PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF LATVIA THE STRUCTURE OF RECOMMENDATION ON REGULATED ACCESS TO NGA AND THE ROLE OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION AS THE FIRST STEP.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Regional Forum for Europe Broadband: A Pillar of Social and Economic Development 6-7 September 2012 Sheraton Hotel, Tirana Sofie Maddens Toscano ITU Expert.

Advertisements

Equitable Access to ICT The EAC Experience East African Community.

Shared Use of Radio Spectrum in the EU

Current Status of Notifications under the EU Consultation Procedure regarding Cable Networks CLEC Seminar - Electronic Communications Regulation and Cable.

Heinz Hilbrecht Director "Security of Supply and Energy Markets" European Commission - DG TREN , GRI NW, Amsterdam Regional Cooperation Role of.

DG Information Society PSC 1 The 1999 Communications Review Peter Scott DG Information Society Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION.

Towards a Connected Continent: How to achieve a European Single Market for Telecommunications? Speeding up NGN ubiquity: a pillar for digital growth Athens,

MOBILE/WIRELESS BROADBAND QUALITY OF SERVICE EVALUATION, SPRK EXPERIENCE Aleksandrs Čerņakovs-Neimarks Deputy Director of Electronic Communications and.

LOCAL LOOP UNBUNDLING IN HUNGARY Local Loop Conference, 5th July 2005, Bucharest Sandor Szilágyi National Communications Authority, Budapest.

Tele2 5 March 2008 EPP-ED Public Hearing Mikael Grape.

Marek Piiroja  In principle at the moment in Estonia the fibre access (including prices) is not regulated and by the SMP decision on 2009.

Broadband to everybody!? Torstein Olsen Director Norwegian Post and Telecommunications Authority LLU Conference, Bucharest, 5 July 2005.

©Ofcom Review of the Framework Some issues under discussion by regulators Jim Niblett International Policy Director 22 December 2005.

Mark van Stiphout – DG TREN – C2 Internal market for electricity and gas The role of TSOs in the third package EUROPEAN COMMISSION GIE conference 7 May.

1 Access regulation and incentives for investment in alternative broadband infrastructure* Harald Gruber Presentation for REGULATION AND COMPETITION SEMINAR.

Interconnection and Regulation of IP-Networks Ass. Sven Tschoepe, LL.M 15/5/04 ITS 15th Biennial Conference Berlin, Germany September, Internationalisation.

Development of BB markets Access markets (M4 & M5) and remedies applied Linda Paršova 10 TH BALTIC ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND POSTAL SERVICES REGULATORS’

Cost sharing models of NGN rollout in rural or remote areas BEREC-EaPeReg-REGULATEL-EMERG Summit Barcelona, 2-3 July 2015.

G.Pūras Development of Broadband markets Communications Regulatory authority of Lithuania Electronic communications department Disclaimer: The.

Strategies to achieve Broadband For All: is the US the only answer? Renata Kowalska Lisbon, 17 th June 2010 US and broadband strategy in Poland.

Broadband Internet Current and future challenges for regulators: a selection Athens – June 1, 2007 Philippe Defraigne Cullen International

Company LOGO IT - REGULATION ISSUES CRC Regulatory Department Ch. Oyungerel Kh. Ninjbolor Ulaanbaatar

1 COMMUNICATIONS REGULATION COMMISSION Republic of Bulgaria MOBILE BROADBAND EUROPE – BULGARIAN EXPERIENCE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MOBILE BROADBAND ACCESS.

Market Analysis under the New EU Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications CLA European Conference 2005 Stockholm, October 27-28, 2005 Hogan &

21 Kolonaki Square, Athens, T: , F: , E: W: The Energy Community of South.

DG Information Society 1 Liberalisation and regulation in Electronic Communications in the EU 2nd ICT Summit Istanbul, 3-6 September 2002 Hans-Peter Gebhardt.

On the organization and conduct of expert examination in science and technology in the USA and the European Union Scientific Research.

The 3rd package for the internal energy market Key proposals EUROPEAN COMMISSION Heinz Hilbrecht Directorate C - Security of supply and energy markets.

The Notification Procedure of national telecoms markets Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006.

Local Loop Unbundling PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 6 th JUNE 2007.

SABIEDRISKO PAKALPOJUMU REGULESANAS KOMISIJA Andrejs Dombrovskis expert Telecommunications and Postal Department Public Utilities Commission Electronic.

Frederic Maduraud European Commission DG Information Society OECD Workshop on Broadband Seoul, June 2002 “Exploiting the Broadband.

