1 MP2015-05-23-001 Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. MP 2015-05-23-001:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ion Heating and Velocity Fluctuation Measurements in MST Sanjay Gangadhara, Darren Craig, David Ennis, Gennady Fiskel and the MST team University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Advertisements

PPPL,NFRI Study of Error Field and 3D Plasma Response in KSTAR J.-K. Park 1, Y. M. Jeon 2, In collaboration with J. E. Menard 1, K. Kim 1, J. H. Kim 2,
NSTX S. A. Sabbagh XP615: Active Stabilization of the Resistive Wall Mode at Low Aspect Ratio  Goals (Part I):  Operate new RWM feedback system on 0.9–1.0.
1 J-W. Ahn a H.S. Han b, H.S. Kim c, J.S. Ko b, J.H. Lee d, J.G. Bak b, C.S. Chang e, D.L. Hillis a, Y.M. Jeon b, J.G. Kwak b, J.H. Lee b, Y. S. Na c,
13th IEA/RFP Workshop – Stockholm October 9-11, D characterization of thermal core topology changes in controlled RFX-mod QSH states A. Alfier on.
XP810 and 801 report, Feb 08 slide 1 Buttery, Gerhardt, La Haye, Sabbagh June 2008 reporting meeting – XP810 and 801 experiment: 801: Marginal island width.
HEAT TRANSPORT andCONFINEMENTin EXTRAP T2R L. Frassinetti, P.R. Brunsell, M. Cecconello, S. Menmuir and J.R. Drake.
Fast imaging of global eigenmodes in the H-1 heliac ABSTRACT We report a study of coherent plasma instabilities in the H-1 plasma using a synchronous gated.
NSTX The Resistive Wall Mode and Beta Limits in NSTX S. A. Sabbagh 1, J. Bialek 1, R. E. Bell 2, A. H. Glasser 3, B. LeBlanc 2, J.E. Menard 2, F. Paoletti.
Recent Results from the STOR-M Tokamak A.Hirose, M. Dreval, S. Elgriw, O. Mitarai(1), A. Pant, M. Peng(2), D. Rohraff, A.K. Singh(3), D. Trembach, C. Xiao.
NSTX S. A. Sabbagh XP501: MHD spectroscopy of wall stabilized high  plasmas  Motivation  Resonant field amplification (RFA) observed in high  NSTX.
Profile Measurement of HSX Plasma Using Thomson Scattering K. Zhai, F.S.B. Anderson, J. Canik, K. Likin, K. J. Willis, D.T. Anderson, HSX Plasma Laboratory,
J A Snipes, 6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting, Tarragona, Spain 4 – 6 July 2005 TAE Damping Rates on Alcator C-Mod Compared with Nova-K J A Snipes *,
NSTX XP830 review – J.W. Berkery J.W. Berkery, S.A. Sabbagh, H. Reimerdes Supported by Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL.
NSTX SAS – APS DPP ‘05 Supported by Office of Science S.A. Sabbagh 1, A.C. Sontag 1, W. Zhu 1, M.G. Bell 2, R. E. Bell 2, J. Bialek 1, D.A. Gates 2, A.
S.A. Sabbagh for NSTX Macrostability TSG Macrostability TSG Suggested FY-12 Milestones – Address key ReNeW issues for ST development 1) Assess sustained.
The toroidal current is consistent with numerical estimates of bootstrap current The measured magnetic diagnostic signals match predictions of V3FIT Comparisons.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
SMK – ITPA1 Stanley M. Kaye Wayne Solomon PPPL, Princeton University ITPA Naka, Japan October 2007 Rotation & Momentum Confinement Studies in NSTX Supported.
XP1518: RWM PID control optimization based on theory and experiment S. A. Sabbagh, J.W. Berkery, J.M Bialek Y.S. Park, (et al…) Department of Applied Physics,
Non-axisymmetric Control Coil Upgrade and related ideas NSTX Supported by V1.0 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U.
Active resistive wall mode and plasma rotation control for disruption avoidance in NSTX-U S. A. Sabbagh 1, J.W. Berkery 1, R.E. Bell 2, J.M. Bialek 1,
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
NSTX IAEA FEC 2006 PD: S.A. Sabbagh 1 Supported by Office of Science S.A. Sabbagh 1, R. E. Bell 2, J.E. Menard 2, D.A. Gates 2, A.C. Sontag 1, J.M. Bialek.
2 The Neutral Particle Analyzer (NPA) on NSTX Scans Horizontally Over a Wide Range of Tangency Angles Covers Thermal ( keV) and Energetic Ion.
1 NSTX-U/KSTAR 2013: Stability/rotation results for plasmas at/near n = 1 limit (S.A. Sabbagh, et al.)Oct. 21 st, 2013 High beta, MHD, and non-resonant.
Workshop on MHD Control 2008 – O.Katsuro-Hopkins Computational analysis of advanced control methods applied to RWM control in tokamaks Oksana N. Katsuro-Hopkins.
PPPL International Collaboration Activities J. R. Wilson Head Off-site Research Department Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 4th US-PRC Magnetic Fusion.
CHI Run Summary for March 10-12, 31 & April 9, 2008 Flux savings from inductive drive of a Transient CHI started plasma (XP817) R. Raman, B.A. Nelson,
Investigation of fast ion mode spatial structure in NSTX N.A. Crocker, S. Kubota, W.A. Peebles (UCLA); E.D. Fredrickson, N.N. Gorelenkov, G.J. Kramer,
Study of NSTX Electron Density and Magnetic Field Fluctuation using the FIReTIP System K.C. Lee, C.W. Domier, M. Johnson, N.C. Luhmann, Jr. University.
NSTX EXPERIMENTAL PROPOSAL - OP-XP-825 Title: HHFW Heating/CD phase scans in D L-mode plasmas P. Ryan, J. Hosea, R. Bell, L. Delgado-Aparicio, S. Kubota,
Measurement of toroidal rotation velocity profiles in KSTAR S. G. Lee, Y. J. Shi, J. W. Yoo, J. Seol, J. G. Bak, Y. U. Nam, Y. S. Kim, M. Bitter, K. Hill.
NSTX WZ – XP524 - NSTX Results Review ‘05 Supported by Office of Science Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT.
NSTX XP818: ELM mitigation w/midplane coils - SAS S. A. Sabbagh, J-K. Park, T. Evans, S. Gerhardt, R. Maingi, J.E. Menard, many others… (joint ELM mitigation.
1 Stability Studies Plans (FY11) E. Fredrickson, For the NCSX Team NCSX Research Forum Dec. 7, 2006 NCSX.
1 L.W. Yan, Overview on HL-2A, 23rd IAEA FEC, Oct. 2010, Daejeon, Republic of Korea HL-2A 2 nd Asia-Pacific Transport Working Group Meeting ELM mitigation.
XP1020: Determination of Weak RWM Stability Rotation Profiles J.W. Berkery, S.A. Sabbagh, H. Reimerdes Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University,
Steady State Discharge Modeling for KSTAR C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory US-Korea Workshop - KSTAR Collaborations, 5/19-20/2004.
Dependence of Pedestal Structure on Ip and Bt A. Diallo, R. Maingi, S. Zweben, B.P. LeBlanc, B. Stratton, J. Menard, S. Gerhardt, J. Canick, A. McClean,
NSTX XP818: ELM mitigation w/midplane coils – SAS, JKP, RM, SG XP818: Exploratory approach to finding ELM mitigation solution with midplane non-axisymmetric.
NSTX XP1031: MHD/ELM stability vs. thermoelectric J, edge J, and collisionality -NSTX Physics Mtg. 6/28/10 - S.A. Sabbagh, et al. S.A. Sabbagh 1, T.E.
Solenoid Free Plasma Start-up Mid-Run Summary (FY 2008) R. Raman and D. Mueller Univ. of Wash. / PPPL 16 April 2008, PPPL 1 Supported by Office of Science.
Edge Turbulence in High Density Ohmic Plasmas on NSTX K.M. Williams, S.J. Zweben, J. Boedo, R. Maingi, C.E. Bush NSTX XP Presentation Draft 5/25/06.
Non-linear MHD modelling of RMPs with toroidal rotation and resonant and non-resonant plasma braking. M.Becoulet G. Huysmans, E. Nardon Association Euratom-CEA,
SMK – APS ‘06 1 NSTX Addresses Transport & Turbulence Issues Critical to Both Basic Toroidal Confinement and Future Devices NSTX offers a novel view into.
