Your Presenters What we’re asking of you Statewide stakeholder review process taking place in all regions We want your feedback on all aspects of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
To Eliminate Poverty and Family Violence in El Paso County.
Advertisements

Response to Recommendations by the National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies (NACCRRA) The Massachusetts Child Care Resource & Referral.
Board of Early Education and Care Strategic Planning Update February 10, 2009.
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
Building a System of Care in Child Welfare: North Carolina
700: Moving Through the Collaboration Continuum to Improve Permanency Outcomes Wednesday, March 20, 2013.
NRCOI March 5th Conference Call
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
1 Strategic Planning. 2 Elements of the Strategic Planning Process Strategic planning is a continual process for improving organizational performance.
1 Understanding and Developing Child Welfare Practice Models The Service Array Process National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement.
CWDA CHILDREN’S COMMITTEE SUMMER WORKSHOP. Key Messages  Today is a starting point – the first step of the process  There will be many more opportunities.
Using An Organizational Assessment : A framework to Help Agencies Build on Strengths, Recognize Challenges, and Develop a Comprehensive Work Plan, CWDA.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Capacity for Family Partnership, Youth Partnership, Cultural and Linguistic Competence and Cross System Partnership Track 1 – Early Developmental Stages.
Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
United Advocates for Children of California 1401 El Camino Avenue, Suite 340 Sacramento, CA (916) direct  (866) toll free.
1 Understanding and Developing Child Welfare Practice Models Steven Preister, Associate Director National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Adapted from materials developed by Anita P. Barbee, MSSW, Ph.D.
Background Materials Useful in Developing a California Integrative Theoretical Framework January 9, 2014 Webinar Led by the members of the Practice Model.
VERMONT AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
California Child Welfare Core Practice Model Design Workshop:
Bethany Geldmaker RN, PNP, PhD
Planning for A Single Point of Access For Families One Stop Family Support and Resource Center Baltimore, Maryland.
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Children and learning – the new agenda Children and Lifelong Learning Scrutiny Committee July 05.
California Child Welfare Core Practice Model: Theoretical Framework, Values, and Principles Adapted from materials developed by Anita P. Barbee, MSSW,
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
TELECONFERENCE/WEBINAR ON MAY 6,2010 2:30 – 4:00 PM EASTERN THE NATIONAL CHILD WELFARE RESOURCE CENTER FOR ORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVEMENT Building Ongoing.
National Title IV-E Roundtable Bloomington, Minnesota Presentation on Title IV-E State, Tribal, and University Partnerships June 4, 2015 Theresa Tanoury,
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
Lori Clarke Convergent Horizons February 6, 2015.
533: Building a Trauma-Informed Culture in Child Welfare.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
SUPERVISION: SIGNS OF SAFETY STYLE Phase 1 The Supervision Contract Phase 2 Case Specific Supervision Phase 3 Performance Booster Phase 4 Review of P.E.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
EEC Strategic Framework Board Meeting February 12,
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Common Core 3.0 Online Learning Classroom Skill Building Field Activities.
New Trainer Orientation Webinar bayareaacademy.org.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
Keeping our Commitments to Collaborative Children’s Services.
Signs of Safety Webinar Series UC Davis Extension Center for Human Services Northern Training Academy Overview of Signs of Safety Implementation.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
Board of Early Education and Care Strategic Planning Update October 14, 2008.
California Child Welfare Core Practice Model: Development of Theoretical Framework and Alignment with Values and Principles Anita P. Barbee, MSSW, Ph.D.
California Child Welfare Core Practice Model: Theoretical Framework, Values, and Principles Adapted from materials developed by Anita P. Barbee, MSSW,
California’s Child Welfare Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Overview California Department of Social Services 1.
Continuous Quality Improvement: Our Desired State The Vision for Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Localities Early Intervention and Prevention Integrated Working Partnership Shared Accountability for children and families.
Welcome Acknowledgements.
Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge Letters of Support Webinar
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
Overview of the California Child Welfare Core Practice Model (CPM)
Child Welfare Demonstration Project (CWDP)
AspireMN Member Meeting
Your Library: Explore, Learn, Read, Connect
Creating the Conditions for CPM to THRIVE
Child Welfare: Mark Lapiz (Santa Clara County)
Presentation transcript:

Your Presenters

What we’re asking of you Statewide stakeholder review process taking place in all regions We want your feedback on all aspects of the model, but we will be focusing on specific practices social workers will use in their work We want to know: – Do these practices resonate with you? – Is anything missing?

Practice Model Background California counties have tried many promising practices to improve outcomes for children and families We noticed that many of the new practices had common elements Some recent efforts have even tried to combine different initiatives into more comprehensive practice models We wanted to work together to build on that

Towards a Statewide Practice Model The County Welfare Directors Association (CWDA) Children’s Committee has been working to develop a statewide practice model Monthly meetings Statewide Workshops Goal: – To define California’s Child Welfare Services as a profession grounded in theory, with a set of core values, common elements and identified behaviors

Guiding Vision – California’s 58 counties embrace one practice model that guides their individual Child Welfare Services programs by integrating successful practices into a framework that supports the achievement of safety, permanency and well-being for children and their families in the Child Welfare Services system.

Stakeholder Engagement The California model is built on work done with stakeholders who helped develop CAPP and other practices – Youth, Parents, Caregivers, Tribes, Communities Now we are reaching out across the state to hear from you

Let’s take a closer look at the model.

Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors

Theoretical Framework Our theoretical framework is an organized set of explanatory principles that help us understand: – What leads to the problem of child maltreatment? – How can we work to prevent child maltreatment from starting or stop it once it has started?

Theoretical Framework

Values Our values provide an expression of an ideal or optimal state of being. They explain what we are striving for in our work with families.

Evidence- Informed Organizational Support Permanency Safety Growth and Change Cultural Responsiveness Partnership Professional Competency Well- Being Respectful Engagement This is What We Believe Our Values

Casework Components: This is What We Do

Practice Elements: This is How We Do It Engagement Inquiry / Exploration Advocacy Teaming Accountability Workforce Development and Support

Practice Behaviors Define practice elements so agency and community partners know what to expect and can build coordinated services and supports. Support evaluation of model fidelity and outcomes. Provide a framework for practice.

Practice Behaviors Provide direction to practitioners about how they will practice social work using the practice model.

Our Goal Refine our draft practice behaviors to ensure they – Are clear and recognizable – Are flexible enough to allow for differences in procedures, tools, and supports – Workable with existing practice already in use – Informed by our key stakeholders, who know what good practice looks like.

So, let’s look at the draft practice behaviors

We want your feedback on all aspects of the model, but we will be focusing on specific practices social workers will use in their work We want to know: Do these practices resonate with you? Is anything missing? Share Your Ideas