Present status of the target and beam dump system at BigRIPS fragment separator Koichi Yoshida RIKEN High Power Targetry Workshop April 11 – 15, Oxford.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Preliminary studies for T2 primary target for the NA61 fragmentation beam run 11 th October 2010 – NA61 Collaboration Meeting M. Calviani on behalf of.

Advertisements

The Rare RI Ring Facility at RIKEN RI Beam Factory M. Wakasugi, and Rare RI Ring Collaborators RIKEN, Nishina Center, Japan ARIS2014.

Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.

First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.

The Current T2K Beam Window Design and Upgrade Potential Oxford-Princeton Targetry Workshop Princeton, Nov 2008 Matt Rooney.

1 CENTER for EDGE PLASMA SCIENCES C E PS Status of Divertor Plasma Simulator – II (DiPS-II) 2 nd PMIF Workshop Sep. 19, 2011 Julich, Germany H.-J. Woo.

Transient FEM Calculation of the Spatial Heat Distribution in Hard Dental Tissue During and After IR Laser Ablation Günter Uhrig, Dirk Meyer, and Hans-Jochen.

1 Design of Gridded-Tube Structures for the 805 MHz RF Cavity Department of Mechanical, Materials, and Aerospace Engineering M. Alsharoa (PhD candidate)

Ian Bailey Cockcroft Institute/ Lancaster University October 30 th, 2009 Baseline Positron Source Target Experiment Update.

Japan-US Workshop held at San Diego on April 6-7, 2002 How can we keep structural integrity of the first wall having micro cracks? R. Kurihara JAERI-Naka.

for a neutrinos factory

Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.

Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.

Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC LCLS RF Gun Thermal Analysis John Schmerge, SLAC November 3,

Target & Horns Fluxes were distributed. W/ J-PARC type 2.5 o, 2 o, 3 o. Target cooling evaluation and test Target stress analysis Serious stress analysis.

Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.

The JPARC Neutrino Target

1 THERMAL LOADING OF A DIRECT DRIVE TARGET IN RAREFIED GAS B. R. Christensen, A. R. Raffray, and M. S. Tillack Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department.

Scoping Study of He-cooled Porous Media for ARIES-CS Divertor Presented by John Pulsifer Major contributor: René Raffray University of California, San.

APS-DNP Fall20041 Design Studies for RIA Fragment Separators A.M. Amthor National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University Department.

Aug. 8-9, 2006 HAPL meeting, GA 1 Advanced Chamber Concept with Magnetic Intervention: - Ion Dump Issues - Status of Blanket Study A. René Raffray UCSD.

ILE, Osaka Concept and preliminary experiment on protection of final optics in wet-wall laser fusion reactor T. Norimatsu, K. Nagai, T. Yamanaka and Y.

M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski and M. D. Hageman Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Extrapolating Experimental Results for Model Divertor.

FETS-HIPSTER (Front End Test Stand – High Intensity Proton Source for Testing Effects of Radiation) Proposal for a new high-intensity proton irradiation.

Radiation Cooling of the ILC positron target LCWS 2014, Belgrade, Serbia 7 th October 2014 Sabine Riemann, DESY, Peter Sievers, CERN/ESS, Andriy Ushakov,

201 MHz and 805 MHz Cavity Developments in MUCOOL Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Nufact 2002 Workshop, London,

High-Power Density Target Design and Analyses for Accelerator Production of Isotopes W. David Pointer Argonne National Laboratory Nuclear Engineering Division.

Bias Magnet for the Booster’s 2-nd Harmonic Cavity An attempt to evaluate the scope of work based of the existing RF design of the cavity 9/10/2015I. T.

1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.

Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)

JPARC- Decay Volume M.Sakuda (KEK) 11 November Decay Volume Requirements Design 2. Construction Status 3. Summary and schedule In collaboration.

1 Positron Target R&D at KEK Plan and Status AD&I Meeting 2009/8/27 KEK Hybrid Target Test at KEKB Linac Liquid Lead Target Test at ATF Linac Window Test.

Synchrotron radiation at eRHIC Yichao Jing, Oleg Chubar, Vladimir N. Litvinenko.

High flux heat transfer in a target environment T.Davenne High Power Targets Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Science and Technology Facilities Council.

Positron Source General Update M. Kuriki(Hiroshima U./KEK) ALCW2015, April 2015,Tsukuba/Tokyo, Japan.

ICIS2015,Aug , 2015, New York, USA Further improvement of RIKEN 28GHz SC-ECRIS for production of highly charged U ion beam T. Nakagawa (RIKEN, Nishina.

BNL E951 BEAM WINDOW EXPERIENCE Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Neutrino Working Group Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Heavy Ion Accelerators for RIKEN RI Beam Factory and Upgrade Plans H. Okuno, et. al. (RIKEN Nishina Center) and P. Ostroumov (ANL) Upgrade Injector Low.

