U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Chesapeake Bay SEC Case Study: Stream and Floodplain Ecosystem Services Dianna Hogan, Emily Pindilli,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Economic Value of Water in the Green River Basin Ernie Niemi,ECONorthwest Watts and Associates Rio Verde Engineering Jeff Fassett Consulting.
Advertisements

Why economic valuation of Hima can be useful
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Wetland Functions and Values Fundamentals for Conservation Commissioners Training Program - Unit 5 Fundamentals for Conservation Commissioners Training.
South Llano River: One of 2011’sTop Ten National Fish Habitat Action Plan named SLR as “water to watch” WHY?? –Conserve freshwater, estuarine, and marine.
Role of Natural and Beneficial Functions in Community Sustainability EPA Programs Supporting Flood Risk Management and Community Sustainability Association.
Lesson Plans 1) Slides 4-11, Case Study Section 1 2) Case Study Section 2 and 3 3) Global circulation stations 4) Finish Notes on water 5) Water Diversions.
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
Watersheds Capture, Store And Safely Release Water.
Professor John Agard UWI Environment in Development.
Future Research NeedsWorld Heritage and Climate Change World Heritage and Climate Change - Future Research Needs Bastian Bomhard World Heritage Officer.
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
Landscape Ecology, Urban Forestry & Wetlands.  Woody vegetation in populated places  25% of forest canopy in US.
Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Division Assessing the Effectiveness of Restoration Technologies Elise Striz and Joe Williams.
Overview of Watershed Systems
CO 2 Valuing Virginia’s ECOSYSTEM Services
Bay Area IRWMP Public Workshop #1 July 23, OBJECTIVES I BAIRWMP-Goals and Objectives II. DWR Guidance- “Measures” III Process IV. Proposed.
Millennium Assessment (MA) 2003 Typology of Ecosystem Goods and Services Regulating Benefits obtained from regulation of ecosystem processes climate regulation.
A joint USDA, EPA, USGS, BLM, Univ. of Arizona, Univ. of New Mexico, and Univ. of Vermont program on the Assessment of Goods and Valuation of Ecosystem.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation & Open Space District Integrated Approach to Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation.
Eftec Economics for the Environment Consultancy Using ecosystem services for cost benefit analysis of forestry decisions Roundtable on Cost / Benefit of.
Jan 2005 Kissimmee Basin Projects Jan Kissimmee Basin Projects Kissimmee River Restoration Project (KRR) Kissimmee Chain of Lakes Long Term Management.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
InVEST Nirmal Bhagabati Emily McKenzie. Outline What is InVEST? – History of development – Scope, objectives, users – Conceptual approach and applications.
Amy’s slides for Lafarge road- tester presentation CEV launch at WRI May 3, 2011.
Emily Shimada, Environmental Science, University of Idaho Research Team B: Watershed Management in the Andean Paramo Faculty Advisors: Dr. Alex Fremier,
Step 1: Assess Riparian Resource Function Using PFC §1d. Complete PFC assessment l 17 questions about attributes and processes l Reminder – PFC based on:
Standards for Ecologically Successful River Restoration Palmer et al., 2005, Standards for Ecologically Successful River Restoration Palmer et al., 2005,
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
How can InVEST inform Bioeconomic Modeling?
Flooding New Orleans, Aug Flooding –Varies with intensity and amount of rainfall –Perhaps the most universally experienced natural hazard Flood.
Valuation of ecosystem services of Makira and Masoala Protected areas Michel Masozera.
Spatial mapping as a tool for mainstreaming biodiversity values Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de.
Stream Processes and Habitat Ryan Johnson. Overview Watershed Processes – Factors and their effects on the watershed as a whole Stream Processes – Factors.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Dr. Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water April 16, 2007 USGS: Water Resources Program.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Hydrologic and Water Quality Modeling of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Huan.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Watersheds Chapter 9. Watershed All land enclosed by a continuous hydrologic drainage divide and lying upslope from a specified point on a stream All.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
Corporate Ecosystem Valuation (CEV) Road Test Case Study: Lafarge May 3, 2011.
RIPARIAN PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION A Tool for Integrating the Fundamental Sciences into Collaborative Decision-Making.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Cooperating Partners Presentation October 12, 2006 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP) B S Strategies and Objectives C ANTA ARBARA OUNTY.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
U S Environmental Protection Agency
How do humans affect watersheds and the hydrologic cycle ?
Establishing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management On the Upper Mississippi River Dr. Ken Lubinski, USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center.
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Knowledge and research needs for wetlands and lakes IWRM presentation 18 November 2008 Johan Schutten Senior Wetland Ecologist SEPA.
DWA CORPORATE IDENTITY Presented by: Johan Maree Deputy Director: Media Production 12 December 2012 ECOSYSTEM SERVICES Greg Huggins.
Millennium Assessment (MA) 2003 Typology of Ecosystem Goods and Services Regulating Benefits obtained from regulation of ecosystem processes climate regulation.
Draft example: Indicators for water supply reliability and storage projects Presented by Steve Roberts (Department of Water Resources, Storage Investigations)
Streamside forests reduce nutrient pollution of aquatic ecosystems Donald E. Weller, Thomas E. Jordan, and Matthew E. Baker Smithsonian Environmental Research.
Water Census Progress: DRB Focus Area Perspective Bob Tudor Deputy Director Delaware River Basin Commission.
A future task in good hands Action 5 Implementation in Germany – First Experiences and Next Steps Burkhard Schweppe-Kraft Unit: Legal Affairs, Economics.
Linking Stewardship to Ecosystem Services Presentation to Camrose County Miquelon Growth Management Study Review Committee March 22, 2011 Candace Vanin,
Investing in Ocean Health Presentation to Ocean Protection Council (February 2016) Sara Aminzadeh, Executive Director, California Coastkeeper Alliance.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Adapting to Climate Change: Using the Green to Beat the Blues Roberta Clowater Executive Director Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society - New Brunswick.
2035 General Plan Update Joint Study Session on Draft Conservation Element Planning Commission and Parks & Recreation Commission December 1, 2015.
Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
Wildlife Management and Ecosystem Services
5. Impact assessment world café: Ecosystem services
Climate and Green Plan Town Hall Toolkit
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Good riparian management Financial benefits for the public
a) Thematic presentations: part 1: biophysical benefits
Floodplains: important ecosystems and mitigators of flood risks
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Chesapeake Bay SEC Case Study: Stream and Floodplain Ecosystem Services Dianna Hogan, Emily Pindilli, Fabiano Franco, Stephanie Gordon October 21, 2015 Little Bennett / Soper Branch April 2011

Introduction  Chesapeake Bay  Nation’s largest estuary – 64,000 mi 2 watershed  Restoration and protection is a priority for numerous government and nongovernmental stakeholders  Development pressure is high, land use decisions constantly being made  This case study comes from direct observations of land use decision making in a part of the Chesapeake Bay watershed Local officials tried to use ecosystem service concepts (but not explicitly)

Introduction  Chesapeake Bay  Nation’s largest estuary – 64,000 mi 2 watershed  Restoration and protection is a priority for numerous government and nongovernmental stakeholders  Development pressure is high, land use decisions constantly being made  This case study comes from direct observations of land use decision making in a part of the Chesapeake Bay watershed Local officials tried to use ecosystem service concepts (but not explicitly) 1. ecologic 2. economic 3. social 4. traffic/transportation

Background  This project is designed to make ecosystem service concepts directly useful and available for land use decision making  Focusing on stream and river floodplain services  Floodplains (rivers, streams)  Hydrologically important - water quality, quantity, timing, recharge, storage  Ecologically productive, important habitat  Greenspace (recreation), cultural  Environmentally sensitive (urban/ag LU) Soper Branch stream and floodplain  General Method 1. LiDAR mapping of stream and floodplain physical characteristics 2. Integrated biophysical metric development (estimate production) with economic valuation

Project Approach 1. Floodplain lidar mapping (began 2014) 2. Use stream and floodplain physical characteristics to estimate ecologic functions 3. Develop metrics based on ecologic functions 4. Correlate ecologic functions with final ecosystem goods and services (local and downstream) 5. Estimate value of local and downstream ecosystem services 6. Scale Up

 LiDAR mapping  Entire Chesapeake Bay watershed  Preliminary mapping done for much of the watershed  Missing some areas in VA (pending data)  Not Coastal Plain yet  Validation, checks, potential corrections in progress

 Lidar-derived extraction of physical floodplain features  Channel width, bankfull area, floodplain extent and width, elevation (levees and terraces), wetlands, etc.  In addition, use land cover, vegetation cover

Develop and test biophysical metrics  Using developed and developing relationships (regressions) between physical features (field measured and lidar) and ecological function  Meaning: linking stream and floodplain physical characteristics with functions we can tie to biophysical production of services  e.g., sediment retention (water quality)  Have field measurements of streams and floodplains that either provide sediment deposition or are a source (bank erosion) expressed as a function of ratios/metrics that can be derived from lidar (floodplain and stream bank characteristics)  Depends on ecosystem, province, stream order, etc.  Status: Literature review and compilation of these ratios/relationships (working closely with partners)

ecosystem services  Literature review of floodplain ecosystem services underway  Case study is focused on quantitatively evaluating services which are:  Relevant to Chesapeake Bay watershed  Can be evaluated biophysically  Can be valued monetarily  Additional services may be qualitatively assessed

Floodplain Ecosystem Services Ecosystem ServiceEcological FunctionHuman Benefits Nutrient/Sediment Retention Nutrient/sediment retention Water clarity, recreation, commercial fisheries Flood Attenuation Watershed surface flow regulation Avoidance of safety and property damage Wildlife ViewingProvision of wildlife habitatRecreation - wildlife viewing (local focus) Carbon SequestrationCarbon sequestration Reduced climate change impacts to health, property, agricultural yield, etc. Water Supply Surface and groundwater storage Water consumption (domestic, agriculture, industry, etc.) Enhancement of Soil Fertility Sediment and nutrient deposition Improved soil quality, increased crop yield Medicinal Resources Provision of habitat for species with medicinal properties Pharmaceuticals Water PurificationRemoval of toxic substancesPollution control, detoxification

Nutrient/Sediment Retention  Ecosystem Service Logic Flow  Benefits accrue both locally (local water quality) and downstream (Chesapeake Bay) Photo Credit: Missouri DOT Photo Credit: USGS Floodplains act as nutrient/sediment sink or source depending on physical features Reduces nutrients and other pollutants from reaching water bodies Increases water quality, may reduce need to purify water, may reduce need to decrease nutrients from other sources Photo Credit: USGS

 Ecosystem Service Logic Flow  Benefits being evaluated at local scale  Floodplains reduce local stream flashiness and retain proportion of stream overflows  Link water retention to local reduction in flood risk for adjacent property Flood Attenuation Photo Credit: City of Chesapeake Floodplains should act as ‘sink’ during precipitation events Reduces peak flow Flood probability reduced magnitude, and/or frequency Adapted from Mitsch and Gosselink 2000 Flood damages reduced property damage safety implications Photo Credit: Potomacs.com Adapted from Mitsch and Gosselink 2000

 Ecosystem Service Logic Flow  Benefits being evaluated at local scale (recreation downstream will be captured in sediment/nutrient retention) Photo Credit: FWS Wildlife Viewing Photo Credit: Chesapeake Bay Alliance Photo Credit: FWS Floodplains provide and connect wildlife habitat Increases abundance of wildlife Increases opportunities to view wildlife in and near floodplains

 Ecosystem Service Logic Flow  Benefits accrue globally, local sequestration will be valued via the Social Cost of Carbon Photo Credit: USGS Carbon sequestration: in vegetation in soil in water Reduced climate change Reduced damages: health effects property damage loss of life loss of ecological functions agricultural yield Lower atmospheric carbon Photo Credit: IPCC Photo Credit: EPA of Ireland Carbon Sequestration

Water Supply  Ecosystem Service Logic Flow  Benefits being evaluated at local scale  Capability to derive ground water recharge from floodplains still being assessed  Link recharge to local water consumption Photo Credit: USGS Photo Credit: Chesapeake Bay Alliance Floodplains provide vegetation Photo Credit: EPA Vegetation and other factors help recharge groundwater Increases supply of water for domestic, industrial, and agricultural uses

 Valuation will be service-dependent, methods still being fully developed (draft list):  Nutrient/Sediment Retention  Considerable work at EPA and elsewhere on benefits of Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) which are directly relevant for valuation of N and P exported or avoided downstream  Valuation includes aesthetics (property values), recreation, and commercial fishing  Flood Attenuation  Primary study of local property values and flood damage costs  Wildlife Viewing  Benefits transfer of local wildlife viewing values applied using site specific characteristics  Carbon Sequestration  Social Cost of Carbon  Water Supply  Cost-based derivation, considering market values of water as well as potential increase in transportation or accessibility of water costs

 Project and metrics designed to be scaled up/down for land use decision support  Explore methods (validation)  Understand confidence in transferability to other watersheds and to scale  Assess level of effort and data requirements to expand analysis to other floodplains and streams at regional or national levels

 Chesapeake case study: determine whether readily measured stream and floodplain features can be used to estimate ecosystem services  Directly integrate ecosystem services into land use decision support Conclusion