Expression of Spatial Variability in Corn (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Growth Stage Using Optical Sensor Measurements By-Plant Prediction of Corn (Zea.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1992, At What resolution are there real biological differences.
Advertisements

O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y Rationale N. Macnack¹, J. Kelly², J. Mullock¹, I. Ortiz-Monasterio 3, and W. Raun¹. ¹Plant and Soil Sciences,
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
History of Predicting Yield Potential TEAM VRT Oklahoma State University TEAM VRT Oklahoma State University.
Use of sensor based nitrogen rates to improve maize nitrogen use efficiency in the Northern Argentinean Pampas. Ricardo Melchiori 1, Octavio Caviglia 1,
New development of Hybrid-Maize model Haishun Yang Associate Professor / Crop Simulation Modeler, Dept. Agronomy & Horticulture University of Nebraska.
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
Optimizing Crop Management Practices with DSSAT. Our Goal With increasing population and climate change, the ability to maximize crop production is essential.
Indirect Measurement of Plant Height in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Pam Turner Oklahoma State University.
Sensor Orientation to maize canopy row and estimating biomass and Nitrogen Status Paul Hodgen, Fernando Solari, Jim Schepers, John Shanahan, Dennis Francis.
Use of Active Optical Sensor in North Dakota Dave Franzen and Lakesh Sharma, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
REGRESSION Predict future scores on Y based on measured scores on X Predictions are based on a correlation from a sample where both X and Y were measured.
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Variability Reduction through Aggregation Relative Output Large ramps are detectable real-time by satellite and ground stations Variability models primarily.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
Title: Spatial Data Mining in Geo-Business. Overview  Twisting the Perspective of Map Surfaces — describes the character of spatial distributions through.
Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.
Sensor Technology in India R.K. Gupta, B. Singh, P. Chandna, R.K. Sharma, M.L. Jat.
Reverse N lookup, sensor based N rates using Weather improved INSEY Nicole Remondet.
Chapter 5 Demand Forecasting.
Using Sonar and Digital Imagery To Estimate Crop Biomass Introduction Sonar: may be used to detect proximity and distance in machine vision (Senix 2003)
Introduction: Business Meetings: Sensor-Based Nutrient Management Community Wednesday, October 24 th 4:00 pm – 4:30 pm Duke Energy Convention Center, Room.
Option G: Ecology and Conservation Chpt. 18: pages
GreenSeeker® Handheld Crop Sensor
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Use of By-Plot CV’s for Refining Mid-Season Fertilizer N Rates Daryl Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Eric C. Miller Jeremiah L. Mullock, Jacob T. Bushong, and William R. Raun NUE Conference Sioux Falls, SD August 5 th, 2014.
Chapter 5 Demand Forecasting 1. 1.Importance of Forecasting  Helps planning for long-term growth  Helps in gauging the economic activity (auto sales,
Use of Alternative Concepts for Determining Preplant and Mid-Season N rates.
Sensors Role In Agriculture
Reverse N lookup, sensor based N rates using Weather improved INSEY Nicole Remondet Rationale Weather is an aspect of agricultural sciences that cannot.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
2013 NUE Conference Des Moines, Iowa August 5-7 Jacob T. Bushong.
GreenSeeker Sensor Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
A Simplified Linear Transformation to Calculate N Application Rates in Corn and Wheat.
Development of a SBNRC Calculator for Cotton D. Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University W. Raun, J. Solie, M. Stone, R. Taylor, O. Walsh, D. Edmonds, C.
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Automated Calibration Stamp Technology for Improved In-Season Nitrogen Fertilization K. Freeman, R. Teal, C. Mack, K. Martin, B. Arnall, K. Desta, J. Solie,
EVALUATION OF THE RADAR PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENT ACCURACY USING RAIN GAUGE DATA Aurel Apostu Mariana Bogdan Coralia Dreve Silvia Radulescu.
Plant-to-Plant Variability in Corn Production K.L. Martin, P.J. Hodgen, K.W. Freeman, Ricardo Melchiori, D.B. Arnall, R.K. Teal, R.W. Mullen, K. Desta,
Single plant yields: The NE experience. Why talk about individual plants when farmers are shelling up to 40ft swaths?
1 Chapter 5 Demand Forecasting. 2 1.Importance of Forecasting  Helps planning for long-term growth  Helps in gauging the economic activity (auto sales,
University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Applied Plant Sciences and Plant Biotechnology Universität für Bodenkultur.
Variable Rate Technology in Wheat
1 1 Chapter 6 Forecasting n Quantitative Approaches to Forecasting n The Components of a Time Series n Measures of Forecast Accuracy n Using Smoothing.
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Weekly NDVI Relationships to Height, Nodes and Productivity Index for Low, Medium, and High Cotton Productivity Zones T. Sharp, G. Evans and A. Salvador.
Eric Miller, Jacob Bushong, and Bill Raun NUE Conference August 6 th, 2013.
Theory of Predicting Crop Response to Non-Limiting Nitrogen.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Laboratory for Agriculture and Environmental Studies Sensor Based Variable Rate N Management in Mid-Atlantic.
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Evaluation of the Yield Potential Based NFOA for Cotton
Cotton Sensor Research Update
Development of a Response Index for Corn
Sensing Resolution in Corn
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Irrigated Corn VT VT Irrigated Corn
Sensors and Fertility Management
REVIEW.
Annual ASA Meeting, Indianapolis
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
Methods of Determining Canopy Closure in Winter Wheat
K. Freeman, B. Raun, K. Martin, R.Teal, D. Arnall, M. Stone, J. Solie
Tastes Great. Less Filling
Forecasting - Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Expression of Spatial Variability in Corn (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Growth Stage Using Optical Sensor Measurements By-Plant Prediction of Corn (Zea mays L.) Grain Yield Using Optical Sensor Readings and Measured Plant Height K.L. Martin, W.R. Raun, M.L. Stone, J.B. Solie, K.W. Freeman, B. Tubana, B. Chung, R.K. Teal, D.B. Arnall, K. Desta, S. Moges, C.J. Mack, J.W. Lawless, O. Walsh, S. Holtz, K. Lawless

