Capturing the outcomes of the European Territorial Cooperation Programmes Follow up to ex post evaluation of INTERREG III Presentation Template Ieva Kalnina,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR.
Advertisements

Regions for Economic Change | LMP Workshop 3C When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform How can INTERACT.
Technical meeting with the Regional representative offices in Brussels Brussels, 17 March 2009 The INTERACT II Programme – Knowledge Management and Capitalisation.
1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Evaluation: Setting Outcome Indicators and Targets Seminar: 15 March 2011, La Hulpe Veronica Gaffey Acting Director.
1 DG Regio Evaluation Network Meeting Albert Borschette, Brussels, 14 October 2010 Ex post evaluation of Interreg III - Presentation of Final Results Pasi.
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE SEC. GEN. OF INVESTMENTS AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGING AUTHORITY CIP Interreg Interregioanal Cooperation in INTERREG III Programmes.
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café ESPON 2013 Programme: Progress and Prospects.
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Green: Going.
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14 October.
Territorial Cooperation – adding value to the Danube Region Ivana Lazic, INTERACT Point Vienna 9 July 2010 | Novi Sad.
Opportunities for interregional cooperation in Regional Operational Programmes: Article 96.3.d) of the Common Provisions Regulation INTERACT Future Pilot.
Indicators : Telling the story of European Territorial Cooperation Bologna, 20 June 2013.
04/2007 European Funds in Bulgaria Supported by the European Commission (DG ENV)
Current and future cooperation opportunities in CENTRAL EUROPE GovernEE Final Event, Hódmezővásárhely, 3 July 2013 Viera Slavikova, JTS CENTRAL EUROPE.
Smart specialisation, integrated strategies and territorial cohesion: tension or synergies 27 September Brussels ESPON 2013 Programme: The territorial.
Part-financed by the European Union The new Baltic Sea Region Programme Susanne Scherrer, Director of the Joint Secretariat Rostock/Riga.
Result orientation: Telling the story of European Territorial Cooperation Skellefteå, 19 September 2013.
Alpine Space Summit Stresa, 20 June 2006 Claudio CARUSO European Commission DG REGIO A new approach for European Transnational Co-operation
Part-financed by the European Union Promoting attractive and competitive cities and regions Arve Skjerpen, Norway Member of the BSR INTERREG IIIB Steering.
How to Use the Structural Funds ? 1.Financing sustainable energy projects. 2.Practical support – RUSE operation. Jana Cicmanova Energie-Cités.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
RTD-B.4 - Regions of Knowledge and Research Potential Regional Dimension of the 7th Framework Programme Regions of Knowledge Objectives and Activities.
Opportunities for interregional cooperation in Regional Operational Programmes: Article 96.3.d) of the Common Provisions Regulation INTERACT Future Pilot.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 Interregional Cooperation and the Lisbon and Gothenburg Agendas “GROW” Brussels, 18 October 2007 Territorial Co-operation.
The Future of Transnational Cooperation in Central Europe ( ) Claudia Pamperl JTS INTERRREG IIIC East.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial.
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture 1 EU rural development policy Nikiforos SIVENAS European Commission Directorate General.
EUROPEAN STUCTURAL FUNDS Esben Poulsen, European Commission Head of the INTERREG Unit Directorate General for Regional Policy INTERREG IIIB Partner Search.
European Territorial Cooperation SAWP meeting, 9 July
NATIONAL INFO-DAY Tirana, Albania, September 16th 2015.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
EU Structural Funds Presentation to Chief Executives 9 May 2006 Hillgrove Hotel Monaghan.
1 European Territorial Cooperation in legislative proposals Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward studies, impact assessment, DG Regional Policy.
Transnational cooperation in North-West Europe today: a first appraisal Joint Technical Secretariat.
Financing possibilities for implementation of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region 21 September 2011 | Riga, Latvia.
PILOT PROJECTS ON FUTURE OUTCOME/RESULT INDICATORS The Interreg IVB North Sea Region Programme Case Carsten Westerholt Project Devlopment and Communications.
Part-financed by the European Union Setting regions in motion by Giedrė Švedienė, Undersecretary Joint Programming Committee/Ministry of the Interior,
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Fostering the urban dimension Analysis of Operational Programmes co-financed by the European Regional Development.
MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECTS: BEST PRACTICES COOPERATING IN SOUTH WEST EUROPE 12th of October 2005.
The SURF-Nature project – Let´s improve the use of Regional Funds together! Peter Torkler, WWF Germany, SURF – nature project coordinator Cardiff, 27 September,
Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013.
1st Meeting on HIT with Cross-Border Cooperation and Transnational Cooperation Programmes in the Mediterranean Area 17 September 2014 | Milano.
– Opportunities for a low-carbon economy – Focus on Italy Brussels, 30 September 2015 Rosanna Micciché European Commission, DG REGIO 1.
UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat,/Sakari Saarinen / Project Coordinator / NEW BRIDGES Kick-off 4-5 March 2009 New Bridges – Strengthening.
The role and position of URBACT in EU urban policy Fiona Wieland European Commission DG REGIO Urban and Territorial Development Kick off meeting Action.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Stakeholder Workshop Brussels – 5 February 2014 INTERREG EUROPE Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer INTERREG IVC.
ESPON Workshop at the Open Days 2012 “Creating Results informed by Territorial Evidence” Brussels, 10 October 2012 Introduction to ESPON Piera Petruzzi,
EU Cohesion Policy : A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation 16 September 2014| Milano.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
1 Cohesion Policy Evaluation Network Meeting: Brussels, October 2010 Ex post evaluation of Cohesion policy programmes co-financed.
1 Second call for proposals – National Information Day EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Benoît Dalbert, Project Officer, Joint Technical Secretariat.
 from the Barents Sea to the Mediterranean  5500 km  12 EU member states  63 regions.
1 The urban dimension of cohesion policy 2014 – 2020.
Interreg Programmes Preliminary Conclusions May 2016.
KEEP (Knowledge and Expertise in European Programmes) 29 October 2015 | Warsaw, Poland Meeting of the National Coordinators for the EUSBSR.
Follow up to ex post evaluation of INTERREG III
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14.
EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
New opportunities for cooperation
EUSDR Action Plan - Revision
Territorial Cooperation and Territorial Cohesion Results of the consultation on the consultation Input to TCUM seminar 25 September 2009 | Brussels.
Cohesion Forum Brussels, May 2001
Strategic Guidelines for EU Territorial Cooperation Programmes Post-2020 Introductory notes. Malta: 26 April Eduardo medeiros 2017.
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café
Project intervention logic
INFORMATION SEMINAR Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania programme
Project intervention logic
Presentation transcript:

Capturing the outcomes of the European Territorial Cooperation Programmes Follow up to ex post evaluation of INTERREG III Presentation Template Ieva Kalnina, INTERACT 25 October 2011 | Brussels

2 Presentation Template | General Rules A million Euro question What changes does cross-border cooperation bring to Europe, cross-border areas and border communities? OR What do we deliver with the funds we receive and what change takes place as a result of these deliverables (outputs)?

Presentation Template | General Rules 3 What do European cooperation programmes deliver? New and maintained jobs Support to business development Half a million people have participated in trainings and events km of roads, routes, railways etc have been built BUT Similar outputs are delivered also by the Objective 1 and 2 programmes – why finance the same under ETC?

European cooperation programmes have also produced New and extended cooperation networks Cooperation agreements Joint cultural, natural, urban and rural measures BUT What has changed as a resulted of these for the population living in the border area?

Envisaged outcomes of the exercise Clarification of current programme focus Clarification of ETC objective Inputs for next programming period

The exercise Follow up to the conclusions from the ex post evaluation of INTERREG III Initiated by DG Regio in Tournai last September Based on voluntary participation of programmes Carried out either through internal reflection exercises within MA/JTS or as part of programme evaluations

Pilot exercise Using the approach: -CBC: UK-FR-BE-NL (Two Seas), FR-SUI, FR-BE, CZ-PL, DK-SE- NO (OKS), North -Transnational: North Sea, North West Europe Programme internal reflections: -CBC: Ireland-Wales -Transnational: Northern Periphery Case studies on (1) “programme maturing” (Germany – Netherlands) and (2) capturing attitudinal and behavioural change (Peace III) + Analysing programme evaluation outcomes, linking with other related activities & raising wider awareness

First observations on the design of ETC programmes The programme scope is generally too wide and the available (limited) funding is spread too thin Majority of programmes have identified priority intervention areas without explicitly defining what needed to be changed about these Programmes are rarely embedded in or linked to the wider context: the overall development needs of the cooperation area. Wider strategies often do not exist or are vague Programmes primarily rely on bottom-up approach in programme implementation Role of cooperation maturity and programme’s continuity

First observations on the outcomes of ETC programmes: clarification of the ETC objective European Territorial Cooperation programmes contribute to the overall (economic, social / societal and territorial) cohesion of the EU by supporting cohesion of respective cross-border or transnational programme areas and by working together with common assets and/or challenges Through this programmes create: common identity, integrated physical space, services and communities, balanced development, solutions for common challenges, experimentation, grounds for investments, improved policies and governance etc.

Types of change Integration related: common identity, integrated community and services, business & education frameworks, common branding Investments (in wider sense): filling in the gaps through investments in physical, economic and social infrastructure, investments in human resources, preparation of investment projects, development of solutions for joint challenges Policy and governance related: improved governance capacity, coordinated governance, improved regional peformance

The essential steps of the reflection process Answering the question “What change are we aiming to deliver?” and how to measure it? Setting the baseline Verifying to what extent the projects we fund contribute to that change?

INTERACT Point Viborg Jernbanegade 22 t: DK – 8800 Viborg Denmark INTERACT is co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) | European Territorial Cooperation Thank you for your attention Please do not hesitate to contact us for any further information or visit