This communication reflects the views only of authors, and the commission cannot be held responsible for any use, which may be made of the information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Advertisements

Planning for Learning and Teaching, Assessment and Moderation
Organizing Reflection
Post 16 Citizenship Liz Craft Valuing progress Celebrating achievement.
Training of Master Trainers for SME-ICT project Implementation
Assessing student learning from Public Engagement David Owen National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Teacher Certification Assessor Information Session November 27, 2014.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework
Performance management guidance. Performance management Part C: Appraisers An introduction to the revised Performance Management Regulations January 2011.
Elizabeth Deane WIL symposium July One definition: The broad skills that a University expects that graduates will have acquired and be able to demonstrate.
Peer Feedback and Assessment: Students as Partners in Designing Inclusive Assessment and Feedback Regina Pauli 1 and Marcia Worrell 2 1 Department of Psychology,
Quality Enhancement and Communications The development and delivery of a research active curriculum will be promoted as a core and high quality activity.
Assessment and Problem Based Learning PBL 2004 Glen O’Grady Director, Center for Educational Development.
Towards the Development of a Subject Specific Mathematics Teaching Component Michael Grove, Duncan Lawson and Bill Cox.
PEARL Personal Employability Achievement and Reflection for Learning PEARL Personal Employability Achievement and Reflection for Learning.
“The Lewisham Edge Project: An apprenticeship model for in-service vocational teacher training” Lewisham College Edge Foundation London South Bank University.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
CRICOS Provider No 00025B Strategies for enhancing teaching and learning: Reflections from Australia Merrilyn Goos Director Teaching and Educational Development.
A Brief overview of the Standards to support learning and assessment in practice. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standard to Support Learning and.
360-degree feedback Briefing for Participants Full Circle Feedback
Dr. Pratibha Gupta Associate professor Deptt. of Community Medicine ELMC & H, Lucknow.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
A Brief overview of the Standards to Support Learning and Assessment in Practice. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standard to Support Learning and.
SOLSTICE Conference th & 5 th June 2015 Designing and facilitating cross-country collaborative learning in a professional education context Sarah.
Overall Teacher Judgements
Name of School Name of Portfolio Grade Level Inclusive Dates.
Transforming lives through learning Profiling Education Scotland.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
SITE Conference – 3/ Successful Online Assessment, Evaluation, and Interaction Techniques Presented by: Dr. Barbara K.Mckenzie – Dept. of MIT, State.
Meeting the challenges of part time professional education Professor Anne Peat – Dean Tracey Moore – Taught Programmes Coordinator Gary Albutt – Director.
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
Project Partnership There are 8 partners in the project consortium The project coordinator Vladan Devedzic, Professor University of Belgrade, Serbia
Pedagogy for the 21 st Century LSS Retreat, November, 2010.
UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD SUPPORTING PRE-SERVICE TRAINEES ON PLACEMENT Pre-service Mentor Training 2011.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Assessment for learning
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
Twinning Training on Student Grading YSMU, Yerevan, October 27-29, 2015.
PRESENTATION AT THE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITIES QUALITY FRAMEWORK Professor Sarah Moore, Chair, National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning.
Key Competencies.
Supporting further and higher education Situating e-portfolios: what do learners need? Helen Beetham Consultant in Pedagogy JISC e-learning programme.
Faculty Development Models
PROFILING AT STRATHGARVE PRIMARY. PROFILING  As teachers – through personal example and setting standards in our questioning and provision of feedback.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Activity 1 Stickies on the board Any unanswered questions so far Issues or challenges What do I want to know before the end of this session?
 managing self managing self  relating to others relating to others  participating and contributing participating and contributing  thinking thinking.
Calderdale and Kirklees SCITT June 2015 Ian Ross.
Assessment at Castle Batch Assessment is at the heart of teaching and learning at our school: It provides evidence to guide teaching and learning.
For the recognition of non-formal learning in European youth work learningbadges.eu.
National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
The Exeter Model of ITE Induction for Initial Teacher Education Coordinators, Mentors, Principal School Tutors, University Visiting Tutors and External.
The UEL Professional Development Award. The PDA – what is it? A flexible employability development programme offering you certification for your involvement.
1 Capstone design and curriculum renewal Margot McNeill Learning and Teaching Centre Thursday, 2 July 2009.
GRASS – Open Badges for Grading Soft Skills This communication reflects the views only of authors, and the commission cannot be held responsible for any.
Allowances and affordances of ICT Ideas to explore Choose your adventure A worked example Back stage ideas Ideas bank ICT as an assessment management.
Institutional development and evaluation 09. June 2016.
Fern Albery-S Tess Downes-S Matthew Kelly-S
Australian Professional Standards for Teachers Unpacking the Standards
An Overview of Accounting in the new Junior Cycle Specification
Dr Carolyn Johnstone OctoberVET, 18 October 2016
Employers’ perception of digital / open badge accreditation
Professional Development Lead Support Programme Workshop Version 2
Instructional Coaching Samir Omara RELO-NileTESOL Trainer s. m
European TRAINING FOUNDATION
GRASS – Open Badges for Grading Soft Skills
Using ePortfolios in Learning & Teaching
The National and Local context
Presentation transcript:

This communication reflects the views only of authors, and the commission cannot be held responsible for any use, which may be made of the information contained therein. Funded with support from the European Commission, within project Grading soft skills: GRASS, No LLP-1-RS-KA3-KA3MP Research Team: Niall Seery, Donal Canty, Adrian O`Connor & Jeffrey Buckley Technology Education Research Group University of Limerick

 University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland Technology Education Research Group (TERG) Dept. Design & Manufacturing Technology  Initial Technology Teacher Education (ITTE) B. Tech (Ed) - NFQ Level 8 Honours Degree  Focus of Research Investigation Pedagogical & Technological Approaches Validation & Recognition of Soft Skills  The ASSIST Digital Badges Graduate Attributes Soft Skills

 B. Tech (Ed) - NFQ Level 8 Honours Degree EY Subject Pedagogics 1 (Wood Tech. & Graphics) EY Subject Pedagogics 1 (Engineering Tech. & Graphics)  12 Weeks (Autumn Semester 2015) I Hour Subject Pedagogy Lecture p/w 2 Hour Graphical Pedagogy Lab p/w 2 Hour Practical Pedagogy Lab p/w  Second Year ITTE Students 5 Female 95 Male

 Clarification This badge will be awarded to people who display evidence of the capacity to make something more comprehensible and free from ambiguity.  Narration This badge will be awarded to people who display evidence of the capacity to provide a descriptive account or tell a story about something.  Representation This badge will be awarded to people who display evidence of the capacity to effectively use something (e.g. metaphor, symbol) that stands for something else.  Summation This badge will be awarded to people who display evidence of the capacity to add the most important pieces of something together in a concise form.

 Appreciation This badge will be awarded to people who display evidence of the capacity to recognise the worth, quality, or importance of something or someone.  Contribution This badge will be awarded to people who display evidence of the capacity to give something to someone in order to help achieve or provide something.  Negotiation This badge will be awarded to people who display evidence of the capacity to discuss something formally with someone in order to reach an agreement.  Participation This badge will be awarded to people who display evidence of the capacity to be involved in an activity or event with someone in doing something.

 Authentic Evidence of Student Performance Multi-Modal Capacity  Situational Context of Skill Demonstration Construct of Capability  Relative Progression of Initial Attainment Targeting Specific Benchmarks  Value Judgements of Educational Stakeholders Self Assessment Peer Observation Teacher Evaluation

 Private Web Hosting - Dynamic Web Space Full User Confidentiality Online Registration Forms  Facilitating Soft Skill Evidence Supporting Multimodal Data Files Managing Submissions & Accreditation  Assessing Soft Skill Evidence Benchmarks of Soft Skill Attainment  Badge Earners Individual User Profiles Linked to Professional Networks

Self-CritiquePeer-CritiquePeer Name: ______________  What are the factors that influenced the nature and quality of participation? 1. Level of Participation Excellent Very Good Good Did Not Participate Evidence: 2.Impact of Participation

AttributeSoft SkillStudent ActivityAwarded ClarificationPair Work: Verbal Demonstration53 NarrationPair Work: Verbal Discussion65 RepresentationGroup Work: Video Presentation67 SummationAutonomous Student Evidence59 AppreciationAutonomous Student Evidence81 ContributionGroup Work: Project Feedback67 NegotiationClass Activity: Walking Debate68 ParticipationGroup Work: Critiquing Drawings65

Intra - Personal Inter - Personal Ways of Working With Others Ways of Thinking Soft Skills  Motivational - Digital Credentials  Credible - Badge Currency  Sustainable - Technological Capacity

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Stefan StenbomMartha Cleveland-Innes Simon BenjaminssonAnna-Maria Martinsson Stefan Hrastinski

 Encourage discussion  Encourage reflection  Provide emotional support

 Digital badges can be used to encourage reflection and the development of online tutoring skills.  Identification of the challenge to balance the private activity, reflection on tutoring skills, and the social activity, communication with the students.  Encourage discussion was the most applied online tutoring skills, while encourage reflection and provide emotional support were more challenging to apply in practice.

 Encourage discussion  Encourage reflection  Provide emotional support  Elicit coachee’s level of understanding  Use goal-oriented communication  Build trust

 Six+ sub-badges = Math coach badge/certificate