U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 20041 General Supervision.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Advertisements

A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Chapter 56 Workgroup Orientation Session The Road to Chapter 60 June 30, 2007.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 State Monitoring Under IDEA A Snapshot of Past Practices.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
The Next Decade: Special Education and Oregon Charter Schools COSA Fall Conference October 2009.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) edgar.html.
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
State Performance Plan: A Two-Way Street Ruth Ryder Larry Wexler Division of Monitoring and State Improvement Planning.
Systems Performance Review & Improvement (SPR&I) Training Oregon Department of Education Fall 2007.
Objectives: 1) Participants will become familiar with General Supervision Monitoring Plan Section of the Kansas Infant Toddler Services Procedural Manual.
Speed Bumps on the Fiduciary Road Title I Administrative Meeting Timonium Maryland April 14, 2010 Cvieta Jovanovich.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Participation of the State Advisory Panel and State Interagency.
SHAME FEAR I AM NOT SEEN ACCESS I AM SEEN SYSTEMS CHANGE I AM A SPECIAL CITIZEN ACCOUNTABILITY and BUILD CAPACITY I BELONG AND MEANINGFUL LIFE EFFECTIVENESS.
STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016.
RESULTS-DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION Ann Moore, State Director Office of Special Education (OSE) January 2013.
BIE Special Education Academy September 2011 Tampa Bay, Florida Presenter: Donald Griffin Education Specialist, Special Education Bureau of Indian Education.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Welcome Stakeholders December 5, 2007 Improving Special Education Services (ISES) December 5,
Results Driven Accountability PRT System Support Grant Targeted Improvement Plan Cole Johnson, NDE.
1 General Supervision. 2 General Supervision (and Continuous Improvement) 1.What are the minimum Components for General Supervision ? 2.How do the Components.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Complaints Information Santina Thibedeau March 5, 2009.
Arizona Early Intervention Program (AzEIP) Team-Based Early Intervention Services Overview for Administrators ADMINISTRATIVE.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
1 OSEP Verification Visits Fiscal Component FFY Office of Special Education Programs.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
O S E P Office of Special Education Programs United States Department of Education Aligning the State Performance Plan, Improvement Strategies, and Professional.
January 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 Noncompliance.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
1 Early Intervention Monitoring Wyoming DDD April 2008 Training.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs General Supervision: Developing an Effective System Implications for States.
6/18/2016 DES / AzEIP 2011 Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training.
Understanding the Data on Preschool Child Find and Transition Annual Performance Report Indicator 12 February, 2016
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
General Supervision and School Improvement: Utilizing all relevant data to inform statewide efforts for scaling up David Guardino Manager, School Improvement.
Public School Monitoring Roadmap
Guam Department of Education
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
Monitoring Child Outcomes: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
SPR&I Regional Training
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Using Data to Build LEA Capacity to Improve Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Concepts of General Supervision Accountability for Implementation & Improved Results

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA The BIG 8 of General Supervision (and Continuous Improvement) 1.What are the minimum components for General Supervision ? 2.How do the components form a state system ? 3.What are the annual processes operating within the system ?

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Difference between Concepts & a Model Each state develops Its Own Model of General Supervision based on what’s required and desired

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA State Performance Plan Policies, Procedures, and Effective Implementation Data on Processes and Results Targeted Technical Assistance & Professional Development Effective Dispute Resolution Integrated Monitoring Activities Improvement, Correction, Incentives & Sanctions Components of General Supervision Ask Yourself How Each Piece Operate s and Fits Into the Whole Fiscal Management

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Accountability’s Big View State Performance Plan Policies, Procedures & Effective Implementation Data on Processes and Results Targeted Technical Assistance & Professional Development Effective Dispute Resolution Integrated Monitoring Activities Improvement, Correction, Incentives & Sanctions Data on NCLB Student Performance & AYP Reading First Technical Assistance & Professional Development State Plan for NCLB Improvement, Correction for NCLB What accountability requirements for other programs have? How Do the Big 8 Fit Into a State System? Fiscal Management

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Requirements: State Performance Plan (SPP)  34 CFR §§ and Annual performance reports (APRs)  34 CFR § Performance goals and indicators  34 CFR § SPP  34 CFR § (c) and (d) Monitoring and enforcement  34 CFR § Targets and reporting State Performance Plan

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA State Performance Plan  Stakeholders should be actively involved in all aspects of the SPP.  The development and implementation of the SPP leads to improved results.  Reporting is critical to ensuring accountability to the public.  The SPP is the blueprint for systems change. State Performance Plan

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Requirements: Policies, Procedures & Effective Implementation  20 U.S.C. § 1232d(b)(1) Program administered in accordance with rules  20 U.S.C. § 1232e(b)(1) local educational agency (LEA) administers program in accordance with rules  34 CFR § Compliance with statutes  34 CFR § State policies and procedures (state plan)  34 CFR § Methods of ensuring services  34 CFR §§ LEA policies and procedures Policies, Procedures & Effective Implementation