Consideration of Baffle cooling scheme

Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.

Radiation damage calculation in PHITS

ICIS2015 in NY Y.HIGURASHI Y. Higurashi (RIKEN Nishina center) 1.Introduction RIKEN RIBF and RIKEN 28GHz SC-ECRIS 2.Emittance measurements 1.4D.

Possibility to increase intensity of polarized hydrogen target Dmitriy Toporkov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia Spin Physics Workshop.

Solid Targets for Neutron Spallation Sources Eric Pitcher Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented to: AHIPA Workshop October 20, 2009.

1 Possibility to obtain a polarized hydrogen molecular target Dmitriy Toporkov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia XIV International.

1 CNS summer school 2002 The RI-Beam Factory and Recent Development in Superheavy Elements Search at RIKEN ◆ Brief introduction to the RI Beam Factory.

RF source, volume and caesiated extraction simulations (e-dump)

SKEKB Mini Work SKEKB Vacuum System – Arc Section – Contents Y.Suetsugu KEKB Vacuum Group 1.Beam Chambers 2.Pumps: Pump, Pressure,

Status: Cooling of the ILC e+ target by thermal radiation LCWS 2015, Whistler, Canada 3 rd November 2015 Felix Dietrich (DESY), Sabine Riemann (DESY),

Implantation rates at the focal plane of Super-FRS Some Simulations for AIDA Detectors.

The NSCL is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and Michigan State University. RIA R&D is funded in part by the U.S. Department of Energy.

The International Workshop on Thin Films. Padova 9-12 Oct of slides Present Status of the World- wide Fusion Programme and possible applications.

Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.

Recent progress of RIKEN 28GHz SC-ECRIS for RIBF T. Nakagawa (RIKEN) 1.Introduction RIKEN Radio isotope factory project 2.RIKEN 28GHz SC-ECRIS Structure(Sc-coils,

Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.

Ian Bailey Cockcroft Institute/ Lancaster University September 30 th, 2009 Baseline Positron Source Target Experiment Update LCWA09.

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS Legnaro National Laboratories Numerical simulation strategy for the SPES FEBIAD ion source INFN – CISAS collaboration.

Liquid targets for positron production - ??? Jerry Nolen Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory POSIPOL Workshop Argonne National Laboratory September.

SAMURAI magnet Hiromi SATO SAMURAI Team, RIKEN Requirements Geometry Magnetic field Superconducting coil and cooling system Present status of construction.

Chopper Beam Dump Thermal Problem 10/27/20101PX Linac FE Technical Discussions.

V. Raginel, D. Kleiven, D. Wollmann CERN TE-MPE 2HiRadMat Technical Board - 30 March 2016.

704 MHz cavity folded tuner Thermal Analysis C. Pai

IF Separator Design of RAON

Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ

of secondary light ion beams

STUDIES TOWARDS TARGET-HORN INTEGRATION Institute of Applied Mechanics

LH Generated Hot Spots on the JET Divertor

Thermal analysis Friction brakes are required to transform large amounts of kinetic energy into heat over very short time periods and in the process they.

Status of Equatorial CXRS System Development

Beam dump for J-Parc neutrino facility

Presentation transcript:

Present status of the target and beam dump system at BigRIPS fragment separator Koichi Yoshida RIKEN High Power Targetry Workshop April 11 – 15, Oxford

RI Beam Factory (RIBF) at RIKEN year Beam Intensity From Dr. Kamigaito ・ Operation of RIBF started in ・ Various ions from p to 238 U can be accelerated. ・ Maximum energy is 345MeV/n for heavy ions up to 238 U ・ Goal intensity is 1 pμA for all ions. Max. Power = 82 kW Goal 49 pnA => 4.0 kW 689 pnA => 11.4 kW 486 pnA * => 12.7 kW 123 pnA => 3.1 kW *fixed-energy mode with single-stage charge stripping SC-ECRIS(28GHz)+RILAC2 K700 fRC SRC

RI beam produced (400) for 115 experiments Production yield measured (1404) New isotope 2007, 2008 New isotope 2011 New isotope 2012 New isotope 2013 New isotope 2014 New isotope 2015 RI beam produced at BigRIPS (May 2007 – Dec 2015) Max. intensity 18 O1000 pnA 48 Ca689 pnA 70 Zn123 pnA 78 Kr486 pnA 124 Xe38 pnA 238 U49 pnA 238 U 124 Xe 78 Kr As of Dec A total of ~140 new isotopes identified so far. 70 Zn 48 Ca BigRIPS Fragment Separator From SRC Production & separation Particle identification & two-stage separation 1 st stage Wedg e Two-stage separator 2 nd stage Major features of BigRIPS 18O18O Production of RI beams ・ Projectile fragmentation ・ In-flight fission of 238 U beam Photo of 2 nd stage  Large acceptances ±50 mr, ±3%  Superconducting quadrupoles  Pole-tip radius = 17 cm, pole tip field = 2.4—2.5 T  Two-stage separator scheme  2 nd stage with high resolution  Max. Rigidity B  = 9 Tm

