MQXFS1 Test Results G. Chlachidze, J. DiMarco, S. Izquierdo-Bermudez, E. Ravaioli, S. Stoynev, T. Strauss et al. Joint LARP CM26/Hi-Lumi Meeting SLAC May.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TQM05 (coil #36) Test Summary 1. TQ coil #36 in a mirror structure Coil #36 tested with a radiation resistant impregnation material 0.7-mm diameter Nb.
Advertisements

2 nd Joint HiLumi LHC – LARP Annual Meeting INFN Frascati – November 14 th to 16 th 2012 LBNL: Helene Felice – Tiina Salmi – Ray Hafalia – Maxim Martchevsky.
Protection study options for HQ01e-3 Tiina Salmi QXF meeting, 27 Nov 2012.
MQXF state of work and analysis of HQ experimental current decays with the QLASA model used for MQXF Vittorio Marinozzi 10/28/
ASC 2012, 10/10/2012Test results and analysis of LQS03 – G. Ambrosio 1 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Test Results and Analysis of LQS03 Third Long Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole.
Test Result overview: Timeline, highlights and challenges H. Bajas TE-MSC-TF.
Overview of main results from first HQ02a test For HQ meeting 7/30/13.
Coil parts & Instrumentation issues for LQ/HQ coils tested at Fermilab HQ/LHQ coil parts task force.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
2 nd Joint HiLumi LHC – LARP Annual Meeting INFN Frascati – November 14 th to 16 th 2012 Helene Felice Paolo Ferracin LQ Mechanical Behavior Overview and.
LQ Goals and Design Study Summary – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collab Mtg – SLAC, Oct , 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC LQ Goals & Design Summary Giorgio Ambrosio.
LQS01 Test Preparation and Test Plan LARP Collaboration Meeting 12 LBNL - April 8-10, 2009.
HL-LHC/LARP, QXF Test Facility Workshop– R. Carcagno QXF Test Requirements Ruben Carcagno BNL Workshop December 17, 2013.
Design optimization of the protection heaters for the LARP high-field Nb 3 Sn quadrupoles M. Marchevsky, D. W. Cheng, H. Felice, G. Sabbi, Lawrence Berkeley.
Development of the EuCARD Nb 3 Sn Dipole Magnet FRESCA2 P. Ferracin, M. Devaux, M. Durante, P. Fazilleau, P. Fessia, P. Manil, A. Milanese, J. E. Munoz.
MQXF Cable for Q1/Q3 D.R. Dietderich MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
HiLumi-LHC / LARP Conductor and Cable Internal Review October 16 th and 17 th 2013 H. Felice LARP Short Magnets Fabrication and Test experience relevant.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Progress Report on LQ Program Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Task Leaders: Fred Nobrega (FNAL) – Coils Jesse Schmalzle (BNL) – Coils.
HL-LHC Annual Meeting, November 2013HQ Planning – G. Sabbi 1 HQ Status and Plans G. Sabbi High Luminosity LHC Annual Meeting Daresbury, UK, November 11-14,
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
MQXF support structure An extension of LARP experience Helene Felice MQXF Design Review December 10 th to 12 th, 2014 CERN.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
Test Program and Results Guram Chlachidze for FNAL-CERN Collaboration September 26-27, 2012 Outline Test program Quench Performance Quench Protection Magnetic.
QXF quench heater delay simulations Tiina Salmi, T. Salmi.
1 Quench Protection Workshop - 04/29/2014 QXF heater design M. Marchevsky, D.W. Cheng (LBNL) E. Todesco (CERN) T. Salmi (Tampere UT) G. Chalchidze, G.
Helene Felice HQ Test Results Review Thursday December 16 th Overview of HQ coils and Magnet.
HQM01 Test Summary Outline -Magnet Instrumentation and Shim System -SG Data -Short Sample Limits -Quench Training at 4.6 K and 2.2 K -Ramp rate and Temperature.
Cold powering test results of MBHSP102 Gerard Willering, TE-MSC-TF With thanks to Jerome and Vincent and all others from TF for their contribution.
1 BNL -FNAL - LBNL - SLAC P. Wanderer IR’07 - Frascati 7 November 2007 U.S. LARP Magnet Programme.
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Dan Cheng, Xiaorong Wang 12/15/2015 MQXFA Connectors Discussion Part II.
MQXFS01 instrumentation, Projecting towards MQXFA D. Cheng, S. Myers, H. Pan, X. Wang 10/14/20151.
Sept. 29, 2008Rodger Bossert1 Quench Positions in TQC Models Rodger Bossert Technical Division Technical Memo #TD September 29, 2008.
HQ02A2 TEST RESULTS November 7, 2013 FERMILAB. HQ02 test at Fermilab 2  First HQ quadrupole with coils (#15-17, #20) of the optimized design o Only coil.
TQC03e Test Status  Magnetic measurements at 300 K  Z-scan at ±10 A  Magnetic measurements at 4.6 K (I max up to 6.5 kA)  Quench training and ramp.
LARP DOE Review, 7/9/2012Long Quadrupole – G. Ambrosio 1 Long Quadrupole Program Giorgio Ambrosio DOE Review of the LARP Program SLAC July 9-10, 2011 LQ.
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Many people contributed to this work, most of all the Long Quadrupole Task Leaders:
Answers to the review committee G. Ambrosio, B.Bordini, P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
LQM01 Test Summary Guram Chlachidze LARP CM16 Montauk, NY May 16-18, 2011.
MQXFSM1 results Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev 10 June 2015LARP meeting.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 Quench Protection of Long Nb 3 Sn Quads Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab.
LQS01a Test Results LARP Collaboration Meeting 14 Fermilab - April 26-28, 2010 Guram Chlachidze.
Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole for Linear Accelerators Progress Report V. Kashikhin for the FNAL Superconducting Magnet Team (presented.
MQXFS1 Protection heater delays vs. Simulations 9 May 2016 Tiina Salmi, Tampere university of technology Acknowledgement: Guram Chlachidze (FNAL), Emmanuele.
1 MQXFS Mirror Fabrication R. Bossert, G. Chlachidze, S. Stoynev HiLumi-LARP Collaboration Meeting May 11-13, 2015 FNAL.
CERN QXF Conductor Procurement and Cable R&D A.Ballarino, B. Bordini and L. Oberli CERN, TE-MSC-SCD LARP Meeting, Napa, 9 April 2013.
Cold powering test results of the 11 T cosθ model magnets at CERN Gerard Willering With thanks to Jerome Feuvrier, Vincent Desbiolles, Hugo Bajas, Marta.
LQ Test Results and Next Steps 1 st HiLumi LHC/LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN, November 2011 Guram Chlachidze.
MQXFPM1 and MQXFS1b Test Results
TQS Overview and recent progress
11T Magnet Test Plan Guram Chlachidze
Model magnet test results at FNAL
HQ Mirror Assembly R. Bossert
MQXF Goals & Plans G. Ambrosio MQXF Conductor Review
MBHSP02 test STATUS and first results
Quench Protection Measurements & Analysis
MQXF coil cross-section status
Detection thresholds in LARP Magnets
PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
MQXFS1e – PH-to-Coil hipot tests
Long term behavior and high-QI test in the MQXFS program
Long term behavior of MQXFS1
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
Hi-pot results summary
MBHSP109 Test results 11T technical meeting – EDMS number:
Presentation transcript:

MQXFS1 Test Results G. Chlachidze, J. DiMarco, S. Izquierdo-Bermudez, E. Ravaioli, S. Stoynev, T. Strauss et al. Joint LARP CM26/Hi-Lumi Meeting SLAC May 18-20, 2016

Introduction The very first test of a 150-mm diameter Nb 3 Sn quadrupole MQXFS1 Short model with 1.5-m long coils Coils fabricated both at CERN (#103 and #104) and LARP (#3 and #5) Previously LARP coil #2 successfully tested in a “mirror” configuration After the first cool down in November 2015 the magnet leads were damaged during the low current tests Investigating committee performed a thorough cause analysis of the incident Recommendations were made to increase safety of the test process The incident and findings of the investigating committee were discussed at meetings with the LARP and CERN colleagues The magnet and top plate power leads were replaced in a very short time Shorted-bus test was done to check new power leads of the top plate at currents up to 25 kA Thanks to coordinated and efficient efforts of the team the problem was well identified and fixed 2

Cable properties & SSL Estimates Coils made of Nb 3 Sn strand RRP 108/127 (#3 and #5) RRP 132/169 (#103 and #104) SSL at 1.9 K: 21.5 kA (coil #103) 3 Cable width, mm Cable mid. thickness, mm1.529 Keystone angle, degree0.518 Twistpitch, mm109 Number of strands40 Core 316 SS Short-sample CurrentFieldGradienCurrentFieldGradienNom. CurrentNom. GradientNom. Field% Iss 4.3 K 1.9 K kATT/mkATT/mkAT/mT% Coil Coil Coil Coil Magnet

Magnet Instrumentation LARP magnet instrumentation: Voltage taps on the IL and OL CERN and LARP SG systems (train gauges on the coils, rods and shell) Quench antenna Magnet is protected with the IL/OL PH 4 IL Heaters OL Heaters CERN coils LARP coils

Cool down and checkouts Controlled cool down: Temperature gradient less than 100 K between the magnet top and bottom 4 Days of cool down (a week of warm up) 120 m Ω dump resistor for initial checkouts, and 30 m Ω for the quench training 5

