DIET OF SLIMY SCULPIN IN A TRIBUTARY TO SKANEATELES LAKE M. A. CHALUPNICKI and J. H. JOHNSON USGS Great Lakes Science Center Tunison Laboratory of Aquatic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
David McCormick & Simon Harrison
Advertisements

Biological Response of Two North Central PA Streams After Flood of September 2011 Fred Rogers CWI, Supervisor Dr. Mel Zimmerman Introduction: Within Pennsylvania,
Leaf Pack Experiments Aquatic Ecology. Background Historically, most small streams in the eastern United States were forested. Leaf fall from the forest.
Daily Patterns of Aquatic Insect Activity at the Surface of a Northeastern Iowa Trout Stream Katie J. Hopp and Kirk J. Larsen Luther College, Department.
Fish and Zooplankton Interactions Wetzel Chapter 16, pp
Norine E. Dobiesz James R. Bence Prey consumption by key predators in Lake Huron Predator-prey interactions:
Levels of Ecological Organization in Freshwater Systems Population Community Ecosystem.
Stream Ecology (NR 280) Topic 9 – Species Interactions Herbivory Predation Competition.
Lake Michigan 2011 Status and Trends of Prey Fish Populations Chuck Madenjian, Bo Bunnell, Tim Desorcie, Margi Chriscinske, Melissa Kostich, and Jean Adams.
With a special focus on Mayflies, Caddisflies, and Stoneflies Aquatic Entomology & Benthic Macroinvertebrates.
Characteristics of Channel Darter Habitat in the Winooski River, Vermont Douglas E. Facey and Shannon M. O ‘Brien Department of Biology Saint Michael’s.
Food Webs A food web describes the feeding relations among organisms in all or part of a community Usually those feeding relations are described by a diagram.
Rachel Piening Ecology 303 Abstract Introduction Literature Review Methods and Materials Data and Results Conclusion References.
Do installed steam logjams increase macroinvertebrate richness and abundance? Seyeon Kim and Ong Xiong with faculty mentor Dr. Todd Wellnitz Biology Department.
Bacteria Harpacticoid Gymnamoeba. Trophic Relationships among Bacteria, Gymnamoebae (Protozoans) and Harpacticoids in the Sediments of Otsego Lake Paul.
Ecology: Lecture 17 Community structure.
Climate, Ecosystems, and Fisheries A UW-JISAO/Alaska Fisheries Science Center Collaboration Jeffrey M. Napp Alaska Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries.
Age-structured assessment of three Aleutian fish stocks with predator-prey interactions Doug Kinzey School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of.
Quantitative Genetics
An Investigation of the Effect of Turbidity on the Diel Vertical Migration of Zooplankton in the Chincoteague Bay, VA. James Bergenti, Department of Biology,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Great Lakes Science Center Great Lakes Research.
Native Bees Along Elevation Gradients as Bioindicators of Climate Change Scott Daniels 1, Dave Smith 2, Neil Cobb 3 1. Cesar Chavez High School, Laveen,
Lake Superior Benthic Fish Community Structure By Michael H. Hoff U.S. Geological Survey Great Lakes Science Center.
Science & Technology in the Environment Ecology – Summarize how ecology and the environment affect an organism’s ability to adapt or change.
Introduction Oithona similis is the most abundant copepod in the Gulf of Alaska, and is a dominant in many ecosystems from the poles to the sub-tropics.
Comparing aquatic macroinvertebrates communities between native and invasive plant species in Mill Creek Shelly Wesner Department of Biological Sciences,
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has classified hydrogen peroxide as a low regulatory priority drug when used at concentrations of up to 500.
Modeling the Effects of Stream Microhabitat on Group Size and Foraging Success of Juvenile Coho Salmon William Hintz, Matthew Faust, and Mitch Banach Dr.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invertebrate Communities as Tools for Establishing Minimum Flows and Levels in Florida Streams.
Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Fish Larval Assemblages of the Tebrau Straits South Western Johore Peninsular Malaysia By A. Arshad, Roushon A., S.
A Comparative Stream Study of Two First Order Streams in Nixon Park, York PA Susan Price Department of Biological Sciences, York College Introduction Macroinvertebrates.
What can parameters about a fish can we measure that relate to feeding? What environmental factors influence fish feeding? What biotic factors influence.
