Booster lattice measurement and correction with LOCO C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya Booster workshop 23 Nov 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transparent Re-alignment of the Diamond Storage Ring M. Apollonio – Diamond Light Source Ltd ESLS – XXII Workshop, ESRF Grenoble, November 25 th /11/2014M.
Advertisements

PIP and the Booster Notch Bob Zwaska October 12, 2011 PIP Meeting.
SESAME – TAC 2012: M. Attal Maher Attal SESAME Booster Characterization.
Author - Title (Footer)1 LINEAR LATTICE ERRORS AT THE ESRF: MODELING AND CORRECTION A. Franchi, L. Farvacque, T. Perron.
Ultra Low Vertical Emittance at the Australian Light Source Mark Boland on behalf of Rohan Dowd 1.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Alignment and Beam Stability
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Trajectory Correction and Tuning James Jones Anthony Scarfe.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Accelerator Physics Issues Shekhar Mishra Sept 17-19, 1996 Main Injector DOE Review.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source Ian Martin Joint Accelerator Workshop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory28 th -29 th April 2004.
Studies on Lattice Calibration With Frequency Analysis of Betatron Motion R. Bartolini DIAMOND Light Source Ltd FMA workshop, Orsay, LURE, 1 st and 2 nd.
FLS2006 Workshop, HamburgEduard Prat, DESY DISPERSION MEASUREMENT AND CORRECTION IN THE VUV-FEL (FLASH) Winni Decking, Torsten Limberg, Eduard Prat 37th.
Vacuum Issues from the Beam Dynamics Point of View Marc Muñoz.
E. Karantzoulis - BESSY, June Elettra2.0-The next generation Emanuel Karantzoulis Circumference m 12 fold symmetry Energy 2 (& 2.4 GeV.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007.
Adiabatic eRHIC Extraction June 3, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC meeting1 With emittance growth analysis.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Optics corrections in the ATF damping ring Jürgen Pfingstner, Yves Renier.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
Booster Acceptance, Apertures, and Alignment Kiyomi Seiya Proton Source WorkshopDecember 07, 2010.
Booster Alignment & Magnet Moves Kiyomi Seiya. Aperture scan B75 : Aperture scan program with new corrector Kent Triplet, Alex Waller BPM data from B40.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
Frequency Map Analysis Workshop 4/2/2004 Peter Kuske Refinements of the non-linear lattice model for the BESSY storage ring P. Kuske Linear Lattice My.
Analysis of Multipole and Position Tolerances for the ATF2 Final Focus Line James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Proton Source 1/12/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Delivery Because MiniBooNE is off.
June 2006LHCCWG / J. Wenninger1 Orbit response measurements and analysis J. Wenninger AB-OP Principle Software status Example from SPS ring and lines Potential.
Emittance Tuning Simulations in the ILC Damping Rings James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Advanced Optics Control, CERN, Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Böge, Á. Saá Hernández, D. Mayilyan and.
Corrections for multi-pass eRHIC lattice with large chromaticity Chuyu Liu ERL workshop 2015 June 7, 2015.
11/18/2004 FNAL Advanced Optics Measurements at Tevatron Vadim Sajaev ANL V. Lebedev, V. Nagaslaev, A. Valishev FNAL.
A Possible Source of the Tune Drift on the Front Porch in the Tevatron.
Improving and fixing the Booster MADX model C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya PIP Meeting 16 Dec 2015.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Booster Corrector Review, Oct. 10 th, 2006 E. Prebys Introduction/Specifications Eric Prebys Proton Plan Manager.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
Threading / LTC/ JW1 How difficult is threading at the LHC ? When MADX meets the control system … J. Wenninger AB-OP &
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Sextupole calibrations via measurements of off-energy orbit response matrix and high order dispersion Nicola Carmignani.
Tolerances & Tuning of the ATF2 Final Focus Line
Vertical Emittance at the Quantum Limit
eRHIC FFAG Lattice Design
FiDeL: the model to predict the magnetic state of the LHC
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Low Emittance Tuning Tests at the Diamond Light Source (Rutherford Labs) Dec R. Bartolini, S. Liuzzo, P. Raimondi SuperB XV Meeting Caltech, CA,
Impact of remanent fields on SPS chromaticity
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Linear and Nonlinear Lattice Correction Via Betatron Phase
Energy Calibration of the SPS with Proton and Lead Ion Beams
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Optics Measurements in the PSB
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Report on Electron Polarization Study
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Presentation transcript:

Booster lattice measurement and correction with LOCO C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya Booster workshop 23 Nov 2015

Introduction People involved –C.Y. Tan, K. Triplett & K. Seiya Motivation –To measure and correct the Booster lattice Goal –Control the Booster lattice Set good working points Use corrector quad and skew quad packages that were installed in 2009 –Corrector package contains horz vert dipole, normal and skew quads, normal and skew sextupoles. –Corrector package in between every 24 long and 24 short straight sections (FOFDOOD), i.e. 48 corrector packages. –Each magnet about 10 ft (~3 m long) –1 FOFDOOD cell is m long. C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO23 Nov 20152

