WEB EuroPA 2006 A.S.P.O. Analysis of Operational Programmes web sites Titti Paderi Formez Bruxelles, December 12th.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
Advertisements

1 The new ESF Investing in your Future -
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
1 Open Days 2008 Communicating Cohesion Policy Together Bruxelles, 10/07/2008 The experience of the Italian ED network in Cohesion Policy Communication.
Regions for Economic Change | LMP Workshop 3C When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform How can INTERACT.
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
Workshop 4: Using the EU Structural Funds to support Independent Living Ines Bulic European Network on Independent Living Strasbourg Freedom Drive, 9 Sept.
>> Web Accessibility at WIPO Victoria Menezes Miller Web Systems Officer Internet Services Section February 2, 2010.
Regional Policy Information and Communication rules The state of play European Commission Peter Fischer, Directorate General for Regional and Urban.
Delegation of the European Commission Romania preparing for EU membership European Structural and Cohesion Funds.
Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office INDUCTION TRAINING SEIO GENERAL FRAMEWORK CREATED.
Information and Publicity Requirements Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 24th March 2015, Svolvær, Norway.
Electronic Communications for MAEB, BAMLIS (UQI135H3)
COMMUNICATION CSF III Instituto Financeiro para o Desenvolvimento Regional, IP.
The URBACT II Programme General Presentation Vilnius, 20 January 2011.
Project Communications Strategy Communications Plan EU Publicity Requirements Project Website Project Logo.
South East Europe Territorial Cooperation Programme Presenting the Beneficiaries of the Programme.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The EU Recovery Plan and the proposal amending the European Regional Development Fund Regulation.
Introducing the Hurricane Preparedness and Recovery Web Portal - October 8, Presented by Charles R. McClure, PhD Director, FSU Information Institute.
1 European Lifelong Guidance Policy Network Work Package 1 – Career Management Skills Synthesis Meeting NATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR CAREER GUIDANCE Aleksandra.
Innovation in the Rural Development Networks Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development Matthias Langemeyer & Iman Boot.
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Guidance on the.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
Cooperation in the mainstream programmes / article 37-6b example of Limousin (France) inhabitants inhabitants 43 inhabitant / km2 43 inhabitant.
1 Reference Framework for Sustainable Cities (RFSC) Some useful functionalities for Finnish cities.
Regional Policy European Commission 1 10/17/2015 Wolfgang Petzold DG REGIO 10 September 2004 SFIT meeting on evaluation DG REGIO's Information and Communication.
Regulatory requirements in the current programming period Funchal, 18 November 2010.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Event – date, place About INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG IVC Joint Technical Secretariat.
Description of Work Objectives WP 8 serves to define the technical content of the VI for contact thermometry. It will contain a selection of guides to.
Information Actions in Finland Structural Funds 2007 – 2013 Leena Lyra Information of EU Programmes Ministry of Employment and the Economy.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
1 Information and communication rules for EU Cohesion policy INFORM meeting, 7-8 December 2011 Directorate General for Regional Policy, Communication.
1 Information and Communication rules for EU Cohesion policy Brussels, 20 October 2011 Peter Fischer
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Transport Enhancing TEN-T funding Pawel Stelmaszczyk Special Envoy for European Mobility Network DG MOVE Warsaw, 18 December 2013.
ACP S&T Programme - Stakeholder conference October Implemented by the ACP Secretariat Funded by the European Union EDULINK - ACP Science and.
MONITORING SYSTEM OF EU STRUCTURAL FUNDS: PHYSICAL INDICATORS International Conference for New Member States February 1-2, 2012, Vilnius (Lithuania) European.
Using Internet sites to inform potential beneficiaries & the public: the Greek experience Ivana Doulgerof CSF Management Organisation Unit Programming.
Orientation for new Lead Partners and Partners Information & Publicity Requirements Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 12 June 2008 – Voss, Norway Kirsti.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT meeting, 12 December 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
ESPON Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café 18 May 2010 in Bruxelles Call for Proposals on Transnational Networking Activities (Projects carried through.
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.
European Conference on eGovernment Applications: “From Policy to Practice” The Call for Applications.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity Structural Funds Information Team Brussels, 30 June 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO.
1 CORDIS and FP6 4 steps to succeed Greece FP6 Workshop.
Chair: Steven M. Ross, Center for Research in Educational Policy; Center on Innovation & Improvement Collaborating Researchers: Jen Harmon, Center on Innovation.
Horizon 2020 Ian Devine European Advisor – UK Research Office University of Manchester, 11 September 2014.
Communicate your project Lead Partner Seminar, 25 March 2011.
"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity in programming period
INFORMATION & PUBLICITY REQUIREMENTS Rachel Burn, Joint Secretariat September 29th, Akureyri, Iceland.
PRIORITIES FOR THE FUTURE
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
INFORMATION & PUBLICITY REQUIREMENTS
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
Cohesion Policy Information and Communication rules The state of play
ESIF Open Data Platform
Web Content Accessibility Beata M. Ofianewska (DG COMM) 7 December 2006 December 2006 COMM C2.
Prioritised Action Frameworks for financing Natura 2000
Natura 2000 management group Brussels, 19 May 2011
Training module 8 Adoption of territorial assessment tools
Presentation transcript:

WEB EuroPA 2006 A.S.P.O. Analysis of Operational Programmes web sites Titti Paderi Formez Bruxelles, December 12th

Why ASPO? All the Obj. 1 Regional Operational Programmes use the web site as an instrument of communication The e-government policies The activity of the WEB EuroPA 2006 project, which aims to support the operability of Communication Plans by the elaboration of working instruments Web EuroPA 2006

Information and publicity measures on the web site Commission Regulation (EC) 1159/2000: Managing Authorities must use some information instruments (such as billboards and commemorative plaques), but they can choose the other methods, e.g.: the institutional web site Practical Guide to communicating on the Structural Funds : The web site is considered an “essential tool” Web EuroPA 2006

ASPO’s Objectives  Self-evaluation: it delineates the physionomy of the web section devoted to the OP and to the Structural Funds, described on the basis of the positive aspects (which are to be improved and to be perfected) and of the information or functional deficiencies (which are to be examined in order to identify criticalities and define improvement margins)  External evaluation: it helps the comparison of similar experiences (by defining the best practices) and the standardisation (convergence towards an “ ideal ” model) Web EuroPA 2006

ASPO’s features ASPO’s indicators have been defined on the basis of:  the rules of the Commission Regulation 1159/2000  the terms contained in the Practical Guide to communicating on the Structural Funds  the propositions of the working group formed by the Formez team and the Obj. 1 Information Officers Web EuroPA 2006

How ASPO works: the indicators For each indicator you have to consider the presence or absence of information and, in most of the cases, the quality of it (score is from 0 to a maximum of 4). The last option includes the former ones. When you calculate the score you have to consider the value of the multiplier (1-3), which increases the score depending on the importance of the indicator Web EuroPA 2006 B12. Is the information about the implementation available? absent0 present (mid-term evaluation report)3 present (annual implementation report)4

ASPO’s contruction The check-list proposed by Formez It was constructed on the basis of the two main targets (the public and the potencial beneficiaries) plus the “information multipliers” Meetings with the Information Officers Meetings were held between May September 2005 to put together the suggestions from the Information Officers E-work We worked at distance to amend the check-list and test it on the web sites Web EuroPA 2006

ASPO’s structure  5 thematic indices (A-D contents, E technological devices): A.FRONT-OFFICE B.TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT C.SERVICES TO THE “POTENTIAL BENEFICIARIES” D.RELATIONALITY AND PARTNERSHIP E.USABILITY, ACCESSIBILITY, TECHNOLOGICAL DEVICES  58 indicators Web EuroPA 2006

A. FRONT-OFFICE Objective: self-presentation of OP information service  The objectives of the Communication Plan, the contact details of the Information Officers and of the Managing Authorities, the information service to the public (e.g. call center, help-desk, etc.)  The structural funds, the OP and the links to the institutional web sites about regional policy  News about the OP implementation Web EuroPA 2006

B. TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT Objective: to show all the financial opportunities provided by the EU and national regional policy, presenting the territorial strategy and giving visibility to the projects  the assistance package and the other main programmes at regional level  the integrated territorial projects  the projects part-financed by the Structural Funds  the OP implementation  the framework of the period Web EuroPA 2006

C. SERVICES TO THE POTENTIAL BENEFICIARIES Objective: to reach quality services that ensure transparency for the potential beneficiaries  a “usable” description of the assistance package (data base, guided way)  information on calls for proposals  details of contacts for the information on the measures and the implementation  other services (glossary of terms, FAQ’s, online information service) Web EuroPA 2006

D. RELAZIONALITY AND PARTNERSHIP Objective: to give the Monitoring Committee and the local network an online section to:  inform  be informed  discuss  collaborate Web EuroPA 2006

E. USABILITY, ACCESSIBILITY, TECHNOLOGICAL DIVICES Objective: to make the finding of the information easy for everyone  URL recognisability, link to the home page of OP section from each page, equal and recognisable elements in all pages, search engine  minimum criteria of accessibility  link check, HTML check, browser compatibility, load time check Web EuroPA 2006

The working group The Formez team and the Information Officers of Objective 1 Regional Operational Programmes Contacts: Titti Paderi Tel.: 0039 – (0) Web EuroPA 2006