Why Study Diets??. The Life of a Diet Sample Background to foraging Why is it important to analyze diets? Collecting diet samples Identifying diet components.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
LOTIC ECOSYSTEMS Flowing water Moving continuously in one direction. Headwaters- Where the river or streams begin. Rivers are created in two ways: 1.
Effects of Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) on Nesting Tree Swallows.
1 ? 2 5 Basic types of species interactions
Jennifer M. Marsh M.S. Fisheries Student School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Background to Foraging. C.S. Buzz Holling aka "the man" Functional response was developed based on a 1959 paper These eating These.
Understanding Your Data Set Statistics are used to describe data sets Gives us a metric in place of a graph What are some types of statistics used to describe.
ABSTRACT Species in natural communities are linked together by the transfer of energy and nutrients. We investigated the effects of top predators on nutrient.
Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of three common methods for studying the diet of raptor nestlings on two Accipiter species. Kuang-ying Huang,
Effects of simulated climate change on the abundance of an exotic weevil, Cyrtepistomus castaneus Bryan Marbert (ASU ) and Paul Hanson (ORNL) Contact Information:
Impact of Native Tree Species Foliage on Aquatic Invertebrate Communities Branden Birth Department of Biological Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania.
Aquatic Invasive Species Distribution Geography 1820.
Feeding Behavior of Myotis lucifugus and Eptesicus fuscus Holt,J.,G. Basinsky, T. Floria, R. Friesen, A. Page, and J. Paula. Department of Biology, Fitchburg.
Relationships between fish predators and prey Bottom up
Introduction Egg production in copepod species may be the largest component of copepod production and is a parameter routinely monitored in ecosystem studies.
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
Preliminary analysis of nearshore food web changes in Lake Michigan inferred from isotopic analysis of yellow perch scales Craig A. Stricker 1, Brent A.
The Effects of Lake Productivity and Campsite Usage on Crayfish Abundance Within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Sarah Schieffer, Nicole Bauer, Brandon.
OMSAP Public Meeting September 1999 Nearfield Hard-bottom Benthic Communities Barbara Hecker Hecker Environmental September 23, 1999.
Introduction Many species of fish use Great Lake Coastal Wetlands (GLCW) at some point during their lives. Shorebirds use GLCW as stopover points during.
13. Sediment and aquatic habitat in rivers (a)Benthic organisms and bed sediments (b)Fish and bed sediments (c)Reach classification based on bed material.
What questions do ecologists ask about communities? Structure Dynamics Function How many species? How do they compare in abundance? Who eats who? How do.
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. AP Environmental Science Mr. Grant Lesson 31 Ecological Communities.
Queen Angelfish Aaron Papa PERIOD 5. SCIENTIFIC CLASSIFICATION COMMON NAME: Queen Angelfish KINGDOM: Animalia PHYLUM: Chordata CLASS: Osteichthyes ORDER:
Egg production rates of Pseudocalanus mimus and Pseudocalanus newmani in the Gulf of Alaska R.R. Hopcroft, C. Clarke, & A.I. Pinchuk Institute of Marine.
Diets. Why are diets important? What information do they tell us? What questions do they answer? Fish’s view –Source of energy (bioen) Managers view –Stocking.
Chesapeake Bay: An Introduction to an Ecosystem Section 4: Communities II-1E4: Swimmers View this quiz as a slide show from “the beginning” During the.
A review of information for part 1 and part two… with an introduction to part 3.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Efficacy and Toxicity of Chloramine T Disinfection on Cisco Fry G. E. MACKEY, M. A. CHALUPNICKI, J. H. JOHNSON USGS Great Lakes Science Center, Tunison.
Vertical Distribution of Larvae off the Coast of Assateague Island, Virginia Carlee Kaisen Department of Biological Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania.
Initial Assessment of Habitat Use by Stocked Lake Sturgeon in the Genesee River D. E. DITTMAN 1 and E. C. ZOLLWEG 2 1 Tunison Laboratory of Aquatic Science,
Impacts of Lake Organisms on Terrestrial Systems
Using Benthic Macroinvertebrate Populations to Assess Campus
Nathan Servey, Brennan Dow, Brittany Burant and Mason Loden
Ecological Pyramids.
