Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Particle ID Tony Weidberg
Advertisements

Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Detector Design Issues:  Interaction Region David Asner/LLNL Linear Collider Retreat, Santa Cruz, June 27-29,
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
Background Studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC ALCPG 2004 Winter Workshop January 8, 2004.
Detecting Particles Martin Gallacher – University of Birmingham.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
SPD spill-over and the subtractor Míriam Calvo 23 June 2010.
Evaluation of G4 Releases in CMS (Sub-detector Studies) Software used Electrons in Tracker Photons in the Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pions in the Calorimeter.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Time development of showers in a Tungsten-HCAL Calice Collaboration Meeting – Casablanca 2010 Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
Backgrounds in the NLC BDS ISG9 December 10 – Takashi Maruyama SLAC.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
1 Muon Collider Backgrounds Steve Geer Fermilab Steve Geer MC Detector & Physics DOE June 24, 2009.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
May 31th, 2007 LCWS C. Gatto 1 Tracking Studies in the 4 th Concept On behalf of 4th Concept Software Group D. Barbareschi V. Di Benedetto E. Cavallo.
Silicon Detector Tracking ALCPG Workshop Cornell July 15, 2003 John Jaros.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #15.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
1 Nick Sinev, ALCPG March 2011, Eugene, Oregon Investigation into Vertex Detector Resolution N. B. Sinev University of Oregon, Eugene.
1 Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump Siva Darbha Supervisors: Lewis Keller and Takashi Maruyama.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
OUTGOING NEUTRONS IN CALET CALET AIMS AT DETECTING UHE CR ELECTRONS HIGH REJECTION FACTOR FOR PROTONS/NUCLEI NEEDED POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT RESPECT ‘STANDARD’
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
Feb 7, 2006S. Kahn -- Muon Collider Detector Backgrounds 1 Detector Backgrounds in a Muon Collider Steve Kahn Muons Inc. LEMC Workshop.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
Backgrounds in the Muon Collider Experiments Adam Para, Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting, SLAC, March 8, 2012.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Tracking: An Experimental Overview Richard Partridge Brown / SLAC Fermilab ALCPG Meeting.
MDI Simulations at SLAC Takashi Maruyama, Lew Keller, Thomas Markiewicz, Uli Wienands, SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting, FNAL June 21, 2013.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
Muon Collider Higgs Factory Physics and Detector Studies R. Lipton, Fermilab A Muon Collider is uniquely capable of producing Higgs bosons in the s channel.
Effect of L* Changes on Vertex Detector and Forward Calorimeter Performance LCWS 2015 Whistler, BC, Canada November Bruce Schumm UCSC/SCIPP 1.
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Neutron and Photon Backscattering from the ILC Beam Dump
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
Monte Carlo studies of the configuration of the charge identifier
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
Report about “Forward Instrumentation” Issues
Tony Hill Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
T. Markiewicz / SLAC MAP at SLAC Working Meeting 2 July 2014
MAP 2014 Spring Workshop Fermilab May, 2014
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
Hit density at scoring planes at r=10, 30, and 50 cm.
Physics event timing Use Pythia to generate hadronic decays at 125 GeV
Converted Photon Hits in Muon Higgs Factory
Hit Density Geant 3 scoring planes
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Presentation transcript:

Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014

FLUKA Geometry Takashi Maruyama In all plots: 1 beam only beam enters from R side Beam starts at X=-1.947m Z= m S=22.71m T0=75.7ns 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz2

Summer 2013 Work Attempted to Ensure Agreement w/ MARS as presented by Striganov at June 2013 MAP CM Per beamStriganovMaruyamaCutoff E Photons1.6× × MeV e+/e-6.1× × MeV Neutrons8.6× × MeV Ch. Hadrons5.1×10 4 7× MeV gamma e+/e- Time (ns) 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz3

Study Hit Density per Readout Plane Geant 3 Detector planes – Each 300um Silicon Track Fluka generated particles in 4 Tesla field Record hit position and hit time Find hit density per readout time w/ and w/o timing cut – Figure of merit for ILC backgrounds and detectors – Some preliminary discussions of readout electronics required Barrel Detector Radius (cm) Half Length (cm) VXD Tracker ECAL EndcapZ (cm)Rin (cm)Rout (cm) VXD Tracker ECAL May MAP CMT. Markiewicz4

Pythia timing to set timing gates Z (cm) R (cm) Time (ns) Barrel 1 Endcap 1 Barrel 2Barrel 3 Endcap 2 Endcap 3 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz5

Photons Crossing Defined Silicon Layers 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz6

7 Error in our Interpretation of “FLUKA time” Uncovered On 5/20/14 discover error in time assigned to parent particle by our interpretation of FLUKA: – NOT time it left beampipe, W cone or W disk, but rather time at the end of the “FLUKA step” which is large in the case of photons, charged hadrons & neutrons and small in the case of e+/e- For photons, Takashi reran FLUKA for 1 bunch & scored the photons (rather than letting them convert): Multiply by 5100 x 2% = 102 to get background associated with one bunch. # hits/converted γ underestimated (hits/γ~4) For electrons: error small, use Takashi’s full statistics: Multiply unnormalized plots by x510 to get backgrounds associated with 1 bunch Time when photon produced by showering decay electron (all 9 Silicon layers in this plot) Previous incorrect result (+75 ns) June 2013 Current correct result 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz

Time and z of produced photon background Downbeam Cone tip: Z=-20.45cm R=2.8cm Upbeam Cone tip: Z=+20.45cm R=2.8cm Muon Beam 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz8

Z Distribution of Photons in r=5.5cm Barrel VXD Use this to get Peak/Average occupancy Should also look at azimuth as more background in horizontal plane 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz9

Time Distribution of photon hits on r=5.5cm Barrel time=time_parent +time_child time_parent time_child rel. to parent Source of photons 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz10

Converted Photon Background Occupancy in r=5.5cm VXD Barrel Max. transit time for prompt photon from vertex is 0.71ns ALL background hits 43k x 102 x 2 x 1000 = 8.8 x 10^9 hits per train Layer has r=5.5cm and L=2x20.5=41cm; Area=1417cm^2 Average hit density is 6.2 x 10^6 hits/cm^2 If pixel = 20um x 20 um, this is 25 hits/pixel average per train Peak occupancy is ~4x average occupancy -> 100 hits/pixel A +/-0.8ns time cut would be required to reject the backgrounds from tip of the downstream cone, leave background from the upbeam cone and the beampipe k/43.0k= 43% Occupancy is to be compared to engineered KPIX architecture for 4 hits per readout per train 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz11

Z Distribution of photons in r=50 Barrel Look at photons at r=50cm -91<z<91 Silicon layer: 1 st layer of tracker 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz12

Time Distribution of photon hits on r=50cm Barrel time_parent time_child rel. to parent Source of photons time=time_parent +time_child 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz13

Converted Photon Background Occupancy in r=50cm Tracker Max. transit time for prompt photon from vertex is 3.5ns ALL background hits 136.4k x 102 x 2 x 1000 = 27.8 x 10^9 hits per train Layer has r=50cm and L=2x91=182cm; Area=57177cm^2 Average hit density is x 10^6 hits/cm^2 If detector is = 50um x 1 cm strip, this is 2430 hits/strip average per train Peak occupancy is ~2x average occupancy -> 5000 hits/strip The time of flight variation across the barrel ( ns) encompasses the majority of the background Occupancy is to be compared to engineered KPIX architecture for 4 hits per readout per train 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz14

Z Distribution of photons on r=131cm ECAL Barrel 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz15

Time Distribution of photon hits on r=131cm Barrel time_parent time_child rel. to parent Source of photons time=time_parent +time_child 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz16

Background Converted Photon Occupancy at r=131cm Max. transit time for prompt photon from vertex is 8ns ALL background hits 135.2k x 102 x 2 x 1000 = 27.6 x 10^9 hits per train Layer has r=131cm and L=2x200=400cm; Area=3.29E5cm^2 Average hit density is 8.4x 10^4 hits/cm^2 If detector is = 1cm x 1 cm pad, this is 8.4x10^4 hits/pad average per train Peak occupancy is ~2x average occupancy -> 16k hits/pad The time of flight variation across the barrel ( ns) encompasses the majority of the background Occupancy is to be compared to engineered KPIX architecture for 4 hits per readout per train Average photon energy is 1 MeV – At calorimeter, an energy cut would work – It is difficult to shield 1 MeV photons No easy fix for trackers 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz17

Time Distribution of photon hits on 2 VXD disks at z=25cm, 6.7<r<18.4 TOF from vertex =1.0 ns Gate 0.5<t<1.5ns time_parent time_child rel. to parent Near disk/far disk Source of photons 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz18

Converted Photon Background Occupancy at on 2 disks at z=25cm, 6.7<r<18.4cm Max. transit time for prompt photon from vertex is 1.0 ns ALL background hits 28k x 102 x 1 x 1000 = 2.85 x 10^9 hits per train Area of each disk=923cm^2 Average hit density is 3.1 x 10^6 hits/cm^2 If pixel = 20um x 20 um, this is 12.3 hits/pixel average per train Peak occupancy is ~2.5x average occupancy -> 31 hits/pixel A ns gate leaves most of the background intact 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz19

Time Distribution of photon hits on 2 disks at z=92cm, 25.3<r<53.3cm TOF from vertex =3.5 ns Gate 3<t<4ns time_parent time_child rel. to parent Near disk/far disk From cone tips + anomaly Source of photons 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz20

Background Occupancy at on 2 disks at z=92cm, 25.3<r<53.3cm Max. transit time for prompt photon from vertex is 3.54 ns ALL background hits 17.6k x 102 x 1 x 1000 = 1.79 x 10^9 hits per train Area of each disk=6914cm^2 Average hit density is 2.6 x 10^5 hits/cm^2 If strip = 50um x 1cm, this is 1300 hits/strip average per train Peak occupancy is ~1.25x average occupancy -> 1600 hits/strip A 3-4ns gate leaves 12.1/17.6=69% of these hits 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz21

