Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Representing clients before the Mental Health Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Our role Guardianship Board. Presentation will consist of: Overview of the Guardianship Board Key activities Challenges into the future The process Applications.
Advertisements

A brief history of L.A.O. Ontario first implemented an organized legal aid plan for criminal cases in Lawyers provided legal assistance on a volunteer.
SPECIAL EDUCATION: What You Need to Know The Training Institute on Disability Rights.
MAG form by GMP domains Susi Harris Calderdale PCT GP Appraisal Lead.
Stage 3 in the Jury selection process Panel preparation.
The right to a fair hearing before the Mental Health Review Board – what it means and how to ensure it Catherine Leslie Lawyer / Pro Bono Coordinator Mental.
The Public Guardian.
Guidelines on Building and Using Power
Highly Specialised Technologies Evaluations
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
DUE PROCESS DEVELOPMENTS IN TERMINATION AND GRIEVANCES.
EVALUATION OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS. Strengths of Mediation  Strengths 1) Mediation is often less expensive. Mediation avoids the costs of a trial,
YOUTH ATTORNEY. GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 1:  The primary change in the general provisions article is the establishment of an attorney for children.
Ethical Justice Chapter Ten: Ethical Issues for Criminal Defense Attorneys.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
RECONCILIATION AND MARRIAGE TRIBUNAL FEM RECONCILIATION Steps at reconciliation must be taken by the parties to a marriage. S. 55(1) Law Reform.
Informal Custody Trial Presented by Judge Benjamin Simpson and Judge Penny Friedlander Test driven and road ready!
DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS
1 Consent for treatment A summary guide for health practitioners about obtaining consent for treatment Bridie Woolnough Resolution Officer Health Care.
Regional Center Fair Hearing Process Presented by Katie Casada Hornberger Office of Clients’ Rights Advocacy.
LAWYERS ETHICS Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl. APPLICABLE PROFESSIONAL RULES  Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct 
Advocacy Skills for Caregivers. The Alzheimer Society of Manitoba thanks the Women’s Endowment Fund of the for its support of the Advocacy Skills for.
Workplace Discipline: Limiting delay in disciplinary processes.
MENTAL HEALTH (AMENDMENT) ACT 2003 Given Royal Assent on 21 October Except for Part 2, the Act came into operation the day after it was given Royal.
The Role of Family Consultants in the Family Court- A Guide for the Effective Solicitor.
Information, Advice and Support Services Waltham Forest 17 th March.
AELA Law and Governance ‘Start-up and Tune-up’ Clinic Legal Services in South East Queensland 26 June 2015.
Transition Planning: The Role of the CCBDD Behavior and Health Supports Department Richard Cirillo, Ph.D. Chief Clinical Officer Cuyahoga County Board.
Eleni Belivanaki & Sarah Khan
The work of the Research Ethics Committee Dr Carol Chu.
The Basics of Advocacy For Health Professionals Sean Ledington (Student Nurse )
Ethical Considerations for Self Help Center Staff Assisting Self Represented Litigants While Maintaining Neutrality June 10, 2011.
Planning appeals Peter Ford Head of Development Management Planning Committee Training – 30 th July 2015.
1 Welcomes You To It’s Those Wonderful Rights! Welcome To read the script that goes with each slide, click on the Notes tab (to the left of this screen).
EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.
Resolving Education Disputes Scott F. Johnson. About Me Professor of Law at Concord Law School Hearing Officer with NH Dept. of Education NHEdLaw, LLC.
The Adversary System.  To provide a procedure for disputing parties to present and resolve their cases in as fair a manner as possible  Controlled by.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
STANDARDS FOR GUARDIANS AD LITEM Supreme Court Rule 110A.
 Encourage and support awareness of their rights & responsibilities.  Provide a commitment to access and equity principles  Empower the older person.
Easy Read Summary Mental Capacity Act Mental Capacity Act A Summary The Mental Capacity Act 2005 will help people to make their own decisions.
Self Directed Support (SDS) and Adult Support and Protection (ASPA)
Consent & Vulnerable Adults Aim: To provide an opportunity for Primary Care Staff to explore issues related to consent & vulnerable adults.
Legal Aspects of Nursing Part 1
The Paralegal Professional ESSENTIALS, 2/e By Cheeseman and Goldman PRENTICE HALL ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ PA 101: Unit.
Copyright ©2012 Delmar, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Chapter 8 Applying Communication Skills.
Resolving Education Disputes Scott F. Johnson. About Me Professor of Law at Concord Law School Hearing Officer with NH Dept. of Education NHEdLaw, LLC.
1 Disability Support Pension Welfare Rights Centre Qld Bryony Walters.
What is counselling & how does it differ from other forms of helping? Session Overview Aims: Define Counselling Identify how counselling differs from other.
Working With Young People Presented by: Katrina Jefferson, Community Legal Education Lawyer.
What is the court’s expectation of doctors? British Medical Association 17 November 2006.
Involving children in decision-making has received much attention in New Zealand, and internationally, recently. Care of Children Act 2004 attempts to.
The Children’s Society Black Country Advocacy Service “The Children’s Society Black Country Advocacy Service is an independent, confidential service in.
Substance Abuse in the Workplace: Supervisory Training FIRSTCALL presents:
GUARDIANSHIP and ADMINSTRATION Raquel Dos Santos Self Representation Service and David Manwaring Human Rights Legal Service Queensland Advocacy Incorporated.
Contemporary Legal and Ethical Challenges in Counseling Law and Ethics in Counseling Conference 2016 New Orleans, Louisiana.
Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Reviews of ITOs Rebekah Leong QAILS Conference 18/03/14.
Exclusions and Reviews. Key Points Permanent exclusion should only be used as last resort Decision to exclude must be lawful reasonable and fair A permanent.
LEGAL HEALTH CHECK PATHWAYS MODULE ONE: Introductory Concepts for Legal Assistance Services.
Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Changes to the Mental Health Act (Qld) David Manwaring,
Recognizing the Client
An overview of the process of Guardianship Do I need to think about this, what is the process and who can assist me? Emma Heagney civil solicitor Legal.
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Catherine Pape, Specialist SLT and lay member of SENTW
Ethics for Lawyers – and how that impacts your child’s case
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
Justice in the Criminal Justice System
Disclaimer Opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Virginia Department for Aging.
Communication Partner Service
Presentation transcript:

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Representing clients before the Mental Health Review Tribunal Rebekah Leong QAILS Webinar 26/02/14 Queensland Advocacy Incorporated

Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Outline Background to representation Scope of powers of MHRT Initial contact with client and MHRT Who can attend MHRT hearings? Capacity Documents, evidence and experts At the hearing Appeal process Forensic matters Referral sources

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Representation statistics ( )

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Importance of representation Quality and efficiency Increase patient attendance Clearly defines roles Improves perception and understanding of process Increase understanding and communication with treating team

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Powers of MHRT Review of ITOs – in first 6 weeks then every 6 months Review of FOs – every 6 months, Fitness for Trial – every 3 months in first year and then every 6 months Applications to move out of Qld Applications for ECT Confidentiality orders Exclusion of visitor appeals

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability EEOs, JEOs and R&Rs

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Initial contact with client and MHRT 1.Is it something the MHRT can help with? 2.When is the next hearing, is there value in applying for an early hearing? 3.Get written authority from client. 4.Send written authority to MHRT advising that you now act for the client and request all documents relevant to the matter

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Who can attend the MHRT hearing? Patient Ch 12 Pt 4 Legal representative Agent Allied person s 455 Guardian – s 44 and 76 GAA Act Support people Treating team, Attorney-General representative, security guards

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Capacity Presumption of capacity Capacity is time-specific, domain specific and decision specific Capacity can be increased with appropriate support Test for capacity: – Understanding the nature and effect of decisions about the involuntary order – Freely and voluntarily making decisions about the involuntary order – Communicating decisions in some way. Formally appointed guardians or separate representative

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Documents from the MHRT ITOsFOs Notice of hearing Clinical reportForensic dossier Notice of decisionClinical report LCT review committee recommendation CFOS report Notice of decision

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Clinical reports >6 days before hearing – 38% 3-6 days before hearing – 26% 1-2 days before hearing % Same day as hearing – 17% Nil report – 4.7% After hearing – 0.2%

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Tips for representation Proceedings are not adversarial – remember that in most cases, the client will have to maintain a relationship with the treating team after the hearing. It is not all about winning. Positive outcomes for the client include: progress with their treatment, opening up a line of communication with the treating team, ensuring better participation and understanding of their diagnosis and treatment. Encourage the client to participate in the hearing and speak for themselves. The lawyer’s role is to ensure the client has said everything they wanted to say and apply the law to the facts. Avoid the situation where the client or their support/allied person unhelpfully hijacks a hearing. Prior to the hearing, explain to the client and any other people attending the hearing their role at the hearing. Try not to interrupt. Everyone will have their opportunity to speak and respond.

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Tips for representation (cont) Be ready to assist the client if they are having difficulties in expressing themselves properly. Do not judge the client. Like everyone, they have a right to make their own decisions, even poor decisions. Maintain boundaries. Ensure the client understands the role of their lawyer. If your client intends to give false evidence at a hearing, inform them that it is an offence to provide false or misleading information to the Tribunal and that we cannot continue to represent them if they intend to lie. Also inform them that if they lie at the Tribunal hearing, we are under an ethical obligation to the Tribunal to inform them that we do not rely on that evidence. Act on instructions

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Appeal process Written reasons within 7 days - 21 days Appeal within 60 days Form on court’s website Representation through LAQ.

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Forensic process

Queensland Advocacy Incorporated Systems and Legal Advocacy for vulnerable people with Disability Organisations that do MHRT work QAI – ; LAQ – advice and MHC matters Legal – QAI, QPILCH, QADA, TASC Advocacy organisations – Amparo, Independent Advocacy Townsville, Gold Coast Advocacy, Rights in Action (Cairns), Sunshine Coast Citizen Advocacy, Speaking Up for You, Mackay Advocacy, Queensland Parents for People with Disability, Capricorn Citizen Advocacy