BMN Run owerview D.Vishnevskiy Mar23,2015. Run summary information NameFromToRuns Run1Feb 22Feb 1412 -188 Run2Mar 5Mar 8220 - 395 Run3Mar 11Mar 15403.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cosmic Ray Test of GEM- MPI/TPC in Magnetic Field Hiroshima University Kuroiwa CDC Group Mar
Advertisements

Test beam 2001 Results M.C. Fouz Muon Week, CERN Nov 01.
1 STAR TOF Calibration. 2 Detectors TPC(TPX) - tracking MRPC TOF (TOFr) – stop time measurement pVPD/upVPD - start time measurement Particle momentum;
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
THE BRIEF HISTORY OF LuMo CONSTRUCTION FROM MIT TO HU OZGUR ATES HAMPTON UNIVERSITY OLYMPUS COLLABORATION MEETING APRIL 2011.
9/11/2007JC Wang1 Track Resolution Scale, assume equal  meas for different planes. HP3 HP4 All 6 measurements. Without leftmost one. Without rightmost.
1 Apr. 28, 2007 Test of the Pulse Height and Time Jitter for the IHEP Full-Size RPC’s with 8-m-Long Readout Strip Planes C. Lu, K. McDonald and W. Sands.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Preparation of MTD production Yongjie Sun Center of Particle Physics and Technology University of Science and Technology of China.
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams Michele Faucci Giannelli.
Thursday, November 7th ECFA meeting - Valencia - A.-M. Magnan 1 CALICE Summary of 2006 testbeam for the ECAL Anne-Marie MAGNAN Imperial College London.
X.Dong, USTC/LBNL Feb. 20th, 04, STAR Collaboration Meeting 1 TOF Software Progress Xin Dong, for TOF Group  TOF detectors in Run IV  Online software.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
SPiDeR  SPIDER DECAL SPIDER Digital calorimetry TPAC –Deep Pwell DECAL Future beam tests Wishlist J.J. Velthuis for the.
DE/dx measurement with Phobos Si-pad detectors - very first impressions (H.P Oct )
Status of TPC experiment ---- Online & Offline M. Niiyama H. Fujimura D.S. Ahn W.C. Chang.
1 MTD Calibration for Cosmic Ray Triggered Data in RUN 10 at STAR Lijuan Ruan (BNL), Liang Li (UT Austin) 04/01/ Workshop on STAR MTD Production.
The 2007 CALICE Test CERN (part II) Erika Garutti, Fabrizio Salvatore.
LAV Software Status Emanuele Leonardi – Tommaso Spadaro Photon Veto WG meeting – 2015/03/24.
The new set of MWPCs for CB Collaboration Meeting Glasgow March 2006 A. Braghieri, P.Pedroni.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL, Feb 2005 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software update L3 display 200 GeV February.
1234 Dec Jan Feb 2007 Delivery of 500 MPPCs MPPC numbering Mass check MPPC soldering WLSF megastrip source scan ACFA Shipping Feb-14.
1 A.Andronic 1, H.Appelshäuser 1, V.Babkin 2, P.Braun-Munzinger 1, S.Chernenko 2, D.Emschernmann 3, C.Garabatos 1, V.Golovatyuk 2, J.Hehner 1, M.Hoppe.
GEM Trackers for Super BigBite Spectrometer (SBS) in Hall JLab The Super Big Bite Spectrometer (SBS) is one of the major new equipment in hall A in.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
April 27-29, Hangzhou1 STAR time-of-flight detector Calibration Ming SHAO USTC.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
E. GaruttiCALICE collaboration meeting, Prague CERN Test beam (part II) Erika Garutti, Fabrizio Salvatore.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Studying the efficiency and the space resolution of resistive strips MicroMegas Marco Villa – CERN MAMMA meeting Tuesday, 13 th December 2011 CERN, Geneva.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
RPC Design Studies Gabriel Stoicea, NIPNE-HH, Bucharest CBM Software Week GSI-Darmstadt May 10, 2004.
STS simulations: Layout, digitizers, performance Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
Simulation of the CALICE Test Beams with MOKKA Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London.
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
Database David Forrest. What database? DBMS: PostgreSQL. Run on dedicated Database server at RAL Need to store information on conditions of detector as.
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
B.Satyanarayana (For INO collaboration) Department of High Energy Physics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai, 400.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
RD51 GEM Telescope: results from June 2010 test beam and work in progress Matteo Alfonsi on behalf of CERN GDD group and Siena/PISA INFN group.
( ATLAS was designed for LHC: L=10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) [ Now we expect 7.5 x instantaneous and 10 x integrated luminosity ] PILEUP: from ~30  >200 proton.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
FNAL beam test data analysis A Hands-on session at CMS Upgrade School Aiwu Zhang Florida Institute of Technology On behalf of the CMS GEM collaboration.
A Brand new neutrino detector 「 SciBar 」 (2) Y. Takubo (Osaka) - Readout Electronics - Introduction Readout electronics Cosmic ray trigger modules Conclusion.
Trigger system for setup 2016 V. Rogov, V. Yurevich,D.Bogoslovski, S.Sergeev, O.Batenkov* LHEP JINR *V. G. Khlopin Radium Institute, St. Petersburg.
TOF Emittance Emittance measurements with the TOFs Mark Rayner 4 December 2008.
Beam detectors in Au+Au run and future developments - Results of Aug 2012 Au+Au test – radiation damage - scCVD diamond detector with strip metalization.
Future Beam Test Plans of the Calorimeter Group Aug 学術創成会議 Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu) for the GLD calorimeter group We are planning to have two beam.
TRIGGER & T0 for RUN 2016 V. Yurevich meeting CAEN digitizer T0.
1 The Scintillation Tile Hodoscope (SciTil) ● Motivation ● Event timing/ event building/ software trigger ● Conversion detection ● Charged particle TOF.
Vasilisa Lenivenko Vladimir Palichik (LHEP, JINR ) Alushta, June 2016.
Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee
Results with the RPC system of OPERA and perspectives
Beam detectors performance during the Au+Au runs in HADES
FSC status and plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino
High-Resolution Micromegas Telescope for Pion- and Muon-Tracking
TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE
The Status of the Data Analysis of the Beam Test at FZJ
Bonn Test Station data analysis with PandaRoot
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
Barrel RPC Conditions Database
Status of the TOF Detector
ScECAL+AHCAL+TCMT Combined Beam FNAL
CLAS12 Timing Calibration
RPC FEE The discriminator boards TDC boards Cost schedule.
Current status Minjung Kim
Digitally subtracted pulse between
Presentation transcript:

BMN Run owerview D.Vishnevskiy Mar23,2015

Run summary information NameFromToRuns Run1Feb 22Feb Run2Mar 5Mar Run3Mar 11Mar

Electronics DCH1DCH2 TOF700 TOF400 T0 Trigger marks to PCh beam counters ECAL ZDC

Data format errors Processing run: Event 301 !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x692E11 id: D1 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event 3927 !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x692E11 id: D1 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x id: E8 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x id: 2 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x692E11 id: D1 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x692E11 id: D1 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x692E11 id: D1 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x085A06 id: F payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x60D350 id: D3 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x692E11 id: D1 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x692E11 id: D1 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x692E11 id: D1 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x692E11 id: D1 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x692E11 id: D1 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x692E11 id: D1 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x692E11 id: D1 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x692E11 id: D1 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! Event !!!!!!!!!!! serial: 0x692E11 id: D1 payload: !!!!!!!!!!! “Monster” events broken events

Detector mappings Run1Run2Run3 Tof400TOF400_map_Mar4.txtTOF400_map_Mar11.txt Tof700TOF700_map_Feb20_Mar11.txtTOF700_map_Mar11.txt DchDCH_map_Feb20_Feb25.txtDCH_map_Mar4.txtDCH_map_Mar11.txt ZDCZDC_map_Feb20.txt ECALWill be ready soon PCh