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Policies, Procedures & Effective Implementation  Aligned with IDEA  Implemented by local programs  Methods to detect noncompliance and ensure correction of noncompliance  Program improvement through improvement planning and incentives  Current interagency agreements and memoranda of understanding (MOU) when required to ensure IDEA implementation  Mechanisms to determine effectiveness of agreements and MOU Policies, Procedures & Effective Implementation

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Requirements: Effective Dispute Resolution  34 CFR § Procedural safeguards  34 CFR §§ Complaint procedures  34 CFR § Procedural safeguards  34 CFR § Procedural safeguards notice Effective Dispute Resolution

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Effective Dispute Resolutions  Are timely  Track issues  Inform onsite and offsite monitoring activities  Periodically evaluate effectiveness of resolutions  Determine that parents and families and students understand their rights, especially in cases where there are few or no complaints, hearings, or other resolutions Effective Dispute Resolution

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Requirements: Data on Processes & Results  20 U.S.C. § 1232d(b)(4) Evaluate effectiveness  20 U.S.C. § 1232e(b) LEAs report to the state educational agency (SEA), board, Secretary  34 CFR § (b) Data collection  34 CFR § Targets and reporting  34 CFR § Annual report of children served Data on Processes & Results

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Data on Processes & Results  Collection and verification 618 Dispute resolution Previous monitoring reports other  Examination and analyses Areas of state concern Clusters of related indicators  Reporting APR (state) LEA Performance compare to state targets  Status determination  Improvement Data are used to plan and revise activities Data on Processes & Results

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Requirements: Integrated Monitoring Activities  20 U.S.C. §1232d(b)(3)(A) Proper methods of monitoring  34 CFR § Monitoring least restrictive environment (LRE)  34 CFR § SEA responsibility for general supervision  34 CFR § State monitoring Integrated Monitoring Activities

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Integrated Monitoring Activities  Stakeholders involved  Focus on specific hypotheses for area  Teams include family members  Investigation related to noncompliance and program improvement  Multiple methods and data sources to monitor every program, every year  Activities include continuous examination of performance for compliance and results  Written reports specify evidence of correction and of improvement  Internal and external technical assistance and professional development support improvement and correction Integrated Monitoring Activities

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Requirements: Targeted TA and Professional Development  20 U.S.C. §1232d(b)(3)(B), (C), (D) Provide TA, promising practices and disseminate information  20 U.S.C. §1232e(b)(8) LEA has effective dissemination to teachers and administrators  34 CFR § TA on LRE  34 CFR § Personnel qualifications Targeted T/A & Prof Dev

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Targeted Technical Assistance & Professional Development  Directly connected to the SPP and improvement activities  Provided to correct noncompliance and improve results  Principles of adult learning  Measure effectiveness of implementation  Incorporate various agencies in development and dissemination  Distribute promising practices and evidence based practices to local programs Targeted T/A & Prof Dev

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Requirements: Improvement, Correction, Incentives, & Sanctions  20 U.S.C. §1232d(b)(3(A) and (E) Proper methods – correction and enforcement  34 CFR §80.12 Special conditions  34 CFR §80.43 Enforcement  34 CFR § LEA compliance  34 CFR § State monitoring and enforcement  34 CFR §§ Determinations and enforcement actions  34 CFR § Enforcement Improvement & Correction, Incentives & Sanctions

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Improvement, Correction, Incentives & Sanctions  Explicit state authority to enforce regulations, policies, and procedures  TA to ensure correction of noncompliance  Improvement planning to meet targets  Corrective action planning and follow- up tracking of correction and improvement  Range of formalized strategies and/or sanctions for enforcement with written timelines  Determines the status of local programs annually Improvement & Correction, Incentives & Sanctions

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Requirements: Fiscal Management  34 CFR §§ and Distribution of funds  34 CFR § Treatment of charter schools  34 CFR § Private schools proportionate share  34 CFR §§ and Maintenance of effort  34 CFR §§ and Excess cost/supplement not supplant  34 CFR § Early intervening services 15%  OMB Circular A-133 – Single Audits Fiscal Management

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Fiscal Management  States distribute funds in accordance with federal requirements.  Funds are used in accordance with federal and state requirements.  States provide oversight on the use of funds.  Funds are aligned to problem areas in the SPP/APR Fiscal Management

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Describing a ‘System’ of General Supervision Problems in Description (beginning list) Equating general supervision as only onsite monitoring Viewing administration as a collection of separate and isolated functions Defining accountability as an event rather than a ‘state’ and process Others?

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA State Performance Plan Policies, Procedures, and Effective Implementation Data on Processes and Results Targeted T/A & Professional Development Effective Dispute Resolution Integrated Monitoring Activities Improvement, Correction, Incentives & Sanctions Fiscal Manage- ment What is ‘System ?’

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA It’s about Better Results

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA State Performance Plan Policies, Procedures, and Effective Implementation Data on Processes and Results Targeted Technical Assistance & Professional Development Effective Dispute Resolution Integrated Monitoring Activities Improvement, Correction, Incentives & Sanctions Fiscal Management General Supervision Big 8

For More Information