Why The Forest Service and the BLM Have Different Wilderness Management Histories The Wilderness Act at 50 Lewis and Clark Law School April 11, 2014 Robert.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Resource Advisory Councils (RACs) Bureau of Land Management.
Advertisements

Note to presenters - This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should.
Cottonwood Wash Abandoned Mine Reclamation Project: A Partnership in Watershed Reclamation.
An Historical Look at Planning for Federal Public Lands: Adding Marine Spatial Planning to the Field 2014 Shapiro Environmental Law Symposium: The Role.
Monitoring Changes in Wilderness Character Why, What, and How 1.
I. Introduction II. Inventory Procedures A. Background B. Route Analysis & Boundary Identification C. Size D. Naturalness E. Outstanding Opportunities.
The Allegheny National Forest A few quick facts: Established in 1923 by Presidential Proclamation under the authority of the 1911 Weeks Act. Current Acreage:
USDA Forest Service. FS owns 8.5% of the total land area in United States.
 Meeting Administration and Objectives  The Partnership  Understanding the Study Area  What We Heard  Alternatives to be Evaluated  Participant.
The Wilderness Act Was signed into law on: September 23, 1968 September 3, 1964 December 31, 1978.
BLM and DOE Coordination through the Uranium Leasing Program Presented by Mitchell Leverette, Bureau of Land Management Washington, DC.
Collaborative Resource Management: An Assessment of NOAA Sanctuary Advisory Councils and BLM Resource Advisory Councils Project Team: Project Team: Kathy.
An Introduction UI and WSU CESU Workshop March 2005.
 The Mining Law governs access to federal lands for locatable hardrock mineral activities ◦ It is not an environmental statute and doesn’t need to be.
TIM CHARTERS STAFF DIRECTOR U.S. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES “ WHY BUILDING A SOLAR PROJECT ON FEDERAL.
What are Lands with Wilderness Characteristics (LWCs)? How did we map LWCs? How did GIS mapping and analysis help mapping LWCs? How do you protect LWCs?
National Landscape Conservation System The Conservation, Protection, and Restoration Rattlesnake Arches, McInnis Canyons National Conservation Area.
Phase 2 – Develop the Revised Plan Cities and Counties have land use plans – so do national forests Cities and counties may have residential areas, commercial.
1 Cooperating Agency and Coordination Training Washington State Association of Counties Friday, November 22, 2013 Victoria Barr, Oregon/Washington State.
Wilderness Characteristics Policy & Guidance for the BLM Two manuals completed in March 2012: 6310 – Conducting Wilderness Characteristics Inventory 6320.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at:
This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should be reviewed and.
Environmental History of the US: Some Important Thinkers
Public Lands Environmental Politics. Public Lands What are public lands? How do publics lands fit into environmental Policy? Clash of public interests.
Challenges of Forest Governance: A Perspective from the United States Sally Collins Associate Chief, U.S. Forest Service.
Sierra Water Workgroup Summit 2013 Kings Beach, CA Don Yasuda Regional Analyst USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region
Cooperating Agencies & Coordination Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and BLM Regulations Federal Coordination with Local Government Hosted.
Manual Direction Cave & Karst Resources Management James Goodbar Senior Cave /Karst Specialist Bureau of Land Management May 12-16, 2014 Cody, Wyoming.
Eastern Interior Resource Management Plan/ Environmental Impact Statement Update for the Resource Advisory Council — October 29, 2013.
I. Introduction II. Inventory Procedures A. Background B. Route Analysis & Boundary Identification C. Size D. Naturalness E. Outstanding Opportunities.
Wilderness Viewpoints Anthropocentric vs. Biocentric.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should be reviewed and.
I. Introduction II. Inventory Procedures A. Background B. Route Analysis & Boundary Identification C. Size D. Naturalness E. Outstanding Opportunities.
Electric Transmission Lines and Utility Corridors.
Alaska National Interest Lands Act of 1980 Rachel Lustbader Maria Espinoza.
Cave and Karst Management Through Land Use Planning James Goodbar Sr. Cave Specialist Bureau of Land Management Cody, Wyoming May 12-16, 2014 Aaron Stockton.
“A wilderness...(4) may also contain ecological, geological, or other features of scientific, educational, scenic, or historical value.” Wilderness Act,
Current and Future Roles of the USFS from a State Perspective Bill Stewart CDF Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP)
Business Plan for the National Landscape Conservation System.
RESOURCE ADVISING IN SPECIAL MGMT. AREAS. TYPES OF SMA’S Designated Wilderness WSA - Wilderness Study Area National Monuments and similar areas Wild and.
Bureau of Land Management: Identifying Land with Wilderness Characteristics By: Heather Evans.
Intro – Manuals & Misconceptions I. Introduction A. How the training modules work B. Manuals 6310, 6320, & 5 Misconceptions II. Inventory Procedures III.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should be reviewed and.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at:
Planning – Factors I. Introduction II. Inventory Procedures III.Planning A. Background to LWCs in Planning B. Factors to Consider When Protecting LWCs.
NEPA and WildernessNEPA and Wilderness Michael C. Blumm & Lorena Wisehart ‘13 Wilderness Act at 50 (April 11, 2014) Lewis and Clark Law School.
Communications Site Program Bureau of Land Management (BLM) & Forest Service (FS) Robert Wilson BLM, Washington Office National Project Manager for Communication.
Why preserve it? What is it? How to monitor it? Citizen stewardship WILDERNESS CHARACTER.
Federal Public Lands: Heart of the Rocky Mountain West Robert B. Keiter Wallace Stegner Professor of Law University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law.
Environmental History What has been the human relationship with nature?
PETER A. APPEL ALEX W. SMITH PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY. OF GEORGIA SCHOOL OF LAW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PRESENTED AT LEWIS AND CLARK LAW SCHOOL APRIL 11,
Wilderness Fires Law, Policy, Mgt Approach Steve Kimball, R1 Prog. Mgr. Wilderness, WSR’s, O/G’s Law, Policy, Mgt Approach Steve Kimball, R1 Prog. Mgr.
Birthplace of Rivers National Monument Project.
Crafting Comprehensive Public Land Legislation
San Gabriel Mountains Community Collaborative
Wilderness Characteristics Guidance for the BLM
The Natural Resources Recreation option in NRPI: managing and providing satisfying outdoor recreation opportunities today while protecting natural resources.
Wilderness Characteristics Guidance for the BLM
Food for thought… What did you learn from your timeline?
Wilderness Characteristics Guidance for the BLM
Wilderness Characteristics Guidance for the BLM
Wilderness Characteristics Guidance for the BLM
Wilderness Characteristics Guidance for the BLM
IS YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT PREPARED
Wilderness Characteristics Guidance for the BLM
Wilderness Characteristics Guidance for the BLM
Research in Wilderness: How much is enough?
Undersecretary of Interior
Presentation transcript:

