Presented by: Meredith Penner Program & Training Specialist BCIU #22 May 8, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IT Portfolio Shell – Add a title, your name, date, links and examples
Advertisements

So you want to be an Administrator? Chris Marchese Matt Walsh.
Bringing it all together!
1 Strengthening Teaching and Learning: Educational Leadership and Professional Standards SABES Directors’ Institute July 2011.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL). UD in Architecture a movement of designing structures with all potential users in mind incorporated access features.
UNIVERSAL DESIGN FOR LEARNING N ANCI L EE. Introduction to Universal Design Universal Design was a term coined by architect Ronald Mace. Design Principles.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Improving Educational Participation and Outcomes for ALL Students with Universal Design for Learning and–for some–Special Education Services Joy Smiley.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
Ricki Sabia, JD edCount, LLC Senior Associate and NCSC Technical Assistance and Parent Training Specialist Universal Design for Learning: Working to Create.
Assisting Struggling Readers and Writers: Using Evidence-Based Resources to Support Adult Learners Michigan Conference 2014 Kathy Houghton-- LINCS.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Presentation by Dr. Brian Butler Disability Support Service UCC.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Nick Zomer Dean Rusk Middle School
Technology Leadership
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
I’m In Activity Reflect on the morning in 1-2 sentences “I’m in”
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
CREATING OPPORTUNITIES FOR STUDENTS IN READING/LANGUAGE ARTS Tanya Tullos Jennifer Brock.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
1 PROFESSIONAL LEARNING within a COLLABORATIVE INQUIRY FRAMEWORK The professional learning cycle: serves as a process for professional learning is driven.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
PRESENTED BY JULI CALLAHAN / SARAH JOHNSTON INCLUSION / PROGRAM SPECIALIST LISD 2009 National Universal Design for Learning Task Force Implementing Specially.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Principal Effectiveness: Setting the Stage Principal Effectiveness.
Sharing and Building Ideas Fayette Long Walden University Sherry Lambertson Reaching and Engaging All Learners Through Technology, EDUC-6714 D-2 November.
Tiffany Harrell “The goal for every student is to learn, but not every child learns in the same way.” (Firchow, 2011)
Universal Design for Learning Alison Driekonski Walden University S. Lambertson EDUC-6714D-1 Reaching and Engaging All Learners Through Technology October.
Asma Khalfan Al-Yahyai Mithaa Abdullah Al-Amri. NETS (NETSS) (NETST) (NETSA) (NETSC) (NETSCSE)
ALYSSA HOLZHAUSEN EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP 325 SPRING 2013 IT Portfolio.
Universal Design for Learning A Basic Skills TLC Workshop Presented by: Lynette Pratt, Bryan Ouchi, Cory McKinley.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Candidate’s Name: Date:.  Candidates who complete the program are educational leaders who have the knowledge and ability to promote the success of.
A Portfolio by: Mary S. Weinaug Enter.  As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of teacher standards  ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Eric M. Roubion EDLD 871. Online Teacher Professional Development Standard F.
Universal Design for Learning
A portfolio by Jamie Andrews Created in ELD 325 Instructional Technology Spring 2010.
Universal Design for Learning Creating Curb Cuts Creating Curb Cuts.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Where does it fit? 2016.
Creative Intervention Planning through Universal Design for Learning MariBeth Plankers, M.S. CCC-SLP Page 127.
2016 Where does it fit? Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
OVERVIEW of the ISTE NETS for Administrators Presented by Kevin Brady and Alison Fricke.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
Vanessa Woodard Brooks Meeting Individual Student Needs With Technology (620) Dr. Gina Conner Updating the Technology Infrastructure both in.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION (DI) Melody Murphy Week 4 Discussion.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
MDE Mississippi Teacher Center Beginning Teacher Support Training Program.
WSI Self Contained Classroom Track
IT Portfolio Shell – Add a title, your name, date, links and examples
DPI 10 Teaching Standards
Universal Design for Learning Guidelines
Program & Training Specialist
November 7 , 2012.
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
Universal Design Because connections are not being made
I’m In Activity Reflect on the morning in 1-2 sentences “I’m in”
NJCU College of Education
Pennsylvania Department of Education
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
Presentation transcript:

Presented by: Meredith Penner Program & Training Specialist BCIU #22 May 8, 2012

ItQ: Invitation To Qualify Pennsylvania recognizes that effective leadership is one of the most important predictors of student success in school. Act 45 of 2007 reflects Pennsylvania’s commitment to excellent leadership in education by refocusing all professional education on the nine PA Leadership Standards (listed on page 2). The Department is seeking proposals from educational entities that want to be considered Approved Providers of continuing professional education for school and system leaders, as defined by Act 45 of This document describes the Department’s expectations for professional education that is offered to school and system leaders. Successful applicants will meet the specifications outlined in this document, and the courses or programs submitted will be approved for a period of three (3) years.

