SuperB Integration SuperB Experimental hall. Related topics of Slac D&D activities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assembly Hall in Hybrid-A’ and ILD 2014/9/6 Yasuhiro Sugimoto 1.
Advertisements

V. Carassiti - Princeton (USA) 9-13/01/ BABAR IFR UPGRADE DETECTOR ASSEMBLING AND MOUNTING.
AMS-02 tracker mechanics status of assembly and integration Inner tracker integration completion: - Assembly and cabling - Temperature and magnetic field.
Global Design Effort Detector concept # Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Name September 17, 2007.
October 22, 2003H.J. Krebs1 LST Mechanical Design Review 2005 IR-2 Installation Discussion H.J. Krebs October 22, 2003.
March 23, 2009H.J. Krebs1 BaBar D&D Schedule & Budget Overview H. James Krebs March 23, 2009.
October 22, 2003H.J. Krebs1 LST Mechanical Design Review Mechanical Installation Preparation H. James Krebs October 21, 2003.
Experimental Area Meeting V. Bobillier1 Good connection to earth (in many points) of every metallic parts to be installed in the cavern is very.
Remote manipulations / diagnostics in radioactive areas and handling of radioactive material Workshop, Geneva, Switzerland 6 th May 2013 THE REPLACEMENT.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto ILD MDI/Integration 1.
Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Design Effort Safety Requirements for IR Conventional Facilities and Siting Group Safety Requirements for IR.
31, May 2007 ILC DESY 07 1 Surface Building Design Development Tom Lackowski GDE.
Background Issues: Real Time Radiation Measurement S.M.Yang EPC.IHEP Mini-Workshop on BEPCII Background Study March 2008 Institute of High Energy.
Material Disposition Planning Olga Ligeti Radiation Protection Department MARCH 24, 2009.
TGC Big wheel Sector assembly plan Tatsuo Kawamoto ATLAS workshop 2005.
Hall D Civil and Detector Progress Elliott Wolin 12-Sep-2002 U. Of Regina Middle of Nowhere Canada.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto 1.
1 5 December 2012 Laurent Roy Infrastructure / Electronics Upgrade -Cabling (long distance) -Rack and Crate (space, electrical distribution, cooling) -Detector.
ANU Shutdown Status AEM meeting Cons Gattuso 7 May 2012.
1 Discussion for basic options — engineering video conference July 12, 2006 Outline Water pool — advantages — issues, problems, engineering options Aquarium.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
September 18, 2007H. J. Krebs1 SiD Collaboration One Piece End Door Design Concept plus Forward Equipment Interfaces H. James Krebs SLAC September 18,
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
ORKA Preservation Task Force ORKA Preservation Task Force first meeting Wednesday, February 8, Notes by Peter H. Garbincius Notes from meeting are.
Transport & Handling of Detectors TAN Workshop S. Prodon –
3/20/11 ALCPG11 Global Design Effort 1 CFS Detector Hall Considerations Tom Lackowski.
1/13 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 9, 2006) Mount.
Global Design Effort - CFS DESY Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ACCELERATOR INTEGRATION AND DESIGN MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
February 14, Comprehensive Review B. Schmidt Outline: Status and overview of activities: –Platforms and staircases –Muon Filters and beam plugs.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
DON LYNCH NOVEMBER 6, AGENDA November 4, BABAR Magnet Update Global Design Concept – Update Outer HCal Structural Analysis (2 nd pass) sPHENIX.
Tomelleri S.r.l. ® Copyright 2007 © ASTRONOMY AND RESEARCH July 23rd 2008 VST Meeting1.
SPHENIX MECHANICAL D. Lynch August 21, /15/2014sPHENIX Mechanical Design.
May 31, 2010Bill Wisniewski1 Mechanical Integration Issues.
SECONDARY BEAM HANDLING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN STATUS BRUNO FERAL (CERN/EN) DIAMANTO SMARGIANAKI (CERN/EN) Project Leader: I.Efthymiopoulos (Cern/EN)
Integration Prototype1 BaBar Integration as a Prototype for SuperB Bill Wisniewski SuperB Workshop at LNF 6 April 2011.
1. Road to the EDR 2 Requirements Safety system Transfer line concept Plant concept design Requirements Evaporator concept and performance Transfer line.
LHCb CO 2 cooling meeting Burkhard Schmidt – May 20,
Cryogenics for SuperB IR Magnets J. G. Weisend II SLAC National Accelerator Lab.
DTU A VISION OF SUPPORTING NEUTRON CHOPPER ESS PT 1 - BUNKER SYSTEMS Discussion Document.
SuperB Experimental hall General considerations on the Babar experimental area Preliminary space requirements hall proposal. A floor plan. Specification.
June 2, 2008 Bill Wisniewski1 BaBar Disassembly and Disposal Overview.
Comments on Services Elba Comments on Services & … Bill Wisniewski SLAC.
October 6, 2009Bill Wisniewski1 State of drawings Remedies? Forward Region DIRC/DCH/EMC interplay Road Trip Discussion Beam pipe & forward cone plug ‘Quick’
01 June 2011F. Raffaelli1 Super B Mechanical integration. List of reference persons and institutions for the mechanic of the sub detectors. Review of the.
Kitakami Side AHCAL Assembly or anywhere in any detector.
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
Miscellaneous MEC Topics Mainz, CM September 2016, MEC Session J
Experimental Hall in Mountain Regions
Integration meeting F.Raffaelli
ETD PID meeting We had many presentations dedicated to the PM test .
CLIC Handling Engineering Update
Miscellaneous Topics MEC Session, CM March 2017 at GSI J. Lühning, GSI
Detector Utility/Service Cavern
Introduction BaBar Components The Problem IFR Upgrade: 2004 & 2005
Experimental hall design in Japanese site
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
Update of experimental hall in Japanese mountain site
SuperB Experimental Hall
Integration and IR Hall
Detector hall in mountain regions
L H C A T L A S International Collaboration on the LHC Project
SuperB Integration Summary of previous integration sessions.
Inner DET. Integration Inner detector envelope Radial clearances.
Limited Streamer Tube Project Summary
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
SuperB Integration Summary of the Integration Status
DS20k Integration Workshop
Presentation transcript:

SuperB Integration SuperB Experimental hall. Related topics of Slac D&D activities.

