1 PENSION REFORM IN CROATIA: 1998-2004. 2 PENSION REFORM BRIEF PAYGO PARAMETRIC REFORM IN 1998 FUNDED PILLARS LEGISLATED IN 1999 SUPERVISION AGENCY (HAGENA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Budgetary aspects of the Macedonian Pension Reform Zorica Apostolska Director, MAPAS April 9, 2008 Bucharest Agency for supervision of Fully Funded Pension.
Advertisements

Social Security – The choice of a lifetime Understanding when and how to file for Social Security benefits NRM-12743AO-NX.
Coverage in the Chilean Pension System Solange Berstein– Chair IOPS Technical Committee Pensions Supervisor, Chile IOPS Regional Workshop Amman, Jordan.
The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston Pension Plan Changes Pension Plan Participant Information Meetings April - May 2014.
PPA 419 – Aging Service Administration Lecture 4b – Social Security Reform.
1 Aging and solidarity in the United States : What we can learn and transfer to the European Union? Nyleñka Paille Jihann Kheladi Tachrifa Maoulida Morganne.
Social Security Forum, February 24, 2005 Presenter: Dr. R. Steven Daniels Department of Public Policy and Administration.
Agency for the Supervision of Fully Funded Pension Insurance (MAPAS) Preparing the Financial Market for an Aging Population - The case of Macedonia Zorica.
PENSION SYSTEM IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA. Pension system, key institutions Ministry of Labor and Social Policy Pension and Disability Insurance Fund of.
Presentation of the Macedonian Pension Reform March 2004 Zorica Apostolska.
Pension System Reform in the Republic of Macedonia Kiev, May 2004.
Pension funds in Iceland Hrafn Magnússon Managing Director National Association of Pension Funds Reykjavík September 30th 2005.
Social Security Includes a number of government programs designed to insure stability in income and standard of living Programs in Social Security: 1.Old.
October 2007 Canadian Experience in Public Pension Fund Management and Operations Asia-Pacific Finance and Development Center Conference.
COUNCIL OF ONTARIO UNIVERSITIES Council of Ontario Universities Working Group on University Pension Plans Presentation for Briefing Meeting on Solvency.
Florida Government Finance Officers Association Webinar GASB’s New Pension Standards December 18, 2014.
1 1 Provided by:. 2 2 Today’s Agenda Overview of Retirement Plans How Plans are Used – Private vs Public Hot Topics and Trends Employment Opportunities.
DEVELOPMENT OF PRIVATE PENSION INDUSTRY IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA Conference “Evolution of Pension Reforms: Bulgaria’s Experience and Regional Perspectives”
Republic of Serbia Republic of Serbia Pension System 2009.
1 Albanian Pension System REGIONAL SEMINAR ON PENSION ZAGREB, 9-10 MARCH, 2009 REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF LABOR, SOCIAL AFFAIRS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES.
1 Pension Fund Industry in Thailand Chaibhondh Osataphan Chairman Association of Provident Fund Manager Thailand First International Pension Fund Conference.
Learning Objective # 5 Determine your planned retirement income. LO#5.
Adequate and sustainable pensions in Bulgaria: Contribution from supplementary retirement provisions BISSER PETKOV Deputy Chairman of Financial Supervision.
11/27/2007 Pension Reforms in China and Taiwan Hongxia Jiao Yi-Ying Chen.
Reforming an Unsustainable Public Pension System: The German Case
M Forum Plenary Session McGill University Pension Plan October 5,
Private Pension Insurance in the Czech Republic The Decumulation Phase Seminar on Private Pension Provision, Tallinn, Štěpánka Pollnerová.
ANADOLU HAYAT EMEKLİLİK A.Ş. COMPANY PRESENTATION Decem ber 2009.
Minimum Pension Guarantee in Poland Zofia Czepulis-Rutkowska Seminar for social security actuaries and statisticians: actuarial aspects of pension reform.
BULGARIAN SYSTEM OF PRIVATE FULLY-FUNDED PENSIONS (ACHIEVEMENTS AND CHALLENGES) “Pension Reform in Eastern Europe: Experiences and Perspectives” Kiev,
Development and Results of Fully Funded Pension Provision in Bulgaria BISSER PETKOV Deputy Chairman of Financial Supervision Commission Head of Social.
