-Ends, Servers, Triggering Ingredients Workshop on LHC Post Mortem Session 1 – What exists - PM System, Logging, Alarms Robin.
[R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In Charge of LHC] HWC Workshop ( ) Consolidation and major changes that have impact on the powering circuits.
1 J. Mourao (TE/MPE/CP) Enhanced DQHDS functionality  Status for 2011  Increase Magnet diagnostic capabilities  Our proposals.
AB/CO Review, Interlock team, 20 th September Interlock team – the AB/CO point of view M.Zerlauth, R.Harrison Powering Interlocks A common task.
16-17 January 2007 Post-Mortem Workshop Logging data in relation with Post-Mortem and archiving Ronny Billen AB-CO.
Conclusions on UPS powering test and procedure I. Romera Acknowledgements: V. Chareyre, M. Zerlauth 86 th MPP meeting –
QPS high level controls LabView tools, an overview.
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
Training LHC Powering - Markus Zerlauth Powering Interlocks Markus Zerlauth AB/CO/MI.
MPP Workshop Status of Powering Interlocks I. Romera on behalf of MPE-MS MPP Workshop, 12 June 2015, I. Romera (TE-MPE)1.
MPP Meeting 07/03/2007 MPP Main Ring Magnet Performance Panel Meeting Wednesday 7th March 2007 Agenda: 1)Matters arising 2)Recommendations for the case.
An invitation to an open discussion We are team reviewing its performance globally We want to help each other to reach the objectives We know the other.
Interfacing the FMCM for additional protection in the LHC and the SPS- LHC/CNGS Transfer Lines to the CERN controls system Cristina Gabriel Casado, Interlock.
Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner Software Tools for Commissioning Robin Lauckner 28 th March, 2007.
MPE Workshop 14/12/2010 Post Mortem Project Status and Plans Arkadiusz Gorzawski (on behalf of the PMA team)
Machine Protection Review, Markus Zerlauth, 12 th April Magnet powering system and beam dump requests Markus Zerlauth, AB-CO-IN.
Training LHC Powering – Blanca Perea Solano From Individual System Tests to Powering to Nominal Blanca Perea on behalf of Hardware Commissioning Coordination.
Hardware Commissioning Review, R. Denz, 12-May Superconducting circuits: what remains to be done during hardware commissioning R. Denz AT-MEL-PM.
LHC Post Mortem Workshop - 1, CERN, January 2007 (slide 1/52) AB-CO Measurement & Analysis Present status of the individual.
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
Data providers Volume & Type of Analysis Kickers
DRY RUNS 2015 Status and program of the Dry Runs in 2015
2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium (NSS)
R. Denz, A. Gomez Alonso, AT-MEL-PM
Powering LHC magnets version 30/3/2007.
Minimum Hardware Commissioning – Disclaimer
SCADA for Remote Industrial Plant
Powering the LHC Magnets
Powering from short circuit tests up to nominal
Re-Commissioning (IST) of Electrical Systems: QPS, EE & PIC
Detailed global view on protection and detection of the circuits
Initial Experience with the Machine Protection System for LHC
Machine Protection Xu Hongliang.
Machine Protection System Commissioning plans
Operation of Target Safety System (TSS)
Review of hardware commissioning
Presentation transcript:

AB-CO Review September Session on circuit commissioning Session on circuit commissioning Post-Mortem requirements F. Rodríguez-Mateos on behalf of the SACEC sub-Working Group

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM Outline  Setting the scene  Purpose of PM  A reliable system  Data sent to the PM database  Other data required for the analysis of an event  The three facets of analysis  IST requirements  HC requirements  Final remarks

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM Setting the scene  I will concentrate on the superconducting magnet circuits since it is there that major efforts are necessary and provided  These slides are the result of many discussions at SACEC , among colleagues from many groups and not least, our experience in String 1 and 2 facilities over a few years  Post-Mortem in the title of this talk refers to: PM database PM client interface The data sent by the clients Data retrieval and browser Analysis tools (manual and automatic)  Sub-Working Group of HCWG which deals with the Software Applications for the Commissioning of Electrical Circuits;

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM  Monitor the proper functioning of the systems related to the s.c. electrical circuits, namely QPS, PIC and Power Converters (not in arbitrary order)  Verify their crosstalk and interdependencies Which system triggered first? Why did it trigger? Which systems were subsequently triggered and why (crosstalk, dependencies)? What are the effects to the first triggering system? What are the effects to the other systems triggered? Purpose of PM (1/2)  Improve efficiency (rapid analysis, anticipation of misbehavior of equipment, etc)  Diagnostic tool

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM Purpose of PM (2/2)  PM is NOT only used when something goes wrong!  It is regularly used during: The Individual System Tests (IST) of the QPS The Hardware Commissioning Procedure (HCP) for the interlocks (PIC and interfaces) The tests at different current levels taking place during the powering-to-nominal phase  A condition to power is that all the transient recorders in the equipment are ON and that the PM database and the PM client interface are operational (same applies to Logging)