Arnsburger Str. 64, Frankfurt, Germany Tel , Fax Internet:

This project is funded by the European Union EU regulatory framework for electronic communications - Access Directive Richard Harris Independent EU telecommunications.

Federal Office for Communications Digital Agenda for Europe Going local 2013: Switzerland.

Telecoms Review Institutional aspects European Parliament, 5 March 2008.

Asta Sihvonen-Punkka Director General of EMA Vice-Chair of ERGEG Baltic Electricity Mini-Forum 1 October, 2010 Jurmala ACER and regulatory empowerment.

Independence and powers of regulators: legal and institutional requirements Heinz Hilbrecht, Director, European Commission World Forum on Energy Regulation.

22 – 23 November 2007 GIE Annual Conference How the Third Package might encourage investment.

Florence Forum, November 2008 Regulation (EC) 1228/ ERGEG Compliance Monitoring.

21 June 2011 NGA Network Principles & Planning Tom Fulford-Brown, Business Development Manager, Geo.

MARKET ANALYSIS IN SERBIA Workshop on EU telecommunications regulation, Belgrade, June Aleksandar Utjesinovic Market Analysis and Cost Accounting.

Inês Nolasco Senior Regulatory Affairs Manager European Competitive Telecommunications Association.

Gints Zeltiņš Commissioner of the Public Utilities Commission of Latvia Multi-sectoral regulator: Public Utilities Commission of Latvia.

Government Construction Projects & Capital Spend New broadband related rules for the construction industry in 2016 Edel Hartog 11 May 2016.

N.Gelvanovska Infrastructure sharing experience in Lithuania Natalija Gelvanovska Electronic Communications Department Access and Networks Section 2009,

REPUBLIC OF LATVIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Līga Daugaviete Senior Legal Adviser of Energy Division October 26, 2005 Customer Complaints and Dispute.

ROMANIA NATIONAL NATURAL GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY Public Service Obligations in Romanian Gas Sector Ligia Medrea General Manager – Authorizing, Licensing,

Broadband Workshop Facilitating Broadband Investment French regulatory framework Bertrand Vandeputte ARCEP European Commission – DG INFSO March 23rd, 2011.

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF LATVIA Broadband wholesale: first steps in Latvia Laura Juhansone - Daugule Expert of Authorisation Division, Electronic.

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF LATVIA PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE OF NGA SOLUTIONS IMPLEMENTATIONS, ESTABLISHMENT OF NGA INVESTIGATIONS AREAS Aleksandrs Čerņakovs-Neimarks.

TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.

Infrastructure sharing and its contribution to the development of the infrastructure- based competition in Lithuania TAIEX Multi-beneficiary Workshop on.

N° 1 Possible co-operation between rail and buses in the area of Telematics Applications for Passengers Presented by European Railway Agency (ERA) th.

M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 10 – Information society and media.

Construction of fiber networks in alternative duct infrastructure Natalija Gelvanovska RRT, LT.

PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO

key regulatory issues in the Republic of Moldova 3rd Meeting of the Benchmarking Expert Working Group (BEWG) February 2017 Ladies.

The 3rd package for the internal energy market

PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO

Infrastructure sharing experience in Lithuania

Regulation of NGA networks – the EU experience

Agenda Context Motivation Scope Main expected results.

ERGEG GRI South South East – , Maribor

Implementation of infrastructure sharing in Lithuania

Republic of Poland Office of Electronic Communications

XIIIth Madrid Forum (16th/17th October 2007)

Presented by European Railway Agency (ERA)

The new European Electronic Communications Code DEEP-IN Project Inaugural Conference 24 June 2019 Carlota Reyners Fontana, Head of Unit B5 European Commission,

Very High Capacity and 5G Networks: from the EU code to the EU market

Presentation transcript:

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF LATVIA THE STRUCTURE OF RECOMMENDATION ON REGULATED ACCESS TO NGA AND THE ROLE OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION AS THE FIRST STEP Aleksandrs Čerņakovs-Neimarks Deputy Director of Electronic Communications and Post Department, Public Utilities Commission, Latvia Kiev, 13 – 14 October All views expressed in this presentation are strictly personal and are not binding for the Public Utilities Commission

The aim of this Recommendation is to foster the development of the single market by enhancing legal certainty and promoting investment, competition and innovation in the market of for broadband services in particular in the transition to next generation access networks (NGA)

WHY DO WE NEED THE RECOMMENDATION 2010/572/EU Broadband – topic Number One To stimulate the transition from copper to fibre- based network according to Directive 2002/21/EC Article 16(4) To promote efficient investments by all operators To reduce the civil engineering infrastructure costs To ensure the effectiveness of access to fibre lines, terminating segments and ducting