Pension Systems in Times of Financial Crises: Serbia
IBIS Academy 2008 Dublin, Ireland Green Paper on Pensions Brendan Kennedy The Pensions Board IBIS Academy 2008 Dublin, Ireland.
COH PENSION SYSTEMS STATUS UPDATE BUDGET & FISCAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE December 7, 2010 Craig Mason Chief Pension Executive.
Inter-relation between the three pillars in the Icelandic pension system Nordisk skattevidenskabeligt forskningsråds seminar København 26. og 27. oktober.
Private pension schemes and their impacts on the public systems in the time of crisis The CMKOS – FES Conference Prague 31st March 2011 The Destiny of.
The Social Security in Italy Project Communicate October 2006.
The Pension System in Indonesia Extending Pension Coverage to Informal Sector Workers: The Asian Challenge November 30 – December 1, 2006 P.S. Srinivas.
New Investment Challenges in Pension Insurance, Developments and Trends in Fully-Funded Pensions in Bulgaria Bisser Petkov – Deputy Chairperson.
Warsaw, Poland May 17, 2010 Poland Social Sector and Public Wages Public Expenditure Review From Maastricht to Vision 2030 Overview.
Retirement Protection Plus Program Protection for Retirement Plan Contributions A Unique Benefit for Valued Employees Disability.
1 Pension Reform in Central and Eastern Europe Elaine Fultz Senior Specialist in Social Security ILO Budapest.
1 Pension Reform in Central and Eastern Europe Elaine Fultz Senior Specialist in Social Security ILO Budapest.
Slovenian Pension System in the Context of Upcoming Demographic Developments Boris Majcen and Miroslav Verbič Institute for Economic Research.
Robert Holzmann World Bank Pension Systems and Financial Crisis: An Overview Regional (ECA) Workshop Pension Systems in Times of Financial Crisis Brussels,
1 The role of REGOS in pension reform. 2CONTENT Introduction Tasks Business processes Employers in reform system Conclusion.
A Healthy Financial Picture Should include the following: Monthly Spending Budget Emergency Savings Flexible Spending Account Debt Elimination Plan Disability.
Social Security: The Brookings Institute Washington, DC January 13, 2005 The view from.
FUNDED PENSIONS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Design and Experience Agnieszka Chlon-Dominczak Cancun, May 15th, 2003.
Design features of an IA System: What Can We Learn from Other Countries? By Estelle James.
Sofia April Croatia – recent developments 1.
Transition costs and their impact on adequacy Vidija Pastukiene Seminar on Private Pension Provision Transition costs and decumulation phase Tallinn, 6-7.
Bulgaria’s Pension Reform Responding to the Needs of Workers for the 21 st Century.
Today’s Lecture #24 Social Security What Goes In and What Goes Out? Financing Historical Development Benefits What You Can Expect.
20 CHAPTER Social Security PUBLIC SECTOR ECONOMICS: The Role of Government in the American Economy Randall Holcombe.
Measuring Political Risk of Hungarian Social Security System Is there a really good reform? Juraj Kopecsni.
The Cost of “Choice” in a Voluntary Pension System Prof. Jon Forman & Sandy Mackenzie for the Tax Economist Forum Washington, DC Third Way, 1025 Connecticut.
Pension Funds in Slovakia – Consequences for the Economy Peter Golias INEKO - Institute for Economic and Social Reforms Economic Forum – Krynica, Poland.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 19 – Social Policy and Employment.
Pension Reform Workshop Leogrand Hotel Chisinov, June 2008
“The Future of Social Security”
The Romanian Pension Reform
Irena Risteska Ministry of Labor and Social Policy
THE SWEDISH SECOND PILLAR
Lithuanian Pension system Projection results AR 2018
Lessons from the Great Swedish Pension Reform Should we move
Pension reform and private pension funds in Poland: Goals and Facts.
Lithuanian pension system and reforms MISSOC Network Meeting Vilnius, October Ministry of Social protection and Labour.
PENSION SYSTEM IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
Public Basic Pension Sustainability in China
Presentation transcript:

1 PENSION REFORM IN CROATIA:

2 PENSION REFORM BRIEF PAYGO PARAMETRIC REFORM IN 1998 FUNDED PILLARS LEGISLATED IN 1999 SUPERVISION AGENCY (HAGENA) AND CENTRAL REGISTRY OF AFFILIATES (REGOS) ESTABLISHED IN 1999 SECOND PILLAR LAUNCHED IN 2002 THIRD PILLAR STARTED IN 2002 COMPREHENSIVE REFORM OF CONTRIBUTION COLLECTION AND ADMINISTRATION FISCAL EXPANSION IN THE PAYGO PENSION PILLAR IN 2004

3 FIRST PILLAR REFORM ELEMENTS RAISING RETIREMENT AGE FROM 55/60(W/M) TO 60/65(W/M) IN 10 YEARS 2004: W=58; M=63 RAISING EARLY RETIREMENT AGE FROM 50/55(W/M) TO 55/60(W/M) IN 10 YEARS 2004: W=53; M=58

4 FIRST PILLAR REFORM ELEMENTS RAISING CALCULATION PERIOD FROM 10 BEST YEARS TO FULL CAREER IN 3-YEAR INCREMENTALS IN 10 YEARS 2004: 25 BEST YEARS RAISING DECREMENTAL RATIO TO 3.6% PER ONE YEAR OF EARLY RETIREMENT FROM 1,2% PER ONE YEAR

5 FIRST PILLAR REFORM ELEMENTS CHANGING INDEXATION SCHEME (50%W + 50%P BEFORE AND AFTER) 1991-X 1993: W BEFORE AND W AFTER X VII 1998: W BEFORE AND P AFTER VII 1998 – III 2004: W/P BEFORE AND AFTER III 2004 – TODAY: BACK TO W BEFORE AND W AFTER TIGHTENING DISABILITY ELIMINATING TEMPORARY DISABILITY STRENGTHENING DISABILITY ELIGIBILITY

6 PENSION SYSTEM FORECAST PRIOR TO 2004 LEGISLATION EXPANDING PAYGO SYSTEM

7 PENSION SYSTEM FORECAST AFTER 2004 LEGISLATION

8 TARGET REPLACEMENT RATES (BEFORE 2004 LEGISLATION)

9 BASIC FEATURES OF SECOND PILLAR ELIGIBILITY: WORKERS BELOW 40 YEARS OF AGE MANDATORY WORKERS BETWEEN 40 AND 50 OPTION WORKERS ABOVE 50 YEARS OF AGE: PAYGO CONTRIBUTION RATE TO INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT: 5% OF GROSS WAGE (20% TOTAL CONTRIBUTION) SECOND PILLAR BENEFIT: ONLY PRICE-INDEXED LIFETIME ANNUITY

10 SECOND PILLAR CURRENT PERFORMANCE 4 PENSION FUNDS IN MARCH 2004 (DOWN FROM 7 IN 2003) 1,1 MILLION PARTICIPANTS (OUT OF 1,43 MILLION INSURED INDIVIDUALS) NET ASSETS IN MARCH 2004: 5,2 BIL KUNA (3% OF GDP) AVERAGE RATE OF RETURN (III III 2004) 2,76%; (IV III 2004) 7,47% PER ANNUM LOW SWITCHING FREQUENCY

11 2 ND PILLAR PORTFOLIO (MARCH 2004)

