QA4EO Update on the Quality Assurance Framework For Earth Observation Joint GSICS GDWG-GRWG meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© GEO Secretariat Agenda Item 3. GEO UPDATE. © GEO Secretariat Membership 67 members and 43 Participating Organisations – New Members:Latvia, Moldova,
Advertisements

GEOSS Data Sharing Principles. GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan 5.4 Data Sharing The societal benefits of Earth observations cannot be achieved without.
AR – Issues for Attention Tactical and Strategic Guidance documents – what is the agreed approval/ publication process? –Strategic Guidance will.
Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
ID-06 Building a User-Driven GEOSS Essential Components of User Management for GEO Tasks.
GSICS Partnerships: CEOS WGCV IVOS, X-CAL, GRUAN
ONS Research Data Access Strategy AGENDA Background and context Confidentiality The Strategy.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
WMO WMO Integrated Global Observing System (WIGOS) CBS EXPERT TEAM ON AIRCRAFT-BASED OBSERVING SYSTEMS 1st Session (Geneva, September, 2013) Dr I.
© GEO Secretariat The Group on Earth Observations – Status and Post 2015 Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat 41 st CGMS Tsukuba, Japan 8-12 July 2013.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IMPROVEMENTS CURTIN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider code 00301J.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
How GEO works  Coordinating activities of Members and Participating Organisations  Supporting the development of capabilities for Observations, Processing.
Promoting Excellence in Family Medicine Enabling Patients to Access Electronic Health Records Guidance for Health Professionals.
4. Quality Management System (QMS)
The use and convergence of quality assurance frameworks for international and supranational organisations compiling statistics The European Conference.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Introduction to ISO New and modified requirements.
Shelter Training 08b – Belgium, 16 th –18 th November, 2008 based on content developed by p This session describes the benefits of developing a strategic.
Report of the Science and Technology Committee GEO Plenary VIII Istanbul, Turkey 16 November 2011.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
1 ID-03 Science and Technology in GEOSS C1 Engaging the Science and Technology (S&T) Community in GEOSS Implementation Hans-Peter Plag IEEE.
Quality assurance activities at EUROSTAT CCSA Conference Helsinki, 6-7 May 2010 Martina Hahn, Eurostat.
6. Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS Validating the way forward: Review of feedback from Plenary.
ADD Perspectives on Accountability Where are We Now and What does the Future Hold? Jennifer G. Johnson, Ed.D.
GEO Implementation Plan 2025 Barbara Ryan & Espen Volden GEO Secretariat SIT Workshop Agenda Item 15 CEOS SIT Technical Workshop CNES, Montpellier, France.
© GEO Secretariat GEO Work Plan 2nd GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholder Workshop "GEOSS: Supporting Science for the Millennium Development.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
Slide: 1 CEOS SDCG-3 Meeting|Sydney, Australia| 7-9 February 2013 Space Data Coordination Group Land Surface Imaging Virtual Constellation Ake Rosenqvist,
CEOS Working Group on Calibration and Validation (WGCV) Report Agenda item: 17 Presented by: Pascal Lecomte.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-03: Science and Technology in GEOSS ID-03-C1: Engaging the Science and Technology (S&T) Community in GEOSS Implementation.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Developing a Quality Framework for Community Languages Schools Dr Tim Wyatt Dr Bob Carbines Erebus International Victorian Annual Conference 7 July 2007.
The Use of the Targets by the Institutions & Development Implementation Board in Monitoring the Work Plan Implementation 2nd GEOSS Science and Technology.
WGISS-39, Tsukuba, Japan, May 11-15, 2015 GEO Community Portals Ken McDonald/NOAA CWIC Session, WGISS–39 May 13, 2015.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-01 Advancing the GEOSS Data Sharing Principles.
Synthesis of Strategic Issues (Climate, Disasters, Water) and a draft European strategic framework.
Strengthening the Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Africa Consultation on IPBES May 2010 Nairobi, Kenya Peter Gilruth,
Mapping (EGIDA/GEOSS) Stakeholders and STC Road Map Hans-Peter Plag Michael Nyenhuis.
CEOS Priorities for 2013 Agenda 3 Kerry Ann Sawyer CEOS Executive Officer CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA 12 March 2013.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
The Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) must deliver timely, quality, long- term, global information to meet the needs of its nine societal.
Overview of progress towards a data quality assurance strategy to facilitate interoperability WGISS – May 11 th, 2009.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Introducing the Science and Technology Roadmap 1 st GEO/EGIDA Workshop Bonn, Germany, May 09 th - 11 th, 2011.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Revised AQTF Standards for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February August 2006.
Data Sharing Task Force Update Ivan DeLoatch, USGS, ADC Co-chair Alan Edwards, EC, DSTF Co-chair ADC/CBC Joint Committees Meeting Sao Paulo, Brazil 28.
The Data Sharing Working Group 24 th meeting of the GEO Executive Committee Geneva, Switzerland March 2012 Report of the Data Sharing Working Group.
Midterm Evaluation of GEOSS Highlights and Key Messages from the Evaluation Report Charles Hutchinson Chair, Evaluation Team GEO Executive Committee Meeting.
Land Surface Imaging VC: Terms of Reference Julio Dalge, P.G. Diwakar, John Faundeen INPE ISRO USGS CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA March 12,
Baseline Indicators and Performance Measurement Framework for Procurement Regional Workshop on Procurement Capacity Development Lima, Peru April.
Midterm Evaluation of GEOSS Highlights and Key Messages from the Evaluation Report Charles Hutchinson Chair, GEOSS Midterm Evaluation Team GEO Executive.
WGCapD, CEOS and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Deputy CEOS Executive Officer / CSA Marie-Josée.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
QA4EO in 10 Minutes! A presentation to the 10 th GHRSST Science Team Meeting.
Work Plan Work Plan Management (Document 21)
Earth Observation Science CEOS Guidelines for the validation of satellite SST Observations David T Llewellyn-Jones &Gary K Corlett Space Research Centre.
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
GEOSS Data Sharing Principles
Purpose of referencing
Training Course on Integrated Management System for Regulatory Body
WMO Integrated Global Observing System (WIGOS) 16-RA VI Side Event Helsinki, Finland, 11 September 2013 Dr Miroslav Ondráš, Dr Wenjian Zhang (WMO) Dr.
Roadmap to Enhanced Technical Regulations of WMO
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. . Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 43
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
Capacity Building for WGCV
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 44
GCOS Strategy: advocate-coordinate-communicate
Presentation transcript:

QA4EO Update on the Quality Assurance Framework For Earth Observation Joint GSICS GDWG-GRWG meeting

2 QA4EO Background (1 / 2) The GEOSS community represents a wide variety of disciplines, which utilise a multitude of monitoring methodologies and procedures In order to reliably integrate their outputs into the various systems and services, supporting the Earth Observation (EO) needs of Society, the following principle is set forth: “All EO data and derived products must have associated with them a documented and fully traceable quality indicator (QI)”. The QA4EO initiative seeks to ensure the implementation of this principle in a harmonious and consistent manner throughout all EO communities to the benefit of all stakeholders.

3 QA4EO Background (2 / 2) QA4EO is an initiative of the CEOS Working Group on Calibration and Validation (WGCV) QA4EO was recognized as a Task in the GEO work plan, with a view to develop a Quality Assurance framework applicable to all disciplines of environmental observation The initiators of QA4EO intend to consult major EO communities in order to ensure its wide applicability  GSICS Executive Panel has provided feedback  WMO (incl. President of CIMO) participated in the QA4EO workshop on “Facilitating the Implementation of QA4EO” in Septe/Oct 2009 in Antalya, Turkey.

4 CoMPONENTS OF THE QA4EO A one-page summary will describe the key principle of QA4EO and become the primary reference.  This document will contain all pre-requisite information against which compliance can be assessed and will constitute QA4EO. A framework document explains the principles and introduces the Key Guidelines based on best practices The Key Guidelines provide additional details Where appropriate, they are complemented by templates and examples related to specific application areas

5 QA4EO Principles QA4EO Essential Principle Data and derived products shall have associated with them a fully traceable indicator of their quality Quality Indicators A Quality Indicator (QI) should provide sufficient information to allow all users to readily evaluate its the “fitness for purpose” of the data or derived product Traceability A QI shall be based on a documented and quantifiable assessment of evidence demonstrating the level of traceability to internationally agreed (where possible SI) reference standards

6 set of SEVEN Key Guidelines

7 Additional principles (1) Data Management The data product must be freely and readily available / accessible / useable in an unencumbered manner for the good of the GEOSS community, for both current and future users. This necessitates that all EO data and associated support information (metadata, processing methodologies, QA, etc.) is associated with the means to effectively implement a quality indicator. In return, the provider must be consistently acknowledged.

8 Additional principles (2) Documentation Management and Outreach Sound and effective harmonised documentation management is needed to facilitate and enhance interoperability and achieve the objectives of consistent and traceable quality information. To enable this activity, all stakeholders must have a clear understanding of the adequacy of the information that they are accessing and using for their specific application. The evidence for this clarity should ideally be accessible through a centralised portal and should be fully traceable to its origins. The traceability and interoperability process must be understandable by any ppropriately trained individual within GEOSS and efforts must be made to encourage the wider usage of information and facilitate the training of GEOSS users.

9 QA4EO self declaration The GEO QA4EO process should initially be established as a self-declaring process.  Where organisations already have well established and documented quality management systems and processes e.g. WMO, this process will be relatively simple and transparent.  In other cases a questionnaire/template will be drafted to enable data providers to make visible the evidence that supports any declared quality information for users to assess its adequacy. The questionnaire will make clear the requirements needed for QA4EO compliance and thus also be educational.  The GEO data depository/portal will be evolved to allow and encourage the assignment of a QI, linked with the “quality questionnaire”, with each data set and ensure its presence or absence is visible to the user.

10 GOVERNANCE ASPECTS A QA4EO Coordination Body will be established in order to reflect the cross-cutting nature and importance of this task at the GEO level.  In the longer-term this body should include representatives from other GEO tasks and all Societal Benefit Areas (SBAs).  The QA4EO Coordination Body would monitor progress and provide a guidance, harmonisation and capacity building function, not regulatory at this time. A High-level implementation and action plan will be drafted to facilitate the expansion and where necessary the applicability of QA4EO to the wider EO community and to engage data providers and users.

11 MORE: The whole material developed by the QA4EO is to be found on the QA4EO website (

12