THE STRUCTURE OF NGA RECOMMENDATION There are 4 most important points: A. Unbundled access to optical local loop B. Access to the ducting system C. Access to the terminating segments D. Creating, support and access to the information system (publishing the information, data bases and/or mapping)

HOW DO WE KNOW THE OPERATORS’ NEEDS ? There are many different opinions between operators how to implement basic points of the NGA Recommendation Ask the operators about possible practical solutions to be developed – create and distribute questionnaire or arrange public consultation

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS Part A – LLU (1) Q1. Is it necessary for you to apply for the unbundled access to optical local loop (LLU)? Q2. Do you use the LLU now? Q3. What type of LLU technical solutions meets your requirements? Q4. Do you have your own fibre network now? Q5. Did another operator ask you to provide him LLU in your network as a service? Q6. Do you provide LLU in your network as a service now? Q7. What type of LLU technical solutions do you provide now?

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS Part A – LLU (2) Q8. Do you need the regulation from NRA for LLU? Q9. Do you need the regulation for the dispute resolution? Q10. Do you need the technical regulation and regulation for procedures? Q11. Do you need the tariff regulation? Q12. Do you think that only SMP operator has to be obliged to provide LLU as a service (asymmetrical regulation)? Q13. Do you think that every operator, who has an fibre based network, has to be obliged to provide LLU as a service (symmetrical regulation)?

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS Part B – Ducting (1) Q1. Is it necessary for you to apply for the access to ducts belonging to another operator to provide your own fibre network? Q2. Do you use ducts belonging to another operator now? Q3. Do you have your own ducts? Q4. Did another operator ask you to provide him access to your ducts as a service? Q5. Do you provide the access to your ducts as a service to another operator now?

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS Part B – Ducting (2) Q6. Do you need the regulation from NRA for the access to ducts? Q7. Do you need the regulation for the dispute resolution? Q8. Do you need the technical regulation and regulation for procedures? Q9. Do you need the tariff regulation? Q10. Do you think that only SMP operator has to be obliged to provide access to it’ ducting as a service (asymmetrical regulation)? Q11. Do you think that every operator, who has an fibre based network, has to be obliged to provide access to it’ ducting as a service (symmetrical regulation)?

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS Part C – Terminating Segment (1) Q1. Is it necessary for you to apply for the access to the network terminating segment, belonging to another operator, to provide your own network? Q2. Do you use terminating segment, belonging to another operator, now? Q3. Do you have your own terminating segments? Q4. Did another operator ask you to provide him access to your terminating segment as a service? Q5. Do you provide the access to your terminating segment as a service to another operator now?

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS Part C – Terminating Segment (2) Q6. Do you need the regulation from NRA for access to the terminating segment? Q7. Do you need the regulation for the dispute resolution? Q8. Do you need the technical regulation and regulation for procedures? Q9. Do you need the tariff regulation? Q10. Do you think that only SMP operator has to be obliged to provide access to it’ terminating segment as a service (asymmetrical regulation)? Q11. Do you think that every operator, who has an fibre based network, has to be obliged to provide access to it’ terminating segment as a service (symmetrical regulation)?

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS Part D – Information System (1) Q1. Do you need the information system or/and data base or/and electronic maps etc. with the information related to NGA? Q2. What kind of information has to be placed in such system: a. Geographical information about fibre optics cables (owner, type and capacity of cable, route, etc.)? b. Geographical information about ducts (owner, diameter of duct, free capacity, route, etc.)? c. Geographical information about the terminating segment (owner, type and capacity, route, etc.)? d. Information about planned civil engineering construction works (responsible person, place, type of construction)?

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS Part D – Information System (2) Q3. Who has to be responsible for such information system: a. Every operator for his own system? b. SMP operator? c. All operators designed and supported common database? d. NRA? e. Municipalities? d. Combination of mentioned above? Q4. Does the access to such information system should be opened for everybody or operators only or some another security limitations should be implemented? Q5. Does the access to such information system have to be free of charge?

CONCLUSION IT IS NOT EASY TO MAKE A DECISION ABOUT THE SOLUTIONS FOR ALL NGA PROBLEMS IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO SOLVE ALL THE PROBLEMS DURING THE SHORT PERIOD OF TIME, BUT IT IS NECESSARY TO START FROM SOMETHING ASK MARKET PLAYERS ABOUT THEIR VIEW ON THE NGA PROBLEM, ANALYZE ANSWERS AND OPINIONS AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS WILL BE EASER, MAY BE…

THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION Phone: Fax: