1 Status of preprocessing of data from TB DESY Tadeáš Bilka, Peter Kodyš, Peter Kvasnička Charles University in Prague F2F tracking workshop, May 30-31,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clara Gaspar on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration, “Physics at the LHC and Beyond”, Quy Nhon, Vietnam, August 2014 Challenges and lessons learnt LHCb Operations.
Advertisements

1 Databases in ALICE L.Betev LCG Database Deployment and Persistency Workshop Geneva, October 17, 2005.
Using the EUDET pixel telescope for resolution studies on silicon strip sensors with fine pitch Thomas Bergauer for the SiLC R&D collaboration 21. May.
1 Scintillating Fibre Tracker Simulation Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Tuesday 9 th March 2004.
Far Detector Data Quality Andy Blake Cambridge University.
1 Online data quality and monitoring M. Ellis Daresbury DAQ Meeting 31 st August 2005.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 Online Reconstruction & a little about Online Monitoring Linda R. Coney 18 August, 2009.
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
UA9 Collaboration H8 Sept’10 Run - Preparatory Meeting Review & Status of the Telescope DAQ and Online/Offline Software Mark Pesaresi Jonathan.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Tracker
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
C. Seez Imperial College November 28th, 2002 ECAL testbeam Workshop 1 Offline software for ECAL test beam The pre-processing model The offline software.
SITRA Test beams Simulations Zdeněk Doležal Charles University Prague Annual EUDET meeting Munich October 2006.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
LAV Software Status Emanuele Leonardi – Tommaso Spadaro Photon Veto WG meeting – 2015/03/24.
JANA and Raw Data David Lawrence, JLab Oct. 5, 2012.
Software Status  Last Software Workshop u Held at Fermilab just before Christmas. u Completed reconstruction testing: s MICE trackers and KEK tracker.
Marco Delmastro 23/02/2006 Status of LAr EM performance andmeasurements fro CTB1 Status of LAr EM performance and measurements for CTB Overview Data -
Preliminary results with the Alibava Telescope G. Casse, S. Martì, J. Rodriguez, I. Tsurin and the Alibava collaboration 1 G. Casse,20th RD50 Workshop,
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL, Feb 2005 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software update L3 display 200 GeV February.
1 Calice UK Meeting 27/03/07David Ward Plans; timescales for having analysis results for LCWS Status of current MC/data reconstruction Reconstruction status;
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
GLAST LAT Project LAT Instrument Analysis Workshop – Feb 27, 2006 Hiro Tajima, TKR Data Processing Overview 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: TKR Data Processing.
TRT Offline Software DOE Visit, August 21 st 2008 Outline: oTRT Commissioning oTRT Offline Software Activities oTRT Alignment oTRT Efficiency and Noise.
TB1: Data analysis Antonio Bulgheroni on behalf of the TB24 team.
Offline and Monitoring Software for the EMEC+HEC Combined Run Combined Test Beam and LArg Software and Performance 11 September 2002 Rob McPherson University.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection December 11, 2006 Track Selection for T-Alignment studies Louis Nicolas EPFL Monday Seminar December.
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
Why A Software Review? Now have experience of real data and first major analysis results –What have we learned? –How should that change what we do next.