Data types Event builder data (*.data files), 2 groups –Format changed after RUN1 HRB files (*.dat files), PCh –For Run3 ~every run RAW files, data from electronics, format independent, ROOT branches (RAW digits) Digit files, raw data with mapping applied ( detectors structure oriented ) RecHits High level objects

Data location Raw data (.data &.dat files): /nica/data4mpd1/dataBMN/run1 /nica/data4mpd1/dataBMN/run2 /nica/data4mpd1/dataBMN/run3 Raw ROOT files (for event builder data & hrb): /nica/data4mpd1/dataBMN/bmnroot/RAW Raw ROOT files ( event builder + hrb): /nica/data4mpd1/dataBMN/bmnroot/EB+HRB

ADC & TDC raw data format

Trigger & timing data formats

RAW -> DIGIT root [2].x testRaw2Digit.C("/nica/data4mpd1/dataBMN/bmnroot/RAW/bmn_run0607.root"); r oot [0].x testRaw2DigitMwpc.C("/nica/data4mpd1/dataBMN/bmnroot/EB+HRB/bmn_run0645_eb+hrb.root")

Mwpc mapping mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F304E, 0)); //x11 CHAMBER #1 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F3043, 1)); //yl11 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F1A8D, 2)); //yl12 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F4504, 3)); //x12 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F4514, 4)); //yr11 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F45DF, 5)); //yr12 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046EFA53, 6)); //x11 CHAMBER #2 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F3F1D, 7)); //yl11 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F028B, 8)); //yl12 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F3F97, 9)); //x12 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F4513, 10)); //yr11 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F3F8E, 11)); //yr12 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F47CB, 12)); //x11 CHAMBER #3 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F3F8B, 13)); //yl11 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F30B8, 14)); //yl12 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F2950, 15)); //x12 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F2A79, 16)); //yr11 mapDevID.insert(MMAP::value_type(0x046F2FFF, 17)); //yr12 Layers Channels 0..95

BmnMwpcDigit

DCH - 2 chambers, 8 layers each: XA,XB; YA,YB; VA,VB; UA,UB - Each layer have 240 channels, step 1cm (15 groups of 16 channels) - A&B shifted by 1/2 cm - V,U rotated by 45 deg wrt X,Y - group 15 is readout of group 7 from opposite side of beam hole

DCH Time correlation between shifted planes A&B Needed to increase resolution: R(t)~=0.5/100 cm/ns; T=(Ta+Tb)/2; Xa=Xa+R(Ta-T); Xb=Xb- R(Tb-T); X=(Xa+Xb)/2; // position X

BmnDchDigit need more precise R(t) calibration

TOF400 mapping 2 modules 24 strips each Possible mapping problems Left sideRight side

TOF400 timing

TOF400 position Strip length ~=60cm L&R Cables have different length

TOF chambers: 2 big, 2 small - 32 strips each (two sides readout) cm big strip width (1 mm offset) cm small strip width (1 mm offset) Up big (UB) Down big (DB) Up small (US) Down small (DS)

TOF700 mapping Run1,Run2 Run3 UB L R DB L R US L R DS L R Two dead TDC channels Some strips have significant difference in L & R counts Mapping need to be validated

TOF700 & 400 digis To produce BmnTof1Hit & BmnTof2Hit we need: - Implement TDC DNL and INL corrections to improve timing resolution - dt(amplitude) corrections to improve timing resolution - Measure L(t) (DCH tracks needed) to have position on the strip (expected 5mm resolution)

ZDC Average signal

ZDC signals What is “Energy”?

ECAL Only 18 channels connected to readout

ECAL average shape

BmnZDCDigis & BmnEcalDigis To produce BmnZDCHit & BmnEcalHit we need: - Understand what is “raw energy” - Made energy calibration (raw number -> real energy)