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM A reliable system…  If PM data are lost: Tremendous difficulty to make any diagnostic in a superconducting magnet chain All the commissioning sequence must be repeated before powering the circuit again  Hence the need for a secured and reliable data … Collection Transmission Storage Retrieval

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM Detection threshold reached Detector triggersCurrent loop open Quench loop controller changes state Interlock activated Quench heater power supply triggered Heaters fired 10.5 ms2.5 ms1 ms0.1 ms 1.5 ms Energy extraction triggered Current commuted to dump resistor 8 ms AMC local buffer filled AMG on QLC buffer filled PIC History buffer created AMS controller buffer filled A case study: A quench in a main dipole t PC aborted PC PM buffer filled Data sent to the PM database (1/3)

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM Data sent to the PM database (2/3)  All post mortem buffers will be received by the corresponding gateways and shipped to the post mortem database Up to 4 gateways are involved (at least 3) In parallel, logging continues when filling the post mortem buffer  Important for 13 kA EE systems All QPS/EE systems are blind while shipping the buffer to the gateway  Amount of data and transmission rate Size of typical QPS post mortem buffer: 61 kByte Transmission rate per agent (independent of number of agents sending buffers): 480 Byte/s 50 buffers for a typical case : 3 24 kByte/s within 3 min A case study: quench in a main dipole for the QPS

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM Data sent to the PM database (3/3)  There are three main systems sending transient data buffers to the Post-Mortem database  QPS … Will be the largest PM client About 45’000 signals are included in circular buffers stopping in case of quench or other event (see EDMS doc. no ) Signals generated by about 2000 controllers with internal trigger and “local” time stamp with ±1 ms precision wrt to UTC time Maximum sampling rate around 200 Hz  Power Converters … Internal trigger (also external -timing-) I ref, V ref, I meas, V meas are recorded at 100 Hz over 40 s I meas is recorded at 1 kHz over 16 s There is a buffer running at a sampling rate of 50 Hz over 5 min State transitions are time-stamped at ±1 μs precision wrt UTC  PIC … Internal trigger History buffers of state changes with ±1 ms precision wrt to UTC time Time stamp precision across systems is fundamental for the reconstruction of an event

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM Other data required for the analysis of an event  Besides the “fast” data from the three systems above, other signals coming from systems with no transient recorders are required. This implies the need for importing into the event analysis data from the Logging Database  Cryogenics ( ref. L. Serio, AT/ACR ) Sector Cryo Ok Cell T max Cell pressure Quench valve position Pressure in line D P, T and position of discharge valve to quench buffer  Vacuum ( ref. P. Cruikshank, AT/VAC ) Beam vacuum total pressure Sector valves status Ion pumps current Insulation vacuum total pressure  Other signals -Under study-

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM The three facets of analysis We have identified three major axis where the work is being focused:  A data viewer (interactive browser) with standard features that are well known since the String days: easy data retrieval view data y=f(t) in engineering units several curves from different systems on same plot, in different scales several plots per page, several pages zooming, cursors, highlighting of signals,...  Analysis of the sequence of events Verification that the chronological order is what it is expected  Analysis of waveforms Verification that deduced parameters are within the expected range  and  lead to the way of automation (pattern recognition for sequences and curves)

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM … automatic analysis: sequence  at magnet level quench detection heater firing all heaters fired coherency flag ok  at circuit level quench detection in other elements (magnets, bus bars, current leads) opening of the quench loop opening of energy extraction change of status in PIC switching the power converter off  at sub-sector level switching other power converters off opening of energy extraction in other circuits quench detection in other magnets heaters fired in other magnets

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM … automatic analysis: waveforms Analysis software must be capable to…  calculate extraction voltage and its time constant circuit current time constant heater discharge and time constants dV r /dt at quench  measure maximum magnet voltage at quench maximum circuit voltage  detect time to exceed a threshold diode conducting/blocking  check coincidence of multiple curves voltage across magnets

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM IST requirements  QPS For their IST in LSS8L, end of November 2005, the QPS team needs  the PM database and interface operational  data viewer operational Later, for IST in the arc in April 2006,  the automatic analysis tools with reduced functionality (to be defined)  PIC No special needs during ISTs For the check of interlocks in LSS8L (PIC1), PM must be operational at the same level as for QPS in February 2006  Power Converters No special requests during ISTs

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM HC requirements  For the first powering in LSS8L (February 2006) PM should be fully operational by mid January 2006 for dry runs First validation and refinement of the automatic analysis during the tests a quasi permanent evolution

AB-CO Review September 20, 2005FRM Final remarks  Lists of signals with right naming (w.r.t. the naming conventions) and attributes have been completed by the responsible groups  The browser is well advanced  Discussions to define automatic analysis features have started  Automatic analysis … does not mean:  “We don’t need to look at the curves, the software says it is ok”  “Automatic green light for next powering” … is a fundamental tool to help and do calculations for us