Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Presentation of Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Cynthia K. Buettner, Ph.D. July 25, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to the Environment Rating Scales
Advertisements

Assessment of the Cooperative Education Program in Relationship to the Program Outcomes of the Undergraduate Nursing and UHM Cooperative Education Programs.
Who? What? Why?. Child Care Resource & Referral (CCR&R) is a program to support quality child care throughout the State of Iowa. CCR&R is available to.
College & Career Readiness in Illinois Brian Durham Senior Director for Academic Affairs & CTE Illinois Community College Board
Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation: Parent Aware Statistical Analysis Lauren Bach, Marin Beck, Kristen Paulsen, and Katie Westermayer Minnesota State.
Learner Link – Durham County Increasing Access to Early Childhood College Courses Durham’s Partnership for Children Child Care Services Association Durham.
College & Career Readiness in Illinois Brian Durham Senior Director for Academic Affairs & CTE Illinois Community College Board
Best Start Conference January Peel Health Great Beginnings Initiative  In 1999, McCain and Mustard’s Early Years Study documented the importance.
Massachusetts Early Care and Education and School Readiness Study
Technology Showcase Fall 2003 Policy Quest: A Web-Based Examination of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Lorrie C. Reed.
EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF DUVAL Helping parents choose, preparing children to learn QUALITY CONNECTIONS Presentation at the Board Meeting August 31,
Neil Naftzger Principal Researcher Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation February 2015 Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Child Care Quality and Children’s Development in Indiana Low Income Working Families James Elicker, Carolyn Clawson, & Soo-Young Hong Purdue University.
Regulatory Services Section Child Care Center Handbook Child Care Center Handbook NC Division of Child Development.
Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
STEPS TO EXCELLENCE PROJECT Promoting Quality Child Care Provider Information Session September 2007 A Project of the Policy Roundtable for Child Care.
Who? What? Why?. Child Care Resource & Referral (CCR&R) is a program to support quality child care throughout the State of Iowa. CCR&R is available to.
Bridging the Gap How the Internet is impacting the role of the Boston Scientific sales representative. Ellie Martinez December 15, 2005.
2012 Implementation It’s finally here! Goals Goal: to implement QUALITYstarsNY in high needs communities in NYS – State Education Department (SED) funding.
2012 Implementation: A QUALITYstarsNY Recruitment Session.
Diane Schilder, EdD and Jessica Young, PhD Education Development Center, Inc. Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.
 Clients and Services  Outcomes ◦ Mobile Dental Clinic ◦ CARES Plus ◦ School Readiness.
Confidential © InsideTrack, Adult Learners: Researched-based Strategies for Recruitment and Retention.
Kenley Branscome Applied Policy Analytics Massachusetts SAC Needs Assessment Board of Early Education and Care September 13, 2011.
Family, School, and Community Partnerships: A Model for Pre-service Teacher Education Presentation at Center for Research, Evaluation & Advancement of.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administrator Meeting.
KEYS to School Improvement Missouri National Education Association Teaching and Learning Director.
ENHANCE Update Research Underway on the Validity of the Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process ECO Center Advisory Board Meeting March 8, 2012 Arlington,
1 QUALITYstarsNY Field Test Community Information Session 2010 WELCOME!
November 1,  Clients and Services  Outcomes ◦ Mobile Dental Clinic ◦ CARES Plus ◦ Child Signature Program #2 ◦ School Readiness.
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
Indicators of Family Engagement Melanie Lemoine and Monica Ballay Louisiana State Improvement Grant/SPDG.
GSA OGP Advisory Committee Engagement Survey ACES 2004 Overall Results September 23, 2004.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: Program Evaluation Toolkit August 9, 2012.
NASA Earth Observing System Data and Information Systems
ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSION Background: Georgia rates the quality of early childcare learning centers using a tiered quality improvement system.
Oregon’s Quality Rating and Improvement System and Education Service Districts OAESD Spring Conference May 15, 2015.
Getting Started with the State Pre-Planning Process.
Camille Kandiko, Indiana University Bloomington Jon Acker and William Fendley, The University of Alabama Lawrence Redlinger, The University of Texas at.
Foundations of Environment Rating Scales Presented By: 1.
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale
Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene WB&A Market Research Executive Summary THE 2003 MARYLAND MEDICAID MANAGED CARE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY.
Assessing CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey Results What Can CAHPS Database Do For You Janice Ricketts, CAHPS Database Manager, Westat 2011 AHRQ Annual Conference.
For over 70 years, the Texas Commission for the Blind has assisted blind and visually impaired Texans in achieving independent and successful lives through.
Karen Peifer PhD, MPH, RN Roopa Iyer PhD Ann Kaskel RN Does Place Matter For Healthy Early Child Care Environments?
+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.
Cultural Voices: Perceptions of Faculty, Staff and Students A Cultural Study funded by the Equal Opportunity Panel University of Kentucky.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Data Collection and Reporting System.
2008 FAEIS Annual Longitudinal Assessment With a Comparison to the 2007 Survey Results The purpose of the FAEIS annual evaluation is to develop longitudinal.
District Strategic Technology Committee. Purposes Submit technology bridge plan to MDE by June 30 (original) Evaluate current resources of the district,
Evaluating the Indonesia Early Childhood Education and Development Project.
An exploratory analysis of Latino risk and protective health factors in a community sample Julie Gast, PhD, MSCHES, Terry Peak, MSW, PhD, & Jason J. Leiker,
T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION GSA OGP Advisory Committee Engagement Survey ACES 2004 Overall Results October 14, 2004.
Superintendent Report September 22, Ground rules  Every challenge is real & unique  The experts are in the room  We absolutely can find solutions.
WSLN 2008 Idaho Notes 500 members in Idaho 5 local affiliates Population in Idaho: 1,429,096 Persons per square mile: 15.6 Land Area: 83,557 square miles.
IMPLEMENTING TITLE I IN BARROW COUNTY SCHOOLS ANNUAL PARENT MEETING
The Hospital CAHPS Program Presented by Maureen Parrish.
Topic IV: Classroom Environments Ellen Marshall, Ph.D. & Cathy McAuliffe- Dickerson, Ph.D.
THE USE OF TWO TOOLS TO EVALUATE HEALTHY START COALITIONS Susan M. Wolfe, Ph.D.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
THE ECERS DEFINITION OF QUALITY AND ITS INTERNATIONAL USE DEBBY CRYER, PH.D. ENVIRONMENT RATING SCALES INSTITUTE, CHAPEL HILL, NC, USA.
Evaluation of Indiana's Pilot Public Pre-Kindergarten Program: First Year Results James Elicker, Katrina Schmerold, David Purpura, Sara Schmitt, Amy Napoli,
Indiana Paths to QUALITY™ Child Care Quality Rating and Improvement System: Outcomes for Children and Child Care Providers James Elicker, Zachary Gold,
REACHING FOR THE STARS Robyn Gibson, M.Ed.
American Evaluation Association Conference November 10, 2010
Using Early Care and Education Administrative Data
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
ESSA accountability & Report Card Proposed regulations
Presentation transcript:

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Presentation of Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Cynthia K. Buettner, Ph.D. July 25, 2006

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Pilot Study Purpose/Design Purpose –Examine relationship between SUTQ rating levels and ECERS-R scores –Examine indicator impact on ECERS-R scores –Assess ability of Benchmarks to distinguish steps –Evaluate impact of SUTQ pilot Data Collection and Sample –Forms distributed by field personnel –Data for the general analyses based on 282 centers –Online survey used to assess impact

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data

ECERS-R Scale Six of the seven subscales –Space and Furnishing –Personal Care –Language –Activities –Interaction –Program Structure Score Ranges –1 to 3 minimal/inadequate –3 to 5 good –5 to 7 excellent

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Step Level by ECERS-R Score

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Step Level by Benchmark: % Not Meeting Requirement for Step Above

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Subsidized Enrollment Funding Sources and ECERS-R Scores

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Personal Care Indicators by Step

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Language Indicators by Step

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Online Survey Three surveys developed: – Rated Administrators – Getting Ready Administrators – Parents s sent to Step Up to Quality centers by ODJFS July 14 th through July 24th Response rates: –28% overall Center response rate (76 of 273 centers) –41% response rate Rated Centers (47 of 114) –18% response rate Getting Ready (29 of 159) –136 responses to the parent survey (total population unknown)

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Administrators of Rated Centers SUTQ Application Process

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Administrators of Rated Centers Importance of SUTQ Benchmarks

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Administrators of Rated Centers Attaining SUTQ Benchmarks

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Administrators of Rated Centers 76% think Board members/funds have a better understanding of quality program components 91% think staff members have better understanding 71% think parents have better understanding 88.6% have used SUTQ to promote their center

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Administrators of Rated Centers SUTQ Materials Used

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data 30.2% have had parents report SUTQ was important in choosing the center 68.2% have made changes in budgeting/fiscal priorities to meet SUTQ benchmarks 50% think participation in SUTQ has improved the quality of child care in center 73% responded that it was likely or very likely that SUTQ benchmarks will lead to continued improvement 88% said they were likely or very likely to refer colleagues at other centers to SUTQ Administrators of Rated Centers

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Administrators of Rated Centers Importance of SUTQ incentives

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Administrators of Rated Centers 98% rated the customer service from their Licensing Specialist as Good or Excellent (mean=4.83) 81% rated the customer service from their Resource Referral Service as Good or Excellent (mean=4.38) 77.5 % plan on applying for a higher rating in the future

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Administrators of GR Centers Ease of SUTQ Application Process

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Administrators of GR Centers Importance of SUTQ Benchmarks

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Administrators of GR Centers Attaining SUTQ Benchmarks

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Administrators of GR Centers 79% think Board members/funds have a better understanding of quality program components 75% think staff members have better understanding 70.8% have made changes in budgeting/fiscal priorities

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data 37% think participation in SUTQ has improved the quality of child care in center (mean 3.38) 73% responded it is likely or very likely that SUTQ benchmarks will lead to continued improvement 79% said they are likely or very likely to refer colleagues at other centers to SUTQ Administrators of GR Centers

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Administrators of GR Centers Importance of SUTQ incentives

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Administrators of GR Centers 84% rated the customer service from their Licensing Specialist as Good or Excellent (mean=4.17) 63% rated the customer service from their Resource Referral Service as Good or Excellent (mean=3.88) 100 % plan on applying for a higher rating in the future

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Parents Materials Received

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data Parents Materials Seen

Step Up to Quality Pilot Data 32% are familiar or very familiar with SUTQ Benchmarks Only 9.6% have used ODJFS web site to identify centers with SUTQ rating; 74.4% would use ODJFS web site in the future 23.8% have used a child care resource and referral agency to identify centers; 78.4% would use such a center to identify a SUTQ rating in the future 39% think SUTQ participation has improved the quality of child care in their center (mean 3.35) 37% said star rating was important or very important in enrollment decision Parents