Gut Content Analysis in Fishes
Presentation transcript:

DIET OF SLIMY SCULPIN IN A TRIBUTARY TO SKANEATELES LAKE M. A. CHALUPNICKI and J. H. JOHNSON USGS Great Lakes Science Center Tunison Laboratory of Aquatic Science Cortland, NY INTRODUCTIONRESULTS METHODS The feeding ecology of benthic fish in cold water streams have typically been overlooked but play an important role in supporting larger fish communities. Slimy sculpin (Cottus cognatus, Figure 1) are a native benthic fish of the Great Lakes that often dominates the benthic ecosystem of cold water streams and are very important in predator/prey interactions. Prior to the invasion of round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) and zebra/quagga mussels (Dreissena polymorpha/ Dreissena bugensis) in the Finger Lakes, slimy sculpin were the major component of the bottom community supporting the larger fish community. Although they are known to be benthic insectivores, their widespread range of cold water stream and lake habitats enables them to be specific in their diet based on local benthic invertebrate community composition. As part of understanding the ecological food web position of coldwater streams in New York, we characterized the diets of slimy sculpin in Grout Brook, the major tributary to Skaneatelas Lake over a 24-h period. DISCUSSION ABSTRACT:In the fall, we examined the diel feeding ecology of slimy sculpin (Cottus Cognatus) from Grout Brook, a tributary to Skaneateles Lake. Of the six time periods examined, slimy sculpin consumed the least during the nighttime (2400-h and 0400-h). Chironomids were consumed the most during all time periods except for 2400-h where Ephemeropterans were consumed the most. There was a moderate preference by slimy sculpin for food from the benthos (0.59 ± 0.06) with Diptera (Chironomids), Ephemeroptera (Baetidae) and Trichoptera (Brachycentridae) the major taxon groups. Slimy sculpin do not appear to select specific prey but behave opportunistically to what is available in the brook. Computed daily ration and index of fullness ranged from 0.12 to 0.22 and 1.15% across the diel cycle, respectively. Estimates of daily consumption ranged from % to 4.0% of their body weight which is in the same range of estimates from other species in the literature. Skaneateles Lake (Figure 2) is one of smaller the Finger Lakes of central New York and one of the cleanest. Grout Brook is a north flowing tributary that is the major water source that enters into southern Skaneateles Lake. The brook is a small cold water tributary that is a major spawning stream for numerous migratory species, including rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), brown trout (Salmo trutta), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and white sucker (Catostomus commersoni). Slimy sculpin are abundant in the stream, and along with juvenile rainbow trout are the dominant fish species. We conducted a systematic diel diet evaluation of slimy sculpin in the lower reaches of Grout Brook using a backpack electroshocker to collect approximately 30 Slimy sculpin within a 300-m stretch of the brook every 4-h over a 24-h period. Fish collected were placed immediately in 10% buffered formalin until diet evaluation in the laboratory. We also collected available benthic prey concurrent with fish collections at specific intervals to quantify food sources within the brook using a Surber every eight hours and consisted of a 3 minute agitation of the stream bottom to quantify bottom prey. Contents of all three nets were pooled together and preserved in 90% ethanol until identification in the laboratory. Slimy sculpin stomachs were removed and weighed prior to contents being identified. Taxa found in the diet as well as collected for available prey were generally identified to family and enumerated. Diet composition and available prey composition were quantified based on the dry weight for each taxon (105 0 C for 24-h). Diel feeding patterns during each 4-h period were evaluated by dividing the wet weight of the full stomach by the wet weight of the entire fish to provide an estimate of feeding periodicity. Feeding periodicity estimates were also used in estimating the 24-h diet of slimy sculpin (i.e., specific 4-h intervals where feeding was highest contributed more to the 24-h diet). Diet overlap among the six time periods was compared by calculating overlap coefficients (Cλ). Coefficient values range from 0, when there are no similarities, to 1, when samples are identical. Values ≥0.60 are considered biologically significant. Because the Shapiro-Wilks test showed that the data were not normally distributed, we used the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance test to examine differences in mean length (TL, mm ± SE), weight (W, g ± SE), and feeding intensity (g ± SE) among the six time periods Statistix 8.0 statistical software (Statistix 8.0, Tallahassee, Florida). A Linear Food Selection Index was used to quantify prey selection in the diet in relation to the benthos. In order to estimate the consumptive demand of slimy sculpin we