Introduction to the Programmatic Review Jon Butterworth (Slides from Victoria Wright, Head of Science Strategy)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

About the European Science Foundation 1. ESF Update Future of NuPECC and EBCs within ESF and Science Europe Jean-Claude WORMS Head of Unit, PESSC 2.

Advertisements

Enhancing student learning through assessment: a school-wide approach Christine OLeary & Kiefer Lee Sheffield Business School.

European Roadmaps for Research Infrastructures presentation by Hans Chang (chair ESFRI) (1st meeting ESFRI Steering Groups, autumn 2005)

Health Scrutiny in Newham CCG Newham Patient Forum Thursday 4 September Cllr Dianne Walls, Chair, Health and Social Care Scrutiny Commission Luke Byron-Davies,

Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Particle Astrophysics meeting October 2010 John Womersley Director, Science Programmes, STFC.

Overview and Introduction

What do reviewers look for in a research proposal? Research Councils’ review criteria Dimitra Koutsantoni Research & Knowledge Transfer Manager.

© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- July 2008.

Lifecycle Management and the Projects Portfolio. 2 Agenda How project portfolio management fits within an overall lifecycle for managing the delivery.

Enhancing student learning through assessment: a school-wide approach Christine O'Leary, Centre for Promoting Learner Autonomy Sheffield Business School.

Logistics and supply chain strategy planning

Organisational Structure ‘Designing a fit for purpose organisational structure’ Draft Blueprint Design v0.8 Project Manager: Peter Allan Project Champion:

Introduction to the CALD Aged Care Strategy Bruce Shaw Senior Policy Officer, Aged Care Federation of Ethnic Communities’ Councils of Australia (FECCA)

Making Good Use of Research Evaluations Anneli Pauli, Vice President (Research)

Implementing the University Strategy: Ensuring Success Jon F Baldwin Registrar.

C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous - RALIoP HEPP Conference, UCL 29 th March Particle Physics Advisory Panel C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous Rutherford.

Arts Council strategy and funding framework 11 November 2010 Ockham’s Razor performing Memento Mori.

STFC Town Meetings Programmatic Review Science Board Summary Matt Griffin (Outgoing) Chair, Science Board 1.

Particle Physics Funding Mechanism PPARC has become STFC –Should be same funding structure as before PP and A constitute about £330M/year About half is.

John Womersley PPD staff meeting John Womersley 6 February 2007.

Science Board Presentation to IOP town meeting Sheila Rowan.

What’s going on John Womersley. Outline Particle Physics Grants Round Financial Situation STFC Strategy Why our science matters more than ever.

Welcome: Amersham School Parent Council. Parent Council Parent Council role is consultative and advisory: The governing body remains the decision-maker.

Student Voices Student:Staff Consultative Committees.

Dr Ritva Dammert Director Brussels May 27, 2009 Evaluation of the Finnish Centres of Excellence Programmes

FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT The next steps. The National Technical Advisory Group On Flooding Issues An Overview and the Future.

Particle Physics Advisory Panel Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University.

Establishing Defra’s evidence needs Dr Steven Hill Chief Scientific Adviser’s Secretariat, Science Directorate.

Document Number: Version: 1v0 © Outperform UK Ltd 1 Assessing the change capability of an organisation Jennifer Stapleton.

The role of the INTOSAI CBC in the INTOSAI value chain September 2015.

1 Part 4 Self-review and certification Your progress as a curriculum developer Part 4 Self-review and certification Your progress as a curriculum developer.

OWL Concept Design Review Report to ESO Council 8 th Dec 2005.

Co-ordinated by aparsen.eu #APARSEN Co-funded by the European Union under FP7-ICT The importance of interoperability and intelligibility in digital.

John Womersley Developing a science strategy John Womersley Director, Science Strategy Nuclear Physics Town Meeting, May 2007.

The Professional Board Some thoughts on board effectiveness and leadership Date 3 December, 2015 Kit Bingham.

Understanding School Finances School Councils. What are school council’s major responsibilities with regard to finance? 1.To develop the school’s annual.

BUSINESS RISK SENTIMENT Building a positive risk culture Richard Thomas IRM Risk Leaders Conference 2015.

Quality Assurance Dr Christopher Stevens

Perspective from STFC as a Funding Agency Charlotte Jamieson Head of Enabling Themes.

Investment decision making

Particle Physics Advisory Panel Report to 2013 Town Meeting Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University.

URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION. The URBEM Framework.

Estates across STFC This presentation is to give PPD the opportunity to respond to proposals for the future management of Estates across STFC The proposals.

Effective Board Governance & role of the Audit Committee Presentation by Cluster Audit Committee – July / August 2012.

MICE Group Leaders Meeting 22 May 2014, 10:00 Paul Soler Introduction, MICE-OsC and STFC Accelerator Review.

Developing an Evaluation Strategy George Selvanera Senior Consultant Cordis Bright Ltd

1 Science Board and STFC News Prof. Dan Tovey University of Sheffield.

Pre-school Learning Alliance Organising, Operating and Delivering the service at Queens Park Children’s Centre.

Sean J Freeman The University of Manchester

NTNU’s quality system for education

A2 Business Studies Objectives;

The Portfolio Concept The portfolio problem in financial investment management consists of determining the “optimal” portfolio of stocks and bonds. Steps.

Session 4: Planning Lessons Tuesday 12th October 2010

Introduction to the Victorian state disability plan 2013–2016

Quality and Standards An introduction.

CPMGT 301 STUDY Lessons in Excellence--cpmgt301study.com.

WCRP Review, 2017 LI Jinghai.

Using the EFQM Excellence Model to support the role of a trustee

“Perform when it counts”

CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.

URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION

NATSPEC Governor Seminars 2009

STFC Update – Programmes Directorate PPAP Community Meeting

UK Nuclear Physics Nuclear Physics Advisory Panel update April 2018

Portfolio, Programme and Project

Council of Chairs Fall Meeting October 9, 2018.

Session 3 The Strategic Position

Mainstreaming Climate Change Adaptation

Roles and Responsibilities

STFC Update Charlotte Jamieson 3rd April 2019.

Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the Programmatic Review Jon Butterworth (Slides from Victoria Wright, Head of Science Strategy)

Why Review the Programme? STFC runs a managed programme of activities For the UK to remain world-leading, we need to regularly assess quality, effectiveness and impact We also need to ensure our programme continues to meet our strategic goals

Purpose of the Programmatic Review To assess the quality of STFC’s programmes in terms of science, operational effectiveness, and impact; To inform STFC’s future strategic and financial planning; To define appropriate research areas and recommend a research portfolio and planning timeline for STFC support to those research areas. To do this we need to Prioritise projects / science areas Optimise science and impact for a range of financial scenarios Ensure there is balance in the programme

Terms of Reference for the Review To define research areas that are consistent with STFC’s strategic aims To evaluate whether each of STFC's current programmes is well-matched to the Council’s strategy To evaluate the recent, current, and likely future scientific excellence, operational effectiveness, and impact of the scientific aspects of each of STFC's programmes To identify any aspects of STFC's programmes that are less well-matched to the Council's strategy and to make recommendations concerning the future of these activities To consider future programme opportunities and, if appropriate, to make recommendations on how these could be taken forward To evaluate the balance of STFC's programmes and to recommend a future research portfolio

Who will do the review? Science Board is leading the review and has set up four sub-groups to do the detailed assessment Particle Physics, Astronomy and Nuclear Physics Sub- Group (chair Jon Butterworth) Large Facilities Sub-Group (chair Olwyn Byron) Impact Sub-Group (chair Bob Warwick) Technology Sub-Group (chair Ken Long)

Timescale for the Review

Questions?