From InDiCo to JACoW in one (well maybe a few) click(s) J. Poole.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Holdings Management Overview
Advertisements

Cardiff University e-Learning: Blackboard Support 6 Virtual Learning Environment An Instructors Guide to Managing Courses with the Control Panel Click.
Materials Data Curation System
1 Module 7: Science. Objectives 2 Welcome to the Cayuse424 Science module. In this module you will learn:  Cayuse424 Basic Template Concepts.  How to.
Online STUDENT PORTAL - TURNITIN Student Manual Ver 1 LSC GROUP OF COLLEGES Belgrade IT Department 2011 LSC GROUP OF COLLEGES Belgrade IT Department 2011.
Web publishing training Introduction to the Tera text Web Content Management System (CMS) Learning Objective: Basic knowledge and skills required to publish.
Welcome to the Turnitin.com Instructor Quickstart Tutorial ! This brief tour will take you through the basic steps teachers and students new to Turnitin.com.
Tutorial 8 Sharing, Integrating and Analyzing Data
JACoW Team Meeting Knoxville, TN 7 to 9 November 2004 Review of EPAC’04 Experience with the SPMS from the position of Conference Administrator Christine.
Proposal 13 HUMAN CENTRIC COMPUTING (COMP106) ASSIGNMENT 2.
Automation Repository - QTP Tutorials Made Easy The Zero th Step TEST AUTOMATION AND QTP.
An Introduction to Content Management. By the end of the session you will be able to... Explain what a content management system is Apply the principles.
Introduction to Usability By : Sumathie Sundaresan.
Notes to Teachers: 1.Make sure each student has his/her file open from the previous class “(student name).xlsx”. 2.A vocabulary list is included on last.
Welcome to turnitin.com!. What is turnitin.com? An online paper submission website Online grading Paper free! A place to keep a record of your assignments.
CPSC 203 Introduction to Computers T59 & T64 By Jie (Jeff) Gao.
XP New Perspectives on Microsoft Office Access 2003 Tutorial 12 1 Microsoft Office Access 2003 Tutorial 12 – Managing and Securing a Database.
1 PDF Optimizer J. Poole. Optimizer, TM Knoxville, October 2007, J. Poole 2 Documentation The documentation on the JACoW website concerning use of the.
Easy Chair Online Conference Submission, Tracking and Distribution Process: Getting Started + Information for Reviewers AMS World Marketing Congress /
U3A Computing Class Leader – Brian Moore Week 5 of 10 weeks. Mondays 4:15 to 5:45 pm Next week is half term then an Inset day So Next lesson is 4 November.
SWC Spring 2010 Application Version SWC Spring 2010 Select Folder 2.
JACoW Website J. Poole. Review the objectives of the web pages. Review the contents of the website (other than the conference proceedings). Proposal for.
Energy Recovery Linac (ERL) Conference June 8–12, 2009 Cornell University, Ithaca New York JACoW Team Meeting Hamburg ICFA ABDW #45 ERL 09 Karl.
Design and Programming Chapter 7 Applied Software Project Management, Stellman & Greene See also:
1 JACoW Joint Accelerator Conferences Website Presented by J. Vigen on behalf of John Poole, JACoW.
Retrieving and Processing Transparencies during a Conference Michaela Marx, DESY JACoW Team Meeting, November 2009, Hamburg, Germany.
JACoW Team Meeting Summary of Meeting Hywel Owen, Daresbury Laboratory.
Wiki Training: Introduction to Instructor: Zach Silveira (415)
Faculty Webpage Design Minimum Requirements. Go to: then High Schoolhttp://gcsc.groupfusion.net/
Invitation Only Conferences Michaela Marx, DESY JACoW Team Meeting Frascati, Italy,November 2005.
Matt Arena, Fermilab.  The Scientific Program Management System is a (GPL) tool for event management  Scientific Program Module  Scientific program.
Submitting Course Outlines for C-ID Designation Training for Articulation Officers Summer 2012.
Processing of Transparencies Michaela Marx, DESY JACoW Team Meeting October 2007, Knoxville, USA.