NSTX Sabbagh/Shaing S. A. Sabbagh 1, K.C. Shaing 2, et al. XP743: Island-induced neoclassical toroidal viscosity and dependence on i Supported by Columbia.
Page 1 Alberto Loarte- NSTX Research Forum st - 3 rd December 2009  ELM control by RMP is foreseen in ITER to suppress or reduce size of ELM energy.
1 NSTX EXPERIMENTAL PROPOSAL - OP-XP-712 Title: HHFW Power Balance Optimization at High B Field J. Hosea, R. Bell, S. Bernabei, L. Delgado-Aparicio, S.
1 Peter de Vries – ITPA T meeting Culham – March 2010 P.C. de Vries 1,2, T.W. Versloot 1, A. Salmi 3, M-D. Hua 4, D.H. Howell 2, C. Giroud 2, V. Parail.
Development and Assessment of “X-point limiter” Plasmas M. Bell, R. Maingi, K-C. Lee Coping with both steady-state and transient (ELM) heat loads is a.
Scaling experiments of perturbative impurity transport in NSTX D. Stutman, M. Finkenthal Johns Hopkins University J. Menard, E. Synakowski, B. Leblanc,R.
1 ISTW 2015: Global MHD Mode Stabilization and Control for Disruption Avoidance ISTW 2015: Global MHD Mode Stabilization and Control for Disruption Avoidance.
Pedestal Characterization and Stability of Small-ELM Regimes in NSTX* A. Sontag 1, J. Canik 1, R. Maingi 1, J. Manickam 2, P. Snyder 3, R. Bell 2, S. Gerhardt.
NSTX SAS – GMS Mtg. 12/1/04 S. A. Sabbagh and J. E. Menard NSTX RWM Active Feedback System Implementation Plan Discussion NSTX Global Mode Stabilization.
NSTX S. A. Sabbagh XP452: RWM physics with initial global mode stabilization coil operation  Goals  Alter toroidal rotation / examine critical rotation.
NSTX XP802 review - S.A. Sabbagh S.A. Sabbagh 1, R.E. Bell 2, S. Gerhardt 2, J.E. Menard 2, J.W. Berkery 1, J.M. Bialek 1, D.A. Gates 2, B. LeBlanc 2,
Tuomas Tala 1/16 ITPA TC Meeting, Princeton, USA 5 October – 7 October 2009 T. Tala (JET, DIII-D), W. Solomon (DIII-D, JET, NSTX) and S. Kaye, L.F. Delgado-
Supported by Experimental studies of ion-scale fluctuations via microwave imaging reflectometry in KSTAR 5 th EAST-Asia School and Workshop (EASW) on Laboratory,
NSTX S. A. Sabbagh XP407: Passive Stabilization Physics of the RWM in High  N ST Plasmas – 4/13/04  Goals  Define RWM stability boundary in (V , 
TH/7-1Multi-phase Simulation of Alfvén Eigenmodes and Fast Ion Distribution Flattening in DIII-D Experiment Y. Todo (NIFS, SOKENDAI) M. A. Van Zeeland.
XP723: Momentum transport and the effect of rotation on confinement Make use of n=3 NRMP for rotation braking in various degrees Steady-state application:
1 Edge Characterization Experiment in High Performance (highly shaped) Plasmas R. J. Maqueda (Nova Photonics) R. Maingi (ORNL) V. Soukhanovskii (LLNL)
NSTX XP1062 (NTV) team review: 9/16/10 - S.A. Sabbagh, et al. S.A. Sabbagh, R.E. Bell, J.W. Berkery, S.P. Gerhardt, J-K Park, et al. XP1062: NTV behavior.
Physical Characteristics of Neoclassical Toroidal Viscosity in Tokamaks for Rotation Control and the Evaluation of Plasma Response S. A. Sabbagh 1, R.E.
NSTX S.A. Sabbagh S.A. Sabbagh 1, R.E. Bell 2, J.E. Menard 2, D.A. Gates 2, J.M. Bialek 1, B. LeBlanc 2, F. Levinton 3, K. Tritz 4, H. Yu 3 XP728: RWM.
Effects of external non-axisymmetric perturbations on plasma rotation L. Frassinetti, P.R. Brunsell, J.R. Drake, M.W.M. Khan, K.E.J. Olofsson Alfvén Laboratory,
T. Tala (JET, DIII-D), W. Solomon (DIII-D, JET, NSTX), S
ELM Control in Application of Non-Axisymmetric Magnetic Perturbations
Successful ELM Suppressions in a Wide Range of q95 Using Low n RMPs in KSTAR and its Understanding as a Secondary Effect of RMP YoungMu Jeon1 J.-K. Park2,
Presentation transcript:

1 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. MP : Isolation of NTV torque profile: Dependence on plasma collisionality and NTV offset rotation – BRIEF summary S.A. Sabbagh 1, Y.-S. Park 1, Y. Jeon 2, Y.S. Bae 2, J.G. Bak 2, J. Chung 2, S.H. Hahn 2, H. Han 2, Y. In 2, J.H. Kim 2, J.Y. Kim 2, J. Ko 2, W. Ko 2, J.G. Kwak 2, J. Lee 2, Y.K. Oh 2, H.K. Park 3, K.C. Shaing 4, H.L. Yang 2, S.W. Yoon 2, G. Yun 3 1 Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA 2 National Fusion Research Institute, Daejeon, Korea 3 UNIST, Ulsan, Korea 4 National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan presented at the NSTX-U Physics Meeting PPPL October 6 th, 2015 Princeton, NJ V1.0 Special thanks! (those marked in red)

2 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. MP aims to compute NTV profile accurately using IPS, also dependence, and offset Motivation  For the first time on KSTAR, the new IPS will allow the accurate isolation of the non-resonant NTV torque profile, with quantitative comparison of experiment to theory  Additional attention to NTV parameters: Dependence of NTV profile on plasma collisionality and q variation Measurement of NTV offset rotation Overall Goals (see full MP write-up for all detail)  Use KSTAR’s new IPS power supply to perform an isolated measurement of the NTV torque profile for the first time  test multiple applied field spectra  Complete our long-standing proposal in KSTAR to determine the dependence of the isolated NTV torque profile on plasma collisionality Use SMBI to maximize * variation in a unique way with the IPS Compare this directly to past NSTX XPs, and new a joint NSTX-U experiment (NSTX-U XP1517 Sabbagh, et al.) as part of our international collaboration  Use an innovative technique to measure the NTV offset rotation on KSTAR for the first time

NSTX NSTX-U Team Review: XP1517: NTV at reduced collisionality (independent coil control) (S.A. Sabbagh, et al.)July 1 st, 2015 NSTX-U i * ~ 1 NSTX NSTX-U 3 NSTX-U XP1517: Neoclassical toroidal viscosity at reduced collisionality “on deck” as joint experiment  Motivation  Experimentally, the dependence of neoclassical toroidal viscosity (NTV) at low collisionality needs further study  Understanding important for NSTX-U V  control, other tokamaks, future devices  Goals / Approach  Examine the dependence of NTV on ion collisionality expected to increase with decreasing i from present experiments, and theory  Determine if superbanana plateau increase of NTV depends on i  Operate with pre-programmed n = 2, 3 applied fields for V  feedback control testing at reduced i  Addresses  NSTX Milestones R(15-3), closed-loop rotation control with 3D fields  Joint experiment with KSTAR NTV strength varies with plasma collisionality,  B 2, rotation plasma rotation T i 5/2 K.C. Shaing, et al., PPCF 51 (2009) NTV force in “1/ ” collisionality regime 1/aspect ratio (compare to KSTAR) K.C. Shaing, M.S. Chu, C.T. Hsu, et al., PPCF 54 (2012) “offset” rotation

4 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. KSTAR experiment to be compared to experiments on NSTX/NSTX-U, part of our international collaboration Utilize technique similar to pioneering NSTX experiments, most recent validated analysis, using full Shaing theory Experimental -dL/dt NN NSTX NTVTOK code n = 2 coil configuration x1.7 n = 3 coil configuration Experimental -dL/dt NTVTOK NN NSTX x0.6 (S.A. Sabbagh, R.E. Bell, T.E. Evans, et al., IAEA FEC 2014 paper EX/1-04)

