Emre ERDOĞAN 01.03.2011 CMPE 220. In the foundations of mathematics, Russell's paradox was discovered by Bertrand Arthur William Russell (18 May 1872.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PARADOX Chi-Kwong Li. A ‘ VISUAL ’ PARADOX : I LLUSION.
Advertisements

The Logic of Quantified Statements
Mathematical Paradoxes
Activity 1.2, the classroom
Bertrand Russell “Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.” Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Russell’s Paradox Jami Durkee Valerie Toothman Jason Prindell.
Island of Knights and Knaves Jack says: “At least one of us is a knave.” Question: Is Jack a knight or knave? What about Jill? Answer: If Jack is a knave,
Beyond Counting Infinity and the Theory of Sets Nate Jones & Chelsea Landis.
Sets Lecture 11: Oct 24 AB C. This Lecture We will first introduce some basic set theory before we do counting. Basic Definitions Operations on Sets Set.
Discrete Mathematics Lecture 5 Alexander Bukharovich New York University.
Basic Structures: Sets, Functions, Sequences, Sums, and Matrices
© by Kenneth H. Rosen, Discrete Mathematics & its Applications, Sixth Edition, Mc Graw-Hill, 2007 Chapter 1: (Part 2): The Foundations: Logic and Proofs.
Instructor: Hayk Melikya
2 February. Discussion Questions What’s the difference between Michael and {Michael}? What would happen if we said Michael = {Michael}?
(CSC 102) Discrete Structures Lecture 14.
Week 7 - Wednesday.  What did we talk about last time?  Set proofs and disproofs  Russell’s paradox.
2.1 Sets ‒Sets ‒Common Universal Sets ‒Subsets 2.2 Set Operations 2.3 Functions 2.4 Sequences and Summations 1.
Russel‘s paradox (also known as Russel‘s antimony)
Basic Structures: Sets, Functions, Sequences, Sums, and Matrices
Even Numbers – Any number that can be divided by 2
Sets SCIE Centre Additional Maths © Adam Gibson. Aims: To understand the idea of a set To be able to use the appropriate mathematical symbols (such as.
CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH Prof. Shachar Lovett Clicker frequency: CA.
CS1001 Lecture 22. Overview Mechanizing Reasoning Mechanizing Reasoning G ö del ’ s Incompleteness Theorem G ö del ’ s Incompleteness Theorem.
Logic and Set Theory.
Cardinals Georg Cantor ( ) thought of a cardinal as a special represenative. Bertrand Russell ( ) and Gottlob Frege ( ) used the.
Computability Thank you for staying close to me!! Learning and thinking More algorithms... computability.
MTH 232 Section 8.1 Algebraic Expressions, Functions, & Equations.
PARADOX Hui Hiu Yi Kary Chan Lut Yan Loretta Choi Wan Ting Vivian.
Non-Euclidean geometry and consistency
Survey of Mathematical Ideas Math 100 Chapter 2 John Rosson Thursday January 25, 2007.
FIRST ORDER LOGIC Berat YILMAZ. BEFORE START, LETS REMEMBER Logic Syntax Semantics.
Set Theory A B C.
Russell’s Paradox Lecture 24 Section 5.4 Fri, Mar 10, 2006.
Math 3121 Abstract Algebra I Section 0: Sets. The axiomatic approach to Mathematics The notion of definition - from the text: "It is impossible to define.
Homework Review notes Complete Worksheet #1. Homework Let A = {a,b,c,d}, B = {a,b,c,d,e}, C = {a,d}, D = {b, c} Describe any subset relationships. 1.
9 February. In Class Assignment #1 Set: {2, 4, 6, 8, 10} MEMBERSUBSETNEITHER 2 {4, 6} {2, 10} {} 3 {{2, 4}, 6, 8, 10}
Lecture 18. Unsolvability Before the 1930’s, mathematics was not like today. Then people believed that “everything true must be provable”. (More formally,
CS621 : Artificial Intelligence Pushpak Bhattacharyya CSE Dept., IIT Bombay Lecture 12- Completeness Proof; Self References and Paradoxes 16 th August,
Sets and Sentences Open Sentences Foundations of Real Analysis.
CompSci 102 Discrete Math for Computer Science
Section 2.1. Section Summary Definition of sets Describing Sets Roster Method Set-Builder Notation Some Important Sets in Mathematics Empty Set and Universal.
Naïve Set Theory. Basic Definitions Naïve set theory is the non-axiomatic treatment of set theory. In the axiomatic treatment, which we will only allude.
Chapter 2 With Question/Answer Animations. Section 2.1.
CSE 20: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science Prof. Shachar Lovett.
Based on slides by Patrice Belleville and Steve Wolfman CPSC 121: Models of Computation Unit 11: Sets.
Based on slides by Patrice Belleville and Steve Wolfman CPSC 121: Models of Computation Unit 11: Sets.
1. List your two names: 2. Re-write the EXACT words from your essay that describe what they did, or how they thought differently.
 Founded in 1884 by Gottlob Frege and Richard Dedekind  Math can be reduced to 9 simple logical axioms  2 axioms are not logical  Axiom of infinity.
Analysis of Algorithms: Math Review Richard Kelley, Lecture 2.
Sets and Size Basic Question: Compare the “size” of sets. First distinction finite or infinite. –What is a finite set? –How can one compare finite sets?
Section 2.1. Sets A set is an unordered collection of objects. the students in this class the chairs in this room The objects in a set are called the.
Chapter 4: Types. Why Have Types? Detect simple kinds of errors: int square(int x) { return x*x; }... int bogus = square(“hello”); String bogus2 = square(3);
Central Idea and Objective Summary. Central “Main” Idea and Detail Main Idea- the topic and controlling point of a paragraph; what the paragraph is about.
Russell’s Paradox Is W in W? In words, W is the set that contains all the sets that don’t contain themselves. If W is in W, then W contains itself. But.
Mathematical Paradoxes
Axiomatic Number Theory and Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems
The Halting Problem.
CPSC 121: Models of Computation 2012 Summer Term 2
Mathematics for Computing
Central Idea and Objective Summary
Sets Extended Maths © Adam Gibson.
February 12 – 19, 2018.
Mathematics and Knowledge
As you write your essay…
What are logarithms? and Where did they come from?
CPSC 121: Models of Computation 2016W2
PHIL 2000 Tools for Philosophers 1st Term 2016
Sets, Sequences, and Summations
We about to get philosophical, yo. By Sara Parker
Presentation transcript:

Emre ERDOĞAN CMPE 220

In the foundations of mathematics, Russell's paradox was discovered by Bertrand Arthur William Russell (18 May 1872 – 2 February 1970) in The same paradox had been discovered a year before by Ernst Friedrich Ferdinand Zermelo (July 27, 1871 – May 21, 1953) but he did not publish the idea.

The Paradox Let R be the set of all sets that are not members of themselves. If R qualifies as a member of itself, it would contradict its own definition as a set containing sets that are not members of themselves. On the other hand, if such a set is not a member of itself, it would qualify as a member of itself by the same definition. This contradiction is Russell's paradox.

Russell-like Paradoxes Russell's paradox is not hard to extend. We can take a transitive verb, that can be applied to its substantive form and then we can form the sentence: The er that s all (and only those) who don't themselves.

An example would be “kiss": The kisser that kisses all (and only those) that don't kiss themselves. or “punish" The punisher that punishes all that don't punish themselves.

Paradoxes that fall in this scheme The barber with "shave". The original Russell's paradox with "contain": The container (Set) that contains all (containers) that don't contain themselves. The Grelling–Nelson paradox with "describer": The describer (word) that describes all words, that don't describe themselves. Richard's paradox with "denote": The denoter (number) that denotes all denoters (numbers) that don't denote themselves.

References Nelson_paradox Nelson_paradox