Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School 2013. A.C. Magnet Systems Neil Marks, ASTeC, Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to RF for Accelerators
Advertisements

Chapter 30. Induction and Inductance
Magnetism Alternating-Current Circuits
EELE 461/561 – Digital System Design Module #2 Page 1 EELE 461/561 – Digital System Design Module #2 – Interconnect Modeling with Lumped Elements Topics.
Neil Marks; DLS/CCLRC Cockcroft Institute 2005/6. Injection and Extraction into/out of Accelerators Neil Marks, DLS/CCLRC, Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington.
T. YOSHIDA, J. OYAMA, T. HIGUCHI, T. ABE and T. HIRAYAMA Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nagasaki University, Japan ON THE CHARACTERISTICS.
Method of beam extraction from a synchrotron by the instrumentality of multilayer Cu-Fe shield Bondarenko Alexey.
Magnetic Circuits and Transformers
Law of Electromagnetic Induction
Alternating Current Circuits
K L University 1. 2 MAGNETOSTATICS 3 Introduction to Magneto statics – Magnetic field, Magnetic force, Magnetic flux Biot-Savat’s law -- Applications.
Transformer.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Transformers.
Chapter 11 – Inductors Introductory Circuit Analysis Robert L. Boylestad.
Magnetic and Electromagnetic Fields
BASIC CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGN  The aim of the design is to completely obtain the dimensions of all the parts of the machine to furnish the data to the.
Chapter 22 Alternating-Current Circuits and Machines.
AP Physics C Montwood High School R. Casao
Main article: Leakage inductance
Alternating-Current Circuits Chapter 22. Section 22.2 AC Circuit Notation.
Transformers Mechanical and Electrical Systems SKAA 2032
BENE 1113 PRINCIPLES OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS
Topic 12: Electromagnetic induction 12.2 Alternating current
Electromagnetic Induction
Chapter 1 MAGNETIC CIRCUIT.
1 AC Electricity. Time variation of a DC voltage or current 2 I V Current Voltage time t.
Electromagnetic Induction
Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.
General electric flux definition
ELECTRICAL BASICS (Chapter 8) Electrical terms Electricity & magnetism Electricity Circuits Magnetism Electrical units Electric potential or eletromotive.
Chapter 32 Inductance. Joseph Henry 1797 – 1878 American physicist First director of the Smithsonian Improved design of electromagnet Constructed one.
, EUROnu Meeting, Strasbourg J. Pasternak Status and recent progress on muon IDS-FFAG J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC Work.
Transformers Transformers are some of the most efficient machines that can be built, with efficiencies exceeding 99%. Only simple machines (levers, inclined.
DC Generators.
Tuesday April 19, PHYS , Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1444 – Section 02 Lecture #18 Tuesday April 19, 2011 Dr. Andrew Brandt Chapter 29 Lenz Law.
Chapter 8 Alternating Current Circuits. AC Circuit An AC circuit consists of a combination of circuit elements and an AC generator or source An AC circuit.
3/17/2014 PHYS , Dr. Andrew Brandt 1 PHYS 1442 – Section 004 Lecture #15 Monday March 17, 2014 Dr. Andrew Brandt Chapter 21 Generator Transformer.
Monday, Apr. 16, 2012PHYS , Spring 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 1444 – Section 004 Lecture #20 Monday, April 16, 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Today’s homework.
1 MAGNETOSTATIC FIELD (MAGNETIC FORCE, MAGNETIC MATERIAL AND INDUCTANCE) CHAPTER FORCE ON A MOVING POINT CHARGE 8.2 FORCE ON A FILAMENTARY CURRENT.
EMMA: Pulsed magnets Kiril Marinov MaRS group, ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory 1.
ESS | A Preliminary Feasibility Assessment of Power Converters and Magnets for Beam Raster System| | Carlos A. Martins, ESS Preliminary Feasibility.
Imperial College London 1 6. Injection into and ejection from circular machines PREACCELERATOR ACCUMULATORRING PARTICLESOURCE INJECTION 1 EJECTION INJECTION.
Monday, April 23, PHYS , Spring 2007 Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1444 – Section 004 Lecture #19 Monday, April 23, 2007 Dr. Andrew Brandt Inductance.
1 ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY EET 103/4 Define and analyze the principle of transformer, its parameters and structure. Describe and analyze Ideal transformer,
1 ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY EET 103/4 Define and analyze the principle of transformer, its parameters and structure. Describe and analyze Ideal transformer,
Principals of fast injection and extraction R. Apsimon.
BASIC INSTRUMENTS - oscilloscopes
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
CONSTRUCTION  The dc machines used for industrial electric drives have three major parts. Field system Armature and Commutator. Field system  The field.
The way to fast and "loss-free" SPS kickers E. Gaxiola With contributions from AB-BT-KSL section and F. Caspers, T. Kroyer, M. Timmins, J. Uythoven.
Chapter 9 CAPACITOR.
ICFA mini-Workshop on Beam Commissioning for High Intensity Accelerators Yasuhiro Watanabe (J-PARC / JAEA) Tracking between bending and quadrupole families.
1 :. Introduction These are special type of transformers used for the measurement of voltage, current, power and energy. As the name suggests, these transformers.
L-8 MAGNETIC CIRCUITS ELE 1001: Basic Electrical Technology
Construction and working of TRANSFORMERs
1 ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY ERT 105/3 Define and analyze the principle of transformer, its parameters and structure. Describe and analyze Ideal transformer,
Lecture 6: Maxwell’s Equations
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
The design schemes of the low field dipole magnets
Maxwell’s Equations.
ASTeC, Cockcroft Institute,
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
Electromechanical Systems
Electromechanical Systems
Ch. 22: More on AC Circuits.
Lattice (bounce) diagram
Chapter 14.
Electric Machine Design Course
Presentation transcript:

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School A.C. Magnet Systems Neil Marks, ASTeC, Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, Tel: (44) (0) Fax: (44) (0)

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Philosophy 1.Present practical details of how a.c. lattice magnets differ from d.c. magnets. 2.Present details of the typical qualities of steel used in lattice magnets. 3.Give a qualitative overview of injection and extraction techniques as used in circular machines. 4.Present the standard designs for kicker and septum magnets and their associated power supplies.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Contents a) Variations in design and construction for a.c. magnets; Effects of eddy current in vac vessels and coils; Properties and choice of steel; b) Methods of injecting and extracting beam; Single turn injection/extraction; Multi-turn injection/extraction; Magnet requirements; c) ‘Fast’ magnets; Kicker magnets-lumped and distributed power supplies; Septum magnets-active and passive septa; Some modern examples.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Differences to d.c. magnets A.c magnets differ in two main respects to d.c. magnets: 1.In addition to d.c ohmic loss in the coils, there will be ‘ac’ losses (eddy and hysteresis); design goals are to correctly calculate and minimise a.c. losses. 2.Eddy currents will generate perturbing fields that will affect the beam. 3.Excitation voltage now includes an inductive (reactive) component; this may be small, major or dominant (depending on frequency); this must be accurately assessed.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Equivalent circuit of a.c. magnet LmLm R dc C leakage ImIm R ac

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Additional Maxwell equation for magneto-dynamics: curl E = -dB/dt. Applying Stoke’s theorem around any closed path s enclosing area A:  curl E.dA =  E.ds = V loop where V loop is voltage around path s;  - (dB /dt).dA = - d  /dt; Where  is total flux cutting A; So:V loop = -d  /dt Thus, eddy currents are induced in any conducting material in the alternating field. This results in increased loss and modification to the field strength and quality. A.C. Magnet Design

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Eddy Currents in a Conductor I Rectangular cross section resistivity , breadth 2 a, thickness , length, cut normally by field B sin  t. Consider a strip at +x, width  x, returning at –x (  >>x). Peak volts in circuit = 2 x  B Resistance of circuit = 2  /(   x ) Peak current in circuit = x  B   x /  Integrate this to give total Amp-turns in block. Peak instantaneous power in strip = 2 x 2  2 B 2   x /  Integrate w.r.t. x between 0 and a to obtain peak instantaneous power in block = (2/3) a 3  2 B 2   /  Cross section area A = 2 a  Average power is ½ of above. Power loss/unit length =  2 B 2 A a 2 /(6  )W/m; xx  -a -x 0 x a B sin  t Cross section A a 10x10 mm 2 Cu conductor in a 1T peak 50Hz sin. field, loss = 1.7 kW/m

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Perturbation field generated by eddy currents Magnet geometry around vessel radius R. g  =  R x 0 Note: that if the vacuum vessel is between the poles of a a ferro-magnetic yoke, the eddy currents will couple to that yoke; the yoke geometry therefore determines the perturbing fields; this analysis assumes that the perturbing field is small compared to the imposed field. Using: B e =  0 I e /g; Amplitude ratio between perturbing and imposed fields at X = 0 is: B e (0)/B = - 2  0   R 2 /  g; Phase of perturbing field w.r.t. imposed field is:  e = arctan (- 2  0   R 2 /  g )

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Distributions of perturbing fields Cylindrical vessel (radius R): Be(X) Rectangular vessel (semi axies a, b): Be(X) Elliptical vessel (semi axies a, b): Be(X) variation with horizontal position X

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Perturbation field generated by eddy currents. Note, eddy currents in vacuum vessels: In all cases, the first order field perturbation is (a -X 2 ) ; → reduction in dipole field and negative sextupole adding to negative chromaticity. cylindrical and elliptical vessels also have 10, 14.. pole.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Stainless steel vessels – amplitude loss. Example: Ratio of amplitude of perturbing eddy current dipole field to amplitude of imposed field as a function of frequency for three values of s.s. vessel wall thickness (R = g/2): Calculation invalid in this region.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Stainless steel vessels – phase. Phase change (lag) of dipole field applied to beam as a function of frequency for three values of vessel wall thickness (R = g/2): Calculation invalid in this region.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School AC effects in steel yokes Steel yokes will have: eddy current power loss - with distortion of B; hysteresis losses. So have to be ‘laminated’ like a mains transformer.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Steel Yoke Eddy Losses. At 10 Hz lamination thickness of 0.5mm to 1 mm can be used. At 50Hz, lamination thickness of 0.35mm to 0.65mm are standard. Laminations also allow steel to be ‘shuffled’ during magnet assembly, so each magnet contains a fraction of the total steel production; - used also for d.c. magnets. To limit eddy losses, the laminations in the steel core are coated with a thin layer (~2 µm) of insulating material, usually just on one side of each lamination.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Steel hysteresis loss Steel also has hysteresis loss caused by the finite area inside the B/H loop: Loss is proportional to  B.dH integrated over the area within the loop.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Steel loss data Manufacturers give figures for total loss (in W/kg) in their steels catalogues: for a sin waveform at a fixed peak field (Euro standard is at 1.5 T); and at fixed frequency (50 Hz in Europe, 60 Hz in USA); at different lamination thicknesses (0.35, 0.5, 0.65 & 1.0 mm typically) they do not give separate values for eddy and hysteresis loss. Accelerator magnets will have: different waveforms (unidirectional!); different d.c. bias values; different frequencies (0.2 Hz up to 50 Hz). How does the designer calculate steel loss?

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Comparison between eddy and hysteresis loss in steel: Variation with: Eddy loss Hysteresis loss A.c. frequency: Square law Linear; A.c. amplitude: Square law Non-linear-depends on level; D.c. bias: No effect Increases non-linearly; Total volume of steel: Linear Linear; Lamination thickness: Square law No effect.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Choice of steel 'Electrical steel' is either 'grain oriented' or 'non-oriented‘: Grain oriented: strongly anisotropic, very high quality magnetic properties and very low a.c losses in the rolling direction; normal to rolling direction is much worse than non-oriented steel; stamping and machining causes loss of quality and the stamped laminations must be annealed before final assembly.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Choice of steel (cont). Non-oriented steel: some anisotropy (~5%); manufactured in many different grades, with different magnetic and loss figures; losses controlled by the percentage of silicon included in the mix; high silicon gives low losses (low coercivity), higher permeability at low flux density but poorer magnetic performance at high field; low (but not zero) silicon gives good performance at high B; silicon mechanically ‘stabilises’ the steel, prevents aging.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Solid steel Low carbon/high purity steels: usually used for solid d.c. magnets; good magnetic properties at high fields but hysteresis loss not as low as high silicon steel; accelerator magnets are seldom made from solid steel; (laminations preferred to allow shuffling and reduce eddy currents)

