1 City of Portland City Council Public Hearing on an Appeal of the Land Use Hearings Officer’s Decision Presentation by BDS Staff: Mark Walhood, City Planner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING October 28, 2008.
Advertisements

WHAT DOES THE CITY of New Orleans ZONING ORDINANCE DO?
Planning & Community Development Department Consideration of a Call for Review Conditional Use Permit #6084 Proposed Chick-Fil-A Restaurant 1700 East Colorado.
June 5, 2007 BCC Called Public Hearing on BZA #SE , April 5, 2007 APPLICANT: Genesis Communications, Inc.
City Council Meeting January 18, Background  Staff receiving increasing number of inquiries regarding installation of wireless telecommunications.
January 29, 2008 BCC Called Public Hearing on BZA # SE , 12/6/07 APPLICANT: Ganesh Bansrupan.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
PC Meeting July 1, 2015 CUP 15-02/DR 15-06/DR
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes – Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Master Planned Development (MPD) Rezoning Application.
An Appeal of a Request For a Special Use Authorization For a Solar Energy Power Plant Docket SUA Appeal of Rainbow Solar Facility.
HRB Meeting June 9, 2015 City Council Remand of AP 14-02/ZC
City of West Linn Bolton Reservoir Replacement Planning Commission Hearing July 1, 2015 Presented by: Thomas P. Boland, P.E. Murray, Smith & Associates,
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
BCC APPEAL PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #SE APPLICANT/APPELLANT: FIRST KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ORLANDO Orange County Zoning Division December.
Planning & Community Development Department Hillsides Residential Care and Educational Center Master Plan City Council July 20, 2015.
Community Development Department ISLAND WALK MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION #2648.
JUNE 19, 2012 BCC APPEAL HEARING ON BZA #SE , April 5, 2012 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: TONY RAHBANY.
Legal Regulations for High School Road II BAINBRIDGE ISLAND MUNICIPAL CODES & COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONDITIONAL USES.
Preliminary Development Plan – Continuation of August 28, 2012 BoCC Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 18, 2012.
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting April 18, 2006 Public Hearing: Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Section Regarding Commercial/Industrial Park.
Land Development Regulations : Section 2 – Waivers (and related sections) Regulation Update Board of County Commissioners Hearing December 9, 2014 Continued.
Community Development Department Special Exceptions for: Automotive parts (e.g. accessories and tires) and Automotive, Recreational Vehicle, and Boat Dealers.
FEBRUARY 21, 2012 BCC PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA # SE , Nov. 03, 2011 APPELLANT/APPLICANT: CHANTEL PRESTON.
January 8, 2007 BCC PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #SE , November 1, 2007 APPLICANT: Sunrise Landscape Supply, Inc. APPELLANT: Daniel Tuttle, (Adjacent.
November 11, 2008 BCC PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #SE , September 4, 2008 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Christian Haitian Church, Inc.
Community Development Department COUNTRY CLUB HARBOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-2 AND PARKS & GREENWAYS ZONING DISTRICTS REZONING APPLICATION #2511.
Planning Commission Public Hearing: SUB Proposed 6-lot Subdivision at Bland Circle December 2, 2015.
Historic Review Board Continued Public Hearing: DR – th St. October 20, 2015.
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZREHARING To amend existing Planned Development zone district to allow for mini-warehouse storage.
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZREHARING To amend existing Planned Development zone district to allow for mini-warehouse storage.
(Continued from May 22, 2007) BCC PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA # SE , 4/5/07 APPLICANT: Knowledge Tree Learning Center June 26, 2007.
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZREHARING To amend existing Planned Development zone district to allow for mini-warehouse storage.
Community Development Department Special Exception Vehicle Rental and Leasing St. Joe Plaza.
BCC APPEAL PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #SE APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Centro Cristiano Restauracion Orange County Zoning Division FEBRUARY 9, 2016 (Continued.
Historic Review Board Public Hearing: DR – th St. September 15, 2015.
Appeal Tuesday, January 14, Background Appeal Grounds Design Modification Options Community Feedback Staff Recommendation.
6 JOSEPHINE STREET APPEAL OF DR/CUP/EA Project Site: Land Use Designation High Density Residential R-3 Zoning District Multiple-Family.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Historic Landmarks Commission Type II Appeal of Approval LU HDZ –
Community Development Department Rezone Application #1783 Parcel ID No RPOF-0031.
Rezoning Application # Use Permit # Use Permit # City Council May 14, Tide Mill Lane Communications Tower & Tree Farm.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
Christopher Brown, Planner II December 4th, 2014 Case No. 14ZONE1036 La Grange Road Office Louisville Metro Planning Commission Public Hearing.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Recommendation LU MS Conway’s NW.
Public Hearings D10, E11, F12 March 26, Today’s Public Hearings D C-TRAN-2 Comprehensive Plan amendment adoption E C-TRAN-1 Comprehensive.
Applicant: Robert Ganem Addresses: 7304 & 7312 Black Oak Lane Planning Commission Meeting – August 21, 2015.
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZ Sevens Residential Memory Care ODP Case Manager: Russell D Clark.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Adjustment Committee Land Use Review LU AD Adjustment.
Planning & Community Development Department Appeal of Board of Zoning Appeals’ Approval of Hillside Development Permit # Glen Holly Drive City.
CPA Congregate Living Facilities as Accessory Use to Religious Facilities Text Amendment Department of Growth Management Mehdi Benkhatar, Planner.
206 THIRD STREET DR/TRP Appeal of. Planning Commission Hearing March 12, 2014, P/C approved a Design Review Permit: - Demolition of the existing.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Design Commission Land Use Review LU DZ Arthouse.
JUNE 18, 2013 BCC APPEAL HEARING ON BZA #SE , MAY 2, 2013 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: JAIGOPAUL BISNAUTH.
CASE SPECIFICS Subject property is located at 725 N. Santa Fe Street –Property is currently vacant –Property is owned by Mesilla Valley Habitat for Humanity.
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
PowerButte: Solar Overlay Replacement with PowerButte Guide
COUNTRY CLUB HARBOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-2 AND PARKS & GREENWAYS ZONING DISTRICTS REZONING APPLICATION #2511.
LEE FARM ADDITION – GDP AMENDMENT
Jefferson County Planning Commission Hearing April 10, 2013
An Alternative to Skyline Blight
DISCOUNT TIRE SITE PLAN PLDRB Public Hearing on August 16, 2017
City Council Meeting October 23, 2017
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
Appeal: Time Extension for Variance # East Walnut Street
City Council Meeting February 26, 2018
Planning Commission Meeting: August 3, 2016
Hotel Conversions Background
Washoe County Board of Adjustment June 6, 2019
Presentation transcript:

1 City of Portland City Council Public Hearing on an Appeal of the Land Use Hearings Officer’s Decision Presentation by BDS Staff: Mark Walhood, City Planner II Case File #LUR CU

2 Purpose of Today’s Hearing Consider Appeal of Hearings Officer’s Decision for Approval (with conditions) for a Radio Frequency Transmission Facility under case file #LUR CU; Appellant is Louise Cody (Chair), Centennial Community Association; Applicant is Paul Slotemaker, consultant on behalf of Qwest Wireless, LLC; Council today will uphold, uphold with modifications, or overturn the HO Decision.

3 Summary of the Proposal Type III Conditional Use Review request to construct 75’ tall monopole with six initial and three future (nine total) antennas, fenced and gated accessory equipment area at grade, and landscaping; Facility to operate at no greater than 100 watts ERP within a residential zone.

4 Background Original proposal was for tower and equipment at northwest corner of site, withdrawn by applicant prior to hearing due to staff concerns regarding visual and functional impacts; Revised proposal for tower near southwest corner of site with smaller equipment enclosure and revised landscaping plan; Staff Report recommended Denial based on visual impact and public benefits; Hearings Officer found all criteria were met, approved proposal with conditions.

5 Approval Criteria B Conditional Use approval criteria for RFT facilities on a tower in a residential zone, and operating at 100 watts ERP or less; and Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan

6 Zoning Map

7 Overall Site Plan - C.6

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17 Overall Site Plan - C.6

18 Landscape Plan - C.7

19 Landscaping Details - C.8

20 Enlarged Site Plan - C.9

21 Elevations - C.10

22 Approval Criteria Conditional Use Approval Criteria ( B.1 - 6) B.1 - The applicant must prove that a tower is the only feasible way to provide the service; B.2 - The tower, including mounting technique, must be sleek, clean, and uncluttered; B.3 - The visual impact of the tower on the surrounding area must be minimized. This can be accomplished by one or more of the following methods: –a. Limiting the tower height as much as possible given the technical requirements for providing service and other factors such as whether the tower will provide co-location opportunities; –b. Planting trees around the tower as a way to soften its appearance. The variety and spacing of the trees will be determined based on the site characteristics, tower height, and other co-location factors; or –c. Other methods that adequately minimize visual impact.;

23 Approval Criteria, continued Conditional Use Approval Criteria ( B.1 - 6) B.4 - Accessory equipment associated with the facility must be adequately screened. If a new structure will be built to store the accessory equipment, the new structure must be designed to be compatible with the desired character of the surrounding area; B.5 - Public benefits of the use outweigh any impacts which cannot be mitigated; and B.6 - The regulations of Chapter , Radio Frequency Transmission Facilities are met. Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan

24 Hearings Officer’s Decision Approval of a Conditional Use application to construct a monopole and antennas in substantial conformance with Exhibits C.6 through and including C.10, subject to the following conditions: A.As part of the building permit application submittal, the following condition (B) must be noted on each of the 4 required site plans or included as a sheet in the numbered set of plans. The sheet on which this information appears must be labeled “ZONING COMPLIANCE PAGE - Case File #LUR CU/ Tracs ID #LU CU”. All requirements must be graphically represented on the required plan and must be labeled “REQUIRED”. B.The monopole and all visible cabling and antennas on the pole shall be provided with a dull, matte light grey finish.

25 Issues on Appeal There are other feasible ways to provide the service, and therefore B.1 is not met; –other nearby locations in Gresham, at various churches in the area, and on existing towers along SE Division Street could provide the service. The visual impact of the tower on the surrounding area has not been minimized ( B.3.a-c not met); –loss of views and visual quality in Lynch View Park; –tower is too tall, landscaping proposed is inadequate (not enough trees); and –other locations on the site closer to the school building, or at the southeast corner of the site, would have less visual impact. The public benefits of the use do not outweigh the negative visual and functional impacts to the site ( B.5 not met).

26 Other issues raised Landscaping will not be maintained; Litter will be a problem; The proposal will have negative impacts on property values of surrounding homes; and The proposal will have detrimental impacts to the health of nearby residents and park users.

27 Alternatives Facing Council Deny the appeal, and uphold the Hearings Officer’s Decision; Deny the appeal, and uphold the Hearings Officer’s Decision with modifications; or Uphold the appeal, and overturn the Hearings Officer’s Decision.

28 fin