THE EL DORADO COUNTY CHARTER SELPA NOV. 18. Steering Meeting | November 18 Fiscal Update Revenues have exceeded the forecast MOE requirement recommendations:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Advertisements

LCFF & LCAP. Key Precepts of LCFF Based on specific considerations: Equity, additional resources for students with greater needs Low-income students English.
Local Control Funding Formula & Local Control Accountability Plan A Basic Introduction Sacramento City Unified School District DELAC Meeting February 18,
LOCAL CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA (LCFF) & LOCAL CONTROL ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN (LCAP)
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
Special Education Collaborative Meeting Policies, Procedures, Practices Fall 2011.
Students in Private School Placed by Their Parents Developed by Contra Costa SELPA
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
Derk Garcia, Interim Chief Academic Officer. LCFF and LCAP Through the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) flexibility and Local Control Accountability.
Building a Special Education Infrastructure Through a Joint Power Authority.
An Overview of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) January 25, 2014 FREMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Educate Challenge Inspire.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
Los Angeles Unified School District Edgar Zazueta, Chief of Staff-External Affairs Valley Schools Task Force 1/29/14 Los Angeles Unified School District.
Monthly Special Education Coordinator Meeting November 13, 2012.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Developing a New Accountability System
ESEA APPLICATION TRAINING 2013 Equitable Participation Rules for Title I Private School Students Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 1.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Presented by: Mr. Kurt Madden, Superintendent Mr. Walter J. Con, Asst. Superintendent – Business Services November 12 th,
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Complaints Information Santina Thibedeau March 5, 2009.
Enrollment Determination Colorado Charter School Institute BOOT CAMP September 1, 2015.
Reporting Requirements for IR Charters and Authorizing Agencies v2.0, Reporting Requirements for Charter Schools and Authorizing Agencies.
Local Control Funding Formula and Local Control Accountability Plan Cat’s Cradle.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
An Update of One Aspect of Monitoring, Support and Technical Assistance Available Through the State Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education.
Building the Parent Voice
ELL Program Advisory Group December 1, TWO PHASES of WORK ELL Program Advisory Group PHASE ONE 1/1/2016As Specified in HB Criteria Determine.
THE EL DORADO COUNTY CHARTER SELPA. Steering Meeting | October 21 * Denotes a handout SELPA Information Sharing Finance * Legislative Updates:  SB 172.
Special Education Meeting November 5, 2013 ASC 3:30 TENNESSEE ROOM.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Monitoring in California Special Education Division California.
Local Control Accountability Plan Update, Renewal, Review Santa Barbara Unified School District
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Title I Program Overview for SWP
THE EL DORADO CHARTER SELPA NOV. 30.
Title I Program Overview for SWP
Process for Enrolling New Special Education Students
Special Education Reviews: A new paradigm for LEAs
Title I Program Overview for TAS
Santa Barbara County SELPA Parentally Placed Students in Private School Training & Meaningful Consultation for Private School Representatives and Parent.
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Karen Ann Breslow, MA, SELPA Program Coordinator
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
Support and Intervention
Assessment, Evaluation and Support
California's Accountability System
Local Control Accountability Plan Input
Indicator 13, Secondary Transition IEP Record Reviews
Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Committee
IEP Basics for Parents and Families
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Assessment & Accountability
Support and Intervention
December Count Training
December Count Training
ESL/Title III Consultants
Title I Program Overview for SWP
Presentation transcript:

THE EL DORADO COUNTY CHARTER SELPA NOV. 18

Steering Meeting | November 18 Fiscal Update Revenues have exceeded the forecast MOE requirement recommendations: –Alignment with other programs –Timeframe established for feedback regarding fiscal monitoring –Prioritize technical assistance and information sharing among states

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan The overall purpose of the stakeholder group is to provide input to the CDE to develop and scale up a State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) that provides supports for local educational agencies to improve outcomes for students with disabilities who are also foster youth, English learners, and/or eligible for free and reduced price meals.

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan Participants will have: – Reviewed and discussed infrastructure elements proposed in the Phase I SSIP – Provided input related to improving the alignment of the SSIP to the LCFF/LCAP – Discussed methods for increasing coordination of multiple programs and services for students with IEPs who are also foster youth, English learners, and/or eligible for free and reduced price meals – Assisted the CDE to develop criteria for selecting evidence based practices, support materials, and expert consultants to be deployed in support of LEAs to achieve state identified measureable results – Reviewed and discussed proposals regarding use of Implementation Science to maximize the effectiveness of the tiered systems of SSIP support – Provided input on the components of the SSIP evaluation including how the stakeholders will continue to be involved in assessing annual SSIP implementation and outcomes October meeting November meeting January meeting

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan Percentage of Students with IEPs for all Populations: 10.9%

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan California considered several potential measures including: The frequency of suspensions and expulsions Graduation rate Scores on statewide academic assessments

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan Sample of Indicator #17

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan Sample of Indicator #17

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan The state anticipates that they will provide additional data and calculations to assist districts to: focus on the students receiving special education services who are in the high-need target student groups and assess how they are performing relative to similar students who do not receive special education services.

