Student Success Initiative (SSI) SSI Manual Overview Lelah Moseley, M.Ed. Special Education Accountability Specialist Education Service Center, Region.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parents Need To Know About… HB 656 Georgia Academic Placement and Promotion Law Department for Assessment/Accountability, DeKalb County School System.
Advertisements

What Is Read to Achieve? Read to Achieve is part of the Excellent Public Schools Act It becomes effective school year The law can be accessed.
North Carolina Read to Achieve and Reading 3D K-3 Literacy Carolyn Guthrie, Director Regional Consultants Excellent Public Schools Act.
Participation in Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills.
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) is the current state assessment program that began in spring For students in grades.
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
2015 SpEd Assessment Updates TETN Event # Presented June 5, 2013 TEA’s Student Assessment Division.
Assessment Implications of HB 5 William Kelly Coordinator of Assessment and Evaluation.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
Understanding the IEP Process
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
February 19,  Introductions  Oklahoma Core Curriculum Tests  Scoring Categories  Reading Sufficiency Act  Possible Exemptions (7)  Probationary.
Parents Need To Know About… HB 656 Georgia Academic Placement and Promotion Law Revised 7/08, Department for Elementary Instruction, DeKalb County School.
Bilingual and ESL Programs: End of the Year Activities May 14, 2012 Closing out and Beginning
Alamance-Burlington Schools
Peaster Elementary. STAAR – What is it? State’s student testing program for Mathematics, Reading, Writing, and Science Emphasizes “readiness” standards,
LPAC overview - Fall 2004 The Language Assessment Process in Texas  LPAC, Language Assessment Proficiency Committee  ARD is the Admissions, Review and.
Annual Review Process for LPAC
ARD Training Education Service Center and School District Training TEA Student Assessment Division.
Language Proficiency Assessment Committee
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
1 School Year 2006–07 Accounting and Budgeting Committee Video Teleconference Kim Thompson OSPI - School Apportionment and Financial Services
Victoria Perez Licensed Specialist in School Psychology Intern/ Diagnostician for HHS.
Texas Administrative Code (TAC), Title 19, Part II Chapter 89. Adaptations for Special Populations, Subchapter BB. Commissioner's Rules Concerning State.
End of Year LPAC for Bilingual/ESL May 08, 2014 Presented by: Sue Banfield Yolanda Sarinana.
Minnesota Assessment System Update Jennifer Dugan “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Getting Ready for Fall Conferences - Parent-Friendly RSA - SB 346 – Third-Grade Graduation HB 2511 – Amendments to SB 346 HB 2516 – Amendments to SB 346.
Read to Achieve Newton Conover City Schools. What is the Goal? The goal of the State is to ensure that every student reads at or above grade level by.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program Montgomery County Schools August 5, 2013.
PREPARED BY DR. HAROLD SMITH EDAD 5399 Bilingual/ESL Education.
Program Overview: Focus- Assessment Bilingual Module 3 Presented by Marcee Camarillo Silvia Saldaña.
State Assessment Training February 8, 2013 Please don’t “ferget”, this training does not take the place of reading the appropriate manuals!
SB 149: Update and FAQ May 20, “While it is critical that the state appropriately holds public schools and districts accountable for delivering.