→2.9MW/m 2 10MW/m 2 154MW/m 2 109MW/m 2 →156MW/m 2 201MW/m 2 12MW/m 2 →1.7MW/m 2 18MW/m 2 39MW/m 2 A/Z=3.5 A/Z=2 238 U→ 100 Sn Target and Beam Dump: Beam Spot and Power Density Beam Power in Target (Be 1/3 Range) Prim.Beam 238 U ~ 48 Ca ~ 12 C 1p  A Trg.Thick 4.4 ~ 17.2 ~ 47.9 [mm] Be Trg.  E 19.7 ~ 3.2 ~ 0.9 [kW/1p  A] in  1mm 25.1 ~ 4.1 ~ 1.1 [kW/mm 2 ] in volume 5.7 ~ 0.2 ~ 0.02 [kW/mm 3 ] ・ Target Beam Spot Size: Small  ~1mm (fwhm) Target Thickness : various thicknesses necessary Optimum thickness ~ 1/3 of the Range. but depends on the experimental request. Material: Be, C, W, Pb, etc. Melt. Point 1284, 3600, 3382, 328 o C ・ Beam Dump placed inside and exit portion of D1 magnet Beam Spot Size, Power Density varied as RI beam setting. R= B  beam / B  separator for the case of 238 U 345MeV/n with 4.4mm Be target, Rotating wheel target with water cooling Stationary system with highly efficient water cooling Beam Power( 238 U 345MeV/n,1p  A=82kW) is dissipated in a target and a beam dump. A/Z=3 R=0.5 R=0.75 R=0.8 R=0.9 R=1.1 R=1.25 R=1.5

Design of the target system Made by Dr. Atsushi Yoshida, Toshiyuki Kubo, 2002 – 2006 Nucl. Instr. Meth. A521(2004)65 Nucl. Instr. Meth. A590(2008)204 Nucl. Instr. Meth. A655(2011)10 Sustainable for a 238 U beam at 345 MeV/n, 1p  A Heat Load for 4mm Be target: 17.8 kW  1 mm beam spot : 22.7 kW/mm kW/mm 3 ANSYS Simulation ->  300 mm rotating disk with water cooling Step-shape disk target: various thicknesses Thin disk Thick disk Beam Air-press. Box Target vacuum chamber double-piped shaft water-cooled disk ANSYS (FEM code) simulation T(water ch.)=25C

6 BigRIPS Target System with maintenance cart target chamber Beam 1m access tunnel *Size : φ30cm *Material : Be, W *Step shaped edge 20,15,10 mm thick for N, Ca, Ar beams 10, 7, 5 mm thick for Kr, Xe, U beams 4, 3,, 2 mm thick for U beam Disk target : for High-power beam  Be : 20,15,10 mm thick Ladder target : for Low-power beam Target ladder (fixed target) *Diameter : ~ 20 mm *Thickness : 1 ~ 20, ~ 60 mm The water way is cut in the ladder. Rotating Target

Design of Beam Dump 6.2MW/m 2 4.4MW/m 2 7.9MW/m MW/m 2 20MW/m 2 1.8MW/m MW/m 2 Surface: 242 ℃ Water side:160 ℃ Surface: 369 ℃ Water side:154 ℃ T max = 248 ℃ T max = 394 ℃ T max = 192 ℃ T max = 126 ℃ Reduces Power density Prolongs effective length by 1/sinθ sin 20°= 0.34 sin 6° = 0.1 A Cu-Ag swirl tube with a INCONEL swirl ribbon A Cu screw tube M8 Twist Ratio=3 (24mm) ・ Cooling tubes with high heat transfer coefficient ・ Tilted Wall By N. Fukuda, H. Mizoi, K. Yoshida, and T. Kubo Beam stops in a wall of cooling channel High pressure 1 MPa High Velocity 10 m/s Critical Heat Flux. ~55 MW/m 2 NIM B317(2013)373

T max = 350 ℃ （ Rad. Damage) Critical Heat Flux (Strong vaporization of cooling water, 55 MW/m 2 ) BigRIPS Beam Dump Acceptable Beam Power (kW) BigRIPS Acceptance 136 Xe 124 Xe 238 U 86 Kr 78 Kr 48 Ca 40 Ca 238 U(effective) R = Bρ_beam / Bρ_RI beam Operation Limit: a) Critical Heat Flux at cooling channel b) Radiation Damage : T > 350 deg. effect is large. Beam dump accept most of the beam except for 238 U. charge state distribution of 238 U 89,90,91+ after the target helps to reduce the heat density. A special exit beam dump for an intense 238 U beam 1 mm Wall thickness to improve the cooling power (design only) Inner dump Exit dump Wall thickness: 3 mm (can stop 18 O beam) Cu-Cr-Zr Of-Cu Cu-Ag