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan

Steering Meeting | November 18 State Systemic Improvement Plan All districts have access to Tier 1 resources. All those below the target will be advised of these resources. Districts who are below the target and getting worse will be urged to participate in CDE funded TA Districts who continue to get worse will be required to participate in CDE sponsored improvement. Tiered Intervention and supports are at the heart of the SSIP Theory of Action:

Steering Meeting | November 18 Gender Identity Practice New law as of January 2014 requires schools to allow students who identify as transgender to use school facilities that most correspond to their gender identity: All students have a right to privacy including transgender status Disclosure of student transgender identity may only be allowed by the law or by the student and their parents Students have the right to discuss and express their gender identity Official records of transgender students: LEA’s must maintain mandatory pupil records that includes a student’s legal name and gender LEA’s are not required to use a student’s legal name and gender on day-to-day school work A change to a student’s official record to reflect a legal name and/or gender can only be done upon documentation from a court order When LEA’s are required by law to use or report a transgender student’s legal name or gender (i.e. standardized testing) the LEA should adopt practices to avoid inadvertent disclosure of confidential information

Steering Meeting | November 18 Dear Colleague Letter 10/23/15 IDEA does not prohibit the use of the terms dyslexia, dyscalculia, and dysgraphia in evaluation, eligibility determinations, or IEP documents SLD eligibility list is not exhaustive RTI may not be used to delay or deny a full and individual evaluation of a child suspected of having a disability Documentation that a student has dyslexia, dyscalculia, or dysgraphia should be taken into consideration and documented in the IEP IDEA does not dictate the service or accommodations to be provided

Steering Meeting | November SELPA Annual Report

ERMHS Updates Steering Meeting | November 18 Received 229 MH plans (87% of the schools in the SELPA) Service counts as of Nov 2=2,481 (26% increase) Currently 21 Level 3 NPS/Residential placements At this time level 2 (5.4Mil) and Level 3 (2.5Mil) is sufficient to fund per guidelines Ensure that if warranted BIS (code 535) include an additional MH service and the student has a current BIP in place and uploaded to SEIS Dec 1 will be the official count Budgets are be due by January 15th

CASEMIS TOP Review and correct CASEMIS errors and warnings daily. 2. Avoid making any changes to the future IEPs. 3. Remember that CASEMIS is pulled at the end of day on December 1, If changes in the future IEP are necessary, pay caution to the blue/red boxes. 5. Check your regularly for updates from your assigned SELPA Program Technicians. 6. Avoid changing “pending” students to “eligible” students. 7. Watch for DINC issues. 8. Check “Shared Searches” in SEIS. 9. Watch for the most common errors during CASEMIS reporting. 10. Feel free to contact your assigned SELPA Program Technician for assistance.

Special Ed Legal Alert Steering Meeting | November 18 Summary: The U.S. District Court for Southern California issued a preliminary injunction ordering a student to "stay put" at a private school placement after the student transferred school districts and the student's new district suggested an interim placement at one of its public schools. D.G. v. San Diego Unified School District, 115 LRP (Sept. 21, 2015). Ruling: When a dispute arises under IDEA involving a transfer student, a student's new school district satisfies IDEA by implementing the last­ agreed upon IEP or, if that is impossible, by adopting a plan that approximates the last agreed-upon IEP as closely as possible. Here,San Diego could not argue that it was impossible to continue student's placement because San Diego had other students actively placed at the same private school.

Report Templates Steering Meeting | November 18 Two templates in SEIS: Psychoeducational ERMHS Aligns with Federal and State Law Bulleted guidelines to assist with complete and accurate information Engages parent participation

SELPA Professional Development Update Steering Meeting | November 18 Ensure staff is signed up and calendared to attend Please contact SELPA of inability to attend PD Online trainings provided on the website: Para Educator Series Prior Written Notice (PWN) SBAC and CAA Manifestation Determination Behavior Basics Digital Library Webinars on Supporting Students with Disabilities through SBAC

THE EL DORADO COUNTY CHARTER SELPA