5 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. KSTAR In-Vessel Control Coil (IVCC) + new power supply in 2015 enabled this experiment New high bandwidth power supply (IPS) for 2015  4 SPAs for 3D field control; 1 SPA for n = 0 control  Each SPA can deliver 5 kA current (~ coil rating); 500V  DC to 1 kHz bandwidth  Can run steady-state  PCS control  Physics / engineering design strongly guided by Columbia U. / PPPL collaboration KSTAR IVCC, vessel, sensors (VALEN model) MPs ~8,000 finite elements

6 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. KSTAR IVCC and the IPS: Subset of the patch panels set up for 2015 TOP MIDDLE BOTTOM Coil Arrays TOP MIDDLE BOTTOM n = 2 or 1 n = 1 This patch panel was used (applied 6 different spectra including n = 1 pitch-aligned and non-pitch-aligned)

7 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. MP : Isolation of NTV torque profile: Brief summary 20 “clean” shots with ~ 20s pulse duration taken in total  Gives 20 x 9 x 2 = 360 opportunities to measure the isolated NTV torque profile  Rotating MHD not apparent, so resonant braking by modes not an issue  Could be the most comprehensive NTV database – still, we almost, but did not fully complete shot list (due to time constraint)  Data / analysis could compete for an IAEA 2016 oral presentation Significant variation of key parameters  (  B 3D /B), q 95 (from ), collisionality (T i altered significantly), V   Six 3D field spectra run (n = 2 and n = 1 pitch-aligned/non-pitch-aligned) Key diagnostics – with some pleasant (significant) surprises!  CES (absolutely required); also MSE and Thomson available

8 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. MP Isolation of NTV torque profile, plasma collisionality and offset rotation: shot plan Task Number of Shots 1) Use KSTAR’s new IPS power supply to perform an isolated measurement of the NTV torque profile (Target: Bt = 2.0T  13300), (INCREASE Bt = 2.6T), (DECREASE Bt = 1.5T); MXD-121C patch panel) A) Generate H-mode target plasma at Bt = 2.6T (reload shot 13300)1 B) Reload (increasing IVCC steps, separate spectra) run at Bt = 2.61 C) Reload (decreasing IVCC steps, separate spectra) run at Bt = 2.61 D) Reload (increasing IVCC steps, combined spectra) run at Bt = 2.61 E) Reload (decreasing IVCC steps, combined spectra) run at Bt = 2.61 (With Bt = 2.6T, GO TO step 2 first, then: F) Repeat steps A) – E) with B T = 1.5T5 2) Determine the dependence of the isolated NTV torque profile on plasma collisionality, using SMBI (use target plasma established from above step) A) Reload 13305, (set Bt = 2.6T) use divertor gas puffing to increase density1 B) Reload 13305, (set Bt = 2.6T) but move SMBI timing back to 120 ms before the IVCC pulse1 C) Repeat steps (2A) and (2B) at Bt = 2.0T and 1.5T4 (NOTE: These shots will have CONSTANT IVCC current step levels determined by step (1C) above; also rerun steps (1D and 1E) with CONSTANT IVCC current step levels, but at a different IVCC current value) 3) Use an innovative technique to measure the NTV offset rotation on KSTAR for the first time A) Generate control shot that will start up with OH and ECH only (targets: 13379, 13412)1 B) Control shot using specific ECH and NBI waveforms, no 3D applied field 1 C) Vary 3D applied field (one IVCC level per shot is expected) – HIGHEST IVCC current first 3 V T (2 shots only) 1.7 T (not enough time to run) Not needed

9 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. MP Isolation of NTV torque profile: Considerations for run (illustration of SMBI + 3D field) Setting up varied 3D field spectra (MXD-121C patch panel)   B/B variation with IVCC current steps  Vary the spectrum in each group of steps  Take shots with combined non-resonant spectra Varying collisionality  B T, I p variation; natural density evolution  SMBI (cold); divertor gas puffing NTV offset rotation – target plasma  2015 shots: 13379, Accomplished (q 95 ~ 5.0, 6.2, 8.2) Still to do (in red) SMBI delivery successful, increased small mode, then 3D field applied 40ms later apparently leads to mode lock SMBI 3D field dB/dt from one of the new (2015) RWM sensors