Booster 23 Nov 2015C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO3

What is LOCO? LOCO stands for Linear Optics from Closed Orbit –This method was invented at NSLS for correcting optics in the light source. –M. McAteer and A. Petrenko started this whole business in 2012 Programs are a collection of ACL scripts, TCL scrips, Mathematica programs, Octave programs and Elegant Lattice files. –I started working on this around March 2013 Cleaned up code. Moved everything to C++. Parallelized the code to make it MPI compliant. Moved lattice to MADX (now official lattice of Booster) from Elegant. The idea –Measure the closed orbit with all the bpms when a 1 bump is introduced. Kicks must be small! –Every dipole corrector is used sequentially and every BPM is used to measure beam position The collection of slopes dx/dkick is called the orbit response of the beam. IMO, this is the brilliance of this method. –From the orbit response, the Twiss parameters and other parameters like corrector quad strengths, bpm calibrations, rolls can be calculated. C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO23 Nov 20154

What is LOCO? (cont’d) From these Twiss parameters, the “measured lattice” can be calculated. –The solution comes from a non-square matrix equation: –This solution that generates the “measured” lattice is probably not what we want –Corrections are calculated from the measurement and loaded into the corrector quads QL and QS. –LOCO is used to measure the lattice again and hopefully the optics get closer to the ideal. 23 Nov 2015C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO5 Quad strengths, rolls etc. slope of orbit response as a function of quad stregnths, rolls, etc orbit response error between model and measurement

Ideal Booster lattice C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO23 Nov Ideal lattice is when QL and QS have zero current. However, in real Booster, QL and QS are not zero. Pseudo quads (QLerr, QSerr) are introduced that sit on top of every QL and QS and LOCO uses these quds to find the errors in the lattice. In the perfect Universe, (QL- QLerr) = 0 and (QS-Qserr)=0 LOCO depends critically that the “reference” or “ideal” lattice is indeed correct. If not, the result is garbage.

Extraction dogleg introduces lattice distortions C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO23 Nov After fitting to get QSerr and QLerr, we will get a distorted lattice and not the ideal lattice in real life because of the effects of the dogleg. Therefore, once we get the QSerr and QLerr, we fix this distortion by hand with a subset of quads in the dogleg region. Note: This effect is greatest a injection but diminishes as the beam energy increases.

The correction C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO23 Nov Not perfect but good enough Lower the strength of these quads as the momentum increases using inverse proportionality. This method was suggested by V. Lebedev. Corrections are all in the horizontal plane.

Measurement and correction C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO23 Nov Booster is divided into 32 break points and at each break point, orbits are measured 6 times to get a good mean and standard deviation of the orbit. There are 96 dipole correctors, and for each dipole three 1 bumps are applied. Orbits are measured from 96 bpms. It takes about 2 hours to collect the data. LOCO is applied for each break point and by inverting a Jacobian of 4.3e6 elements! Results of 32 break points take 15 minutes on 30 processors using parallel processing. Measured beforeMeasured after

At injection 23 Nov 2015C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO10

Does it work? 23 Nov 2015C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO11 After an enormous effort in tuning Booster with the new lattice, we could *never* fix the initial drop in intensity. There is always a 2% difference between LOCO and operational lattices. Why????

Indication of problems C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO23 Nov We found that using the calibration values of the sextupoles in the MADX lattice file to calculate the chromaticity does *not* match the measured values by a lot! A lot of tracking down old magnet measurements of the gradient magnets to see what the problem is.

MADX calibrations are wrong! C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO23 Nov MADX lattice file originally parametrized as constants: ssf = m -3 and ssd = m -3. Clearly incorrect! Reparametrized as function of ke: ssf= x x x x 4 ssd= x x x x 4 Measured sextupole components from “Fermilab Booster Magnets Sextupole Components”, A. Drozhdin, J. DiMarco, R. Tomlin, October 31, 2003.

Results with new sextupole calibrations C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO23 Nov Results clearly a lot better, especially vert chroms. However, not perfect in horz. Measurement error?

What about quad calibrations? C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO23 Nov Again, it looks like we have a similar problem, bad tune prediction. Again, K1 in MADX file uses one value in the gradient magnets. D: m -2 F: m -2

Measured K1 values C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO23 Nov Notice that the spread is very small, but … ~0.5% ~0.3% hysteresis

Small change to K1 values have a huge effect on tunes 23 Nov 2015C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO17 Dramatic changes in tune by just a 0.5% change in K1 strength!

Effect on QL and QS 23 Nov 2015C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO18 There are large effects in QL and QS currents with a 0.5% change in D K1. (Note vertical scales are different in both graphs) Can change between ~0 A to 2 A.

First pass at fitting measurements to K1 calibrations 23 Nov 2015C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO19 Discontinuous between the two fits. The fits do not predict the tunes very well below 1 GeV. rescaled, measured k1 values Doesn’t fit well

Other observations 23 Nov 2015C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO20 K1 fits can predict tunes quite well above 1 GeV! Data taken on 13 Nov 2015 using K1 fits from 24 June Radial position of the beam is moving and thus dp/p is not zero. Chromaticity shifting tunes?

Conclusion More work to figure out if better handle of K1 values help with getting new lattice to have the same or better transmission efficiency than the uncorrected, HEP lattice. –Low energy K1 values where the concern is. Temporarily fudge it? LOCO solution is *not* unique because the problem is clearly over-constrained. Is there a better solution for the minima. Investigation continues … 23 Nov 2015C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya | Booster lattice corrections with LOCO21