1 PSSE Playback Model Validation with PMU Data Damien Sommer, P.E. Senior Transmission Planning Engineer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Second Draft of the NERC Standard PRC Disturbance Monitoring and Reporting JSIS Meeting August 10, 2010 Salt Lake City, UT.
Advertisements

WECC JSIS Update Dmitry Kosterev, BPA.
BPAs Generator Model Validation Technique/Tool MVWG Denver, CO May 18-19, 2009 Steve Yang Bonneville Power Administration.
سیستم آلارم دیجیتالی مجهز به ثبات خطا
Using Synchrophasors for Preventing Cascading Outages
Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory.
Reading a GE PSLF *.epc into PWS
New Energy Horizons Opportunities and Challenges Fault Current Contributions from Wind Plants Dean Miller PacifiCorp July 25,
January TSS J. Gronquist, S. Kincic
Siemens Power Technologies International
Development of Damping Algorithm Olof Samuelsson Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation
ERCOT VRT Study, Phase I ERCOT ROS Meeting December 10, 2009.
Programming Types of Testing.
Resource Data Needed For Dynamic Simulations
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Announcements Be reading Chapter 6. HW 3 is due now.
MotoHawk Training Model-Based Design of Embedded Systems.
PSS®E 34.0 Release Webinar 23 April 2015
Slide 1 Large Wind Integration Challenges for Operations / System Reliability By : Steve Enyeart, BPA With contributions from: Bart McManus, BPA Roy Ellis,
1 New Resource Qualification Testing Sandip Sharma Supervisor, Operations Analysis New Generation Information Forum ERCOT Public November 4, 2014.
ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 13: Per Unit, Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois.
Cape Scott Wind Farm model validation exercise Presentation to WECC REMTF November 18, 2014.
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
System Operator Conference Simulator Drill Orientation 2014 System Operator Conferences Charlotte NC & Franklin TN SERC/SOS Facilitator Team.
Review of BPA Voltage Control Conference
EPRI CIM for Dynamic Models Project Report Terry Saxton Xtensible Solutions May 13, 2009.
INTRODUCTION 1 What word comes to your mind to describe “ The attempt by two objects to occupy the same space at the same moment in time”
 UK Power Networks. All rights reserved Demonstrating the benefits of energy storage on an 11 kV Distribution Network Matthieu Michel – Technology.
ECE 530 – Analysis Techniques for Large-Scale Electrical Systems
FYP Final Presentation: Distributed Audio Mixing Daire O'Neill, Final Year Electronic Engineering Project Supervisor: Dr Peter Corcoran Co-Supervisor:
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Observations using cmpldw WECC MVWG Meeting June 2015 Eric Bakie.
1 Software Reliability Assurance for Real-time Systems Joel Henry, Ph.D. University of Montana NASA Software Assurance Symposium September 4, 2002.
GE Energy GE 2.x Zero Power Voltage Regulation Measurement Results Vincent Schellings.
1 Programming of FPGA in LiCAS ADC for Continuous Data Readout Week 3 Report Jack Hickish.
CASE STUDY Disturbance event comparing PMU and SE voltage angle difference in ERCOT Prakash Shrestha Operations Engineer Advanced Network Application.
My Time in CURENT Graham Treasure. Quick Recap First semester – Electrical theory – Introduction to programming – I already gave this talk Second Semester.
Vestas.com Wind Power Plant Dynamic Reactive Power “Hybrid” Solutions to meet ERCOT Reactive Power Capability Requirements Presented at ERCOT ROS Meeting,
Status Update: Using NMMS for Building SSWG Cases Wes Woitt CenterPoint Energy 2010 SSWG Chair.
DS2 – Grid Integration Dynamic Modelling of Wind Generation in Ireland
Daudi Mushamalirwa Luanda June, 2014 Technical issues of the stability of small size electric systems composed of wind generators and conventional generating.
Shun-Hsien (Fred) Huang ERCOT System Planning ERCOT RPG Meeting September 16, 2011 Preliminary Study Results of the High Frequency Oscillations in the.
1 Software Reliability Analysis Tools Joel Henry, Ph.D. University of Montana.
Unit 3 REACTIVE POWER AND VOLTAGE CONTROL.  BASIC REQUIREMENTS OF EXCITATION CNTRL  Excitation Current up to 10’000 amps  Input frequency range from.
November 16, 2012 Synchrophasor Meeting Dynamic Model Validation Project Jonathan Rose Engineer, Resource Integration Sidharth Rajagopalan Engineer, Dynamic.
Model Validation using PSS®E
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 18: LMP Markets, Symmetrical Faults and Components Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
DWG Procedural Manual: Wind Model Requirements DWG Request to ROS August 11, 2006.
EValid LoadTest, eV.manger and Validation. Agenda Load Test capability of eValid How to execute load test by using eValid Introduction to eV.manager Validation.
Status Update to ROS: Using NMMS for Building SSWG Cases Wes Woitt CenterPoint Energy 2010 SSWG Chair.
Protection of Power Systems
Start of Sales MSI-XXXB Safety Relays Plugable screw or spring-cage terminal blocks.
Slaven Kincic MVWG March System Model Validation Task Force (SMVTF) System Events for System Model Validation o 21th January event:  Colstrip.
Economic Evaluation Program for Transmission Planning in Competitive Power Market LEE, SANG-HO Fusion Technology Research Lab. K-EMS Development.
PowerWorld Case Validation
ISO-NE Synchrophasor Related Projects
Western Electricity Coordinating Council
Siemens Wind Turbine Weak Grid Option Modeling in PSSE WECC library Hongtao Ma, Siemens Wind Power Joergen Nielsen, Siemens Wind Power Good morning,
GIC Analysis using PSS®E
PMU Emulator for Power System Dynamics Simulators
ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
GROUND-FAULT GROUND-CHECK MONITOR
Presented by: LADWP November 14, 2017
PSS®E Update for WECC Good morning, welcome to psse presentation for the UGM I’m glenn pietrow, PSSE product manager and GUI developer Currently manage.
Load Model Data Tool Development Update
Accurate Fault Location Using Modeling and Simulation
PSS®E Update for WECC Good morning, welcome to psse presentation for the UGM I’m glenn pietrow, PSSE product manager and GUI developer Currently manage.
PSSE Playback Model Validation with PMU Data
Siemens Power Technologies International
Hongming Zhang EMS Applications Manager, PEAK RC
Presentation transcript:

1 PSSE Playback Model Validation with PMU Data Damien Sommer, P.E. Senior Transmission Planning Engineer

2 ATC Footprint

3 DATC Transmission in WECC

4 PSSE Playback Feature Model will be available in PSS®E version 34.1 The model is supplied as part of PSS®E installation; therefore, use of this model will not require compilation and link. For version 33 users a.dll file can be downloaded from the Siemens PTI website

5 PSSE Playback Feature This model plays back a known set of voltage and frequency signals. The PLBVFU1 model acts as a generator model. In using this generator model, do not attach an AVR or governor model to the machine associated with the PLBVFU1 model. The played-in voltage and frequency signals must be described in a file as shown below, with each sample described in a separate record and the values in each line separated by spaces or commas: Time, voltage, frequency

6 PSSE Playback Feature The file containing the measurement has to be supplied in a file with an extension “.plb”. The file name (without the “.plb” extension) has to be less than or equal to 12 characters long for PSSE v 34 and less than or equal to 2 characters for PSSE v 33. This file has to exist in the working folder. If the “plb” file is not found, the PLBVFU1 model will keep the internal voltage and frequency fixed at the initial value (i.e., the playback feature will be ignored).

7 PSSE Playback Feature The voltage signal which is played back is the internal (Thevenin) voltage of the playback generator. The ZSORCE of the generator used to represent the PLVFBU1 model should be non-zero. The sampled voltage and frequency values may be smoothed via a first order block with time constants Tv (for voltage signal) and Tf (for frequency signal).