Instructional Accountability Presented by: Elementary-Isela Moreno & Veronica A. Brown Secondary-Olga Cantu & Christina S. Casanova.
STAAR & SSI February 7, 2013 Welcome to. STAAR & SSI STAAR stands for the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness STAAR is administered to students.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.
ARD Committee Decision-Making Process for the Texas Assessment Program Texas Education Agency Training for Education Service Centers.
TAKS-Alt ReportingInformation for Parents Copyright © 2007, Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. Reproduction of all or portions of this work is.
What You Need to Know about Special Education Graduation Mary Milham, Region 7 Specialist / / November 2010.
IDEA and NCLB Standards-Based Accountability Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’ Conference.
Testing & Accountability Update TAKS, EOC, & STAAR.
Grading Policy Review, Recommendation and Rationale March 13, 2012 Mr. Ray Gravuer.
North Carolina Read To Achieve Information for Parents of 3 rd grade students in Davidson County Schools.
Assessment Resources for Parents Brenda de la Garza Education Specialist School Improvement, Accountability and Compliance.
Read to Achieve Parent Presentation What is Read to Achieve? Read to Achieve was created in legislation and approved by the North Carolina.
North Carolina Read to Achieve. The Goal “The goal of the State is to ensure that every student read at or above grade level by the end of third grade.
Suggested training for region, district, and campus professionals 9/24/2014Texas Education Agency – Student Assessment Division 1.
MAKING ASSESSMENT DECISIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Presented by: Curriculum & Instruction Melissa Schramme, Supervisor of Elementary.
STAAR Decision Making Process for LPAC for Teachers.
STUDENT ASSESSMENT LISA COTTLE, DIRECTOR OF TEST ADMINISTRATION TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©
Literacy-Based Promotion Act & 3 rd Grade Summative Assessment Parent Information Night September 29, 2015.
 This presentation does NOT replace reading the Updated for Student Success Initiative Manual.
ARD Committee Decision-Making Process for the Texas Assessment Program (ARD Manual) Training presented at Special Education Assessments TETN.
Charter District Participation in the Student Assessment Program Lisa Cottle, Director of Test Administration Student Assessment Division Texas Education.
SSI Manual Update 1 April 12, SSIStudent Success Initiative GoalGSoal Ensure ALL students receive instruction and support to be academically successful.
A GUIDE FOR CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act
V: Maryland’s High School Assessments (HSAs) & the Bridge Plan for Academic Validation Overview.
» Students who meet the passing standard on STAAR must still meet all promotion requirements outlined in the district policy. We will review.
STUDENT SUCCESS INITIATIVE Districtwide Student Initiatives.
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Parent Academy September 17, 2016
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
North Carolina Read to Achieve A Guide for Parents to House Bill 950
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Advancing ELL Progress
North Carolina Read to Achieve
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Student Success Initiative (SSI) SSI Manual Overview Lelah Moseley, M.Ed. Special Education Accountability Specialist Education Service Center, Region 20 April 13, 2016

