Electron Cloud Modeling for the Main Injector Seth A. Veitzer 1 Paul L. G. Lebrun 2, J. Amundson 2, J. R. Cary 1, P. H. Stoltz 1 and P. Spentzouris 2 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BUILD-UP SIMULATIONS FOR DAFNE WIGGLER W/ ELECTRODES Theo Demma.
Advertisements

Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
1 Warp-POSINST is used to investigate e-cloud effects in the SPS Beam ions Electrons Spurious image charges from irregular meshing controlled via guard.
March 14-15, 2007ECloud Feedback, IUCF1 Electron-Cloud Effects in Fermilab Booster K.Y. Ng Fermilab Electron-Cloud Feedback Workshop IUCF, Indiana March.
Effects of reflections on TE-wave measurements of electron cloud density Kenneth Hammond Mentors: John Sikora and Kiran Sonnad.
Sub-THz Component of Large Solar Flares Emily Ulanski December 9, 2008 Plasma Physics and Magnetohydrodynamics.
ECLOUD Calculations of Field Gradients During Bunch Passage Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Electron Cloud.
An Introduction to Breakdown Simulations With PIC Codes C. Nieter, S.A. Veitzer, S. Mahalingam, P. Stoltz Tech-X Corporation MTA RF Workshop 2008 Particle-in-Cell.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
Simulations of Neutralized Drift Compression D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation Albuquerque, NM S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National.
Introductio n The guiding of relativistic laser pulse in performed hollow plasma channels Xin Wang and Wei Yu Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics,
VORPAL for Simulating RF Breakdown Kevin Paul VORPAL is a massively-parallel, fully electromagnetic particle- in-cell (PIC) code, originally.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
By Jeffrey Eldred Data Analysis Workshop March 13th 2013 Intro to Electron Cloud: An experimental summary.
2 Lasers: Centimeters instead of Kilometers ? If we take a Petawatt laser pulse, I=10 21 W/cm 2 then the electric field is as high as E=10 14 eV/m=100.
1 Electron Cloud Measurements at the Fermilab Main Injector Bob Zwaska Fermilab ECloud07 Workshop April 9, 2007.
RF particle acceleration Kyrre N. Sjøbæk * FYS 4550 / FYS 9550 – Experimental high energy physics University of Oslo, 26/9/2013 *k.n.sjobak(at)fys.uio.no.
STRIPLINE KICKER STATUS. PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1.Design of a stripline kicker for beam injection in DAFNE storage rings. 2.HV tests and RF measurements.
TE Wave Measurements Of Electron Cloud At CesrTA J. Byrd, M. Billing, S. De Santis,M. Palmer, J. Sikora ILC08 November 17 th, 2008.
Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.
1 ECE 480 Wireless Systems Lecture 3 Propagation and Modulation of RF Waves.
Electron Cloud Simulations Using ORBIT Code - Cold Proton Bunch model April 11, 2007 ECLOUD07 Yoichi Sato, Nishina Center, RIKEN 1 Y. Sato ECLOUD07.
25-26 June, 2009 CesrTA Workshop CTA09 Electron Cloud Single-Bunch Instability Modeling using CMAD M. Pivi CesrTA CTA09 Workshop June 2009.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
1 Electron Cloud Cyclotron Resonances for Short Bunches in a Magnetic Field * C. M. Celata a, Miguel A. Furman, J.-L. Vay, and Jennifer W. Yu b Lawrence.
The Magnetic Field The force on a charge q moving with a velocity The magnitude of the force.
Building an Electron Cloud Simulation using Bocca, Synergia2, TxPhysics and Tau Performance Tools Phase I Doe SBIR Stefan Muszala, PI DOE Grant No DE-FG02-08ER85152.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Travelling Wave Tube For Broadband amplifier helix TWTs (proposed by Pierce and others in 1946 ) are widely used For High average power purposes the.
March 23, 2010 CMAD a tracking and e-cloud beam instability parallel code (M.Pivi SLAC) Taking MAD(X) optics file at input, thus tracking the beam in a.
Nonlinear Optics in Plasmas. What is relativistic self-guiding? Ponderomotive self-channeling resulting from expulsion of electrons on axis Relativistic.
Electron cloud in the wigglers of ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
S.A. Veitzer H IGH -P ERFORMANCE M ODELING OF E LECTRON C LOUD E FFECT AND RF D IAGNOSTICS SIMULATIONS EMPOWERING YOUR INNOVATIONS 1 MEIC Collaboration.
Physics of electron cloud build up Principle of the multi-bunch multipacting. No need to be on resonance, wide ranges of parameters allow for the electron.
Self-consistent non-stationary theory of multipactor in DLA structures O. V. Sinitsyn, G. S. Nusinovich, T. M. Antonsen, Jr. and R. Kishek 13 th Advanced.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
CERN, LIU-SPS ZS Review, 20/02/ Brief review on electron cloud simulations for the SPS electrostatic septum (ZS) G. Rumolo and G. Iadarola in LIU-SPS.
RF source, volume and caesiated extraction simulations (e-dump)
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
Electron cloud measurements and simulations at CesrTA G. Dugan, Cornell University 4/19/09 TILC09 4/18/09.
Progress on electron cloud studies for HL-LHC A. Axford, G. Iadarola, A. Romano, G. Rumolo Acknowledgments: R. de Maria, R. Tomás HL-LHC WP2 Task Leader.
Simulation of multipacting thresholds G. Iadarola and A. Romano on behalf of the LIU-SPS e-cloud team LIU SPS scrubbing review, 8 September, 2015.
Microwave Measurement of Recycler Electron Cloud: Jeffrey Eldred 12/19/14.
Prepared by M. Jimenez AT Dept / Vacuum Group, ECloud’04 Future Needs and Future Directions Maximizing the LHC Performances J.M. Jimenez …when Nature persists.
Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
FCC-hh: First simulations of electron cloud build-up L. Mether, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo FCC Design meeting.
Simulations of turbulent plasma heating by powerful electron beams Timofeev I.V., Terekhov A.V.
LIU-SPS e-cloud contribution to TDR Electron cloud meeting, 17/02/20141 o First draft by end of February Between 5 to 10 max pages per chapter, refer.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
Prepared by M. Jimenez AT Dept / Vacuum Group, ECloud’04 ELECTRON CLOUDS AND VACUUM EFFECTS IN THE SPS Experimental Program for 2004 J.M. Jimenez Thanks.
F. Caspers, S. Federmann, E. Mahner, B. Salvant, D. Seebacher 1.
RFA Simulations Joe Calvey LEPP, Cornell University 6/25/09.
3 February 2010 ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort Mauro Pivi SLAC on behalf of ILC DR working group on e- cloud ILC DR Webex Meeting Jan 3, 2010.
Generation of anomalously energetic suprathermal electrons by an electron beam interacting with a nonuniform plasma Dmytro Sydorenko University of Alberta,
Electron Cloud Studies at DAFNE Theo Demma INFN-LNF Frascati.
Progress and Plans for Main Injector beam Pipe Coatings Dave Capista Linda Valerio Project X Collabration Meeting WG3 MI/Recycler September 8, 2010.
Benchmarking Headtail with e-cloud observations with LHC 25ns beam H. Bartosik, W. Höfle, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo.
Peter Stoltz Tech-X Corp. collaborators: J. Cary, P. Messmer (Tech-X)
Electron Cloud Measurement Summary for the April 2014 Run
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
J.A.Crittenden, Y.Li, X.Liu, M.A.Palmer, J.P.Sikora (Cornell)
Measurement of Electron Cloud Density Using Microwaves
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
A Mapping Approach to the Electron Cloud for LHC
2. Crosschecking computer codes for AWAKE
Presentation transcript:

Electron Cloud Modeling for the Main Injector Seth A. Veitzer 1 Paul L. G. Lebrun 2, J. Amundson 2, J. R. Cary 1, P. H. Stoltz 1 and P. Spentzouris 2 1 Tech-X Corporation 2 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Project X Collaboration Meeting FermiLab September 8-9, 2010 Part of this work is being performed under the auspices of the Department of Energy as part of the ComPASS SCiDAC project (DE-FC02-07ER41499) and through the Small Business Innovation Research program

New Simulation Models Help Us Understand Electron Cloud Effects Electron cloud effect may seriously limit future accelerator performance Simulations of electron cloud effects in the Main Injector will aid design for Project X Electron cloud growth rate depends on Secondary Electron Yield (SEY) parameters, bunch intensity, and magnetic field configuration Recent simulations using VORPAL have focused on modeling cloud buildup in different sections of the Main injector (field-free, dipole, quadrupole) over many bunch crossings We have also modeled the effect of different SEY models on long- timescale cloud buildup Microwave injection experiments may be able to diagnose cloud density and evolution. VORPAL simulations are able to connect side-band observations with electron cloud effects VORPAL is a 1-D, 2-D, and 3-D self-consistent plasma simulation code that runs on laptops up to leadership class high-performance clusters These electrodynamic simulations include embedded cut-cell geometry, self-consistent EM fields, kinetic particles, and secondary electron emission

VORPAL Simulation Parameters We have modeled electron clouds in the Main Injector with short and long beam pipe geometries Elliptical cross section with embedded cut-cell boudaries 2.34 cm minor axis & 5.88 cm major axis Short configuration:.25 m with 384 x 48 x 48 (885k) cells Long configuration: 16 m with 6144 x 48 x 48 (14.15M) cells 5 m dipole -> quadrupole -> field free -> dipole Typical Cell Size: 2.6 x 1.1 x 2.7 mm Proton bunch is Gaussian, about 0.3 m long and 3 mm radius, with 0.7x10 10 to 3x10 11 protons/bunch and a bunch spacing of 18.8 ns Simulation time was between hundreds of ns to about a microsecond Short configurations were run on a small Tech-X cluster (32 processes) Long configurations were run on Intrepid (512 processes)

Recent Ecloud Simulation Results In field free regions, clouds evolve to more uniform densities In dipole regions, electrons evolve into vertical striped patterns In quadrupole regions, electron density shows an X pattern Non-uniform cloud density has a significant feedback on theory Connection between rf side band amplitudes and phase shifts assume uniform density clouds N. Eddy, Project X Collab. Meeting 2009

Recent Ecloud Simulation Results Clouds are attracted to the positive potential of the beam, and are accelerated to beam pipe walls, where they may produce secondary electrons Cloud density saturates when the density averaged over a few bunch crossings is constant Here, the beam bunch intensity is 0.7x10 11 m -3, and the beam is offset by 5 mm, giving rise to an asymmetric cloud density P. Lebrun, IPAC10

Recent Ecloud Simulation Results At the beginning of the relaxation phase, just after a bunch has passed, the spatially averaged cloud density is at a maximum At the beginning of a bunch crossing, secondary electrons are just migrating away from the beam pipe walls, and average cloud density is at a minimum With 10x10 11 protons/bunch, the peak volume-averaged density is approximately 2.4x10 13 m -3 The linear cloud density over 1  of the bunch is about 75% of the average linear density of the proton bunch P. Lebrun, IPAC10 max min

Comparison of Secondary Electron Models Used in Simulations Cloud buildup depends intimately on the secondary electron model We have considered two models; The Vaughan model and the Furman-Pivi model. Both the shape of the SEY curve and the value of the maximum of the SEY contribute to the electron cloud growth rate In VORPAL, we can model the SEY as either Vaughan or Furman-Pivi, and rescale the maximum of the SEY Furman-Pivi (copper) Vaughan (stainless steel)

SEY Model Comparisons The cloud saturates quickly when the maximum SEY is large (red) FP model with SEY max = 2.0 (purple) V model with with SEY max = 3.6 Slower growth is seen when the maximum SEY is lower (blue) V model with SEY max = 1.8 (green) V model with SEY max = 1.0 Decay time is about 40 ns in the dipole case, not short enough to kill the electron cloud in between Main Injector bunch trains 300 ns ~ 1/4 MI revolution period P.H. Stoltz, SciDAC 2010

Current and Future Research Comparison between 2-D electrostatic and 3-D electromagnetic simulations Modeling electron clouds as a dielectric plasma instead of kinetic particles Detailed modeling of BPM and other diagnostic responses to traveling wave microwave signals Measure realistic beam pipe responses to traveling wave microwave diagnostics

Comparison between 2-D electrostatic and 3-D electromagnetic simulations Modeling electron clouds as a dielectric plasma instead of kinetic particles Detailed modeling of BPM and other diagnostic responses to traveling wave microwave signals Measure realistic beam pipe responses to traveling wave microwave diagnostics Current and Future Research

Comparison between 2-D electrostatic and 3-D electromagnetic simulations Modeling electron clouds as a dielectric plasma instead of as kinetic particles Detailed modeling of BPM and other diagnostic responses to traveling wave microwave signals Measure realistic beam pipe responses to traveling wave microwave diagnostics Current and Future Research - Provides significant speedup over kinetic PIC simulations, while maintaining accuracy in phase and frequency shifts due to the plasma - Allows for inclusion of magnetic fields in a natural way, through a dielectric tensor - Since the plasma dielectric depends on the plasma density (via the plasma frequency) it is straightforward and accurate to simulate non-uniform density clouds - Captures the frequency dependence of the plasma response to microwaves - The Courant condition remains unchanged, but no particle push! - Plasma dielectric model is only valid for cold plasmas, but it is possible to relax the conditions on collisionless plasmas

Comparison between 2-D electrostatic and 3-D electromagnetic simulations Modeling electron clouds as a dielectric plasma instead of as kinetic particles Detailed modeling of BPM and other diagnostic responses to traveling wave microwave signals Measure realistic beam pipe responses to traveling wave microwave diagnostics Current and Future Research - Currently we have modeled BPM response by measuring the voltage at the BPM location - An offset beam will exhibit an echo effect if the electron cloud density is comparible to the linear beam density - FFT response of BPM voltages showed that the electron cloud weakly resonated at the cutoff frequency of the beam pipe in a dipole section -Better modeling of BPMs, RFAs, and even optical detection of electron-wall interactions are needed

Comparison between 2-D electrostatic and 3-D electromagnetic simulations Modeling electron clouds as a dielectric plasma instead of as kinetic particles Detailed modeling of BPM and other diagnostic responses to traveling wave microwave signals Measure realistic beam pipe responses to traveling wave microwave diagnostics Current and Future Research - Microwaves injected into the beam pipe can measure the electron cloud density, which appears as side bands when the plasma modulates the rf wave - However, reflections and power dispersion in actual beam pipes (not smooth simulated cylinders) change the side band amplitudes, which can not be uncoupled from cloud density - Also, non-uniform clouds do not map so nicely to side band amplitudes - So we need an understanding of the rf transmission characteristics of beam pipes as well as non-uniformity issues in order to deduce cloud density from microwave experiments