Matt Arena, Fermilab.  Overview of SPMS  SPMS History & Statistics  Fermilab  Users, Roles & Privileges (Fine-grained Access)  System Parameters.
1 Spring Team Meeting Summary Updated 28 March 2007.
JACoW Conference Process Overview J. Poole. JACoW Conference Process Overview, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole 2 The Editor’s Objective Produce a set.
Downloading and Installing Autodesk Inventor Professional 2015 This is a 4 step process 1.Register with the Autodesk Student Community 2.Downloading the.
0 eCPIC Admin Training: OMB Submission Packages and Annual Submissions These training materials are owned by the Federal Government. They can be used or.
Rev.04/2015© 2015 PLEASE NOTE: The Application Review Module (ARM) is a system that is designed as a shared service and is maintained by the Grants Centers.
1 Organisational Changes following TM Trieste Decisions J. Poole.
1 Spring Team Meeting Summary. TM Trieste Summary, March 2007, J. Poole 2 Organisational Issues Agreed to new terms of reference – needs rewrite Send.
6 th Annual Focus Users’ Conference 6 th Annual Focus Users’ Conference Import Testing Data Presented by: Adrian Ruiz Presented by: Adrian Ruiz.
August 2005 TMCOps TMC Operator Requirements and Position Descriptions Phase 2 Interactive Tool Project Presentation.
Technical Issues in 2008 J. Poole. We agreed that Acrobat 6 was not a good version to use, so we jumped to 7. Acrobat 9 is now on the market and PitStop.
An Introduction to Designing, Executing and Sharing Workflows with Taverna Katy Wolstencroft myGrid University of Manchester IMPACT/Taverna Hackathon 2011.
The Refereeing Module of the SPMS FEL2005: August Heinz-Dieter Nuhn – Scientific Editor Beck Reitmeyer – Conference Editor Referee = Reviewer = Expert.
Student Quick Start Guide Prepared by: Information Services Division Perpustakaan Sultan Abdul Samad Universiti Putra Malaysia
Introduction to Usability By : Sumathie Sundaresan.
We now will look at options for saving searches in CINAHL. We have accessed the Results for Chloroquine AND Pyrimethamine AND Sulfadoxine search. We now.
NIMAC for Publishers & Vendors: Using the Excel to OPF Feature & Manually Uploading Files December 2015.
1 EPAC’06 Post Mortem J. Poole. EPAC06 Post Mortem, TM Trieste, March 2007, J. Poole 2 EPAC2006 – The Results 1188 papers published (from ~1550 abstracts.
1 Chairman’s Report Volker RW Schaa June 2007.
Delete this slide Although multiple images were used to create each slide, they are saved together as a single image file. This means that you cannot remove.
EPAC’08 Technical Post Mortem J. Poole. 2 Editing at EPAC 2006 Basic assumption is that expert editors can edit an average of 35 papers per day. Started.
1 Processing Picked up in 2007 J. Poole. Processing, TM Knoxville, October 2007, J. Poole 2 Uploading When an editor has processed a file and is ready.
Text2PTO: Modernizing Patent Application Filing A Proposal for Submitting Text Applications to the USPTO.
Downloading and Installing GRASP-AF Workshop Ian Robson Information Analyst, North of England Cardiovascular Network.
TechKnowlogy Conference August 2, 2011 Using GoogleDocs for Collaboration.
1 New Perspectives on Access 2016 Module 8: Sharing, Integrating, and Analyzing Data.
Online Submission and Management Information -- Authors
JACoW 2005 Team meeting Frascati Laboratory 14 to 18 November 2005
Introduction This seminar is intended to give people an overall view of the capabilities of the Scientific Programme Management System (SPMS), to explain.
Holdings Management Overview
Publishing and Maintaining a Website
Lecture 13 RPM and its advantages.
How Can I Download My Transactions Directly Into Quicken
Lesson 12 -Maintaining Documents & Macros Lesson 13 - Protecting & sharing documents Lesson 14 - Advanced Options #1.12, #1.13, & #1.14.
Patents e-Commerce Update: Public and Private PAIR
Patents e-Commerce Update: Public and Private PAIR
Presentation transcript:

From InDiCo to JACoW in one (well maybe a few) click(s) J. Poole

JACoW has been promoting the links between InDiCo and JACoW tools for many years. At the 2006 Team Meeting we agreed to try and build an interface between them. The basic idea is to run the conference using InDiCo, which is much lighter than SPMS, but to feed some output into the JACoW Proceedings Script Package (JPSP) in order to produce JACoW compatible proceedings. 2 Introduction From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole

It was agreed to use the 2007 Energy Recovery Linac Workshop (ERL07) as a guinea pig. Unfortunately it has taken a long time to complete the process but the proceedings are now ready. It was a small workshop, where the emphasis was on working in groups rather than presentations. There were some formal presentations and the main talks and conclusions have been written up. 3 The Prototype From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole

The basic rule that the quality of the final result is critically dependent on the quality of the data entered, is even more important when using InDiCo. Because the InDiCo repository is not managed or maintained to the same level that the SPMS is, it is very easy for errors to creep in. Errors or bad information become very apparent when the website is built. 4 Setting up InDiCo From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole

Run conference using InDiCo Process the contributions and upload JACoW compatible PDF files Get an XML dump from InDiCo Run the scripts Fix the problems Loop until OK 5 Basic Process From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole

6 view=jacow&fr=no&confId=15495 From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole

InDiCo appends ‘-1’ to the session abbreviation in the XML file PLENARY First Session of Working Group 1 7 Software ‘Problem’ From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole

InDiCo will allow a ‘/’ in a session name or abbreviation This is not acceptable to the scripts ERL had many such session names where two working groups met together in a session. 8 Software Features From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole

9

Data quality !! - difficult to see why in InDiCo author index … 10 Case Sensitivity From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole

11 InDiCo Author Details From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole

12 InDiCo Profile Search From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole

HAJIMA Ryoichi Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) 13 XML Reveals More From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole Hajima Ryoichi JAEA

14 JPSP Result From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole A quick fix in the XML (changing the case) gives:

The XML dump does not seem to contain co-author listings. From the previous slides can see that Hajima was co-author on 3 other papers in InDiCo. 15 Co-authors From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole

InDiCo assigns a unique ID to each contribution and the downloaded PDF is given this ID as a filename. The unique IDs are numbers and this leads to some confusion. The numbers appear in the table of contents 16 Paper ID From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole

17 Top and Bottom of the Published Paper From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole

Append a conference acronym to the number … or suppress this output on the page 18 Proposal From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole

Read the manual ! Run through the process –If there are problems, they will almost certainly come from bad data, so go back and fix the original and try again. Once it is ~working † and it is necessary to fix small errors –Customise INDEXLOC.HTM and save as INDEX.HTM –Modify html/banner.htm and save a copy (make the links to the conference home relative and point to this instance, remove link to classification index etc.) –Re-run spmsbatch against a new XML dump –Replace the new banner.htm with your saved version. 19 Methodology From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole † See for the current production versionhttp://cern.ch/poole/erl07

The InDiCo to JPSP process is a valuable addition to the JACoW suite of tools and can be considered to be in production. Some improvements have been suggested, but they are not necessary for the current functionality. This development opens the door for smaller conferences who do not have the resources to implement an SPMS to publish on JACoW –The cost however, is in the manpower required for quality control of the data (which is automatically taken care of in SPMS by the repository). However, there are substantial overall gains. 20 Conclusion From InDiCo to JACoW, TM KEK, November 2008, J. Poole