Background Information SSI was enacted as state law during the 76 th Legislative Session in 1999 and reauthorized during the 81 st Legislative Session in It ensures that students gain sufficient understanding of the knowledge and skills identified in the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills curriculum for reading and math.

Statutory Requirements The Student Success Initiative: requires that all students in the 5 th and 8 th grades pass both the reading and math state assessments in order to meet promotion requirements. NOTE: For school year, SSI requirements have been reinstated for math state assessments.

Statutory Requirements The Student Success Initiative: Requires schools to provide intervention and remediation instruction to students who do not pass these assessments after each administration. Requires schools to provide accelerated instruction/ intensive program of instruction to students who do not pass these assessments during the subsequent school year in order to close achievement gaps.

STAAR Reading & Math Tests – Includes STAAR-A and STAAR-L. What tests do they need to pass? (Spring 2016) STAAR Reading & Math Tests – Includes STAAR-A and STAAR-L. – STAAR-Spanish, where applicable 5 th Grade 8th Grade All students have 3 attempts to pass each test.

Student Success Initiative Manual

Table of Contents – pages i & ii Introduction – pages 2 – 6 Page 2- required accelerated instruction must occur after each administration of the assessment for which a student did not meet the passing standard, including the third administration.

Student Success Initiative Manual Introduction – pages 2 – 6 – Page 3 – A student who enrolls in the school up to the first test administration is subject to SSI requirements as long as he/she remains in the state. – Page 3 – A student who enrolls after the first administration from another state, private school, or homeschool is not subject to SSI requirements. – Applies to ALL students (Special Ed, 504, ELL, Dyslexia, and other related disorders)

Contains: Student Success Initiative Manual Parent Notification Brochures Required Math and Reading Forms Optional Math and Reading Forms SSI Website (TEA)

5 th Grade and 8 th Grade Testing Dates Math First Administration – March 29, 2016 Second Administration (Retest) – May 9, 2016 Third Administration (Retest) – June 21, 2016 Reading First Administration – March 30, 2016 Second Administration (Retest) – May 10, 2016 Third Administration (Retest) – June 22, 2016

Easy Reference Flowchart Page 8 Captures the entire SSI process in one flowchart. Quick reference for campus admin. Page 9-10 Timeline of events

1 st Administration Receive test results approx. 10 days after they are submitted to the state. – Electronic Confidential Rosters – April 19 th – Confidential Student Reports (CSR’s) – April 26th

Other Considerations Special Education – Page 26 After the first administration, if a special education student does not meet the standard, the ARD committee may waive the 2 nd administration and determine promotion or retention at that time. Flowchart for Special Education Services – Page 27

Met Standard vs. Did Not Meet Standard Students who meet standard: – Notification consists of CSR with attached SSI letter. Students who do not meet standard: – Begin accelerated instruction in preparation of the retest in May. – Parents should receive detailed notification: of test results consisting of CSR and attached SSI letter. What the intervention will consist of to include: time, date, how often, and with whom. – Parent/teacher conferences are recommended to discuss the possibility of retention and the process during the 2 nd and 3 rd administrations.

Absences Students who are absent and do not make-up the assessment: – Begin accelerated instruction in preparation of the retest in May. – Parents should receive detailed notification: of test results consisting of CSR and attached SSI letter. what the intervention will consist of to include: time, date, how often, and with whom. Students will participate in the 2 nd administration in May.

No more than a 10:1 ratio for small group intervention. Intervention offered outside of the regular school day requires district transportation for these students. Special Education – The ARD committee determines the level of accelerated instruction. This could either be a full ARD meeting or an amendment to the IEP. ELL – LPAC consultation is required. Required Accelerated Instruction

Texas Education Code (TEC) requires school districts to administer reading instruments to all students in kindergarten through second grade to assess their reading development and comprehension. The statute further requires that a school district implement an accelerated reading instruction program for students who are determined, on the basis of their reading instrument results, to be at risk for dyslexia or other reading difficulties. In the case of a student in special education who does not perform satisfactorily on a reading instrument, the student’s ARDC must determine the manner in which the student will participate in an accelerated reading instruction program. Accelerated Reading Instruction

2 nd & 3 rd Administrations Students who do not meet standard or are absent: – Parents should receive detailed notification: of test results consisting of CSR and attached SSI letter. Continue to receive accelerated instruction until the end of the school year. – Administrator schedules a Grade Placement Committee (GPC) meeting to discuss the students results, Accelerated Instruction Plan (AIP), Intensive Program of Instruction and/or possible retention. – Summer school details are discussed if applicable. – AIP/IPI plans are targeted to the individual needs of the student.

Grade Placement Committee Membership Principal Reading Teacher Parent(s) Additional support staff who provides accelerated instruction. (optional) Required members of ARDC and/or LPAC, as applicable ***Parents may participate via phone conference if unable to attend.

Grade Placement Committee Roles and Responsibilities Document minutes of meeting Membership present – Review Accelerated Instruction Plan (AIP)/ Intensive Program of Instruction and Test Results – Determine assessment decisions for 3 rd administration. – Explanation of Parent Waiver option. – Explanation of summer school requirements – Explanation of the SSI process to parent. Parent must receive a copy of the GPC minutes with attached SSI letter Keep signed copy in Student’s Permanent Record. Ensure report card states “Promotion Pending”

Special Populations The ARD committee serves as the GPC committee for students receiving special education services. – Accelerated Instruction/Intensive Program of Instruction MUST be documented in the IEP. The LPAC committee recommendations should be considered by the GPC committee for students identified as English Language Learners.