SuperB Experimental hall General considerations on the Babar experimental area Preliminary space requirements hall proposal. A floor plan. Specification step plan. Conclusions

General considerations on the Babar experimental area Babar Floor plan is about 38mX22m The actual space in the interaction area does not allow an easy access to the detector for maintenances. The doors can not clear complete the central part of the detector (IFR). The new inner tracker + machine interface will require maybe more longitudinal space for extraction. The position of the beam axis respected to the floor should be increase at least of.5m + the increase of the steel size. The previous beam height from the floor was 3.5m The overhead crane hook high was 34.10’ ( 10.39meter). It was not comfortable for assembly the detector. We need to increase at least.5 meter or more.

General considerations m Assembly configuration Architecture of the Babar experimental area 38m

General considerations m Running configuration Architecture of the Babar experimental area 38m

Preliminary space requirements hall proposal. Assuming to adopt the Babar architecture is necessary for the independence of accelerator and detector activities. Other advantages: a) Only a big crane can handle all the heavy parts b)the tooling for preparation and adjusting are present in only one place; c) Commissioning of the subsector using the final services. 1)We need a large collision area for an easy maintenance. 2)A temporary storage and preparation area for mounting parts. 3) Enough space for the required service. 4) Space for mounting the detector. 5) We need to decided if it necessary to have an area for the service accessible during all phases, assembly commissioning and running.

A floor plan proposals. 1)Super B detector assembled, commissioned at proper beam axis distance, minimizing the travel to his final position. 2)It is important to define the beam axis position respect to the ground level. Depending of what we could have: a) a pit with a crane on surface level; b) a dedicate access ramp. 3)The two configurations have an impact of the way of organizing the handling and commissioning of the sub detector and safety issues. 4)The accelerator tunnel will be enlarged in the interaction area to locate the machine apparatus. This must be integrate in the design of the experimental hall.

A floor plan proposals. Assembly stage Radiation shielding

A floor plan proposals. Assembly stage

A floor plan proposals. Assembly stage

A floor plan proposals.

Beam pipe location

Specifications Step Plan. (SSP) 1)Define the architecture of the experimental area such that makes the works of the detector and accelerator people easy and economical. This work needs to be made involving the machine people that are the interface with the experimental area. I believe that the solution with an access ramp in which everything is at the same level is the more economical and efficient. 2)We need to get all the information from the sub component and detector in term of needs of service (size, position respect to detector, energy dissipated and cooling required, etc). In the region of the interaction we need to establish a direct line with the machine people. Furthermore to understand better of the requirements of detectors in term of accuracy, environmental control services, this will add many specification to the experimental area. 3)Iteration while the design of the experiment will be in progress will make changes on the specification document.

Conclusions At this stage of the project is premature to go in deep in precise study when it is not clear for instance location space available for access, constrain on environmental impact,etc. We need to have an interaction with the machine people to understand: the machine equipment near to the detector; the position of the tunnel; the constrain of the experimental building. A better understanding of the requirements of detectors services, this will add many specification to the experimental area. To gathering all the information we need to start circulating some questionnaire to all people involved of detector.

Questionnaire. SuperB integration questionnaire Data: xx\xx\xx Sub detector name: Author: Electronics: Number of electronic channesl: Power dissipated per channels: Volume occupied by the electronics: Max tolerable distance between the detectors to the electronic module: Requirement of cooling system: Frequency access on the external electronic services per year: Frequency access on the detector per year: Cooling: Requirement of cooling system: Power, flow and temperature type of fluid: Allowed temperature variation: Size of the chiller: Cables: Power cable number: Power cable sizes: Number of Read-out cables: Size of the read-out cables: Number of slow control cables: Size of the slow control cables: Information on the cable distribution around the detector geometry Space for storage in the experimental hall and in fracture required. Describe other requirements that have an impact of the space available like space for access etc.

Related topics of Slac D&D activities Dismount Status Following: Disposal space at SLAC Transportation issues

Status at SLAC Bill Wisniewski

March 2009 Status at SLAC – QMUL 18

Installation of Solenoid Removal Tooling Status at SLAC – QMUL 19

LST and Brass Removal Status at SLAC – QMUL 20

Removal of Upper Arch Assembly Status at SLAC – QMUL 21

Top Sextants & Bottom Inner West Block Removed Status at SLAC – QMUL 22

Deconstructed Onion Storage – Outdoors Status at SLAC – QMUL 23 Now all full

Deconstructed Onion Storage_ CEH, IR2 Status at SLAC – QMUL 24

Deconstructed Onion Storage _ IR12 Status at SLAC – QMUL 25

Transportation issues Status at SLAC – QMUL 26 All Babar components has been dismount and disposed in the SLAC area. We need to decided what we want to get and make a list of the components with their physical data. We need to make a transportation planning that takes in account all aspects. Most of components can be shipped without making special packaging or studies, but still we need to find storage space. The electromagnetic calorimeter and bar box need engineering studies and the design of a transportation tooling.