The PEFA Framework – a tool for monitoring government performance ICGFM – New Developments in Governmental Financial Management Miami, May 19-22, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The PEFA Program – and the PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington DC, May 1, 2008 Bill Dorotinsky IMF.
Advertisements

3. PEFA Update Conclusion/Recommendations: –Comment clearly in repeat assessments on changes in performance –No adjusting of earlier scores even when grounds.
Basel Convention Regional Centres Handbook By Nelson Sabogal.
Application of the PEFA Framework at country-level Issues for consideration PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington DC November 2006 Franck.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
THE APRM MONITORING PROCESS MOZAMBIQUE EXPERIENCE Workshop on Harmonizing the Zambian APRM NPoA with the NDP and MTEF Oct. 2014, Lusaka 1.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework Professional Standards Committee May 2014 Presented By IDI.
The PEFA Program - an Overview
Module 5.3 Measuring the performance of PFM systems.
PEFA as a Platform for Improving Public Financial Management
The PEFA Indicators – How are they being used Actionable Governance Indicators Course - April 29 th, 2010 Frans Ronsholt PEFA Secretariat.
Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Introduction to the framework and lessons learned from its use in Mozambique Health Sector Tanzania, February.
ADB Support of Public Procurement Reform Presented By: Amr J. Qari, Procurement Specialist Seventh Regional Public Procurement Forum, May , 2011.
SAIs’ Role in Enabling Legislative and Citizen Oversight Franck Bessette, World Bank, Abu Dhabi, May 2013.
IPC Global Strategic Programme ( ) IPC Global Partners: IPC REGIONAL Strategic Programme IPC Regional Steering Committee Meeting – March.
The PEFA Program – and the PFM Performance Measurement Framework
Budget Community of Practice (BCOP) Update on Progress Konstantin Krityan, BCOP Chair, BCOP plenary meeting, Armenia February 2015.
1 The PEFA Framework – rationale, adoption and use Jim Brumby, World Bank PEMPAL Plenary Plus Istanbul, February 27, 2008.
PFMRP Phase IV Brief Overview  PEFA, other diagnostic reports along with the CAG and PAC reports provided the frame of reference for development of PHASE.
BPK Strategic Planning: Briefing for Denpasar Regional Office Leadership Team Craig Anderson Ahmed Fajarprana August 11-12, 2005.
3 rd meeting of the DAC Joint Venture on Procurement, Tanzania, 6 May 2008 Draft OECD Recommendation on Enhancing Integrity in Public Procurement Elodie.
February 21, JAS Consultation between the Government of Tanzania and Development Partners February 21, 2006 Courtyard Hotel, Dar es Salaam.
Moving PFM reforms forward: A Strengthened Approach PEM reforms in PRSP countries from Europe and Central Asia Warsaw, February 6-9, 2005 David Biggs DFID.
“Procurement Reforms and Capacity Building: Embedded in Public Financial Management” HLF on Public Procurement Reforms in Africa: Tunis Nov 2009.
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY (PEFA)-PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK Module 4: The Assessment Process, Stakeholders Involvement & Quality.
CPIA 2006 Q13: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management BBL Ivor Beazley/Steve Knack, 6 December 2006.
Measuring PFM Performance The PEFA program and tool CReCER Managua, October 29-31, 2012 Charles Seibert, PEFA Secretariat.
The Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM reforms Applying the PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington, D.C., January 17-18, 2007 Bill Dorotinsky.
A short introduction to the Strengthened Approach to supporting PFM reforms.
Pilot Joint Learning Study Integrity in Public Procurement in Morocco Elodie Beth, Administrator OECD Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate.
Recent Developments of the PEFA Program Video-conference of the PEMPAL BCOP PEFA Working Group February 20, 2009 Frans Ronsholt Head of PEFA Secretariat.
SECRETARIAT WORK PROGRAMME 2009 PARIS21 Steering Committee meeting OECD Conference Centre 6 November 2008.
… THE OPEN BUDGET INDEX and other indicators of accountable public financial management ICGFM 2008 Miami Conference May 20, 2008 Pamela Gomez Project Leader.
Page 1 Budget Execution and Financial Accountability Course January 10-12, 2005 Country PFM Performance Measurement and Monitoring Nicola Smithers PEFA.
The World Bank PREM Public Sector Governance Page 1 Follow-up Actions by Donors and Countries ~ The case of PEFA ~ Session: “What Governments are Doing.
Regional Centers for Evaluation Capacity Development Regional Centers for Evaluation Capacity Development A Multilateral Initiative June 2009.
PEFA in Latin America: comparison with other regions EU Workshop December 2012 PEFA Secretariat 1.
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Ministry of Finance and Treasury Donor Coordination Forum Meeting The Report on progress on Adherence to the Principles of the Paris.
EuropeAid 1 Update on development of the PPCM Guidance.
Page 1 The PFM Performance Measurement Framework A Tool for PFM Performance Measurement and Monitoring Workshop on Applying the PFM Performance Measurement.
An Update on On-Going TG Activities Thursday, March 8, :30-2:00PM PRESENTED BY: LILI LIU & KAI KAISER.
Module 5.2: PFM diagnostic tools and the PEFA INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT.
TREASURY OF GEORGIA – MISSION AND FUNCTIONS Nino Tchelishvili June, 2016 Chisinau, Moldova.
PEFA FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Module 9: Comparisons over time & between countries.
PEFA FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Module 8: Use of PEFA Assessments for Reform formulation & monitoring 1.
Improving public financial management. Supporting sustainable development. PEFA and fiscal transparency OECD CESEE SBO Ljubljana, Slovenia July 8, 2016.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
Country Level Programs
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
PFM Reform Programmes Presentation by Mary Betley
Budget Transparency A New, Global Toolkit
A Tool for PFM Performance Measurement and Monitoring
PEFA 2016 Slides selected from the training materials of the PEFA secretariat.
Public Financial Management Performance Measurement Framework
ZAMBIA PEFA EXPERIENCE
Budget Transparency The New Global Toolkit
THE OPEN BUDGET INDEX and other indicators of accountable PFM
The PEFA Program – roll-out, impact and future focus
PEMPAL – Facilitating Practical Solutions in PFM across ECA
Moving PFM reforms forward: A Strengthened Approach
Public Financial Management Performance Measurement Framework
PEFA 2016 Slides selected from the training materials of the PEFA secretariat.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Finding A Common Scale: An Overview of PFM Performance Indicators
Information Session Brussels, 7 November 2018.
The Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM reforms
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
What do PEFA assessments tell us about intergovernmental fiscal relations? PEMPAL plenary meeting of BCoP March 14—16, 2018; Vienna, Austria.
Ministry of National Economy of The Republic of Kazakhstan
Seventh Regional Public Procurement Forum, May , 2011
Presentation transcript:

The PEFA Framework – a tool for monitoring government performance ICGFM – New Developments in Governmental Financial Management Miami, May 19-22, 2008 Frans Ronsholt, Head of PEFA Secretariat

What is the PEFA Framework Global Roll-Out A country case PEFA support to users Content

What is the PEFA program? PEFA Public Expenditure & Financial Accountability Objective: Results orientation in development of PFM systems & harmonization of PFM analytical work Established: in 2001 by seven agencies. Today working in tandem with the 25 members of OECD-DAC Joint Venture on PFM Initial target: creation of a common information pool on PFM performance at country level Tool: the PFM Performance Measurement Framework, developed by PEFA and launched in June 2005

PFM Performance Framework (or PEFA) Framework PFM Performance Indicators: –31 high-level indicators, covering the entire budget management cycle and all PFM subjects. PFM Performance Report: –the context; the evidence; the analytical summary Indicator scoring on a 4-point ordinal scale, based on: –Objective and transparent criteria –Evidence (not perception) –Internationally recognized good PFM practice Assessing systems performance –not policy; not causes in detail

What can countries use the PEFA Framework for? Inform PFM reform formulation, priorities Monitor results of reform efforts Harmonize information needs for external agencies around a common assessment tool Compare to and learn from peers

Implementation modality Country focus and decision –Application of the PEFA Framework is entirely decentralized to the country level (if, when, how to use Framework) Inclusiveness –All stakeholders can be involved and any agency can in principle undertake any role in its implementation; it does not ‘belong’ to any organization Supported by a neutral body - the PEFA Secretariat –offers support to any user of the Framework without representing a particular interest –does not undertake or finance assessments –support is free of charge

PEFA Assessment: roll-out trend

Geographical distribution

PEFA Framework adoption Very good progress – globally –Completed in 72 countries, ongoing in a further 10 Increasingly used for Sub-National gov’t –India, Pakistan, Colombia, Tanzania, Uganda, Ethiopia –Guidelines for SN application issued March 2008 High country coverage in many regions –Africa and Caribbean > 80% of countries –Latin America, Eastern Europe, Asia, Pacific 40-60%

Country case - Mozambique PEFA incorporated in PFM reform monitoring system –baseline 2005, repeat assessment 2007, planned follow-up 2010 Important performance improvements in budget execution –revenue administration, cash management, internal controls Improvements resulted from: –Reforms already well under way in 2005 (e.g. IFMIS/SISTAFE and revenue administration) –Small managerial/admin changes (including quick-wins identified on the basis of 2005 assessment) –New reform initiatives in pay-roll control (identified from the 2005 assessment as an important neglected area of reform)

Country case - Norway Findings of Norad-managed self-assessment presented to OECD- DAC in December 2007 The assessment showed low scores for seven areas of PFM system performance Ministry of Finance reaction: –Weaknesses in procurement practices and follow-up to external audit findings need to be addressed. –Three areas of low scoring not considered priority at present (Multi-year program/sector budgeting, Limited extent of internal audit, no consolidated overview of risks from autonomous agencies and public corporations) –Two indicators scored low but are municipal responsibilities; central government will not get involved.

Services provided by the PEFA Secretariat

Support to assessment managers Support tools on the website ( List of completed, ongoing and planned assessments – updated periodically Links to completed reports, when public Support on request: Advice / Video-conference briefings to country teams on assessment planning List of consultants with PEFA experience Review of terms of reference Quality reviews of draft assessment reports

Support to Assessors Support tools on the website: The Framework (English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Russian, Arabic) Calculation spreadsheets for some indicators Guidance on information / evidence for assessment Clarifications and additional guidance on indicators Training materials Support on request: Indicator interpretation and other advice to assessors during implementation

Stay in touch with PEFA Visit our website: Send us questions: Get on our news distribution list: Send us your name and address

Thank you for your Attention