LibQUAL+ TM Library Survey 2006. LIBQUAL+ “ Only customers judge quality – all other measures are irrelevant”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Connecting Libraries to Organizational Mission: Using Assessment to Strengthen the Academic Health Sciences Librarys Institutional Role James Shedlock,
Advertisements

R LibQUAL+: A Measurement Tool for Special Libraries? Susan Scheiberg Assistant Director, Library RAND Corporation David Shumaker Manager, Information.
School of Medicine FACULTY OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH Does interprofessional education and working have any impact on perceptions of professional identity.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
the UNCG University Libraries ASERL Meeting November 13, 2012 Atlanta, GA Kathryn Crowe Associate Dean for Public Services
IDEA What it is and How to Implement the System Texas A & M, February 2013 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Senior Educational Consultant.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
Neil Naftzger Principal Researcher Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation February 2015 Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved.
“LEADS”: Leadership Enhancement And Development System.
Assessment with LibQUAL+ ™ at the University of Vermont Vermont Library Association College and Special Libraries Section Conference April 7, 2006 Selene.
Writing an Effective Assessment Plan
Presented by Beverly Choltco-Devlin Reference and Electronic Resources Consultant Mid-York Library System September 25, 2009 REVVED UP FOR REFERENCE CONFERENCE.
LibQUAL + Surveying the Library’s Users Supervisor’s Meeting March 17, 2004.
Assessment of Staff Needs and Satisfaction in an Evergreen Environment David Green NC Cardinal Consultant State Library of North Carolina.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Selena Killick ARL/SCONUL LibQUAL+ Administrator Cranfield University Introduction to LibQUAL+
Alice’s Adventures in LibQual-Land Kitty Tynan Assistant Director for Public Services CUA Libraries All illustrations from The Victorian Web: A Tenniel.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
Types of Assessment Satisfaction of the customer. Satisfaction of the worker. Workflow effectiveness and speed. Service delivery effectiveness and speed.
LibQUAL+ TM at the University of Lethbridge 2005 January 26 L. Jacobs.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
EQUIS STUDENT SURVEY EFMD Quality Improvement System The EFMD Accreditation for International Business Schools Equis Core-Team,
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
Old.libqual.org What will ARL do for you? What will you do? January 2005 Shrivenham, UK.
OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
Library Quality Assessment NCES Summer Data Conference July 25, 2002 Martha Kyrillidou, Julia Blixrud, Consuella Askew Waller Project web site
RANDRAND CAHPS® Relevance of CAHPS® for Workers’ Compensation Medical Care Donna Farley Senior Health Policy Analyst, RAND Workers’ Compensation Colloquium.
TM Project web site Report Meeting Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson Martha Kyrillidou July 28, 2003 Durham United Kingdom.
ASSESSMENT. Assessment is the systematic and on-going process of collecting and reviewing evidence about the College's academic and administrative programs.
LibQUAL+™ Process Management: Using the Web as a Management Tool Amy Hoseth Massachusetts LSTA Orientation Meeting Boston, MA October 21, 2005 old.libqual.org.
LibQUAL - Charting Library Service Quality Tove Bang, ASB.
After the Academy Selena Lock LibQUAL+ Results Meeting 22nd August 2005.
Old.libqual.org A fairytale about “ 22 items and a box ” presented by Martha Kyrillidou May 24, 2004 Medical Library Association Washington, DC.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Electronic Resource Use Unit 1.0: Introduction.
ICLS Project Planning Team: Elizabeth Arkles, Stephanie Cusworth, Steven Chang.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Launched in 2009, the HEA's annual Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) is the only sector-wide survey to gain insight from taught postgraduate.
Project web site: old.libqual.org LibQUAL+™ Process Management: Using the Web as a Management Tool ALA Midwinter Conference San Diego, California January.
Chapin Hall All-Staff Meeting February 4, 2010 Performance and Development Cycle Human Resources.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
March 14, 2009 ACRL 14 th National Conference Seattle, WA ClimateQUAL™: Organizational Climate and Diversity Assessment Presented by Martha Kyrillidou,
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
ClimateQUAL™: Organizational Climate and Diversity Assessment Sue Baughman Texas Library Association April 2009.
National Library for Health pilot Cath McCafferty Mersey Care NHS Trust.
Focus on SCONUL Institutions: Cranfield University – DCMT Campus Stephen Town.
Using LibQUAL+ to Rethink Public Services June 2003.
Presentation on Outcomes Assessment Presentation on Outcomes Assessment toCCED Mohawk Valley Community College October 11, 2004.
CSWE Overview This resource highlights key aspects of the mission of the Commission on Research and its goals for the next 5 years. It will then.
Students Learning Effectively through Creative Resource Classes and Creativity in the Classroom Ashanti Banks Ashford University Professor Miller EDU.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Presentation on Outcomes Assessment Presentation on Outcomes Assessment to Administrative Services Mohawk Valley Community College February 7, 2006.
© 2016 Results and Analysis: Elementary Schools Only 2016 School Quality Survey Spring ISD January 19 – 31, 2016.
FinxS Open 360° Feedback.
Using this Communications Template
Library Assessment Tools & Technology
ALERT Prototype Emergency preparedness platform Prototype Presentation
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
Parent and Family Partnership Surveys
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Semiannual Report, March 2015
A vision for learning with Digital technologies
Assessment with LibQUAL+ ™ at the University of Vermont
Presentation transcript:

LibQUAL+ TM Library Survey 2006

LIBQUAL+ “ Only customers judge quality – all other measures are irrelevant”

What is LibQUAL+ TM ? Background Based on SERVQUAL - commercial tool for measuring service quality Produced by the Association of Research Libraries in the US Used mainly by academic libraries Very American in terminology Very Expensive for NHS libraries to use

Composition A survey instrument for libraries designed to solicit, track, understand and act upon users’ opinions of service quality 22 items and a box (+ 5 extra ?’s) 3 Dimensions: Affect of Service Information Control Library as a Place

Questions are intermixed Information Control -8 questions related to whether users are able to find information in the library of their choosing in an independent and autonomous way Affect of Service 9 questions on human dimension of service quality. These relate to the user’s interaction with, and the general helpfulness and competency of library staff

Questions cont. Library as a Place – 5 questions deal with the physical environment of the library as a place for individual study, group work or inspiration.

Why are we taking part? NHS pilot – Sponsored by NLH Being piloted in 9 different types of NHS Trusts + RCN Links into Helicon accreditation Benchmarking against other health libraries Pilot likely to last 2-3 years with opportunity to repeat the survey and compare the results

Goals Foster a culture of excellence in providing library services Help libraries better understand user perceptions of library service quality Collect and interpret library user feedback systematically over time

Goals cont. Provide libraries with comparable assessment information from peer institutions Identify best practices in library services Enhance library staff members’ analytical skills for interpreting and acting on data

Benefits Gives library users a chance to tell you where your services need improvement so you can respond to and better manage their expectations Develop services that better meet your users’ expectations by peer institution comparisons Examine practices of those libraries that are highly regarded by users.

How will the survey work? s sent to all Trust staff inviting them to complete the survey s and Intranet site will have links to actual survey Users complete survey online (10 mins) Open for 4 weeks, so reminder s sent Results sent to LibQUAL electronically

What kind of results will we get? The results of the survey should be available around June There will be results for our libraries and those of other NHS libraries in the pilot The results will be in report book containing bar charts and radiographs indicating the areas where we are meeting expectations and those where we are not

What happens then? The results we receive will be crude data and will need some interpretation (Cranfield) Once we have identified areas for improvement we can think about drawing up an action plan for developing our library service to better meet our users needs If the pilot is successful, LibQUAL+ may be used routinely to measure service quality in NHS

Project Timeline February - March Staff Training March - April Preparing survey and publicity April 24th Survey open May 19 th Survey Closed June- Results from LibQUAL

What did we need to do? Preparations for survey taking place centrally and electronically Liaised with IT and other relevant departments All library staff can be involved in promotion of the survey Need to assist users if they have questions All library staff can complete a survey

Any Questions?