12 SECOND PILLAR FORECAST

13 THIRD PILLAR PERFORMANCE EMERGING INDUSTRY, 4 OPEN PENSION FUNDS IN MARCH 2004, UP FROM 1 IN EARLY 2003 TWO CLOSED FUNDS, FEW LICENSES PENDING 10,800 PARTICIPANTS IN OPEN FUNDS NET ASSETS IN MARCH 2004: 39 MIL KUNA ($6 MILLION)

14 3 RD PILLAR PORTFOLIO (MARCH 2004)

15 PENSION REFORM AND “MINI – FISCAL” REFORM UNIFICATION OF FLOWS OF DATA FOR SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION – REGOS ADMINISTERING THE SINGLE MONTHLY FORM WITH ALL INDIVIDUAL DATA ON CONTRIBUTIONS, PERSONAL TAX AND SURTAX, UNIFICATION OF FLOW OF FUNDS OF SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION – IN THE TREASURY, CENTRALIZED SECOND PILLAR COLLECTION AND ACCOUNT ADMINISTRATION AND PROVISION OF ALL SOCIAL-SECTOR RELATED INFORMATION (REGOS)

16 INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS IN THE SECOND PILLAR – SPECIAL FEATURES REGOS ADMINISTERS SYSTEM OF AFFILIATION, INITIAL AFFILIATION AND SWITCHING, FULL PRIVACY OF INDIVIDUAL CHOICE, EMPLOYER DOES NOT KNOW WHICH FUND THE EMPLOYEES ARE AFFILIATED TO, AGENTS CANNOT REGISTER AFFILIATES (NO EXAMPLES OF AGGRESSIVE DIRECT MARKETING OR DOUBLE REGISTRATION). 24h ACCESS TO INDIVIDUAL DATA

17 REGOS: COMPLIANCE RESULTS IN 2002 AND 2003 SECOND PILLAR FUNCTIONING: COLLECTION RATE 99% TRANSFER OF MONEY TO INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS WITHIN 24 HOURS FULL DATA DISCLOSURE TO INDIVIDUALS INTEGRATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS AND TAXES AND DATA FLOWS: DATA ON TAX AND CONTRIBUTION LIABILITY AVAILABLE IN 15 DAYS INSTEAD WITH 3+ MONTH LAG

18 REGOS: COMPLIANCE RESULTS IN 2002 AND 2003 IMPROVED COMPLIANCE ON ALL CONTRIBUTIONS: IN 2002 SOCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS GREW BY 11%, GROSS WAGES BY 6% AND EMPLOYMENT BY 2% - COMPLIANCE IMPROVED BY 2-3%; IN 2003 COMPLIANCE IMPROVED BY AS HIGH AS 4-5% CROATIAN EXPERIENCE: CONSOLIDATION OF DATA AND MONEY FLOWS SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVES COLLECTION AND COMPLIANCE

19 PENSION REFORM IN CROATIA – SUCCESSES STABILIZATION OF PAYGO FINANCE BY 2004, EFFICIENT SECOND PILLAR COLLECTION AND ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM – HIGH CREDIBILITY (REGOS), EMPHASIS ON INDIVIDUAL CHOICE IN THE SECOND PILLAR (REGOS), SOUND START OF SECOND AND THIRD PILLAR FUNDS AND EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION SYSTEM (HAGENA), IMPROVED COLLECTION AND COMPLIANCE OF ALL PAYROLL TAXES, EFFICIENT PUBLIC CAMPAIGN,

20 PENSION REFORM IN CROATIA – PROBLEMS 2004 PENSION PACKAGE WITH STRONG FISCAL IMPLICATIONS, HIGH COSTS AND FEES IN THE 2ND PILLAR DESPITE CENTRALIZED ACCOUNT ADMINISTRATION FUNCTIONS, LOW CONTRIBUTION FOR THE 2ND PILLAR – 5% SHOULD BE INCREASED IN THE FUTURE, BUT 2004 PENSION PACKAGE MAKES IT LESS LIKELY, SMALL IMPACT ON DEVELOPMENT ON CAPITAL MARKET, SLOW DEVELOPMENT OF VOLUNTARY PENSION FUNDS.