derived a daily ration and an index of fullness using equations set by Mychek-Londer and Bunnell (2013). In order to facilitate comparison to other studies of other fish we estimated specific feeding rates (g g-1 d-1) by dividing daily ration dry weight by fish dry weight. Figure 2: Southern Skaneateles Lake Figure 1: Slimy Sculpin Figure 3: Diet of Slimy Sculpin at 4-h intervals over a 24-h period Figure 4: Benthic community composition every 8-h over a 24-h period Figure 5: Slimy sculpin diet periodicity as a function of percent body weight over a 24-h period Figure 7: Slimy sculpin daily ration as a function of fish body weight Figure 8: Slimy sculpin index of fullness as a function of fish body weight Figure 6: Slimy sculpin diet selectivity analysis of preferred prey We recovered 22 prey taxon from slimy sculpin examined with eight taxon contributing 94.7% of the diet. Baetids (33.1%) and chironomids (33.1%) were the dominate prey items in the 24-h diet (Figure 3). Peak consumption of baetids occurred at 2400-h and 0400-h and stayed a consistent food source throughout the rest of the time periods. Chironomid larvae were consumed the heaviest in the early night and mid-day hours (0800-h, 1600-h, 2000-h) and also provided a substantial food source throughout the rest of the time periods as well. Brachiocentrid larvae were also present at similar levels of consumption as chironomid larvae with a peak at mid-afternoon (1600-h) but were more consistent in the diets throughout all time periods (14.9%-34.1%) except mid-morning (0800-h) where they were not present. Other dipteran, trichopteran and ephemeropteran prey were also fed upon throughout the day but at lower intensities. We recovered 23 prey taxon in the benthos with six taxon comprising 83.7% of the available prey (Figure 2). Trichopteran larvae were the most abundant available prey member (32.3%, Figure 4) and remained at high densities through all time intervals in the bottom community assemblages while baetid and plecopterian densities peaked during mid-morning and were reduced in abundance at night. Taxa from the diet and benthos that contributed less than 1% were combined into an “Other” category. Slimy sculpin diets contents had a high degree of similarity with the benthos community except during mid-morning (0800-h) (Table 1). Diet composition was similar during all time periods (Table 2). Food consumption of slimy sculpin was highest during mid-morning and did not differ throughout the day and into the night until early morning (Figure 5). Slimy sculpin do not appear to select specific prey but were opportunistic, consuming the most readily available benthic prey (Figure 6). Computed daily ration and index of fullness equations were y=0.415e x and y=1.1265x (Figure 7 and 8). Mean daily ration (0.171 g dry wt.) across the seven time periods sampled ranged between 0.12 to 0.22 g dry wt. (Table 3). Mean index of fullness for slimy sculpin (1.15 %) across the seven time periods sampled ranged between % (Table 3). Computed daily consumption estimates was 0.78% over the 24-h period and ranged from 0.007% to 4.0% during the diel cycle. Table 1: Diet overlap values between fish diet and benthic community Fish Stom Fish Stom Table 2: Diet overlap values between fish diet through sampled time periods Table 3: Sample Counts, Mean Index of Fullness and Daily Ration The feeding activity of slimy sculpin was observed to shift from baetids during the day to dipteran larvae at night. This shift in activity is consistent with the literature where authors note the fullest gut contents during night hours. The primary food source of mayfly nymphs and chironomid larvae is also consistent with previous studies noting chironomids and mayfly nymphs comprising upwards of 90% of the diet. The results of this study also suggest that the high degree of similarity between slimy sculpin diet and the benthic community represents active consumption of prey peaking highest during the mid-morning when they are the most active. This is further confirmed by utilization of chironomid larvae which comprised a portion of the diet of sculpin and were abundant in the benthos. Very little information was available for daily ration comparison. In one other study where a ration value was computed for slimy sculpin, the authors reported a value that was 31% lower than our ration value, which can be related to different food web conditions between lake and stream populations. Other species such as Arctic Cod (Boreogadus saida), Bloater (Coregonus hoyi), and Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus) have similar reported food consumption values ( %). However, these species are at colder temperatures in a lake environment than Grout Brook would reach. In one other study where specific feeding rates for slimy sculpin were determined our values were higher likely due to different bottom community assemblages and temperatures between lakes and streams. These data provide useful insights into the trophic ecology of slimy sculpin and allow a baseline comparison of food consumption with lake populations.