Wisconsin’s New Approach to Land Use Controls Presented by Mark F. Giesfeldt Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date #, 2009Presenter Name Response and Remediation Program Update May 1, 2014Derrick Williams, Program Manager.
Advertisements

Cytec Statement of Basis and Permit Modification July 16, 2012 Public Hearing Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Midland Community Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Steven Chester, Director Jim Sygo, Deputy Director.
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE LAWS THE RHODE ISLAND EXPERIENCE.
Department of Environmental Protection “…conserving, protecting and improving the natural resources and environment of the state…” Graham J. Stevens and.
GASB 49 –Accounting & Financial Reporting for Pollution Remediation Obligations An Overview.
PA One Cleanup and Land Use Controls The “Business of Brownfields” Conference April 17, 2008 Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
Remediation Programs Update MSECA Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2012.
Long-term Management of Land Use Controls Mare Island RAB Meeting February 23, 2006.
7 TH ANNUAL GEORGIA ENVIRONMENTAL CONFERENCE AUGUST 22-24, 2012 GEORGIA’S VOLUNTARY REMEDIATION PROGRAM – THE THIRD YEAR presented by DOUG CLOUD M2C2LAW.
Institutional Controls Pamela Elkow and Richard Fil.
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION AVECO July 14 – 18, 2014 Centralized Certification.
1 UNITED CONSULTING Presentation to
Synopsis of House Bill No Geographic Information Systems in Kansas Seeks to make changes to the current governance structure of geographic information.
Who’s Monitoring Land Use Controls on Brownfield Sites? Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
1 LAND USE CONTROLS THE ISSUES AND CHALLENGES Presented by MGP Partners LLC December 7, 2000.
Draft Policy: Considering Environmental Justice in the Regulation of Contaminated Sites October 2007.
The Role of the Licensed Site Remediation Professional (LSRP) Paul Sakson, LSRP Paul D. Sakson Associates, Inc.
Our Water, Our Resource, Our Responsibility Module 2: Water Management Unit 3: The Local Authority - What’s happening? Castle Lake,
WETLANDS and LOCAL PROGRAMS Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
Establishment and Operations of the Collateral Registry of Liberia Euphemia Gbadee Swen-Monmia Savannah, Georgia May 19, 2015.
Missouri Information Technology Advisory Board Case Study: Minnesota’s Electronic Real Estate Recording Task Force 16 September 2003.
Tier II: Module 1C CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program.
1 Updates to Texas Administrative Code 1TAC 206 Jeff Kline, Statewide Accessibility Coordinator Texas Department of Information Resources February 8, 2012.
Tier 1 Module 6 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Public Record & Institutional Controls.
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Matthew Udenenwu Waste Permits Division 2015 TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair.
Idaho Solid Waste Facility Record Keeping June 20, 2006 Idaho Department of Environmental Quality.
Overview of the Land Recycling Program (Voluntary Cleanup Program)
2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Institutional Controls Featuring the Pinellas Site Jack Craig U.S. Department of Energy Office of.
Italy: developments in the new legislation and progress in the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting.
INTEGRATION OF MAIN STATE REGISTERS - LITHUANIAN EXPERIENCE
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
Policy and Legal Framework on Soil Contamination Management in Thailand Workshop on Strengthening Contaminated Soil Monitoring in Vietnam, November.
October Mary Louise Hendrickson Solid Waste Section – Technical Lead
June 4, 2008 Arthur J. Harrington Godfrey & Kahn S.C Pabst/Towne Redevelopment Environmental Legal Strategies.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
New activities Tour de Table – Lithuania Kestutis Kadunas, Geological Survey of Lithuania.
Comprehensive Planning Grant Program Status Update Laura Arbuckle, Administrator Division of Intergovernmental Relations Wisconsin Towns Association December.
Intervention – 2004 Nanisivik Reclamation and Closure Plan Arctic Bay June 3-4, 2004 Nunavut Water Board Public Hearing.
Environmental Factors In this module, we will discuss: Environmental legislation Environmental hazards Due diligence Conducting an environmental.
Plumbing Building Developing Policies and Guidelines Sydney Water Customer Contract Connections to Sydney Water Systems Policy Responsibilities of Connected.
 Section (2), Florida Statutes, requires each local government to maintain a comprehensive plan of the type and in the manner set out in this.
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
Uniform Environmental Covenants Act March 7, 2005.
 Section (2), Florida Statutes, requires each local government to maintain a comprehensive plan of the type and in the manner set out in this.
RCRA 2020 Vision… A View from a Facility Owner Lloyd E. Dunlap Atlantic Richfield Company, BP.
The Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Program Investing in the environment and your economic future Gerald Stahnke, VIC Program Project Manager Minnesota.
The City of Rochester New York Environmental Institutional Control System Prepared By: Mark Gregor City of Rochester, New York Division of Environmental.
Copyright © 2009 Holland & Knight LLP All Rights Reserved Uniform Environmental Covenants Act November 18, 2009 Amy L. Edwards, Esq. (202) Brownfields.
An Introduction to the Voluntary Cleanup Program Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair & Conference May 3, 2016 Gene Muller,
Uniform Environmental Covenants Act Alphabet Soup: Making Sense of IC’s, LUC’s, AUL’s and UECA Kurt Strasser November 13, 2006.
THE UNIFORM ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANTS ACT—THE EPA PERSPECTIVE BROWNFIELDS 2009 Michael A. Hendershot Senior Assistant Regional Counsel United States Environmental.
Institutional Controls in Pennsylvania’s Brownfields Program Presented by: Jill Gaito Director, Brownfields Action Team Office of Community Revitalization.
Long-Term Stewardship: Institutional Controls on Department of Energy Sites Steve Schiesswohl, Senior Realty Officer November 2006.
Brownfields 2004 Putting the Pieces Together - Effective and Reliable Institutional Controls September 21, 2004 Amy L. Edwards, Esq. (202)
Uniform Environmental Covenants Act Brownfields 2009 November 18, 2009 Kieran P. Marion Legislative Counsel, Uniform Law Commission.
Uniform Environmental Covenants Act Brownfields Conference November 15, 2006 Boston, Massachusetts William R. Breetz.
Long-Term Stewardship: Ensuring the Safe Use of Contaminated Sites Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
EPA Brownfields Alphabet Soup: Making Sense of ICs, LUCs, AULs and UECA November 13, 2006 Amy L. Edwards, Esq. (202)
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Waste Management Stony Hill Road Contamination Wake County.
Uniform Environmental Covenants
Minnesota CLE June Webcast Extravaganza Environmental Law Basics for the Business and Real Estate Practitioner Joseph G. Maternowski, Hessian & McKasy,
Noticing Package NOTICING PACKAGE Melike Altun, EM.
1st Avenue Revitalization Project Brownfield Pilot Study Public Outreach Property Owner Stakeholder Meeting June 1999.
RESTORING CONTAMINATED SITES TO PRODUCTIVE USE
Groundwater Contamination Cases in Texas
Institutional Controls At Voluntary Cleanup Sites
Tribal TAB Program Providing “Technical Assistance to Brownfields” to all U.S. Federally Recognized Tribes!
Presentation transcript:

Wisconsin’s New Approach to Land Use Controls Presented by Mark F. Giesfeldt Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

2006 Brownfields Legislation Act 418 and s , Wis. Stats. Effective June 3, 2006

New “Approach” For Land Use Controls (LUCs) Ensures limitations clearly run with the land and are enforceable Ensures limitations clearly run with the land and are enforceable Provides a more accessible means to inform the public Provides a more accessible means to inform the public

Applies to Cleanups Overseen by Departments of: Commerce (low/medium risk LUST sites) Commerce (low/medium risk LUST sites) Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection (agrichemical facilities) Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection (agrichemical facilities) Natural Resources (everything else) Natural Resources (everything else)

Before Legislation: Relied on deed restrictions to ensure engineering controls or other limitations remain a protective option Relied on deed restrictions to ensure engineering controls or other limitations remain a protective option Since 2002 used web and GIS system to track LUCs Since 2002 used web and GIS system to track LUCs Many sites in regulatory limbo: cleaned up but no deed restriction filed Many sites in regulatory limbo: cleaned up but no deed restriction filed

Brownfields Study Group (BFSG) Established by the Legislature in 1998 Established by the Legislature in 1998 Stakeholder policy advisory group Stakeholder policy advisory group Took up the issue of LUC enforceability and access to information Took up the issue of LUC enforceability and access to information Considered the Uniform Environmental Covenants Act (UECA) Considered the Uniform Environmental Covenants Act (UECA)

Brownfields Study Group set goals for new effort: Streamline administrative process Streamline administrative process Decrease sites in regulatory limbo Decrease sites in regulatory limbo Remove negative perception of deed encumbrances Remove negative perception of deed encumbrances Enhance public access Enhance public access Clarify responsibility Clarify responsibility

BFSG Agreed with UECA Goals, However: Too administratively challenging Too administratively challenging Would slow down brownfields cleanups Would slow down brownfields cleanups Increase costs of environmental cleanups Increase costs of environmental cleanups Does not enhance public access to information Does not enhance public access to information

Wisconsin’s General Approach Rely on specific state law rather than restrictions on deed Rely on specific state law rather than restrictions on deed Serves dual purpose of enforceability and public notice Serves dual purpose of enforceability and public notice Consistent with Wisconsin’s approach to licensed landfills (1969) and voluntary party liability exemption (1994) obligations – those obligations run with the land Consistent with Wisconsin’s approach to licensed landfills (1969) and voluntary party liability exemption (1994) obligations – those obligations run with the land

Wisconsin’s General Approach (con’t) Applies to all cleanups regardless of agency or type of site Applies to all cleanups regardless of agency or type of site Runs with land unless another party agrees to responsibility Runs with land unless another party agrees to responsibility Is publicly available on the internet Is publicly available on the internet Requires state approval to change or affect LUC, for a few Requires state approval to change or affect LUC, for a few

Wisconsin’s General Approach (con’t) Bi-partisan support in legislature, including Bi-partisan support in legislature, including Realtors Realtors Conservation groups Conservation groups Industry Industry Local governments Local governments Others Others

LUCs are placed on properties that: Require an engineering control to maintain protectiveness Require an engineering control to maintain protectiveness Unable to finish site investigation or cleanup due to structural impediment Unable to finish site investigation or cleanup due to structural impediment Other factors such as “industrial” closure Other factors such as “industrial” closure

Implementation How it works: How it works: All limitations listed in state closure letter or Certificate of Completion All limitations listed in state closure letter or Certificate of Completion Maintenance plan is required part of closure package Maintenance plan is required part of closure package One-time fee One-time fee Downloadable documents in “closure package” are on web Downloadable documents in “closure package” are on web Geo location of site is noted on statewide map Geo location of site is noted on statewide map

Some of the contents of the closure package: Closure letter and maintenance plan Closure letter and maintenance plan Copies of the most recent deed Copies of the most recent deed Copy of the certified surveyed map Copy of the certified surveyed map Parcel identification number Parcel identification number

Closure Package (con’t) Geographic position of all properties within the contaminated site boundaries Geographic position of all properties within the contaminated site boundaries A table of analytical results A table of analytical results An isoconcentration map, if required as part of the site investigation (SI) An isoconcentration map, if required as part of the site investigation (SI) A table of the previous four water level elevation measurements A table of the previous four water level elevation measurements For soil contamination, a map showing the location of all soil samples For soil contamination, a map showing the location of all soil samples

Closure Package (con’t) An RP-signed statement that legal descriptions are accurate An RP-signed statement that legal descriptions are accurate A copy of letters sent by the RP to properties with groundwater exceedances A copy of letters sent by the RP to properties with groundwater exceedances A copy of all written notifications of a public street or highway or railroad right-of-way A copy of all written notifications of a public street or highway or railroad right-of-way A list of addresses for all impacted off-site properties A list of addresses for all impacted off-site properties

Thank you For more information please visit our web page at rr/brownfields/legislation.htm