10 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. MXD-121C patch panel chosen to allow wide investigation of 3D field spectra, including relative alignment to 2D field pitch Non-pitch aligned has lower Br n = 1 field overall, broad region ~ 10G Combined n = “Field pitch aligned” (+180deg phasing) Combined n = “Field pitch non-aligned” (0 deg phasing) ++–– ––++ +–+– T M B n = 1 n = 2 n = 1 ++–– ++–– +–+– T M B

11 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. Single spectrum waveforms run to isolate NTV profile IPS provided fast IVCC current rise time  ~ 3 ms to maximum current << momentum diffusion time Step the IVCC as many times as plasma pulse length allows  Vary applied field magnitude and spectrum (2 or three steps using n = 2 midplane; n = 1 non-pitch-aligned; n = 1 pitch-aligned  ALL in one shot if possible)  Take second shot, changing the order of the IVCC current steps t(s) Ip (MA) NBI Three IVCC levels per spectrum; Three spectra / shot were run NBI dropouts for CES (~ 0.66 Hz) A B B A 0.75s steps n = 2 mid (4.5s duration) 0.75s steps n = 1: 0 deg (4.5s duration) 0.75s steps n = 1: 180 deg (4.5s duration) t(s) Ip (MA) NBI NBI dropouts for CES (~ 0.66 Hz) n = 1: 0 deg (4.5s duration) n = 1: 180 deg (4.5s duration) n = 2 mid (4.5s duration)

12 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. NTV effect has been successfully isolated with the new IPS! Increasing field strength = stronger NTV  Shown by change in |dVp/dt|  |dVp/dt| changes vs. R – NTV PROFILE Altered field spectrum alters NTV “Non-pitch-aligned” n = 1 field apparently provides stronger braking (!) n = 2 mid n = 1: 0 deg “non-aligned” n = 1: 180 deg “pitch-aligned” Channel 2 Channel 12

13 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. Combined spectrum waveforms run: isolate NTV profile Shots with COMBINED non-resonant field spectra (n = 2 + n =1 non-pitch-aligned  Vary applied field magnitude fixed combined spectrum (n = 2 midplane; n = 1 non-pitch-aligned:  ALL in one shot if possible)  Take second shot, changing the order of the IVCC current steps t(s) Ip (MA) NBI NBI dropouts for CES (~ 0.66 Hz) A B 0.75s steps n = 2 mid, n = 1, 0 deg (non-pitch-align) (4.5s duration) 0.75s steps t(s) Ip (MA) NBI NBI dropouts for CES (~ 0.66 Hz) B A n = 2 mid, n = 1, 0 deg (non-pitch-align) (4.5s duration) n = 2 mid, n = 1, 180 deg (pitch align) (4.5s duration) Three IVCC levels per spectrum; Three spectra / shot were run

14 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. NTV successfully isolated for COMBINED n = 2 + n = 1 spectra Increasing field strength = stronger NTV  Shown by change in |dVp/dt|  |dVp/dt| changes vs. R – NTV PROFILE Altered field spectrum alters NTV Again, “non-pitch-aligned” n = 1 field apparently provides stronger braking Channel 2 Channel 12 n = 2 mid, n = 1, 0 deg (non-pitch- aligned) n = 2 mid, n = 1, 180 deg (pitch aligned) saturation indicates non-resonant NTV

15 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. Isolate NTV torque profile: collisionality scan waveforms Shots with COMBINED non-resonant field spectra (n = 2 + n =1 non-pitch- aligned)  Varied collisionality through director gas puffing  Varied profiles with H-L transitions t(s) Ip (MA) NBI NBI dropouts for CES 0.75s steps n = 2 mid, n = 1, 0 deg (non-pitch-align) (4.5s duration) 0.75s steps t(s) Ip (MA) n = 2 mid, n = 1, 0 deg (non-pitch-align) (4.5s duration) n = 2 mid, n = 1, 180 deg (pitch align) (4.5s duration) Divertor Gas Injection Changed levels Three IVCC levels per spectrum; Three spectra / shot were run

16 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. NTV for COMBINED n = 2 + n = 1 spectra, q 95 =8.2, NO gas puff Increasing field strength = stronger NTV Altered field spectrum alters NTV Some H-L transitions – can take NTV before, and sometimes after transition Again, “non-pitch-aligned” n = 1 field apparently provides stronger braking Channel 2 Channel 12 n = 2 mid, n = 1, 0 deg (non-pitch- aligned) n = 2 mid, n = 1, 180 deg (pitch aligned) H-L transition

17 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. NTV for COMBINED n = 2 + n = 1 spectra, q 95 =8.2, w/gas puff Channel 2 Channel 12 n = 2 mid, n = 1, 0 deg (non-pitch- aligned) n = 2 mid, n = 1, 180 deg (pitch aligned) H-L transitions Increasing field strength = stronger NTV Altered field spectrum alters NTV Some H-L transitions – can take NTV before, and sometimes after transition Generally effect of gas puff is noticeable in NTV braking (need further analysis)

18 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. Innovative technique to measure the NTV offset rotation on KSTAR for the first time - waveforms Schematic of approach to measure NTV offset rotation profile Determine NTV offset velocity profile using an innovative approach with ECH and NBI  Also, to be compared to an experiment proposed on NSTX-U (2016) Run with two 3D field spectra and compare  Run n = 2 field at midplane  Run n = 1 non-pitch-aligned off-midplane Target plasmas  2015 shots: 13379, (time did not allow us to run this)

19 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. Brief summary of “control room” observations and hypotheses KSTAR NTV as observed in these new, isolated NTV shots  Initial observation: strong resonant MHD modes have been avoided  Initial observation: pitch aligned 3D field does not have stronger NTV  Observation indicates no strong amplification due to kink response  Observation: NTV profile is global, non-resonant, no huge variations  Initial observation: NTV profile of combined spectra might be understood by simple superposition of applied field (analysis needed)  Working Hypothesis: NTV depends primarily on |  B|,, not on resonant effects, particulars of resonances, or alignment with 2D field Experience from NSTX ( theory/experiment verification 10 years old!)  Non-resonant NTV is robust, not strongly dependent on profile details  No strong resonant effects – unless strong resonant MHD is present Essential plan to complete this data was (nearly) completed! Great data! Further detailed comparison to past dedicated NSTX, and new joint NSTX-U NTV experiments, will yield further understanding of NTV in tokamaks

20 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. MP : Isolation of NTV torque profile – Diagnostics Required diagnostics / capabilities  Equilibrium magnetics, ECH, full NBI power  IVCC coils in Mixed 1/2/1C patch panel (n = 2 (mid), n = 1 (top/bot))  Toroidal rotation measurement (CES, X-ray crystal)  Ion temperature (CES)  Toroidal Mirnov array / between-shots spectrogram with toroidal mode number analysis  SMBI (cold)  ECE, ECEI Desired diagnostics / capabilities  Thomson scattering (T e, n e ); MSE  Interferometer (line avg. n e evolution)  Locked mode detectors (all positions)  fast camera MSE acquired for all shots taken Acquired. Density profile will help provide a reasonably accurate NTV profile calculation

21 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. Supporting Slides Follow

22 MP Isolation of NTV - * variation, offset 10/6/15 – S.A. Sabbagh, Y.-S. Park, (Columbia U.), Y. Jeon, (NFRI) et al. Resonant effects, hypothesized in some publications, are not observed in NSTX – due to finite gryo-radius/banana width T NTV (theory) scaled to match peak value of measured -dL/dt  Scale factor ((dL/dt)/T NTV ) = 0.6 (for case shown above) – O(1) agreement  NO plasma amplification of 3D field in these calculations Experimental -dL/dt NTVTOK code NN NSTX n = 3 coil configuration Published in Sabbagh, et al., IAEA FEC 2014 paper EX/1-4 Can explain why strong resonances are not observed Further analysis of KSTAR data from this experiment should provide further support, or different understanding  Present “control room” analysis seems to support non-resonant nature of NTV Theory without banana-width averaging with banana-width averaging