FAS Training 2016 Weightings & Sanctions. Farm Inspections  The Department of Agriculture, Food & the Marine undertakes this function in association.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Axis 2: Environment/land management DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development
Advertisements

1 PROGRAMMING TRANSITION From SAPARD to RDPs and SPDs/OPs.
Fertiliser Controls under Cross Compliance Dr Al Grogan Fertiliser Association of Ireland Meeting 6 th Feb 2007.
Position of biodiversity in future CAP Nina Dobrzyńska Department for Direct Payments Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Poland Ryn, 29th September.
Health and Consumers Health and Consumers 1 Commission’s expectations to MS’ structures of enforcement Enforcement of European Animal Welfare related legislation.
Inge Van Oost EC - DG Agriculture and Rural Development Unit AGRI - D1 - “Soutien direct” The Farm Advisory System FAS (Art of Reg (EC) No 1782/2003)
The Seed Capital Scheme and the BES Presented by Cillian Byrnes Revenue.
Sanctioning Guidelines Carm Phillips Compliance and Dispute Resolution Division Market Assessment and Compliance Division.
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. DAVID SMALL DIRECTOR OF FOOD, FARMING AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY.
30. Conference of Directors of EU Paying Agencies Workshop1: The possibilities for optimizing the processes of implementation of direct payments Agency.
CONCLUSIONS OF WORKSHOP 1.DIRECT PAYMENTS AND CMO.
Proposed Code of Practice for Inspections 3 rd Edition David Capon JAG UK Manager Keith O’Brien Cable & Wireless Worldwide.
Organization de los controles de condicionalidad en irlanda Organisation of Controls in Ireland Dr Al Grogan Head of Integrated Controls Division.
National Diploma in Agriculture Farming and EU Food Law Tony Pettit Lecture 8.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
EU Food/Feed Safety Rules Industry Information Session June 16, 2005 Presented by AAFC.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 6 – 8 November 2006 EUROSAI - Prague Léon KIRSCH European Court of Auditors Audit of the Single Payment Scheme ( SPS) (Systems.
Fedral Agricultural Research Centre Institute of Rural Studies Cross-compliance – Greening of the First Pillar? Heike Nitsch “Nature Conservation and the.
European Commission, DG Agriculture and Rural Development
Inge Van Oost EC - DG Agriculture and Rural Development
Procedures and Forms 2008 FRCC Compliance Workshop April 8-9, 2008.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 6 – 8 November 2006 EUROSAI - Prague Léon KIRSCH European Court of Auditors Audit of the Single Payment Scheme ( SPS) (Systems.
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Risk of Error on Closure Ljubljana,
1 Canadian Quality Milk Program. 2 DFO Perspective on CQM  HACCP resonates well with consumers  CQM implementation to ensure consumers’ opinion of farmers.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Sunday, October 25, Procurement of African Timber - Supporting Sustainable Forest Management and Development -
Financial incentives to facilitate enforcement Véronique Schmit Enforcement of European Animal Welfare Related Legislation – 12 &13 June 2012.
New plant health Regulation: main elements of the upcoming Commission proposal Yannis Karamitsios European Commission DG SANCO (E.2)
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine. Organic Sector Department of Agriculture, Food & the Marine regulates the sector in Ireland 5 private.
Beef Data & Genomics Programme Information Meetings 2015 Teagasc Beef Specialists.
CCAT approach to assess potential effects of CC measures on biodiversity and landscape Juan José Oñate.
Errors in rural development spending 7 May 2015 Presentation by Robert MARKUS Head of Unit European Court of Auditors.
ork ork Work – Part 261 ä Individual Responsibility ä State Accountability ä Work Activities ä Caseload Reduction Credit ä Work Penalties ä Waivers ä.
Update of the progress under the CAP- delegated acts, implementing rules, RDPs Claudia OLAZABAL Head of Unit Unit Agriculture, Forest and Soil DG ENV –
FAS Training 2016 SMR 4 Food and Feed Hygiene Carrick on Shannon, Charleville, Kilkenny Integrated Controls Division 1.
INTEGRATED CONTROLS DIVISION Cross Compliance Farm Advisory Service Training 2016 SMR 5 ‘ Hormone Ban’
The CAP towards 2020 Direct payments DG Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission.
1 FAS Training 2016 SMR 7 Bovine Identification & Registration (IDR) Integrated Controls Division.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
Official investigation on a case of BSE on the example of a EU member state I Ivan Ambrožič, DVM, MSc Kiev 4. – 5- April 2011.
Commonage Meetings 2014 Land Eligibility Update 1 Farm Advisory Training 2016 Carrick-on-Shannon, Charleville and Kilkenny.
FAS Training 2016 SMR 8-concerning the Identification and Registration of ovine and caprine animals.
Every employer must ensure, as far as is reasonable practicable, the health, safety and welfare of all his employees More specifically, employers must.
Report to the Council on the implementation of the cross- compliance system April 2007.
Measuring and reducing administrative burdens in EU agriculture CAP Simplification Stakeholder Conference October 2006 Jenny McInnes Department for Environment,
European Court of Auditors
Dr. Dr. h.c. Hinrich Meyer-Gerbaulet
Environmental policies in Europe
State Compensatory Education (SCE) Program
General Data Protection Regulation
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
Monitoring Satisfactory Academic Progress
Food assurance.
AGRICULTURAL & VETERINARY CHEMICALS REGULATION IN AUSTRALIA
Cross Compliance Inspections / Controls
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
Cross Compliance Implementation & Control in England
Expensive commercial practices
OHSC 2018 CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOP - GAUTENG PROVINCE ENFORCEMENT
The Common Agricultural Policy and the Water Framework Directive
Meeting of the Water Directors - Athens, 17/18 June 2003
The Commission proposal for the CAP post 2013
Module No 9: ICT Literacy for Rural Micro-enterprises
The Farm Advisory System
Rural development support for implementing the Water Framework Directive Expert Group on WFD and Agriculture Seville, 6-7 April 2010.
Day 1 easements.
Greening 2017 ACA AGM March 2017.
CIS Expert group on WFD & Agriculture Nitrates Directive and Water Framework Directive Edinburgh 10th October 2012 Luisa Samarelli DG ENV Agriculture,
Support for young farmers in Hungary
GLAS Training for Advisors
Presentation transcript:

FAS Training 2016 Weightings & Sanctions

Farm Inspections  The Department of Agriculture, Food & the Marine undertakes this function in association with the Department of the Environment  It must implement a system of on-the-spot controls  It must provide for reductions or exclusions for non-compliance  Must distinguish between negligence and intent and take account of repeated breaches (Reoccurrence) of the requirements

Cross Compliance The 13 Statutory Management Requirements (SMRs) are categorised into 3 Areas in addition to GAEC and these comprise Cross Compliance  Environment Area  3 directives on environment & 7 GAEC Standards Nitrates, Wild Birds, and Habitats  Public, Animal and Plant Health Area  3 Directives/Regulations on the identification and registration of farm animals  4 Directives on public, animal and plant health  Animal Welfare Area  3 Directives on animal welfare

Cross Compliance Inspection Levels  Eligibility  Land declared for the Single Payment Scheme must be checked for eligibility - 5% on the spot - same as before under the Area Aid checks  Cross Compliance  1% level for all Cross Compliance areas with  Cattle identification where a 3% sample must be checked  Ovines/Caprines where 3% of applicants & 5% of flocks are checked

Selection of cases for inspection  Cases selected for inspection are selected under risk analysis  Between 20 – 25% are selected from the entire population at random.  Remainder of population is selected using risk criteria appropriate to that SMR/Cross Compliance/Eligibility.  Risk Analysis results are reviewed annually and risk categories that perform below random are either dropped or amended and new categories may be added.

Notice of Inspections  Full Cross Compliance inspections are Unannounced.  Elements of the Full Cross Compliance may be deferred to within 48 hours provided there is justification and the purpose of the inspection is not compromised.  Excludes Welfare & Food & Feed Hygiene SMRs.  IDR (Bovines/Ovines) – Are generally notified with up to 48 hours advance notice given.  Eligibility inspections – Are generally notified with up to 48 hours given.

