Narrow plasma & electron injection simulations for the AWAKE experiment A. Petrenko, K. Lotov, October 11, 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AWAKE Electron Spectrometer Simon Jolly 7 th March 2013.
Advertisements

Inverse Cyclotrons for Intense Muon Beams – Phase I Kevin Paul Tech-X Corporation Don Summers University of Mississippi ABSTRACT: I will summarize the.
A Proof-of Principle Study of 2D optical streaking for ultra-short e-beam diagnostics using ionization electrons & circular polarized laser Lanfa Wang.
Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
Frictional Cooling Studies at Columbia University &Nevis Labs Raphael Galea Allen Caldwell Stefan Schlenstedt (DESY/Zeuthen) Halina Abramowitz (Tel Aviv.
Beamline Design Issues D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation W. M. Sharp and S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Presented.
Frictional Cooling Studies at Columbia University/Nevis Labs Raphael Galea, Allen Caldwell + Stefan Schlenstedt (DESY/Zeuthen) Halina Abramowitz (Tel Aviv.
Frictional Cooling MC Collaboration Meeting June 11-12/2003 Raphael Galea.
Transfer reactions Resonant Elastic scattering Inelastic scattering: GR.
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
Preliminary result on Quarter wave transformer simulation a short lens with a high magnetic field and a long solenoidal magnetic field. Field profile of.
DSMC simulations of Rb gas flow A. Petrenko, G. Plyushchev AWAKE PEB CERN Direct Simulation Monte Carlo method (developed by G. A. Bird in the.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
CLIC Drive Beam Injector Design Update Shahin Sanaye Hajari 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Chris Rogers, Analysis Parallel, MICE CM17 Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
Impact of synchrotron radiation in LEPTON COLLIDER arcs
2 Lasers: Centimeters instead of Kilometers ? If we take a Petawatt laser pulse, I=10 21 W/cm 2 then the electric field is as high as E=10 14 eV/m=100.
AWAKE Electron Spectrometer Design Simon Jolly 4 th September 2012.
Laser news AWAKE performance meeting Overview There was a meeting on with the supplier of the laser system (AMPLITUDE) No new information.
A. Kurup, I. Puri, Y. Uchida, Y. Yap, Imperial College London, UK R. B. Appleby, S. Tygier, The University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute, UK.
Summary of the AWAKE Technical Board Meeting September 2014 – March 2015.
Parameter sensitivity tests for the baseline variant Konstantin Lotov, Vladimir Minakov, Alexander Sosedkin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS,
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.
FFAG-ERIT R&D 06/11/06 Kota Okabe (Kyoto Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
AWAKE Electron Spectrometer Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon, Matthew Wing 28 th January 2015.
Diagnostics for intense e-cooled ion beams by Vsevolod Kamerdzhiev Forschungszentrum Jülich, IKP, COSY ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, October 19, 2004.
Overview of ERL MEIC Cooler Design Studies S.V. Benson, Y. Derbenev, D.R. Douglas, F. Hannon, F. Marhauser, R. A Rimmer, C.D. Tennant, H. Zhang, H. Wang,
Bright muon sources Pavel Snopok Illinois Institute of Technology and Fermilab August 29, 2014.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
Electron Source Design Dr Tim Noakes ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Interactions with Rest Gas – Typical Case Interactions with Rest Gas – ELENA Quantitative analysis for ELENA Evaluations at 100 keV Ejection Energy Evaluations.
Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.
MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October, Dmitry Kayran for injector group MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October 7-8, 2009 MeRHIC: Injection System Gun.
AWAKE: D2E for Alexey beam properties Silvia Cipiccia, Eduard Feldbaumer, Helmut Vincke DGS/RP.
Issues Concerning Different Beam Lines Integration C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements: WP3 and.
Latest results on electron trapping and acceleration Konstantin Lotov, Alexey Petrenko, Alexander Sosedkin, Petr Tuev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
beam delivery with SC magnets
ECOOL Meeting 03/26/10 1 Electron beam transport for FNAL electron cooler E-cooling is referred as “non-magnetized” OVERVIEW Material is taken from FNAL’s.
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Parameters of ejected beam
Proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration in hollow plasma
Electron acceleration behind self-modulating proton beam in plasma with a density gradient Alexey Petrenko.
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Preliminary results for electron lens with beam current of 20 A
Status of SPARC Undulator
Calculation of Beam Equilibrium and Luminosities for
Simulation of Luminosity Variation
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
A.Smirnov, A.Sidorin, D.Krestnikov
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
The COMET Experiment Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London, on behalf of the COMET Collaboration. ABSTRACT The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
Task E - A0 and related activities
Task E - A0 and related activities
Status of the VEPP-2000 Collider Project at Novosibirsk
WHAT IS A WAVE? disturbance that transports energy through matter or space.
The n-3He Simulation Using Geant4
Gabriel Palacios 08/12/ kV gun GPT simulations Tee, mushroom and sphere cathodes CEBAF beam parameters Gabriel Palacios
ELENA Extra Low ENergy Antiproton Ring
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Design study for a Helios-like spectrometer at LNS
He Zhang MEIC R&D Meeting, 07/09/2015
Plasma : high electic field can accelerate electron and proton laser plasma accelerator can reduced size of future accelerator can produced particle beam.
Presentation transcript:

Narrow plasma & electron injection simulations for the AWAKE experiment A. Petrenko, K. Lotov, October 11,

Narrow plasma simulations Baseline simulation from CDR (4 mm wide plasma): 2 mm wide plasma (r = 1 mm): 2

Electrons start to leave plasma after SMI develops: Large Er 200 keV/cm (20 MeV/m) Plasma electrons Proton beam Single particle trajectory: 3

Electron beam transport parallel to plasma/proton beam Plasma section entranceAfter 1 m:After 2 m: Electron energy = 15 MeV Close-up of Er field map: Just some very small noise Er 4 Electron beam is too sensitive to small fields over long distances. Even small numerical noise-level Er completely destroys parallel electron beam over 2 m distance. It is very difficult to calculate Er outside plasma with enough accuracy for accurate beam transport simulation.

Plasma wave acceptance Metal screen (first 6 m) 15 MeV electron beam protons plasma Initial beam configuration: Energy of electrons after 1.2 m: xi-r & xi-r’ acceptance: 5

Captured particles (animation) 6

Typical trajectory of captured particle 7

15 MeV electron beam with realistic emittance (ε n = 2 mm*mrad) n(Rb) = cm -3 In vacuum 5 m of plasma section n(Rb) = 0 In the middle of plasma section (5 m): 8

r-r’ acceptance: Beam r·pϕ distribution: r·pϕ acceptance: 9 Electron beam after scattering vs plasma wave acceptance

2.2 % of e-beam is captured Np = 3.0e11 (Baseline variant) 10

1.1 % of e-beam is captured Np = 3.0e11 11

1.1 % of e-beam is captured Np = 3.0e11 12

0.6 % of e-beam is captured Np = 3.0e11 13

(Preliminary) Effect of dipole magnetic field on side-injection 50 MeV e - dipole 14 L = 20 cm, B = 70 Gs

Conclusions Large number of electrons are ejected from plasma as a result of SMI (may be useful for diagnostic of SMI). Metal screen between electron and proton beam/plasma will probably be required for electron beam transport inside plasma section. Typical injection efficiency with realistic 15 MeV e-beam is 1-2 % (Preliminary) Dipole magnetic field (approx 50 Gs) at the injection point increases the side-injection efficiency and makes it possible to inject higher-energy electron beam (50 MeV for example). 15

Additional slides 16

Transverse acceptance17 17

Angular momentum acceptance e-beam 15 MeV r*pϕ is conserved For r = 3 mm:18 18

Energy acceptance19 19

In vacuum: n(Rb) = cm -3 :20 20

Options for electron transport line Difficult to simulate (though may actually work) Easier to simulate, should work, but the number of captured electrons will probably be reduced due to scattering on neutral gas (which induces large r*pϕ) The best control over beam parameters, and the best capture efficiency, (with longitudinally compressed beam might be possible to capture all electrons). Metal screen 2 mm wide channel Fast valve 1 m21 21