Expression of Spatial Variability in Corn (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Growth Stage Using Optical Sensor Measurements Four rows (30 m long) at each location (2 locations, 2 years) In 2004, 2 rows of low population and 2 rows of high population at each site Accumulate NDVI readings using a GreenSeeker™ hand held sensor throughout the growing season Evaluate NDVI and CV of NDVI readings over time Four rows (30 m long) at each location (2 locations, 2 years) In 2004, 2 rows of low population and 2 rows of high population at each site Accumulate NDVI readings using a GreenSeeker™ hand held sensor throughout the growing season Evaluate NDVI and CV of NDVI readings over time

Collect biomass and grain yield by harvesting each individual plant and computing yield in kg ha -1 for the entire row. Evaluate relationships between NDVI and biomass yield, grain yield, and plant spacing Evaluate relationships between CV and biomass yield, grain yield, and plant spacing Collect biomass and grain yield by harvesting each individual plant and computing yield in kg ha -1 for the entire row. Evaluate relationships between NDVI and biomass yield, grain yield, and plant spacing Evaluate relationships between CV and biomass yield, grain yield, and plant spacing

NDVI Over Time V3 V6 VT R4 V6 VT R4 V3 V6 VT R4

CV Over Time V3 V6 VT R4 V6 VT R4 V3 V6 VT R4

Relationship of NDVI and CV of NDVI with Corn Grain and Biomass Yields

By-Plant Prediction of Corn Grain Yield This bicycle was modified such that a GreenSeeker™ sensor head, power source, and shaft encoder could be used to determine distance for each NDVI reading recorded in the data file. Measure the distance of each plant’s location Calculate the area that each plant occupies Where: Di is the area occupied by the i th plant di-1,di,di+1 are the distances to the i-1, i, and i+1 plants Average NDVI of each plant Measure the distance of each plant’s location Calculate the area that each plant occupies Where: Di is the area occupied by the i th plant di-1,di,di+1 are the distances to the i-1, i, and i+1 plants Average NDVI of each plant

The unit was pushed along the corn row as illustrated White marker plates were used at the beginning and end of each row to designate the start and stop point The resulting data file included NDVI for each calibrated distance (approximately 1.1 cm) and sonar height (when sonar was used) The unit was pushed along the corn row as illustrated White marker plates were used at the beginning and end of each row to designate the start and stop point The resulting data file included NDVI for each calibrated distance (approximately 1.1 cm) and sonar height (when sonar was used)

Data Presentation Individual data points collected every 1.1 cm Average NDVI for each plant

NDVI vs. Grain Yield at all sites (2003 and 2004) INSEY vs. Grain Yield at all sites where height was recorded

Plant Height and Corn Grain Yield Prediction Plant height was used as a means of evaluating plant competition. Competition can be defined as: 1. The process by which the activity or presence of one substance interferes with or suppresses the activity of another substance with similar affinities, as of antigens. 2. The simultaneous demand by two or more organisms for limited environmental resources. 3. The simultaneous demand by two or more organisms for limited environmental resources, such as nutrients, living space, or light. Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary (2000) Plant height was used as a means of evaluating plant competition. Competition can be defined as: 1. The process by which the activity or presence of one substance interferes with or suppresses the activity of another substance with similar affinities, as of antigens. 2. The simultaneous demand by two or more organisms for limited environmental resources. 3. The simultaneous demand by two or more organisms for limited environmental resources, such as nutrients, living space, or light. Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary (2000)

Do these plants compete with one another? If they do, what above ground parameter(s) can we use to evaluate this? Does the proximity of the competitor have an impact on the level of competition? Do these plants compete with one another? If they do, what above ground parameter(s) can we use to evaluate this? Does the proximity of the competitor have an impact on the level of competition?

Plant Competition Equation In a series of five plants, the height of plant number 2 and 4 is compared to the average of the height of their neighbors to assess the competitive ability of plants 2 and 4 as compared to the plant in question, plant 3. This value generated from the first step of this process (weighted average value of plant 2 and 4 in the series) is then compared to the actual height of plant 3 to result in a weighted comparison of the competitive ability of plant 3 to its neighbors

GYest is the estimated grain yield Cadj is the competition adjustment factor D is the linear distance occupied by each plant INSEY is the in-season estimate of yield GYest is the estimated grain yield Cadj is the competition adjustment factor D is the linear distance occupied by each plant INSEY is the in-season estimate of yield The competition adjustment factor accounts for the competitive ability of the plant in question when considering its height against those that surround it. This value is then divided by the linear distance to adjust the index due to the change in proximity of the competitive plants (a closer proximity to the competitive plant will divide by a smaller number resulting in more emphasis being placed on the height comparison). The resulting value is then multiplied by INSEY to allow for an incorporation of biomass produced per day.

By-Plant Prediction of Corn Grain Yield Yield Prediction Using INSEY Yield Prediction Using GY est

Questions??