PA Leadership Standards: Core Standards  I. Knowledge and skills to think and plan strategically creating an organizational vision around personalized student success.  II. An understanding of standards-based systems theory and design and the ability to transfer that knowledge to the leader’s job as an architect of standards based reform in the school.  III. The ability to access and use appropriate data to inform decision-making at all levels of the system. Corollary Standards  I. Creating a culture of teaching and learning with an emphasis on learning.  II. Managing resources for effective results.  III. Collaborating, communicating, engaging and empowering others inside and outside the organization to pursue excellence in learning.  IV. Operating in a fair and equitable manner with personal and professional integrity.  V. Advocating for children and public education in the larger political, social, economic, legal and cultural context.  VI. Supporting professional growth of self and others through practice and inquiry.

This application is presented in six parts: 1.Program Description 2.PA Standards 3.Curriculum Framework 4.Course Instruction 5.Culminating Project 6.Qualified Staff Information

Course Title : Supporting and Implementing Universal Design for Learning Target Audience: Continuing Professional Education for School & System Leaders (CPE)

On Line Hybrid Course 6 in class hours 9 on-line hours 10 job-embedded hours 5 hours Culminating Total: 30 Hours

This course will use the principles of Universal Design for Learning as a model to teach the 3 principles of UDL. In order to improve student achievement and increase participation and outcomes, participants will gain an awareness of the need, the various guidelines and the technology and resources that are available and aligned with each guideline to improve and increase multiple means of representation, action and expression, and engagement. The Universal Design for Learning model enables students to access and express knowledge in a variety of ways that eliminate the need for “retrofitted” interventions. (Ex. A student with a reading disability will have options and supports to be able to participate in science/social studies and variety of general education classrooms and those options will be available and pre-planned for ALL students). Course Overview:

Big Idea # 1: Understanding UDL and How it Differs From Other Educational Practices Universal Design for Learning (UDL) contains many components from current educational practices including Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design. The delivery model of UDL encourages educators to provide multiple means for representation, action and expression, and engagement universally in their classrooms before any barriers are evident. This universal delivery gives all students these opportunities and benefits learners that might not present with a specific “barrier” that needs differentiation. The recent surge in technology provides educators with many ways to represent media digitally.

Principles of UDL Multiple  means of representation  means of action and expression  means of engagement - CAST -

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) More ways to access… More ways to participate… More ways to demonstrate learning… Resulting in more equitable access to the general education curriculum for ALL learners

“ Intersection of Initiatives”

Brain Research & New Technologies Multifaceted learning capacities Accessibility to digital media

Big Idea # 2: Defining and Exploring Multiple Means of Representation “Principle I: Provide Multiple Means of Representation (the “what” of learning). Learners differ in the ways that they perceive and comprehend information that is presented to them. For example, those with sensory disabilities (e.g., blindness or deafness); learning disabilities (e.g., dyslexia); language or cultural differences, and so forth may all require different ways of approaching content. Others may simply grasp information quicker or more efficiently through visual or auditory means rather than printed text. Also learning, and transfer of learning, occurs when multiple representations are used, because it allows students to make connections within, as well as between, concepts. In short, there is not one means of representation that will be optimal for all learners; providing options for representation is essential.” (UDL Guidelines )

Multiple Means of Representation

Big Idea # 3: Defining and Exploring Multiple Means of Action and Expression“Principle II: Provide Multiple Means of Action and Expression (the “how” of learning). Learners differ in the ways that they can navigate a learning environment and express what they know. For example, individuals with significant movement impairments (e.g., cerebral palsy), those who struggle with strategic and organizational abilities (executive function disorders), those who have language barriers, and so forth approach learning tasks very differently. Some may be able to express themselves well in written text but not speech, and vice versa. It should also be recognized that action and expression require a great deal of strategy, practice, and organization, and this is another area in which learners can differ. In reality, there is not one means of action and expression that will be optimal for all learners; providing options for action and expression is essential.”(UDL Guidelines )

Multiple Means of Action and Expression

Big Idea # 4: Defining and Exploring Multiple Means of Engagement “Principle III: Provide Multiple Means of Engagement (the “why” of learning). Affect represents a crucial element to learning, and learners differ markedly in the ways in which they can be engaged or motivated to learn. There are a variety of sources that can influence individual variation in affect including neurology, culture, personal relevance, subjectivity, and background knowledge, along with a variety of other factors presented in these guidelines. Some learners are highly engaged by spontaneity and novelty while other are disengaged, even frightened, by those aspects, preferring strict routine. Some learners might like to work alone, while others prefer to work with their peers. In reality, there is not one means of engagement that will be optimal for all learners in all contexts; providing multiple options for engagement is essential.” (UDL Guidelines )

Multiple Means of Engagement

Big Idea # 5: Developing a Systematic Plan to Promote Implementation and Build Capacity “School districts and administrations can be powerful sources of support—financial and otherwise. Administrative commitment to UDL can strengthen a teacher's sense of mission and self-satisfaction and lead to important funding. Administrator support can also help to facilitate funding, which although not a prerequisite for UDL, can create important opportunities. Funding might enable the purchase of equipment, professional development, and the launching of new UDL teaching projects. Districts vary widely concerning the types and level of funding that they offer teachers, but teachers who can convince their administrators of the value of UDL may be able to secure district- level grants, professional development awards, and sabbaticals.” (UDL Guidelines )

Systemic Change Template:

Teaching Every Student

Additional On-line Resources: