 Engineering in the modern society  Professional profile of a modern engineer  Engineer as a key personality in the technological and social progress.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special recognition: University of Florida.  Participants will be able to: ◦ Articulate specifications for learning outcomes ◦ Classify learning outcomes.
Advertisements

1 Comments on EC 2000: Why so much detail to tell us about EC 2000? Practices of Modern Engineering – Spring 2011 You learned where things (courses) fit.
National Academic Reference Standards
For AS 229 (Environmental Technology). 1. A competent environmental technologist with strong understanding of fundamental scientific and technological.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
1 Graduates’ Attributes : EMF, EUR-ACE and Federal Educational Standards Alexander I. Chuchalin, Chair of the RAEE Accreditation Board Graduates’ Attributes.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Outcomes-Based Accreditation: An Agent for Change and Quality Improvement in Higher Education Programs A. Erbil PAYZIN Founding Member and Past Chairman.
ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 To maintain ABET accreditation, Engineering Departments must demonstrate that all of their graduates have the following.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
Introduction to Engineering and Urban Planning How to be a Successful Engineer.
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
OBE Briefing.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
ABET Student Forum September 20, Review of the criterion Criterion 2: Objectives Criterion 3: Outcomes Criterion 5: Curriculum.
Learning outcomes for BUSINESS INFORMATCIS Vladimir Radevski, PhD Associated Professor Faculty of Contemporary Sciences and Technologies (CST)
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR (18 th -27 th November 2013) -MDR Deliverables clearly defined? -Individual team member MDR deliverables.
REVISIONS TO GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Auburn University Senate Information Item, August 2014.
The Balance Between Theoretical and Practical Work Within Electrical and Computer Engineering Courses Dr. Bahawodin Baha March Development Partnerships.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design Murali Varanasi September 02, 2009.
PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Curriculum and Programme Objectives: Mapping of Learning Outcomes Oleg V. Boev, Accreditation Centre, Russian.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Incorporating Engineering Standards in the Major Design Experience William E. Kelly Department of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America.
Supporting ABET Assessment and Continuous Improvement for Engineering Programs William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University.
Cross Cutting Initiatives - Education William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
P ROFESSIONALISM The term professionalism is defined as "1. professional character, spirit, or methods. 2. the standing, practice, or methods of a professional.
CEN ABET Mini- Retreat March 4, CEN ABET Mini-Retreat Agenda: –State of the Assessments –Discussion on loop closings. –CSE Program Objectives/Outcomes.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR Report.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 – Part I.
Introducing Design and Technologies. Victorian Curriculum F–10 Released in September 2015 as a central component of the Education State Provides a stable.
First week. Catalog Description This course explores basic cultural, social, legal, and ethical issues inherent in the discipline of computing. Students.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS. WHAT IS ENGINEERING ANALYSIS? ABET Required Program Outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
Employment Skills for Communications Technology..
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Assessment of Industrial Internships Karyn Biasca.
 Societal and global impact of engineering solutions  Codes of ethics in engineering  Risk-taking in engineering.
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION (O.B.E) (For Students) by: OBE Sector Committee 2016, FKMP, UTHM With Wisdom We Explore Faculty of Mechanical and.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
 (noun) a specification of an object, manifested by an agent, intended to accomplish goals, in a particular environment, using a set of primitive components,
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
Continuous Program Improvement
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Inculcating “Parallel Programming” in UG curriculum
Introducing Design and Technologies
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Information Technology (IT)
Development of ABET Syllabus
Assessment and Accreditation
CE 220 Professionalism A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Presentation transcript:

 Engineering in the modern society  Professional profile of a modern engineer  Engineer as a key personality in the technological and social progress

 Philosophy of engineering looks at engineering from a philosopher’s perspective.  Standing outside the actual practice, it reflects and contemplates on engineering, conceptualizes important aspects of it and calls into question some background premises previously unnoticed inside the practice.

 It operates in the dimension of the conceptual, and its project is to make something that is implicit to become explicit.  It can shed light on many significant issues the practitioners themselves might have overlooked. Philosophy of engineering is essentially what results when the methodologies and concepts of philosophy as an academic discipline are applied to the field of engineering.

 By engineering philosophy we refer to the mindset and general orientation of an agent that seeks out an improvement in some identified part of her environment with a conviction that an improvement-generating solution to a problem at hand does exist, as well as possibility of working out the improved state of affairs.

 An engineering philosophy might not be explicit or articulated. It might involve instincts, feelings and aspirations and might rely heavily on human sensibilities as well as on objective knowledge.  It might not impress an academic philosopher as being “philosophy” in the first place.

 It is out there to change the world for the better, and everything else is secondary, including the legitimacy of the improvement-attempt in question.  As a mindset of systematic impact-seeking action, engineering philosophy reigns far beyond the field of pure engineering.

Engineering Rationality- based steps produce improvement Philosophy Is possessed with accurately describing the world Design sciences Are aimed at producing desirable change

 (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering;  (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data;  (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability;  (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams;  (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems;

 f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility;  (g) an ability to communicate effectively;  (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context;  (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning  (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues;  (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.

 Knowledge and Understanding: they must be able to demonstrate their knowledge and understanding of essential facts, concepts, theories and principles of their engineering discipline, and its underpinning science and mathematics.  They must have an appreciation of the wider multidisciplinary engineering context and its underlying principles. They must appreciate the social, environmental, ethical, economic and commercial considerations affecting the exercise of their engineering judgement.

 Intellectual Abilities: they must be able to apply appropriate quantitative science and engineering tools to the analysis of problems. They must be able to demonstrate creative and innovative ability in the synthesis of solutions and in formulating designs. They must be able to comprehend the broad picture and thus work with an appropriate level of detail. 

 Practical skills: they must possess practical engineering skills acquired through, for example, work carried out in laboratories and workshops; in industry through supervised work experience; in individual and group project work; in design work; and in the development and use of computer software in design, analysis and control. Evidence of group working and of participation in a major project is expected. However, individual professional bodies may require particular approaches to this requirement.

 General transferable skills: they must have developed transferable skills that will be of value in a wide range of situations. These are exemplified by the  Qualifications and Curriculum Authority Higher Level Key Skills and include problem solving, communication, and working with others, as well as the effective use of general IT facilities and information retrieval skills. They also include planning self-learning and improving performance, as the foundation for lifelong learning/CPD.

 In some cases, this impact has been clearly positive, such as in the case of house appliances and water purification.  In others, the impact has been negative, as in the case of bombs with ever-increasing destructive power. In many cases, the impact of engineering products has been both positive and negative, as in the case of automobile.

 Engineers usually give the proper attention to the safety and cost of their products, two aspects that affect all users of engineering products and, therefore, society as a whole.  More recently engineers have also become more sensitive regarding the environmental impact of their products.

 On the other hand, there have been many cases where the engineers involved in the creation of a particular solution, constrained with a limited view of the situation they were trying to address, were not aware or could not possibly imagine the impact that their product would later have on society as a whole (for example, CFCs that have wrecked the ozone layer).

 In the era of market and workforce globalization, engineers need to have a solid understanding of the impact that their products will have locally, as well as globally, so that they can make a sound evaluation of the pros and cons.

   Australian Engineering Competency Standards. Engineers Australia, Engineering House, 11 National Circuit Barton ACT ISBN:  Martin, Mike & Schinzinger, Ronald: Ethics in Engineering, 3rd Ed. McGraw Hill.  1.htm/ 1.htm/

THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION! PLEASE ASK YOUR QUESTIONS