Kazuya Koyama University of Portsmouth Non-linear structure formation in modified gravity models with Gong-bo Zhao (Portsmouth), Baojiu Li (Durham)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benasque 2012 Luca Amendola University of Heidelberg in collaboration with Martin Kunz, Mariele Motta, Ippocratis Saltas, Ignacy Sawicki Horndeski Lagrangian:
Advertisements

Weak Lensing and Redshift Space Data: Tests of Gravity Bhuvnesh Jain, University of Pennsylvania Jake VanderPlas, Joseph Clampitt, Anna Cabre, Vinu Vikram.
Cosmological Constraints from Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Massive Gravity and the Galileon Claudia de Rham Université de Genève Work with Gregory Gabadadze, Lavinia Heisenberg, David Pirtskhalava and Andrew Tolley.
P ROBING SIGNATURES OF MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS OF DARK ENERGY Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution Springel et al., 2005 Presented by Eve LoCastro October 1, 2009.
Theoretical Challenges in the Post-Planck Era Scott Dodelson Bay Area Particle Theory Seminar Oct. 4, 2013.
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
Cosmological Structure Formation A Short Course
PRESENTATION TOPIC  DARK MATTER &DARK ENERGY.  We know about only normal matter which is only 5% of the composition of universe and the rest is  DARK.
Spherical Collapse in Chameleon Models Rogerio Rosenfeld Rogerio Rosenfeld Instituto de Física Teórica Instituto de Física Teórica UNESP UNESP 2nd Bethe.
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Macroscopic Behaviours of Palatini Modified Gravity Theories [gr-qc] and [gr-qc] Baojiu Li, David F. Mota & Douglas J. Shaw Portsmouth,
Gong-Bo Zhao ICG, Portsmouth (PRL submitted) (PRL 11) (PRD 11) (PASP 11) (PRL 09) Understanding the Cosmic.
Near-Horizon Solution to DGP Perturbations Ignacy Sawicki, Yong-Seon Song, Wayne Hu University of Chicago astro-ph/ astro-ph/
Atomic Precision Tests and Light Scalar Couplings Philippe Brax IPhT Saclay « The Proton Radius Puzzle » Workshop, Trento November 2012 P.B and C. Burrage,
Effects of baryons on the structure of massive galaxies and clusters Oleg Gnedin University of Michigan Collisionless N-body simulations predict a nearly.
Effective field theory approach to modified gravity with applications to inflation and dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa Hot Topics in General Relativity And.
Cosmological Post-Newtonian Approximation with Dark Energy J. Hwang and H. Noh
Geneva, October 2010 Dark Energy at Colliders? Philippe Brax, IPhT Saclay Published papers :
Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.
Impact of Early Dark Energy on non-linear structure formation Margherita Grossi MPA, Garching Volker Springel Advisor : Volker Springel 3rd Biennial Leopoldina.
Structure formation in dark energy cosmology La Magia, April 2005.
CERN, January 2009 Evading the CAST bound with a chameleon Philippe Brax, IPhT Saclay.
Large distance modification of gravity and dark energy
Dark Energy and Modified Gravity IGC Penn State May 2008 Roy Maartens ICG Portsmouth R Caldwell.
Modified (dark) gravity Roy Maartens, Portsmouth or Dark Gravity?
BRANEWORLD COSMOLOGICAL PERTURBATIONS
Lecture 3 - Formation of Galaxies What processes lead from the tiny fluctuations which we see on the surface of last scattering, to the diverse galaxies.
Kazuya Koyama University of Portsmouth Non-linear structure formation in modified gravity models.
Dark energy fluctuations and structure formation Rogério Rosenfeld Instituto de Física Teórica/UNESP I Workshop "Challenges of New Physics in Space" Campos.
Academic Training Lectures Rocky Kolb Fermilab, University of Chicago, & CERN Cosmology and the origin of structure Rocky I : The universe observed Rocky.
What can we learn from galaxy clustering? David Weinberg, Ohio State University Berlind & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 575, 587 Zheng, Tinker, Weinberg, & Berlind.
Dark Energy and Modified Gravity Shinji Tsujikawa (Gunma National College of Technology ) Collaborations with L. Amendola, S. Capozziello, R. Gannouji,
Observational test of modified gravity models with future imaging surveys Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Hiroshima U.) Edinburgh Oct K.Y. , Bassett, Nichol,
Cosmological structure formation and dark energy Carlo Baccigalupi Heidelberg, May 31, 2005.
The dark universe SFB – Transregio Bonn – Munich - Heidelberg.
Our Evolving Universe1 Vital Statistics of the Universe Today… l l Observational evidence for the Big Bang l l Vital statistics of the Universe   Hubble’s.
The Theory/Observation connection lecture 2 perturbations Will Percival The University of Portsmouth.
Measuring dark energy from galaxy surveys Carlton Baugh Durham University London 21 st March 2012.
David Weinberg, Ohio State University Dept. of Astronomy and CCAPP The Cosmological Content of Galaxy Redshift Surveys or Why are FoMs all over the map?
Dark Energy Philippe Brax IPhT Saclay « ANR» afternoon, November 2012P.B, C. Burrage, A.C. Davis, B. Li, H. Winther, G. Zhao etc…
Have neutrinos to do with Dark Energy ?
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
 Acceleration of Universe  Background level  Evolution of expansion: H(a), w(a)  degeneracy: DE & MG  Perturbation level  Evolution of inhomogeneity:
Racah Institute of physics, Hebrew University (Jerusalem, Israel)
Anisotropic Clustering of Galaxies in High-z Universe as a Probe of Dark Energy Taka Matsubara (Nagoya Univ.) “Decrypting the Universe: Large Surveys for.
Phenomenology of beyond Horndeski theories Kazuya Koyama University of Portsmouth.
Testing Chameleon Dark Energy Amanda Weltman University of Cambridge Portsmouth June 2008 University of Cape Town.
Cosmology and Dark Matter III: The Formation of Galaxies Jerry Sellwood.
Three theoretical issues in physical cosmology I. Nonlinear clustering II. Dark matter III. Dark energy J. Hwang (KNU), H. Noh (KASI)
Gong-Bo Zhao NAOC and Portsmouth Understanding the Accelerating Universe.
Taka Matsubara (Nagoya Univ.)
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Matters in a star ? Physics at the surface of a star in Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld gravity *Hyeong-Chan Kim Korea National University of Transportation.
Lecture 23: The Acceleration of the Universe Astronomy 1143 – Spring 2014.
Chapter 20 Cosmology. Hubble Ultra Deep Field Galaxies and Cosmology A galaxy’s age, its distance, and the age of the universe are all closely related.
Spherical Collapse and the Mass Function – Chameleon Dark Energy Stephen Appleby, APCTP-TUS dark energy workshop 5 th June, 2014 M. Kopp, S.A.A, I. Achitouv,
Clare Burrage Université de Genève. Axion-like particles (ALPs) are scalars or pseudo-scalars which couple to photons Scalars Pseudo-scalars Assume no.
3D Matter and Halo density fields with Standard Perturbation Theory and local bias Nina Roth BCTP Workshop Bad Honnef October 4 th 2010.
Beyond MOND: TeVeS and its Tests (Depeche MOND) Scott Noble CCRG RIT July 2, 2010.
2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey ¼ M galaxies 2003
Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, University of Portsmouth
Long distance modifications of gravity in four dimensions.
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Notes on non-minimally derivative coupling
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Ignacy Sawicki CEICO, Institute of Physics, Prague
The impact of non-linear evolution of the cosmological matter power spectrum on the measurement of neutrino masses ROE-JSPS workshop Edinburgh.
Presentation transcript:

Kazuya Koyama University of Portsmouth Non-linear structure formation in modified gravity models with Gong-bo Zhao (Portsmouth), Baojiu Li (Durham)

Dark energy v modified gravity Is cosmology probing the breakdown of general relativity at large distance?

Examples  Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati braneworld model gravity leaks into 5D on larges scales and the Universe self-accelerates without cosmological constant  f(R) gravity there is no cosmological constant at low energies yet the expansion of the universe can accelerate It is extremely difficult to construct a consistent theory

General picture  Largest scales gravity is modified so that the universe accelerates without dark energy  Large scale structure scales gravity is still modified by a fifth force from scalar graviton  Small scales (solar system) GR is recovered Modified gravity Scalar tensor GR

From linear to non-linear scales  Linear scales Model independent parametrisation of modified Einstein equations is possible (two functions of time and space) many ways to parametrise these functions directly or indirectly (i.e. parametrisation of the growth rate) Principal component analysis provides model independent tests  Non-linear scales Mechanisms to recover GR on small scales are model dependent Pogosian, Silverstri, KK, Zhao Zhao et.al , , Hojjati et.al

How we recover GR on small scales  Chameleon mechanism (Khoury & Weltman)

Example – f(R) gravity Two limits  GR  Scalar-Tensor(ST) the fifth force has a similar strength as gravity

Linear regime ST GR  Linearise the equation The fifth force does not propagate beyond the Compton wavelength (GR limit) Below the Compton wavelength, gravity is enhanced (ST limit) G 4G/3