For students receiving special education services, an ARDC must make decisions regarding appropriate: Assessment Accelerated instruction/Intensive program of instruction Grade placement based on a student’s individual educational needs GPC for Students Receiving Special Education Services

If a student in special education who is in fifth or eighth grade does not perform satisfactorily on a reading or math state assessment, TEC requires that the student’s ARDC determine: the manner in which the student will participate in an accelerated instruction program; and whether the student will be promoted to the next grade or retained in the current grade. NOTE: The accelerated instruction must be provided to the student before the next administration of the applicable assessment. ARDC Determinations

For ELLs who are receiving special education services, the ARDC in conjunction with the LPAC makes the final decisions about assessment and grade placement, so that issues related to both the student’s disability and language proficiency are carefully considered. ELLs Receiving Special Education Services

Students in special education, including those who take alternate state assessments and those who are not required to pass state assessments in order to graduate, are not excluded from the laws requiring AI and IPI. The ARDC is responsible for determining the instructional interventions needed to assist the student in achieving the state academic standards and/or the standards set forth in the student’s IEP. The ARDC may address AI and IPI in an ARDC meeting. Alternatively, the school district and the student’s parent may agree to amend or modify the student’s IEP without an ARDC meeting in accordance with 34 CFR NOTE: Students participating in STAAR Alternate 2 are NOT subject to SSI grade-advancement requirements. Students Taking Alternate Assessments

Parent Waiver The parent has the option to waive the child’s third administration in the best interest of the child, however… 1.The student would automatically be retained. 2.The student would be required to continue accelerated instruction to include summer school if applicable. 3.ARDC must convene to discuss student’s grade placement for the next year, if applicable. The school/district may not initiate a waiver request.

Appeal Process If either parent initiates an appeal: The GPC reviews student performance data from a variety of sources. – Input from student’s teacher. – Student’s grades. – Other relevant academic information GPC members discuss anecdotal information regarding the student. Vote is taken – unanimous decision is required. All three parties must agree that given the right support and continued commitment to the Accelerated Instruction Plan and/or the satisfactory completion of the AIP, the students is certain to experience success in the next grade level or significantly decrease his/her achievement gap during the coming school year.

Appeal Process (cont.) Only the parent can appeal the automatic retention. The parent(s) consist of one vote along with the principal and the teacher. Three total votes. If the GPC does not unanimously agree to promote, then the student must be retained. Regardless of the appeal outcome, the GPC must design an AIP for the next school year that includes interim progress measure to measure student achievement growth.

TEC requires a school district to offer an intensive program of instruction to a student who does not perform satisfactorily on any state assessment instrument administered under TEC Subchapter B, Chapter 39. A recent amendment to the statute now requires that intensive instruction be provided to a student who is not likely to receive a high school diploma before the fifth school year following the student’s enrollment in grade nine, as determined by the school district. Intensive Programs of Instruction (IPIs)

In addition to accelerated instruction, an intensive program of instruction (IPI) must be provided for all students receiving special education services in grades (state assessment grades) who did not perform satisfactorily on statewide assessments or EOC instruments. The ARD committee must design the IPI to enable the student to attain a standard of growth on the basis of the student’s IEP. The IPI must be documented in the IEP and IEP objectives must be revised as appropriate. (TEC ) AIP & IPI Accelerated instruction (AI) is required for all students, both general education and students who receive special education services, who are at risk of academic failure. In accordance with the SSI, all students in grades 5 and 8 who did not meet minimum standards on state assessments must be provided additional accelerated instruction. The ARD committee will determine the manner in which the student receiving special education services will participate in the accelerated instruction. (TEC )

When designing an IPI, consider the following student data: STAAR results Previous diagnostic tests Classroom assessments Grades Teacher observation IEP Intensive Program of Instruction (IPI) Opportunity for Student-Led Conferences!!!!!

Questions?