8 PMUs On ATC Transmission System 21 PMUs on high side of GSUs: –9 Coal –4 Combined Cycle Gas –2 Nuclear –4 Wind Farms –2 HVDC terminals

9 Python Script v1 – User Input Data baseCase = ‘Large_Coal_Unit_v33_ ' plbfile = 'AA' dyrfile = 'Large_Coal_Unit_v33_ ' csvoutfile = ‘Large_Coal_Unit.csv' testGenNum = testGenID = ‘1' equivFrom = Vnom = 345

10 Python Script v1 – Mini State Estimation Retrieve initial conditions recorded by PMU at POI Sets the initial conditions in the simplified case to those observed by the PMU at the POI Save case with initial conditions as temp.raw

11 Python Script v1 – Run and Output Run simulation using PMU data to define playback unit response Creates channel files for voltage, frequency, active power and reactive power at POI bus where PMU was recording Outputs a.csv file with data for each channel

12 Playback Simulation Process place PMU data.csv file, PSSE files, Python script in event folder Save.csv file as.plb file Run script (takes about 30 seconds)

13 Example 1: Large Coal Unit, Line Faults Simplified Model Used in Playback Runs:

14 Demonstration

15 Example 1: Large Coal Unit, Line Faults Event 1

16 Example 1: Large Coal Unit, Line Faults Event 2

17 Example 1: Large Coal Unit, Line Faults Event 3

18 Example 1: Large Coal Unit, Line Faults Event 4

19 Example 2: Large Coal Unit, Large Unit Trip Event 1 If monitored unit is not dispatched to PMAX governor PMAX value in.dyr file will likely have to be updated Values in MMWG case –Unit MVA = 825 –PMAX = 634 –IEEEG1 governor model –PMAX (pu on machine MVA rating) = (~700/825) PGEN = ~500 MW during this event

20 Example 2: Large Coal Unit, Large Unit Trip Event 1, PMAX = 0.847

21 Example 2: Large Coal Unit, Large Unit Trip Event 1, PMAX = (Pgen / MVA)

22 Example 2: Large Coal Unit, Large Unit Trip Event 1, PMAX = 0.615

23 Example 2: Large Coal Unit, Large Unit Trip Event 3, Oscillations

24 Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Large Unit Trip – CT1 First Pass

25 Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Large Unit Trip – CT1 First Pass If using actual bus numbers and reusing the same python script check channel numbers PSSE orders model information by bus number ascending order If gen bus number is larger than POI bus number in one raw file but smaller than POI bus number in another raw file your exported channels will be different

26 Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Large Unit Trip – CT1 Second Pass

27 Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Large Unit Trip – CT2

28 Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Large Unit Trip – ST

29 Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Line Fault – CT1

30 Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Line Fault – CT2

31 Example 3: Combined Cycle Plant, Line Fault – ST

32 Example 4: ~300 MW Coal Unit Line Fault Event

33 Example 5: ~300 MW Coal Unit Trip of 850 MW Unit in Remote Location

34 Example 6: ~600 MW Nuclear Unit Trip of 1200 MW Unit in Remote Location

35 Example 7: ~600 MW Nuclear Unit 345-kV Line Fault

36 Harder Configurations to Validate: Gas Plant with PMU at Shared POI

37 Harder Configurations to Validate: Gas Plant with PMU at Shared POI PMU is on the POI bus and thus captures the output of both units simultaneously Version 2 Python Script required Investigate PI Historian data on the two units and set one plant P and Q output to initial output Fix the P and Q of the second unit with state estimation in in the python script

38 Harder Configurations to Validate: Wind Farm with Multiple Var Sources

39 Harder Configurations to Validate: Wind Farm with Multiple Var Sources PMU is on 138-kV Bus, there is a DSTAT model and switched shunt device on the 34.5-kV bus Cap Bank on unit bus is supposed to be manual set in the model based on wind unit output PI Historian data will have to be pulled to find starting points for wind unit, switched shunts and DSTAT model

40 Conclusion Still early in process of validating units but so far we haven’t found any events where the models matched reality very well This is a very important tool to help get us to better models More work is needed with GOs to improve models

41 Contact Information Damien Sommer, P.E. (262)

42 Questions