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Comparisons Property: DK-70:CK-27: 27 M 3: XC06 : Type Non- Non- Grain- Non- orientedoriented oriented oriented Silicon content LowHigh - Very low Lam thickness 0.65 mm0.35 mm 0.27 mm Solid a.c. loss (50 Hz): at 1.5 T peak 6.9 W/kg2.25 W/kg 0.79 W/kg Not suitable Permeability: at B=1.5 T 1, > 10,000 >1,000 at B=1.8 T ,100 >160

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School The ‘problem’ with grain oriented steel In spite of the obvious advantage, grain oriented is seldom used in accelerator magnets because of the mechanical problem of keeping B in the direction of the grain. Difficult (impossible?) to make each limb out of separate strips of steel.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School The Injection/Extraction problem. Single turn injection/extraction: a magnetic element inflects beam into the ring and turn-off before the beam completes the first turn (extraction is the reverse). Multi-turn injection/extraction: the system must inflect the beam into the ring with an existing beam circulating without producing excessive disturbance or loss to the circulating beam. Accumulation in a storage ring: A special case of multi-turn injection - continues over many turns (with the aim of minimal disturbance to the stored beam). straight section injected beam magnetic element

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Single turn – simple solution A ‘kicker magnet’ with fast turn-off (injection) or turn-on (extraction) can be used for single turn injection. injection – fast fallextraction – fast rise Problems: i) rise or fall will always be non-zero  loss of beam; ii) single turn inject does not allow the accumulation of high current; iii) in small accelerators revolution times can be << 1  s. iv) magnets are inductive  fast rise (fall) means (very) high voltage. B t

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Multi-turn injection solutions Beam can be injected by phase-space manipulation: a) Inject into an unoccupied outer region of phase space with non-integer tune which ensures many turns before the injected beam re-occupies the same region (electrons and protons): eg – Horizontal phase space at Q = ¼ integer: x x’ turn 1 – first injection turn 2turn 3 turn 4 – last injection septum 0 field deflect. field

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Multi-turn injection solutions b) Inject into outer region of phase space - damping coalesces beam into the central region before re-injecting (high energy leptons only): dynamic aperture injected beamnext injection after 1 damping time stored beam c) inject negative ions through a bending magnet and then ‘strip’ to produce a p after injection (H- to p only).

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Multi-turn extraction solution ‘Shave’ particles from edge of beam into an extraction channel whilst the beam is moved across the aperture: beam movement extraction channel Points: some beam loss on the septum cannot be prevented; efficiency can be improved by ‘blowing up’ on 1/3rd or 1/4 th integer resonance. septum

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Magnet requirements Magnets required for injection and extraction systems. i) Kicker magnets: pulsed waveform; rapid rise or fall times (usually << 1  s); flat-top for uniform beam deflection. ii) Septum magnets: pulsed or d.c. waveform; spatial separation into two regions; one region of high field (for injection deflection); one region of very low (ideally 0) field for existing beam; septum to be as thin as possible to limit beam loss. Septum magnet schematic

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Fast Magnet & Power Supplies Because of the demanding performance required from these systems, the magnet and power supply must be strongly integrated and designed as a single unit. Two alternative approaches to powering these magnets: Distributed circuit: magnet and power supply made up of delay line circuits. Lumped circuits: magnet is designed as a pure inductance; power supply can be use delay line or a capacitor to feed the high pulse current.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School High Frequency – Kicker Magnets Kicker Magnets: used for rapid deflection of beam for injection or extraction; usually located inside the vacuum chamber; rise/fall times << 1µs. yoke assembled from high frequency ferrite; single turn coil; pulse current  10 4 A; pulse voltages of many kV. Typical geometry:

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Kickers - Distributed System Standard (CERN) delay line magnet and power supply:  Power Supply  Thyratron  Magnet  Resistor The power supply and interconnecting cables are matched to the surge impedance of the delay line magnet:

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Distributed System -mode of operation the first delay line is charged by the d.c. supply to a voltage :V; the thyratron triggers, a voltages wave: V/2 which propagates into magnet; this gives a current wave of V/( 2 Z ) propagating into the magnet; the circuit is terminated by pure resistorZ, to prevent reflection.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Kickers – Lumped Systems. The magnet is (mainly) inductive - no added distributed capacitance; the magnet must be very close to the supply (minimises inductance). I = (V/R) (1 – exp (- R t /L) i.e. the same waveform as distributed power supply, lumped magnet systems..

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Improvement on above C The extra capacitor C improves the pulse substantially.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Resulting Waveform Example calculated for the following parameters: mag inductance L = 1  H; rise timet = 0.2  s; resistorR = 10  ; trim capacitor C = 4,000 pF. The impedance in the lumped circuit is twice that needed in the distributed! The voltage to produce a given peak current is the same in both cases. Performance:at t = 0.1  s, current amplitude = of peak; at t = 0.2  s, current amplitude = 1.01 of peak. The maximum ‘overswing’ is 2.5%. This system is much simpler and cheaper than the distributed system.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School An EMMA kicker magnet – ferrite cored lumped system.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School EMMA Injection Kicker Magnet Waveform

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Septum Magnets – ‘classic’ design. Often (not always) located inside the vacuum and used to deflect part of the beam for injection or extraction: The thin 'septum' coil on the front face gives: high field within the gap, low field externally; Problems: The thickness of the septum must be minimised to limit beam loss; the front septum has very high current density and major heating problems

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Septum Magnet – eddy current design. uses a pulsed current through a backleg coil (usually a poor design feature) to generate the field; the front eddy current shield must be, at the septum, a number of skin depths thick; elsewhere at least ten skin depths; high eddy currents are induced in the front screen; but this is at earth potential and bonded to the base plate – heat is conducted out to the base plate; field outside the septum are usually ~ 1% of field in the gap.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Comparison of the two types. Classical:Eddy current: Excitationd.c or low frequency pulse;pulse at > 10 kHz; Coilsingle turn includingsingle or multi-turn on front septum;backleg, room for large cross section; Coolingcomplex-water spiralsheat generated in in thermal contact with shield is conducted to septum;base plate; Yokeconventional steelhigh frequency material (ferrite or thin steel lams).

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Example Skin depth in material: resistivity  ; permeability  ; at frequency  is given by:d =  (2  /  µµ 0 ) Example: EMMA injection and extraction eddy current septa: Screen thickness (at beam height): 1 mm; " " (elsewhere) – up to10 mm; Excitation25 µs, half sinewave; Skin depth in copper at 20 kHz0.45 mm

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Location of EMMA septum magnets

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School Design of the EMMA septum magnet Inner steel yoke is assembled from 0.1mm thick silicon steel laminations, insulated with 0.2  m coatings on each side.

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School ‘Out of Vacuum’ designs. Benefits in locating the magnet outside the vacuum. But a (metallic) vessel has to be inserted inside the magnet -the use of an eddy current design (probably) impossible. eg the upgrade to the APS septum (2002): ‘The designs of the six septum magnets required for the APS facility have evolved since operation began in Improvements.. have provided better injection/extraction performance and extended the machine reliability...’ ‘Currently a new synchrotron extraction direct-drive septum with the core out of vacuum is being built to replace the existing, in-vacuum eddy- current-shielded magnet.’

Neil Marks; ASTeC, CI.‘AC Magnets’; CI School ‘New’ APS septum magnet. Synchrotron extraction septum conductor assembly partially installed in the laminated core.