Time Distribution of photon hits on 2 disks at z=200cm, 38<r<130.9cm TOF from vertex =8.0 ns Gate 6.5<t<9ns time_parent time_child rel. to parent Near disk/far disk From cone tips + anomaly Source of photons 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz22

Background Occupancy at on 2 disks at z=200cm, 38<r<130.9 Max. transit time for prompt photon from vertex is 8ns ALL background hits 25.6k x 102 x 1 x 1000 = 2.6 x 10^9 hits per train Area=49.3E3cm^2 Average hit density is 5.3x 10^4 hits/cm^2 If detector is = 1cm x 1 cm pad, this is 53x10^3 hits/pad average per train Peak occupancy is ~1.2x average occupancy -> 64k hits/pad 68% background hits are in 6.5-9ns gate Average photon energy is 1.2 MeV – At calorimeter, an energy cut would work – It is difficult to shield 1 MeV photons No easy fix for trackers 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz23

There are many slow looping particles both from physics and background events Pythia charged hadrons Time (ns) Barrel 1 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz24

e+e- backgrounds: Source locations more broadly distributed than that of photon backgrounds 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz25

e+e- backgrounds: multiple hits and hit times from loopers All scoring planes Hit time ~6-8 All scoring planes Hit_child rel. to parent e+/e- 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz26

Time Distribution of e+e- hits on r=5.5cm Barrel time=time_parent +time_child 0-1ns gate time_parent time_child rel. to parent 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz27

e+/e- Background Occupancy at r=5.5cm Max. transit time for prompt photon from vertex is 0.71ns ALL background hits 18.1k x 510 x 2 x 1000 = 18.5 x 10^9 hits per train Layer has r=5.5cm and L=2x20.5=41cm; Area=1417cm^2 Average hit density is 13 x 10^6 hits/cm^2 If pixel = 20um x 20 um, this is 52 hits/pixel average per train Peak occupancy is ~3x average occupancy -> 150 hits/pixel/train A 0-1ns gate leaves 1.2k/18.1k= 6.5% 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz28

Relatively few e+/e- Backgrounds make it to the r=50cm barrel tracker & the r=131cm surface of the barrel Ecal, but those hits are “in time” with physics events 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz29

Time Distribution of e+e- hits on z=25cm Disks Many, many spirals before hitting disk delays arrival time=time_parent +time_child ns gate time_parent time_child rel. to parent 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz30

e+/e- Background Occupancy at z=25cm disks Max. transit time for prompt photon from vertex is 1ns ALL background hits 1973 x 510 x 1 x 1000 = 1 x 10^9 hits per train Area of each disk=922.6cm^2 Average hit density is 1.1 x 10^6 hits/cm^2 If pixel = 20um x 20 um, this is 4.4 hits/pixel average per train Peak occupancy is ~4x average occupancy -> 17 hits/pixel/train As the source of these at this disk are 30-80cm from the IP, not the cone tip, a timing cut is very effective: A ns gate leaves 1% 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz31

Relatively few e+/e- Backgrounds make it to the z=92cm fwd tracker & the z=200cm surface of the Endcap Ecal the tighter time cuts help further as e+/e- source is far up the cone, away from the IP at large z 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz32

Summary Table 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz33

Conclusions Irreducible backgrounds emanating from the IP come predominately from the downbeam cone tip and are thus largely in time with the collision ~1 MeV photons that convert (2% probability) in 300um Silicon VXD and Tracking layers are the dominate background Timing cuts not particularly effective given (in this IR geometry) proximity of cone tips to the IP (±0.7ns away) Silicon strip tracker (50um x 1cm) show 100%-500% occupancy per BX to be compared to ILC performance of 1-2%. Can argue what is max. allowed (10%), but 100% does not work. Hits per readout unit per train (1000 BX) >> 4 buffers designed for the ILC Readout architecture (“KPIX”) Reading each readout element each bunch crossing probably required Barrel backgrounds more important than endcap backgrounds Endcap hits caused by spiraling e+e- are out of time when they hit endcap trackers Tracker backgrounds with 50um x 1cm strips >> VXD backgrounds with 20 um x 20um pixels Barrel and Endcap ECAL need to passively absorb ~1 MeV photons/pad/BX without showing a hit Future work: – Fix problems with how we use FLUKA timing information – Investigate larger beam pipe, more relaxed shielding cone geometries 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz34

EXTRA 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz35

Charged h backgrounds: Source locations about the same as that of e-/e+ backgrounds but produced typically much, much later (this is hallmark of FLUKA problem mentioned at beginning of talk: so forget charged hadrons and neutrons for now) 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz36

Charged h backgrounds: multiple hits and long hit times from loopers ~3 All scoring planes Hit_child rel. to parent e+/e- Many low p loopers Pions Kaons protons 29 May MAP CMT. Markiewicz37