Jyly 8, 2009, 3rd open meeting of Belle II collaboration, KEK1 Charles University Prague Zdeněk Doležal for the DEPFET beam test group 3rd Open Meeting.
1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano.
Pixel DQM Status R.Casagrande, P.Merkel, J.Zablocki (Purdue University) D.Duggan, D.Hidas, K.Rose (Rutgers University) L.Wehrli (ETH Zuerich) A.York (University.
DQM for the RPC subdetector M. Maggi and P. Paolucci.
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
TDAQ Experience in the BNL Liquid Argon Calorimeter Test Facility Denis Oliveira Damazio (BNL), George Redlinger (BNL).
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
FIRST RESULTS OF THE SILICON STRIP DETECTOR at STAR Jörg Reinnarth, Jonathan Bouchet, Lilian Martin, Jerome Baudot and the SSD teams in Nantes and Strasbourg.
DQM for the RPC subdetector M. Maggi and P. Paolucci.
1 Tracker Software Status M. Ellis MICE Collaboration Meeting 27 th June 2005.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
Online Consumers produce histograms (from a limited sample of events) which provide information about the status of the different sub-detectors. The DQM.
ID Week 13 th of October 2014 Per Johansson Sheffield University.
Overview of EMU Software Rick Wilkinson. Slice Test DAQ We succeeded in using Slice Test DAQ code to take test beam data, combining chamber and trigger.
LHCb 2009-Q4 report Q4 report LHCb 2009-Q4 report, PhC2 Activities in 2009-Q4 m Core Software o Stable versions of Gaudi and LCG-AA m Applications.
Scenario use cases Szymon Mueller PSNC. Agenda 1.General description of experiment use case. 2.Detailed description of use cases: 1.Preparation for observation.
1 Test Beam with Hybrid 6 Florian Lütticke for the Testbeam Crew Bonn University 7th Belle II VXD Workshop and 18th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors.
LHCb Alignment Strategy 26 th September 2007 S. Viret 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)Offline week / CERN Status of the SPD Offline Domenico Elia (INFN Bari) Overview:  Response simulation (timing info, dead/noisy.
Test beam preparations Florian Lütticke, Mikhail Lemarenko, Carlos Marinas University of Bonn (Prof. Norbert Wermes) DEPFET workshop Ringberg (June 12-15,
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
Tracking, Computing & other Stuff. Correlation of detector hits The track segments of inner and outer MDCs are matched on Cluster level The track segments.
L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Trigger Configuration DB ● L1Calo OKS Database ● L1Calo COOL Database ● ACE Murrough Landon 16 June 2008.
THIS MORNING (Start an) informal discussion to -Clearly identify all open issues, categorize them and build an action plan -Possibly identify (new) contributing.
Munich framework/DAQ meeting, Feb 2011 Peter Kvasnicka, CU Prague: PXD digitization 1 CU Prague Tadeáš Bílka, Peter Kvasnička, Peter Kodyš, Jozef.
Online Monitoring : Detector and Performance check
Beam Gas Vertex – Beam monitor
Calibration Status of the art – the first tTrig calculated from data
TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE
EUDAQ Status Report Emlyn Corrin, 29 September 2010
Bonn Test Station data analysis with PandaRoot
Remaining Online SW Tasks
Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Silicon Strip Tracker Detector
Overview of CLAS12 Calibration
Status and Plans of the Belle-II Tracking Software Martin Heck
Test Beam Measurements october – november, 2016
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
DQM for the RPC subdetector
Presentation transcript:

1 Status of preprocessing of data from TB DESY Tadeáš Bilka, Peter Kodyš, Peter Kvasnička Charles University in Prague F2F tracking workshop, May 30-31, 2016, Wien Charles University Prague

2 Outline 1.Data – resources for analysis (Peter Kodys) 2.First sweep and statistics (Peter Kodys) 3.Alignment (Tadeas Bilka) 4.Problems (Peter Kodys) 5.Plan

3 Data – resources for analysis People who helped directly with this task: Hua, Ulf, Hao, 2xPeter and Daniel 1.Data moved and collected on the ipnp30 Prague server, the other store should be a grid site in DESY 2.Anyone from the collaboration can ask for an account there, contact person: 3.17 external users and 3 from Prague have access now source “sroot.gz” files, 2438 converted “root” files 5.Available sets of files: Source files “.sroot.gz” (complete and done) Converted files to root “.root” (complete and done) New converted, sure full set “.root” (complete and done) SVD Global hardware “.xml” files (complete and done) Eudet telescope files “.raw” (complete and done) BonnDAQ files (in preparation by Benjamin, Florian and Botho) Quality check histograms and summaries (complete and done) 6.We are preparing table for usability for further analysis in basf2 for alignment, tracking, corrections,…

4 First sweep and statistics (preliminary) Full set of data: events in 4.17 days of clean acquisition time Biggest run 178: events Longest run 178: 14.9 hours Biggest subrun (collected in 1 file): events Longest subrun (collected in 1 file): 46.1 minutes Highest rate: 3000 events/sec For basf2 physics tests: 2 runs with secondary target lead 5mm in front of the telescopes kEvents in 17.6 minutes (rate 1200 events/sec) Run 339 unstable rate Magnet ON Beam energy 4 GeV Full PXD and SVD work Telescopes OFF (?) What is missing – tasks for the next TB: Magnet OFF Different beam energies Different angles Telescopes ON High statistics

5 First sweep and statistics (preliminary) Candidates for deep analysis: GeV, MagOff, no Pb, full PXD 565 kEvents 2.339, GeV, MagOn, full PXD, Pb kEvents GeV, MagOn, no Pb, full PXD, 599 kEvents GeV, MagOn, no Pb, full PXD, kEvents GeV, MagOn, no Pb, full PXD, kEvents GeV, MagOn, no Pb, high rate (2kHz) kEvents GeV, MagOn, no Pb very good statistics kEvents GeV, MagOff, no Pb extreme good statistics kEvents – 3GeV, MagOff, no Pb 6247 kEvents Benjamin request (97) - 5GeV, MagOff, no Pb work with telescopes (only one seems) 539 (447) kEvents

6 First sweep and statistics Example of summary table, many runs without logbook info: No info of run Only runs with secondary target Trigger rate problem

7 First sweep and statistics Example of summary table, selection for full runs:

8 Problem! Mass analysis cannot be proceed, because: 1.After clusterizer step following “VXDTF” produce errors and segmentation violation! 2.Another module “GenFitter” also crushed and produce segmentation violation! Please authors clean and correct it!

9 First sweep and statistics Example of quality check: Missing PXD- SVD correlation Correlations for PXD- SVD with secondary target in U Trigger PXD-SVD problem Good PXD-SVD correlation plot Good trigger rate in correlation region Rate of triggers in time – some effect from loss of synchronization?

10 Changes in VXD reconstruction for the testbeam: General, PXD General 1.Testbeam-contributed code in basf2 svn – All testbeam-specific code is in the testbeam package. – Modifications made to pxd/svd packages are good for Belle II – Some clearly marked testbeam-related code clones in pxd (unpacker) – We skipped the use of the git repository - not enough determination... 2.Changes to make reconstruction robust to malformed data – To make HLT/ExpReco processing stable even with experimental configurations, the PXD/SVD digit sorters now handle (some sorts of) malformed data. PXD 1.PXD simulation changed according to Benjamin Schwenker’s proposal – See the talk in the Monday PXD session – Modified to better reflect physics and DAQ configuration parameters – Adapted recently to better fit actual PXD DAQ settings and testbeam data 2.A lot of work in the unpacker - due to problems with DAQ – Decoding tables for strips, shifts in event numbering etc. – Special testbeam version of the unpacker

11 Changes in VXD reconstruction for the testbeam: SVD SVD 1.Introduced “three-consecutive- samples” filter – To pass the filter, the 6 APV samples have to contain 3 consecutive samples above threshold. – The filter effectively reduces noise digits – It suppresses off-time signals slightly more. 2.Import run-dependent hardware test data – Bad strips, strip noises, waveform shapes 3.Masking – List of hardware defects (GIacomo Caria) – Pre-run HW tests (Hao Yin, P. Kvasnicka) – Run-time masks (P. Kodys) – Need to find how to use in clustering

12 Geometry + Mapping → Tracking We directly imported Beast Phase II geometry with small modifications After SVD and PXD mapping was corrected and correlations seen, tracking started to work Visual check of residual distributions → PXD displaced by 1 mm w.r.t. SVD along Z→ absorbed into PXD sensor displacements Even with large misalignment and non-optimized sensors, (some) tracks were found and fitted. Beast geometry checked, only mapping needed hardware and software experts to work together. Good message for Beast Phase II 1 mm PXD z- residuals (unbiased, after Kalman fit) Plot from Track Fit DQM:

13 Initial Alignment & Issues Can be done with first messy data, but needs manual playing with Millepede (can get rid of fake tracks during iterating alignment and removing outliers) Many SVD sensors cannot be aligned due to low statistics, sometimes PXD not in data → big complications for alignment parametrization (e.g. which sensors to fix) – easy to introduce incosistencies in DB (alignment is defined relative to displaced geometry), fixed 1st and last SVD layer for alignment with no field Even after alignment, VXDTF gives plenty of non-sense to track fitters Working on some way to get rid of them for analysis + we should look into the VXDTF (sector maps problem?) Hits on GBL fitted tracks, p-value > ! Noise on slanted SVD added to tracks (you see hits extrapolated to the infinite slanted plane)

14 Preliminary Results PXD layer 1 residuals in run 340 (magnet + secondary target) – only high quality tracks, all cluster sizes, after initial alignment

15 Preliminary results Same run, same tracks, SVD layer 3

16 Alignment & Database We started with framework fall-back DB (nominal alignment) After run 96 (no magnet), DB with alignment was produced and used for fitting at HLT/expreco DB was distributed over . Only local DB used during whole TB After reprocessing we will provide a complete local DB at ipnp30, including e.g. masking Should go into PNNL central DB

17 Plans & Conclusions (Tadeas) Once full data quality analysis is finished, we will produce alignment data for all usable runs (and upload to PNNL)  Perfect exercise for calibration framework and anyone interested in PXD/SVD calibration, database, Beast Phase II, real data … Message to Beast Phase II and next beam test  Geometry fine, just check the mapping, track finding will work and we can do alignment  In next beam test, we need DB operational to test the calibration framework and distribute calibration constants to analyzers

18 TB DESY 2016 produced tracks with correlation in “off-line” check in basf2 delayed by hours to one day – still a bit long Source of delay: data transfer to a visible place on the net (ipnp30) On-line monitor was tuned and should be usable Very poor logbook, sometimes not editable for shifters because “open with other one”, only small subset of runs marked in, mistakes inside Missing in the logbook is a set of basic fixed-format information immediately available for parsing for analysis: Which subdetectors are working Status of subdetectors/planes Telescope IDs Magnet status Beam parameters Secondary target present Unclear naming convention: “physics”, “beam”, “test.all”, “test.pxd”, “test.svd” Communication between subgroups: geometry vs. pixel/strip counting and directions of axes at every step of data chain – needs to be solved before Belle II experiment From the point of view of basf2 Problems

19 Event mismatches from different sources, reasons partly unclear Workarounds on HLT, unpacker and special modules Mapping, coordinate flipping Remapping not existing in DHH firmware -> consequences for ROI on HLT and PXD Unpacking Extend ROIs on HLT -- hampering ROI selection Remapping during unpacking + coordinate flips Remapping triggered other errors in software (PXD Sorter, clusterizer) -> problems in express reco, no DQM ordering of DHE data/DHE-ID was inverted (increasing order expected as for ROIs) In unpacker not checked -> fixed meanwhile Minor issues with data format from DHH (not as defined in specs) -> Trigger Errors and Warning in PXD Unpacker fix firmware, change Warning back to Errors in software From the point of view of basf2 Problems

20 Thank you for your attention Plan (Peter) Continue screening the data for usability for analysis Cross-check basf2 results with Benjamin’s results Create tools for Belle II based on TB DESY 2016 experience Check usability of shape and eta corrections Tracking/alignment/database improvements Prepare tools for the next TB DESY end of 2016 Benjamin, Christoph, Carlos: coordination of TB analysis between groups, first regular meeting would be Friday 9h00. Carlos: preparing new Test beam in autumn of 2016