Minor Cross Compliance Breaches  Certain breaches are considered minor in nature and fall within tolerance e.g. no sign on pesticide store, surplus passport for a bovine animal etc. known as CLT cases.  Farmer has 1 or 3 months to remedy situation and no financial sanction applies otherwise at least 1% is applied.  Remedial Action (RA) can be taken more than once within 3 calendar years provided RA taken at first opportunity.  Herdowner must confirm that RA has been taken by notifying the local office.

Remedial Action in CLT cases First Insp. Result Remedial action Taken % Result Second Insp. Result Remedial action Taken % Result Third Insp. Result Remedial action Taken % Result CltYes0%CltYes0%CltYes0% CltNo1%Clt % (1% x 3) Clt % (3% x 3)

Cross Compliance Weightings  Weightings 1 – 6 = Tolerance (CLT)  7 – 26 Weightings= 1%  27 – 46 Weightings= 3%  47 + Weightings= 5%  EXTENT = 20 Weightings  SEVERITY = 20 Weightings  PERMANENCE = 50 Weightings

Cross Compliance Sanctions  Breaches of a Negligence nature: generally 3% but could be increased to 5% or reduced to 1% depending on the seriousness of the non-compliance.  Apply EXTENT where off-farm impact such as farm- to-farm movement not notified within 7 days.  Consider SEVERITY having taken account of the importance of the consequences of the non- compliance e.g. large number of animals never tagged & DNA required to establish traceability.  Consider PERMANENCE depending on the length of time for which the effects lasts or the potential for terminating those effects by reasonable means e.g. cases where traceability cannot be established or badly polluted river.

Cross Compliance Sanctions  Breaches which are of an Intent nature:  where the non-compliance has been committed intentionally or where a negligence sanction is deemed disproportionate.  generally 20% but could be increased up to 100% or reduced to 15% depending on the seriousness of the non-compliance e.g. organic fertiliser piped to stream or very large number of animals non- compliant  The sanction could be extended outside the year of the finding i.e. excluded for 2 years

Cross Compliance Sanctions  Repeated Breaches (Reoccurrence) Where the breach is repeated within a 3 calendar year period the sanction will be multiplied by 3 to a limit of 15%. Further repetitions beyond 15% will be considered Intent

Reoccurrence Rules  Art 38 of Commission Reg. 640/2014:  Reoccurrence is defined as a repeated non-compliance with the same requirement, standard or obligation (Pillar, Section, Standard) within 3 calendar years.  Must be at sanction level at a previous inspection & at subsequent inspection.  Herdowner can avail of Improvement Rule only once within 3 calendar years.  Max of Reoccurrence is 15%.

Reoccurrence Rules  If reoccurrence is applicable at 100% sanction N2 (200% - 2 yrs) applies  CURRENT sanction is multiplied by 3 on 1 st reoccurrence.  PREVIOUS sanction by 3 on 2 nd or subsequent reoccurrence.  Improvement Rule – Once off benefit at 1 st reoccurrence only within 3 calendar years. Example: 5% 1 st insp, 3% 2 nd insp – result = 9%.  Reoccurring Intentional breaches will increase from 20% - 45% - 60% - 100% - 200%.

Reoccurrence Rules First Insp. Result First Reoccurrence % Result Second Insp. Result First Reoccurr ence % Result Third Insp. Result First Reoccurren ce % Result 5% %1%YES 3% (1% x 3) 3% % (3% x 3) 5% %CL %1%YES3% (1% x 3) 5% %3%YES9% (3% x 3) 1% % (9% x 3) 5% % YES15% (5% x 3) 3% % (15% x 3)

Cross Compliance Sanctions  Weightings are added within an SMR to give overall sanction.  Max sanction for Negligence within an SMR is 5%.  Max sanction is taken within each Area and added across Areas to a max of 5% for Negligence or maximum Intent is taken within an area and added across areas.  Max sanction for Reoccurrence is 15%  Negligence sanction is added to Reoccurrence to a max of 15%  Negligence and Reoccurrence sanctions to a max of 15% are added to Intent sanction to give overall sanction

Thank you for your attention!