Why The Forest Service and the BLM Have Different Wilderness Management Histories The Wilderness Act at 50 Lewis and Clark Law School April 11, 2014 Robert L. Glicksman J.B. & Maurice C. Shapiro Professor of Environmental Law The George Washington University Law School

Potential Explanatory Factors Physical characteristics Agency history, culture, and organizational structure Statutory mandates Agency policies and practices Congressional interest and commitment Judicial review of agency wilderness management decisions

Potential Explanatory Factors Physical characteristics Agency history, culture, and organizational structure Statutory mandates Agency policies and practices Congressional interest and commitment Judicial review of agency wilderness management decisions Physical characteristics Agency history, culture, and structure Statutory mandates ─ Planning ─ Interactions between organic statutes and other laws Congressional commitment

Physical Characteristics Lack of human imprint Opportunities for solitude Ecological, geological, or other features of scientific, educational, scenic, or historical value San Juan National Forest Red Mountain Wilderness Area

History: Timing of Wilderness Assessment and Protection Forest Service – Early FS commitment to preservation of primitive areas – Endorsed when Congress designated 9 million acres of “instant wilderness” in 1964 BLM – Temporary public ownership – No official retention policy until the adoption of FLPMA in 1976 Aldo Leopold 1920s: FS Reg L : FLPMA Inventory Requirement 1964: Wilderness Act

Agency Structure Forest Service Bureau of Land Management

Statutory Differences Level of specificity of planning mandates, generally and by reference to wilderness management The role of R.S rights-of-way

Congressional Commitment Neglecting BLM lands with wilderness potential Denigrating BLM lands Barring imposition of administrative limits on R.S claims Blocking Secretary Salazar’s wild lands policy Sleeping Giant WSA

Recommendations Expand conception of wilderness to include areas of ecological importance, even if they are not scenically spectacular List wilderness as a multiple use under FLPMA Codify restrictions on R.S claims Strengthen FLPMA’s planning requirements Reorganize the BLM to counter capture by local commodity interests Willamette National Forest Paria Canyon-Vermilion Cliffs Wilderness Area Pole Creek Wilderness