Quench Training Training at 1.9 K in TC1 with ramp rate of 20 A/s Highest quench current 18.1 kA or 84.2% of SSL at 1.9 K T/m, 12.5 T

Quench Training (cont’d) Coil azimuthal gauges exhibited unloading (coil separation from the pole) starting from the very first training quench Low pre-load during the magnet assembly Test plans changed: Avoid further training and proceed with the re-prioritized test plan, including quench at 4.5 K and TC2 for quench memory study Check magnet performance for increased pre-load (MQXFS1b) 7

Quench memory Same quench current reached in the first and one only ramp at 4.5 K ~ 93% of SSL In TC2 the magnet continued training from exactly the same place 8

Ramp rate dependence Only few quenches at different ramp rates to avoid further magnet training Quench at 400 A/s developed in the mid-plane, all others - in the pole area 9

Quench Locations Most quenches developed in coil #103 Coil #103 is a limiting coil from the SSL estimates 14 different segments participated in 19 quenches Still in training, low pre-load 10

Quench Locations (cont’d) Most of training quenches developed in the IL pole turn segments 2 quenches could be motion related 2 quenches in the ramp between the coil layers

Quench Locations (cont’d) Most of quenches originated from the pole turns, few – from the IL Pole block Quench antenna signals found very noisy. QA will be repaired and tested in MQXFS1b 12 Pole turns IL Pole block

RRR measurements 13 Coil #3 Coil #103Coil #104 Average measured RRR (witness sample RRR range) LARP coils #3: 250 ( ), and #5: 255 ( ) CERN coils #103: 135 ( ), and #104: 105 ( ) Coil #5

“Holding current” Tests Goal of the test is to demonstrate stable operation at the nominal (ultimate) current for an extended time period 8-hour “Holding current” tests were done at 1.9 K: No quench at I nom =16480 A No quench at I ultimate =17760 A 14

Quench Protection Study Quench protection plans also re-prioritized: Minimum heater power density to start a quench PH delay - Delay between heater firing and quench development Fast Extraction study Only CERN style PH were tested Reference heater test parameters were selected according to the expected values in the full-length MQXF magnet LARP heaters previously tested with the coil #2 in a “mirror” configuration MQXFSM1 LARP heater tests and other QP studies will be completed in MQXFS1b magnet test 15

Minimum power density Expected power density in long models (CERN style PH): 2-strips of OL in series per HFU – W/cm2 1 only IL strip per HFU W/cm2, 2-strips of IL in series – 59 W/cm2 16

Minimum energy density 17 Expected deposited energy density in long models (CERN style PH): 2-strips of OL in series per HFU – 2.7 J/cm2 1 only IL strip per HFU – 3.3 J/cm2, 2-strips of IL in series – 1.7 J/cm2 S. Izquierdo-Bermudez & E. Ravaioli

Heater delay study 18 S. Izquierdo-Bermudez, E. Ravaioli et al.

PH delay study (cont’d) 19 First comparison of the CERN and LARP heaters Coil #103 in MQXFS1 Coil #2 in MQXFSM1 Time constant of the Heater circuit (RC): 40ms/100ms in MQXFSM1 ~ 20ms in MQXFS1 2 IL strips fired in the “mirror” magnet, while only one - in MQXFS1 Comprehensive study of the LARP and CERN style heaters in MQXFS1b test

Splice Resistance Nb 3 Sn-NbTi splices measured in all coils: average resistance of 0.3 n Ω in LARP coils and 0.12 n Ω in CERN coils 20

Brief Summary The very first 150-mm diameter Nb3Sn magnet test was a success In some areas improvements are necessary to meet the design requirements The magnet exceeded the ultimate current of 17.8 kA which is 108% of the operating current, and demonstrated excellent quench memory in the 2 nd thermal cycle The magnet demonstrated stable operation at the nominal (16.5 kA) and ultimate (17.8 kA) currents - “holding current” tests for more than 8 hours Most of training quenches developed in the high field area – the IL pole turn segments The highest quench current was achieved in the very first ramp at 4.5 K, corresponding to about 93% of SSL 21

MQXFS1b Plans Due to possible coil separation, MQXFS1 test was interrupted Analysis of the SG data, and pre-load plans for MQXFS1b will be presented today Further study with increased pre-load will be done in MQXFS1b Effect of increased pre-load on quench training, especially above 18.2 kA Comprehensive quench protection study, including fast extraction tests Both the CERN and LARP SG systems will be utilized again SG system in long magnet will be selected based on test results in short models More exciting results are expected in July - MQXFS1b test There are even plans for MQXFS1c 22

Backup Slides 23

MQXFS1 vs. the “mirror magnet” 24