Welcome to ABC County DSS REAP Meeting MEETING DATE, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On The Right Track Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model 1, 2008.
Advertisements

An Introduction to the “new” NCDB …a webinar for the National Deaf-Blind TA Network November 13, 2013 November 15, 2013 Presented by:
Telling the Story of Canada’s Children A Comprehensive Approach to Accountability National Children’s Alliance November 26, 2004.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
System of Care Start-up Webinar Series Continuous Quality Improvement within a System of Care Context Brigitte Manteuffel, Macro International,
Outcomes, Accountability, and Funding: Key Redesign Themes Richard P. Barth Jordan Institute for Families School of Social Work University of North Carolina.
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
A New Practice Model for Child Welfare
Building a System of Care in Child Welfare: North Carolina
An Introduction to Project NO REST February 11, 2015
700: Moving Through the Collaboration Continuum to Improve Permanency Outcomes Wednesday, March 20, 2013.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model The North Carolina Foster and Adoptive Parent Association.
The Revised Strengthening Families Self-Assessments: What’s Different?
Orientation to the Self-Assessment Process in Head Start
Partnering with Families for MRS/SOC Success!. North Carolina’s Family Support and Child Welfare System Family-centered practice and system of care principles.
Using An Organizational Assessment : A framework to Help Agencies Build on Strengths, Recognize Challenges, and Develop a Comprehensive Work Plan, CWDA.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
A Charge to Collaborate: IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT WHAT WE DO… IT’S ABOUT HOW WE DO IT…
Adair County System of Care Overcoming Obstacles to Helping Others.
Our three year strategy >Our vision >Children and young people in families and communities where they can be safe, strong and thrive. >Our mission >Embed.
Step 6: Implementing Change. Implementing Change Our Roadmap.
1 Understanding and Developing Child Welfare Practice Models Steven Preister, Associate Director National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Planning for Sustainability National Child Traumatic Stress Network All Network Meeting February 6, 2007.
1 CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Ann Bailey, NCRRC July 2010.
Linking Early Intervention Quality Practices With Child and Family Outcomes Sherry Franklin, North Carolina Part C Coordinator Deborah Carroll, PhD, Branch.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
Orientation to the Self-Assessment Process in Head Start.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Defending Childhood Protect Heal Thrive January 25-27, 2011 Sandra Spencer Executive Director National Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Family Team Meetings Andy Kogerma Family Connection Partnership.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Dementia Friendly Communities. 2 Desired Outcomes Community and system capacity that enhances quality of life and positive outcomes for people living.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Fostering Local and National Collaboration to Support Continuous Quality Improvement Angela Sheehan, ORC Macro Beth Dague, Project Director, Project Tapestry.
Welcome To Implementation Science 8 Part Webinar Series Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin Chaparro, Ph.D University of Oregon.
National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement A service of the Children’s Bureau, Member of the T/TA Network Readiness for Systemic.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Improving Outcomes at Scale: Lessons in Collective Impact.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
Overview of the Collaborative Capacity Instrument Integration of Services Leadership Meeting October 21, 2010.
The Power of Parents: National Consortium on Deaf-Blindness Family Leadership Training Program It all begins today!
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
County Name Next Steps Meeting DATE. County Name Welcome!! And…Congratulations on receiving your full licensure!! Give yourselves a round of applause.
dfamerica.org. 2 Desired Outcomes Community and system capacity that enhances quality of life and positive outcomes for people living.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Introduction to the Road to Quality Process using the Missouri Afterschool Program Self- Assessment.
INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS Heather Ouzts, NC DPI Parent Liaison Beverly Roberts, ECAC NC SIP Project Coordinator.
Durham County Board of County Commissioners June 4, 2012.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
Continuous Quality Improvement: Our Desired State The Vision for Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Family-Agency Collaborative Training Team
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
Overview of the California Child Welfare Core Practice Model (CPM)
NEXT STEPS IN DEVELOPING CULTURALLY-COMPETENT
Lincoln County Social Services Organizational Effectiveness
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to ABC County DSS REAP Meeting MEETING DATE, 2012

REACHING FOR EXCELLENCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN PRACTICE

Questions to Answer 1.What is REAP? 2.Why REAP? 3.Why now? 4.Where did it come from? 5.What does this mean for me? 6.What if I don’t like data? 7.What other questions do you have?

What is REAP? - REAP Mission North Carolina state and county DSS and their community partners will create an achievement-focused child welfare culture which includes: Adopting a continuous quality improvement approach to child welfare that is data-driven and results oriented. Sharing accountability for reaching core achievements for children, youth, and families. Engaging community partners to assess needs and build on strengths of each community. Using evidence based best practices, technical assistance (TA), and training to continuously improve achievements.

What do we mean by “continuous quality improvement” ? CQI is a structured process for reviewing, analyzing and using data throughout units and teams in order to improve outcomes.

REAP CQI Approach 1. Adopt Outcomes, indicators and standards 2. Collect data and information 3. Review Analyze and interpret data 4. Apply learning 6 (Watson, 2005)

What is REAP? - Key Components 1.Core Child Welfare Achievements 2.Community Child Welfare Assessment 3.Community Child Welfare Achievement Plan 4.Data-Driven Technical Assistance

What is REAP? - Key Components 1.Core Child Welfare Achievements Monthly “data dashboard” report sent to county DSS Used to track progress on key child welfare outcomes 2.Community Child Welfare Assessment Revised method and tool for bi- annual review Used to identify top priorities for improvement 3.Community Child Welfare Achievement Plan Developed with community partners Based on community’s strengths and needs Includes action steps for changes in practice or system to improve selected outcomes

What is REAP? - Key Components (cont.) 4.Data-Driven Technical Assistance Provided by Division based on county achievements and self-assessment On-line gateway under development to track requests and measure impact of TA and training Peer-to-peer networking for ongoing implementation support

REAP is: An evolution from our family-centered practice model (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) approach Understanding our data and the story behind our data

Why REAP? If we adopt a continuous quality improvement approach…we will become data-driven and results- oriented. If we share accountability…we will achieve better things for children, youth, and families. If we engage community partners…we will build on the strengths of our community. If we receive meaningful technical assistance and training…we will build sustainable change.

Why now? 1.Urgency of our work and the ongoing desire to improve outcomes for children, families and communities 2.Limited resources increase the need for efficient and effective practices 3.Increasing internal and external pressure for accountability

Where did REAP come from? 1.Series of conversations between the NC Division of Social Services’ leadership and the North Carolina Association of County Directors of Social Services 2.NCDSS obtained a federal grant to partner with the Atlantic Coast Child Welfare Implementation Center (ACCWIC) to develop a new technical assistance model in A work group was developed and meetings began in September 2009

Where did REAP come from, cont. 4.Implementation Team with 58 members began meeting in the fall of 2010 ‣ 43% county DSS staff ‣ 38% are NC DSS staff ‣ 19% are community partners and University staff 5.Pilot process in 8 NC counties began in January 2011

Questions

So what does this mean for ME??

What does this mean for me? In REAP counties, all agency staff will: Use the six principles of partnership to support collaboration within and outside of our agency Modify structures and practices to implement outcomes-focused work Use data on a continuous basis to improve outcomes Engage community partners in all aspects of quality improvement

6 Principles of Partnership 1.Everyone desires respect 2.Everyone needs to be heard 3.Everyone has strengths 4.Judgments can wait 5.Partners share power 6.Partnership is a process

Parallel Process – We’re all in this together! Families & Children WorkersSupervisorsLeadership

Small group discussion 1: Applying the Principles  Break into small groups with people from different units/teams  Based on what you know so far, how would the principles would apply to REAP? For example: – How agency leaders can engage staff – How co-workers can work together to review and understand outcomes data – How the agency can engage families & community partners

Small group discussion 2: Using data  What data do you gather or use currently in your job?  What are your worries about REAP?  What do you need from your supervisor or agency to feel more comfortable?  What is one way that REAP could help you in your work with families?

Our Community Partners Our achievement data is not just “DSS data.” It’s our community’s data. We can’t make improvements on our own. Who should be at the table to review our community’s data and develop our Achievement Plan? – Consider other organizations, agencies, etc. – Identify key “champions” in each

What if I don’t like data? – A first look

Why don’t we like data? We see too much of it It has no meaning in our day-to-day work There is no consistent way to use it effectively We spend too much time analyzing a problem and not looking for solutions Data is often used in a punitive way

What if I don’t like using data? - Reframe We use data everyday to improve our own lives We all want to improve outcomes for children, families and communities and effective use of data will help us do that better o If data isn’t helping, probably don’t need to be tracking it Think of data as a flashlight, not as a hammer

What if I don’t like using data? - Support We’ll use these ground rules No shame, no blame, no enemies Cultivate your curiosity Try it on and sit with it

What if I don’t like using data? - Support We’ll receive training for understanding and using data to be more efficient and effective We’ll get help modifying systems and structures to make using data easier and more accessible The Division will provide ongoing TA and opportunities to collaborate with other agencies in REAP

Where we’ve made progress [county DSS can insert list of 2-4 achievement areas of improvement/strengths]

Use of Kinship Care for Initial Placements Duncan et al., 2010

Where we need help from our community [county DSS can insert list of 2-4 achievement areas of most concern or interest/relevance to targeted partners]

Concern: Length of time in foster care Pitt County Convening 11/30/10 Duncan et al., 2010

Small group discussions How would you describe the issue? What are the patterns or trends? What else do you want to know about this issue to understand what’s going on? What else do we need to find out? What other data sources or people should be at the table to understand this issue?

What other questions do you have?

Next Steps Exploration and Adoption Assess current practice, needs and resources to determine if agency is ready to adopt REAP Educate community partners about REAP and engage them in the process Assess potential barriers and needed changes to support REAP Develop an action plan to improve agency infrastructure and support in identified areas Fixen, D.L, Naoom, S.F., Blase, K.A., Friedman, R.M. & Wallace, F.(2005 We can’t do it without you!

Thank you for all you do to achieve good things for children and families!