This presentation will describe the state of each element in the beam line with regards to the current update being undertaken. Firstly, it will describe.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 14, 2004 TJR - - UPDATED 1/25/04 1 MICE Beamline Analysis Using g4beamline Including Jan 25 Updates for Kevin’s JAN04 Beamline Design Tom Roberts.
Advertisements

Beam-plug under M2 and HCAL shielding studies Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt October 9,
RFQ CAD Model Tolerance Studies Simon Jolly 14 th December 2011.
MICE Beam Loss vs Particle Rate Adam Dobbs, ISIS Meeting, 18 th December 2009.
MICE Particle Rate and ISIS Beam Loss Adam Dobbs, Target – ISIS Meeting, 17 th September 2010.
Cooling channel issues U. Bravar Univ. of Oxford 31-Mar-2004.
1 Scintillating Fibre Tracker Simulation Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Tuesday 9 th March 2004.
1 PID, emittance and cooling measurement Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE Analysis phone conference.
SLIDE Beam measurements using the MICE TOF counters Analysis meeting, 23 September 2008 Mark Rayner.
Slide 1 MICE Beamline Design and Commissioning Review 16 th Nov 2007 Simulation comparison / tools / issues Henry Nebrensky Brunel University There are.
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
June 13, Geant4 Simulations of the MICE Beamline Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology June13, 2003.
Beam line summary paul drumm for beam line group.
March 31, Status of the TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detector Packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Laboratory Mice Collaboration Meeting March.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
Chris Rogers, MICE CM16 Wednesday Plenary Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 14 September, 2009.
Diffuser in G4MICE Victoria Blackmore 09/03/10 Analysis Meeting 1/8.
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
Emittance Calculation Chris Rogers, Imperial College/RAL Septemebr
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
TJR 9/24/031 Update: Geant4 Simulations of the MICE Beamline – Absolute Normalization Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 9/24/03 (With thanks.
TJR 7/30/031 Geant4 Simulations of the MICE Beamline Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 7/30/03.
1Malcolm Ellis - Software Meeting - 31st May 2006 Data Challenge Requirements  First list of requirements, based on Yagmur’s document: u
1 G4MICE Analysis of KEK Test Beam Aron Fish Malcolm Ellis CM15 10th June 2006.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
RF background simulations MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
Chris Rogers, Analysis Parallel, MICE CM17 Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
1 Chris Rogers MICE Collaboration Meeting 11th Feb 2005 Tracking and Cooling performance of G4MICE.
Diffuser Studies Chris Rogers, IC/RAL MICE VC 09 March 2005.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
Introduction Status of SC simulations at CERN
MICE Video meeting Alain Blondel 7 December MICE -- what running strategy? reflections on steps I and II.
1 Optics/Analysis Update Chris Rogers MICE Software pc 28 April 05.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.
Quantitative Optimisation Studies of the Muon Front-End for a Neutrino Factory S. J. Brooks, RAL, Chilton, Oxfordshire, U.K. Tracking Code Non-linearised.
Particle Production in the MICE Beamline IPAC10 Linda Coney, UC Riverside, Adam Dobbs, Imperial College London, Yordan Karadzhov, Sofia University The.
Update Chris Rogers, Analysis PC, 13/07/06. State of the “Accelerator” Simulation Field model now fully implemented in revised MICE scheme Sanity checking.
1 Calorimeter in G4MICE Berkeley 10 Feb 2005 Rikard Sandström Geneva University.
Beam MC activity A.K.Ichikawa for beam group For more details,
S. Kahn 5 June 2003NuFact03 Tetra Cooling RingPage 1 Tetra Cooling Ring Steve Kahn For V. Balbekov, R. Fernow, S. Kahn, R. Raja, Z. Usubov.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
11 Nov 2008PC Analysis PC Schedule 2008 Tuesdays fortnightly 9 September  23 September  2 October  CM22  11 November  25 November 9 December.
Online Reconstruction 1M.Ellis - CM th October 2008.
This presentation shall describe; The motivation to design a new system How the new system works and user interaction Current work/results Future work.
Geant4 Simulation of the Beam Line for the HARP Experiment M.Gostkin, A.Jemtchougov, E.Rogalev (JINR, Dubna)
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
3 June 2009J. H. Cobb 1 ANALYSIS SUMMARY CM24 Agenda for Analysis parallel session at CM Sunday 31 May 14:00.
M. Ellis - MICE Video Conference - 30th August Software Report Recent progress:Recent progress: –Start of code to read DATE format (two parts) One.
This presentation shall describe; Work over the last 3 months Ongoing work Plans for the future CM 32.
26 Oct 2010PC Physics Requirements of Software from Chris R ~19 Oct. My.
Status of BDSIM Simulation L. Nevay, S. Boogert, H. Garcia-Morales, S. Gibson, R. Kwee-Hinzmann, J. Snuverink Royal Holloway, University of London 17 th.
1June 2 nd 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 m. apollonio Beamline+( ,P) matrix.
1 Configuration Database David Forrest University of Glasgow RAL :: 31 May 2009.
Nufact02, London, July 1-6, 2002K.Hanke Muon Phase Rotation and Cooling: Simulation Work at CERN new 88 MHz front-end update on cooling experiment simulations.
Measuring Multiple Scattering in Step IV Timothy Carlisle Oxford See MICE Note 374 for updated results.
Paul drumm, mutac jan Status of Muon Beamline design work Kevin Tilley, RAL, 9th Feb Including Beamline Materials in new revision Reference ('True')
1June 1 st 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 Beamline Optics m. apollonio.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
Dipole Magnetic Field Effect on the Antiproton Beam
Bulk production of Monte Carlo
Field-on measurement of multiple scattering
Why do we need to know the fields / map the magnets?
FCC-ee IR magnetic element design – an update
Global PID MICE CM43 29/10/15 Celeste Pidcott University of Warwick
Effect of Reduced Focus Coil Current on Step IV and Step VI
How to turn on MICE Step IV
Presentation transcript:

This presentation will describe the state of each element in the beam line with regards to the current update being undertaken. Firstly, it will describe everything that has been done to each element to this date and also future improvements which will be made to each element. Secondly, the simulation as a whole will be discussed with regards to the x, y and z positions of all the elements relative to the MICE Centre and future work needed to update this. CM 28 Sofia M. Littlefield

Beam Production Current State: The beam is currently being modelled as a multivariate Gaussian beam of pions Future Work: We would like to implement a G4BL style parameterised beam line which; Tracks secondaries of all flavours from target Fills Q1 aperture Has a user defined momentum distribution This needs new code CM 28 Sofia M. Littlefield

Current State: Quads dimension have been changed according to MICE-Note Beam 65 (will be improved further) The field maps of the quads have been improved to match opera field maps Q123 Future Work: Minor changes to the field maps could be implemented due to the irregular shape of the aperture This however is low priority as the field map and G4MICE model is very good Left: Technical Drawings from Note 65 Right: Old version of G4MICE model Furthest Right: Field map CM 28 Sofia X position (cm) Y position (cm) Magnetic Field (Tesla) M. Littlefield

Q456/789 The other quads in the beam line are in the same state as Q123 Technical Drawing taken from Note 65 G4MICE model CM 28 Sofia M. Littlefield

Q456/789 Field Maps Field map taken from G4MICE Field map taken from Opera Images from Chris Rogers CM 28 Sofia M. Littlefield

D1/2 Current State: Dimensions have been changed to match information in MICE Note Beam65 Field maps have been updated via reading in a text file of the field taken from G4BL Future Work: All of the improvements made will be verified. Model of D1/2 Field map taken from G4MICE CM 28 Sofia X position (cm) Y position (cm) Magnetic Field (Tesla) M. Littlefield

Decay Solenoid Current State: Dimensions changed to match information in MICE Note Beam 65 DS now models 10 coils inside the DS rather than 1 Field maps have been updated via reading in a text file of the field taken from G4BL Future Work: All of the improvements made will be verified Checks will need to be made to the dimensions of the DS as the Mylar glass plate (on each end) and the vacuum inside have not been modelled This is because the information in the MICE note is not clear Left: Model of DS Right: Field map CM 28 Sofia Z position (cm) Y position (cm) Magnetic Field (Tesla) M. Littlefield

CM 28 Sofia M. Littlefield

Simulation Current State: x, y and z positions of all elements have been updated according to information taken from the last survey Most elements have had geometries and field maps updated to match reality more closely Future Work: Sanity checks on dipoles and also gather more information of geometries (D1, DS) Comparisons between G4MICE and G4BL of each element will be made, mainly tracking particles through each element (already begun) The field application will be made improve to check the value for Maxwell2 (numerical divergence of the B-field vector) across each element to check if they are physical (finished needs to be verified) Some minor improvements to code e.g. Killing of stray particles, improving simulation speed Add TOFs, GVAs etc (anything else in the beam line) CM 28 Sofia M. Littlefield

Summary The elements have had the dimensions altered to match the information in the MICE note. Field maps have been changed and read into the simulation from text files taken from G4 Beam Line which provides accurate models of the fields seen in reality. Finally the positions of all the elements have been updated but still need to be verified. Left Upper: CAD Model of MICE Hall Left Lower: Survey of MICE Hall Right: G4MICE Model of MICE Hall CM 28 Sofia M. Littlefield

Any Questions? Thank You for Listening CM 28 Sofia M. Littlefield