Current Status of the target and beam dump system Construction and Installation was finished at 2006, and operation was started at (beam intensity is low) Designs of target and beam dump system were based on thermal model simulation. Tests for the cooling power were performed by monitoring the beam spot temperature in parallel with operations. Up to 2014, fixed targets (ladder) were used for experiments. In 2015, rotating targets started for using for experiments. From 2014, effective tests of cooling power became possible. (beam intensity) year Beam Intensity Goal 49 pnA => 4.0 kW, 1.6kW(Be 7mm) 689 pnA => 11.4 kW, 2.2kW(rot Be 15mm) 486 pnA => 12.7 kW, 3.4kW(rot Be 10mm) 123 pnA => 3.1 kW, 1.4kW(Be 12mm) SC-ECRIS(28GHz)+RILAC2 K700 fRC

Beam-spot temperature measurement Beam Target chamber (upper view) (1) Fiber (2) CCD (3) IR, Telescope Sapphire view port & Lenz unit mounted on the Target chamber Temperature ( ℃ ) deg (1) Infrared Fiber Scope (2) IR thermal image camera 12m distance Spot (φ5mm) temperature only Used as on-line monitor 2m up IR camera: Very weak for radiation Can be used only for a short time. IR-FAIX ~ 500 ℃ InGaAs(1.55μm) TVS-8500 AVIO (Japan) Temp. Calib. Heater+Be plate, TC Spatial resolution (1px =0.5mm) 0.5mm slit -> 2mm(H), 3mm(V)

Ladder target (fixed target) Rotating target Be 30mm 、 283pnA 、 1.9kW 234 ℃ Be 15mm 、 280pnA 、 0.88kW 282 ℃ Be 15mm, 420pnA, 100rpm 1.3kW Beam spot 84 ℃ Beam spot temperatures for 48 Ca 345MeV/n Beam

Beam spot temperatures for various beam 238 U +Be 124 Xe +Be 78 Kr +Be 48 Ca +Be Be MP (1278 ℃ ) 238 U +W 124 Xe +W 78 Kr +W 48 Ca +W W MP (3387 ℃ ) rot W (ANSYS) rot Be (ANSYS) 345 MeV/n, 1 p  A Beam Be fixed (Cylindrical Model, Beam spot  1 mm) Deposited Power/target thickness is relatively well measure. Various combination of beams and target thicknesses  Tr1 : Beam Spot Temp. = Tr2 + Qin*Ln(r2/r1) /(2πκLtg ) Qin = Ibeam * dE ∝ dE / Ltg (( Cylindrical model )) analytical model Fixed Target: agree with a simple cylindrical model -> heat transfer coeff. Is not important? some data are higher -> thermal contact between target and ladder is bad? ANSYS calc. -> Zeren Korkulu’s talk Rotating Target: higher temperature than the initial estimation -> need detailed simulations Extensive simulations with ANSYS are now undergoing.

Beam spot size 4.5x x x23.6 Heat density (MW/m 2 ) Cooling water speed (m/s) Max. Temp ( ℃ ) ： Max. Temp at cooling channel( ℃ ) ： Thermocouple Temp.( ℃ ) ： Max heat flux at cooling channel(MW/m 2 ): Temperature measurement with 48 Ca 345MeV/n 500pnA (8.3kW) Thermo-couples mounted on the exit beam dump Beam 2 mm behind the surface fixed Dump: Position change Change the beam optics -> various beam spots, Heat densities : good agreements

Beam Spot size 3.0x x x27.2 Heat Density(MW/m2) Cooling water speed(m/s) Max temp.( ℃ ) ： Max temp. at cooling channel( ℃ ) : Thermocouple Temp.( ℃ ) ： Max. Heat flow at cooling cha.(MW/m2): Water velocity dependence 3-10 m/s Good agreements -> estimation of heat transfer coefficients is appropriate.

Summary & Outlook BigRIPS target system and beam dump system is overviewed. Validation of the design is on going by using intense beams available at RIBF. – For target Temperature of fixed target : Scattered Observed temperatures of rotating target are higher than expected. Further simulations are necessary. Need to figure out the reasons – For Beam dump good agreements of measurements with thermocouples and simulations were obtained. Suggest the estimation of heat transfer coefficients are correct. Highest temperature (surface) have not yet be measured. Accuracy of the estimation of beam spot is not well. Thermal camera to monitor the dump surface is highly desired. Thermal stresses and fatigues for the target and beam dump need to be considered.