 Fifth force is strongly constrained at solar system the post-Newtonian parameter is not  Chameleon mechanism the mass of the scalar mode becomes heavy in a dense environment Engineering f(R) gravity model Chameleon mechanism Hu & Sawicki Brax et.al. Khoury and Weltman

Non-linear regime  Chameleon mechanism In a dense region, linearisation fails and GR is recovered Present day Ricci curvature of the Universe today It is required to solve a non-linear Klein-Gordon equation of the scalar field self-consistently

Behaviour of gravity There regimes of gravity Understandings of non-linear clustering require N-body simulations Scalar tensor GR G 4G/3

Parameter  Compton wavelength For a larger, the Compton wavelength is longer  Chameleon mechanism The Chameleon works when and the linearisation fails It works better for smaller and earlier times

Models  Full f(R) simulations solve the non-linear scalar equation  Non-Chameleon simulations artificially suppress the Chameleon by linearising the scalar equation to remove the Chameleon effect  LCDM Oyaizu et.al. PRD , Schmidt et.al. PRD

N-body Simulations  MLAPM code  ECOSMOG code (based on RAMSES) Li, Zhao , Li, Barrow Zhao, Li, Koyama Li, Zhao, Teyssier, Koyama Braxet.al

Snapshots at z=0  If the fifth force is not suppressed, we have Chameleon is working Compton wavelength is short Fifth force is not suppressed

Snapshots Chameleon is working Chameleon stops working Chameleon starts to hibernate

Power spectrum (z=0) full Non- Chameleon Zhao, Li, KK Li, Hellwing, KK, Zhao, Jennings, Baugh 1206.xxxx

Quasi non-linear scales  Standard perturbation theory predictions Even in F4, inclusion of Chameleon effects is important below k<0.1 h/Mpc SPT agrees with N-body results at 1% level at k<0.09 h/Mpc (z=0) (KK, Taruya, Hiramatsu ) Bernardeau, Brax , Brax, Valageas

Growth rate  Growth rate on linear scales it is defined as F4 linear GR linear F4 GR Stronger gravity enhances linear growth rate as well as non-linear damping Jennings, Baugh, Li, Zhao, Koyama, F4: G 4G/3

Redshift space distortions  Power spectrum in redshift space become anisotropic  Multipole decomposition Modelling of non-linear effects is crucial to extract the differences in the linear growth rate between GR and f(R) gravity models Jennings, Baugh, Li, Zhao, Koyama, F4 linear GR linear F4 GR Taruya, Nishimichi, Saito , Nishimichi, Taruya

Halos  MHF (default halo identifier of MLAPM) Use TSC interpolation to assign particles to grids and identify halos using the spherical over density method  Spherical over-density We use the virial over-density in LCDM at z=0 and at z=1  Minimum number of particles in halos is 800

Mass function full Non- Chameleon  If Chameleon is not working, strong gravity creates more and more heavy halos and the abundance of massive halos is enhanced  Cluster abundance gives the tightest constraint so far  Chameleon works better for heavier halos and it suppresses the abundance of large halos

 In modified gravity models, dynamical mass inferred from velocity dispersions and lensing mass can be different  f(R)  Difference between dynamical and lensing masses The fifth force does not change geodesics of photon The fifth force enhances Newtonian gravity below the Compton wavelength Zhao, Li, Koyama Screening of dark matter halos Schmidt

Environmental effects GR is recovered even in small halos nearby big halos Large bubbles =better screened (GR is recovered) Zhao, Li, Koyama

Creating a screening map  It is essential to find places where GR is not recovered  Small galaxies in underdense regions  SDSS galaxies within 200 Mpc GR is recovered Cabre, Vikram, Zhao, Jain, KK

Tests of gravity using unscreened galaxies  dwarf galaxies in voids shallow potentials unscreened  Galaxies are brighter  A displacement of the stellar disks from HI gases HI gas: unscreened Stellar disk: screened Jain & VanderPlas Davis et.al

Summary  Non-linear clustering mechanisms to recover GR play a crucial role  The power spectrum tends to go back to the one in GR with the same expansion history  GR is better recovered in massive halos  Details of the recovery of GR depend on screening mechanisms  A challenge for theoretical predictions need to solve non-linear Poisson equation for the scalar  Perturbation theory approach  N-body simulations  Need to find the best places to detect deviations from GR  Fifth force can significantly changes stellar evolution in unscreened galaxies (Chang & Hui, Davis et.al.)  Stellar discs can be self-screened in unscreened dwarf galaxies (Jain & VanderPlas) (KK, Taruya, Hiramatsu ) (Zhao, Li, KK , Li, Zhao, Teyssier, KK )